On 12/04/11 09:38, Peter Miller wrote:
The general conclusion of the discussion above was that where
maxspeed=60mph is applied to a single carriageway road there is also a
default 'maxspeed:type=GB:unrestricted' (or whatever value is decided
on). This default (and the one for 70mph for
On 09/04/11 08:20, Peter Miller wrote:
On 9 April 2011 08:15, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
mailto:peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 6 April 2011 16:53, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk
mailto:e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Richard wrote:
I'd put the number for
On 07/04/11 21:29, John-Michael Wiley wrote:
I was trying to map a plaza today and I wanted to enter in a new node
for a Sport club (workout facility with weights, fitness classes,
tennis courts, etc…) I looked around the local area for other such
facilities and the only one I could find had
On 06/04/11 14:22, Peter Miller wrote:
Do we have a preference for tagging unrestricted limits in the UK? I
say that because a section of the A1 is beginning to look a bit war
damaged (as in edit war).
It started with maxspeed=national. I changed it to maxspeed=70 mph.
Christcf then added
On 06/04/11 15:55, Peter Miller wrote:
On 6 April 2011 15:02, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
wrote:
On 06/04/11 14:22, Peter Miller wrote:
Do we have a preference for tagging
is
not to be undertaken lightly. IIRC about 10% is wrong. The best data are for
Hullwhere Chris Hill surveyed the lot. I have done only about 20% of
Nottingham's NaPTAN stops and have a similar error rate. Unfortunately
processing NaPTAN alongside primary surveying just didnt prove viable, but
there are plenty
On 31/03/11 16:49, Pieren wrote:
My first intention was to ignore this message but I cannot, I refuse
ignorance and fud. So again, some basic definitions: facts are nowhere
in the world copyrightable, nowhere. Copyright is about
creation/invention. Collections of facts are using copyright
On 28/03/11 18:34, Davide Venturini wrote:
hi,
I'm new of this list,
I've just a question:
I'm a mac user (snow leopard/base camp/road trip)
I have already downloaded three maps form open street map web site,
every time I try to install one map, the new map overwrite the
previous on road trip,
I have just discovered that a new version of the OpenData CodePoint was
released in February, so I have updated the layer for looking up
postcodes in the editors.
I have decided to force the layers to display from zoom 16 onwards which
is one zoom higher than before. If that causes anyone a
On 16/03/11 19:51, Matt Williams wrote:
Greetings all,
For the last week I've been working on a sort of 'replacement' for the
Royal Mail's postcode/address finder (you know, the one with the ~5
queries a day limit without an account) [1] but based entirely on data
in the OSM database. You can
at Blackadder's Society of Cartographers talk on Why OSM won't be
bulk importing OS OpenData and am aware of the work Chris Hill has done on admin
boundaries etc.
Obviously also aware of the ITO work with OS Locator and what people have done
with that.
There was work on importing detailed water features
On 24/02/11 13:14, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM wrote:
Recently, I have noticed a number of MapDust bugs which contain a
postcode sector and, apparently, a range of housenumbers (e.g.,
Southdale Dr 40-98, NG4 1, GB for
http://www.mapdust.com/detail/142061). There is no postcode or address
On 15/02/11 16:42, Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM wrote:
I did do a little experiment some time ago (but you do need postcodes
assigned to buildings):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sk53_osm/5333098864
I was going to write up some more but Chris Hill
http://chris-osm.blogspot.com/2011/01/using-gb
On 03/02/11 11:04, Peter Miller wrote:
Fyi, ITO will soon have to give the OS £13,500 for another's years use
of their ITN dataset and then additional usage and printing fees
during the year. As such I really want to get to the point where we
can say 'no thanks'!
As I suspected, the real
On 20/01/11 23:09, Richard Bullock wrote:
Please do not just add the centroid to the map. I don't see the value of
that. I am interested in the experience people gain from using this
data, for example to add postcodes to an address such as addr:postcode.
