On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.comwrote:
*UK
*England/Wales/Scotland
*English regions (North East, East of England etc)
*Ceremonial counties/unitaries
*Districts
*Parishes/Wards etc (but lets deal with the big ones first)
Ceremonial counties are not
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:35 AM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It uses name, then place_name (but only when name is not given),
then ref, iata, icao, old_name, and loc_name as if these were
in square brackets after the name as described above. Hence
name=Archway Road; ref=A5;
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:07 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else noticed the number of stares going up? I had about 5
in my hour or so of mapping. I waved at 3 of them and got one wave back.
Last month I had someone ask me if they had parked their car in an OK place.
They
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Pieren Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but again, the problem is not the templates but PHP on the server has a
limited memory and this page takes about 900Kb size of text and pictures
(with or without templates). (the error is a not possible to allocate
On Feb 19, 2008 1:03 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For example: here in Spain, the NUTS1 level is an artificial
classification.
Nobody in spain would use that.
And in the UK, NUTS-2 and NUTS-3 at least are artificial classifications
that nobody would use.
Seriously, look
On Jan 24, 2008 11:26 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also worried about people using gauges adding 5ft 5in somewhere,
we should at least require decimals.
I've tagged low bridges in Leicester with maxheight=15'0, for example.
That's what the sign on the bridge says,
On Jan 24, 2008 4:18 PM, Martin Trautmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
US: 1,000.00 m = 1 km
DE: 1.000,00 m = 1 km
1 000.00 m = 1 km ... my recommendation
There is really no point using a thousands separator in figures which are
supposed to be machine-readable.
--
Abi
On Jan 9, 2008 11:50 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand why numbers are used instead of names. My question is why are
there no odd numbers listed? It just looked strange.
Future-proofing. It leaves gaps so that if new units are invented that fit
between existing ones you
On Jan 10, 2008 11:06 AM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Gower wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:11:35PM +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
the boundary data should be relatively easy to come by
Not where it isn't marked on the ground, and is only defined by
reference to
On Jan 10, 2008 11:35 AM, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Greater London debatable or for a mapping/administritive meaning are
you counting the outside boundaries of the London Boroughs?
I personally do it by the London Transport zone, as your generally need a
10-12minute bus service so
On Jan 10, 2008 11:52 AM, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm right then compatibility isn't quite as much as an issue as the
discussion has made me think.
Wikipedia's position is indeed that they are allowed to illustrate GFDL
articles with cc-by-sa images, because the images and the
On Jan 10, 2008 4:37 PM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really? Trying to future-proof against hierarchies that have been around
for (in some cases) millenia? Ooh, I know, we could have negative numbers to
indicate planet, solar system, galaxy, etc. For future interstellar use.
I'm not
On Dec 16, 2007 9:37 AM, Mike Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An unsurfaced road should simply be a road with the surface tag set:
highway=secondary
surface=unpaved
That's not to say some non-Map Features tags are being supported. If so,
I've never heard of either of them and suggest
On Dec 14, 2007 11:40 PM, Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Her Majesty in Council. (Without claiming that the judgment is in any
way flawed, it should be pointed out, of course, that this is just a
judicial review, and in no way binding or precedent setting)
As a side-note, when we
On 9/20/07, Alex Mauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be better to use the layer tag rather than the tunnel
tag, but I agree that the whole thing should be railway=subway.
I prefer tunnel to indicate tunnels. In addition, layer=-1 would be useful
for where the underground goes in
On 7/16/07, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... not in my experience! They all use GPS devices, and the last time
I got a taxi he took us to the wrong part of Hammersmith (the
streetname was similar to the one we wanted, and pulled out an A-Z.
Was that a real taxi driver (who do have to
16 matches
Mail list logo