I've added a few addr:postcode to my
On 21/01/11 09:51, Kevin Peat wrote:
Hello Chris,
I was wondering why you don't see any value in just adding the
postcode centroids to the map?
There are probably 25000+ buildings in my area so it isn't feasible
for me to add them all and their addresses in less than a lifetime
whereas
On 21/01/11 12:18, Kevin Peat wrote:
Chris,
I'll go with the flow on this, there isn't much point adding stuff to
the db where there isn't a consensus. My postcode area is TQ so if you
could add this to the layer that would be great, it would be useful
for tagging buildings anyway.
Kevin
On 20/01/11 11:18, Brian Prangle wrote:
Is anyone working on importing the boundaries from the shape file
available from OS OpenData? Does it have ward level boundaries for
major cities?
I have imported parish boundaries and the county boundary in my local
area. It is hard work because they
Now that people are tracing buildings from Bing etc addressing is
getting more widespread, but one awkward area is postcodes. The Open
data that OS released last year included the Code Point Open dataset
which has the location of postcode centroids. These can help with adding
postcodes to
After reading the complexity of the proposal for something as simple as
a bus stop I thought I should stress something that I believe as
important: Mappers are precious.
There has been some discussion on IRC about this proposal and these are
few of the comments:
/These proposal-twiddlers
On 09/01/11 16:28, Gorm E. Johnsen wrote:
Hi
Today there is 5500 ways with highway=unsurfaced (Taginfo
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/highway=unsurfaced). They seem
to be evenly spread over the planet and was depreciated
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features almost
A new national Address list is to be created for England Wales.
http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/newsroom/1786564
I suggest we lobby the Minister (Eric Pickles) and the Office of Fair
Trading to get the list released under the Government's new Open Data
licence. Maybe Sir Tim B-L would
On 03/12/10 12:22, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 03/12/10 12:11, Chris Hill wrote:
A new national Address list is to be created for England Wales.
http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/newsroom/1786564
I suggest we lobby the Minister (Eric Pickles) and the Office of Fair
Trading to get the list
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Sure (if you accept that the street sign put up by the council is
more authoritative than the Ordnance Survey's database, which
actually I doubt).
A quick glance at the local OS map shows me a street name that anyone in the
town would know was
Ed Avis wrote:
Kevin Peat ke...@... writes:
http://oscompare.raggedred.net/?zoom=15lat=50.72407lon=-3.52609layers=B0TF
Three-quarters of the differences reported here are in the presence or absence
of a single apostrophe. This masks the more important discrepancies and makes
the report
ke...@cordina.org.uk wrote:
OK, so transferring data isn't as academically pleasing as gaining a GPS trace
and basing a map on that, but I don't see how a road in OSM from OS data is
worse than no road being present.
Gathering data for OSM on the ground is so much more than just the track
Craig Loftus wrote:
Which is more accurate: the OS Streetview data that shows MHW (spring, I
assume) or the PGS data?
I haven't used it for coast lines, but doesn't OS Vector District
include the high water mark? This would be the most 'accurate',
although not necessarily the most
Steve Doerr wrote:
*From:* Ed Loach mailto:e...@loach.me.uk
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 07, 2010 7:46 PM
*To:* 'Steve Doerr' mailto:steve.do...@blueyonder.co.uk ;
talk-gb@openstreetmap.org mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* RE: [Talk-GB] Dorset/Wilts county boundary wrong...is there
OK, this stupidity has gone too far.
Now the 'moderator' is arguing with the trolls on a 'moderated' list.
I quit this list.
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Shane Reynolds shane...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] The last 2%
Hi,
I am the developer who works on a number of products including OSM
Analysis
for ITO.
I am
Shane Reynolds wrote:
Hi,
I am the developer who works on a number of products including OSM
Analysis for ITO.
I am slightly confused about making the OS Locator box a dashed box if
the not:name tag is present. When we do the processing if any street
is found with the not:name tag matching
David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Shane Reynolds shane...@gmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] The last 2%
Hi,
I am the developer who works on a number of products including OSM
Analysis
for ITO.
I am
The alternative way of looking at the comparison Musical Chairs displays
is to look at the ITO layer over a standard Mapnik or OSMARender layer.
ITO only show the OSL comparisons that do not match OSM, so all of
things Musical Chairs shows as green boxes are not shown. If this is
what you
Graham Jones wrote:
Hi All,
I see that someone has been busy importing Power Lines from OS
OpenData in my part of the world
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.6341lon=-1.2238zoom=14layers=M.
I wondered how it was done, and if they were thinking of doing
woodlands too, because we have lots
Graham Jones wrote:
Thanks Chris,
The wiki page gives nice instructions on how to convert the shapefile
content into OSM format, but it is the next stage I am wondering about
- how do you get that into OSM without risking messing something up.
The scripts create a file intended to load into
Carsten Nielsen wrote:
Why is this island not rendered on mapnik and osmarender maps ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4119119
You need to add a natural=coastline tag. Make sure the direction of the
way is correct, land on the left. It will not render in Mapnik until the
coastline
John Smith wrote:
On 31 July 2010 02:05, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
While I follow this mailing list, I am pretty sure that many people working
in the OSM ecosystem is not following the change that fast. It means that
What change, I have made a suggestion and was
John Smith wrote:
On 29 July 2010 20:21, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
1st October 2010
Gives time to get the rendering resolved.
Does anyone have a problem, or see any problems, shifting the
following tags into the emergency=* tag space?
amenity=police -
John Smith wrote:
On 30 July 2010 02:59, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Firstly, not all hospitals are emergency hospitals, so I think that is a bad
idea.
Point taken...
Secondly John, you seem to have unilaterally decided to make this change,
and actually implemented some
Iain Simpson wrote:
I've just started with OSM in Stafford (52.81, -2.13) and am starting
by surveying my local suburb - nearly blank on the map.
Yesterday I was walking down a nearby lane with my GPS - by a private
residential caravan park - when the owner(?) came out and asked,
quite
Tom Hughes wrote:
I'm be pleased to be able to announce a new addition to the tools
available to support the OpenStreetMap project.
The new help.openstreetmap.org site is a StackOverflow style question
and answer site where we can curate good answers to the questions
people ask about how to
Robin Paulson wrote:
there's a mapper near me, who's very active adding data.
the problem is, he's making a lot of mistakes, such as roads not
joining correctly at junctions, bridges drawn as a separate parallel
line to the highway they should relate to, and other fairly
unambiguous errors.
up
Stan Berka wrote:
I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on
this location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged
as residential, but I've been there two days ago and it's a decent
compacted gravel road, almost 2-car wide primarily for agricultural
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
One big problem with any 4th dimensional idea is plate tectonics. I'm
willing to bet that if you were to map how London was before the great
fire of 1666, the coordinates of places won't match their current
locations in WGS84 coordinates.
And exactly how do you
Liz wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Grant Slater wrote:
On 15 June 2010 08:56, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
The tweet says couple of hours and that was 5 hours ago. Anyone knows
how much longer will it take?
We had to wait for Adaptec to start work - Grant is holding on
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I have found ITO World's layer of name anomalies rather useful, but I
could only see it in an editor, so I put together a comparison page,
using the techniques from the sautter.com transparent map.
Tristan Scott wrote:
I happen to know a chap who has quite a lot of aerial imagery of
Norfolk villages.
Because he publishes the images, I cannot release the images to the
public or to other mappers, but I can use them myself to generate
mapping data.
If you can't release the imagery to
Ed Avis wrote:
Bob Kerr openstreetmapcraigmil...@... writes:
I can easily understand that apostrophes and the name bypass are annoying,
however I think there is an opportunity here.
For example, bypass or by-pass. This highlights an inconstancy in the OS
data,
which will be useful
Greg Auger wrote:
For instance this McDonald's was moved to a completely different
location: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/345112185/history
Other ways have removed tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/22800339/history
It seems to me we should revert all of mem0709's
I have found ITO World's layer of name anomalies rather useful, but I
could only see it in an editor, so I put together a comparison page,
using the techniques from the sautter.com transparent map.
http://oscompare.raggedred.net
The slider (top right) alters the transparency of the layer. I've
I have found ITO World's layer of name anomalies rather useful, but I
could only see it in an editor, so I put together a comparison page,
using the techniques from the sautter.com transparent map.
http://oscompare.raggedred.net
The slider (top right) alters the transparency of the layer. I've
Carsten Gerlach wrote:
Am Samstag 05. Juni 2010 11:15:16 schrieb Jon Burgess:
Can you provide a map link to the exact area you modified?
Some weeks ago I fixed this coastline
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=12193534 but is only in zoom level 14 right
rendered, all other levels
Phil Endecott wrote:
A challenge that I hope you can help me with is finding the right rules
to convert from OSM tag combinations to OS-lookalike path rendering
styles, i.e. footpath, bridleway, byway, permissive path, permissive
bridleway, long-distance path, path, track. There are also
Andy Allan wrote:
I believe we need to track these false positives. If Ipswich is any
guide, and there is about a dozen errors per town, then there is going
to come a point where we are all repeatedly examining the same false
positives trying to track down the remaining few actual mistakes in
Peter Miller wrote:
We have created a map layer for Potlatch showing OS Locator names
which are not in the nearby OSM data in a nice visual way.
Details in our blog post of the subject.
http://itoworld.blogspot.com/2010/05/os-locator-validation-mapping-for-uk.html
To access the tiles
Peter Miller wrote:
On 1 Jun 2010, at 15:39, Chris Hill wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
We have created a map layer for Potlatch showing OS Locator names
which are not in the nearby OSM data in a nice visual way.
Details in our blog post of the subject.
http://itoworld.blogspot.com/2010/05
I believe the StreetView tiles are offset south(ish) by a few metres in
East Yorkshire too. Reprojected shape files line up well with surveyed
data. I have traced a few buildings from StreetView but I've stopped
until I had worked out what was wrong. Now given other people's comments
I do
Joe Richards wrote:
On searching, I have seen several pages and proposals in the wiki for
scuba diving sites and for dive shops. I am currently tagging up the
island of Utila, Honduras, which is well known for its diving. What
can I use as a basic tag type for these two things (a dive
Steve Bennett wrote:
One of my favourite things about working on openstreetmap is just how
much you learn about the world...without ever leaving your computer :)
One of the things I love about OSM is how it has encouraged me to see so
many new things and learn so much about my local area
Mike Harris wrote:
Richard - good thought - I hadn't thought about using a designation
tag without a highway tag to avoid the rendering - it might solve my
problem of unwalkable public rights of way in forests around here.
Contact your local council. They have a legal duty to enforce
, it would be helpful if
someone else could provide some help with using Python for the 99%
that think its a snake.
Cheers,
Jason
On 11 May 2010 16:53, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I've written up the way I have used OS shapefiles in the wiki
http
ogr2ogr command line has the output and input files around
the wrong way (gdal 1.7.2).
Kevin
On 11 May 2010 18:28, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Tim Francois wrote:
Chris
Any chance of providing some command snippets for using gdal's
Graeme Wilford wrote:
The combination of high-res aerial imagery and OS StreetView data is
very powerful indeed.
For the sake of walkers and cyclists, I'd encourage others to tackle
Surrey's waterways. The road network is fairly sane but the (typically
NPE-derived) water network makes a
James Rutter wrote:
...been tidying up the Surrey Heath district boundary now that we can
do what we want with Boundaryline. Anyone got any advice for ward
boundaries...can't find much at all on the wiki? What's the
admin_level for ward or has it not been defined yet? What's the deal
with
Seventy 7 wrote:
Can someone tell us what's happening with the latest release of OS data
please? When streetview came out there were quite a few emails about tiles
being rendered for tracing etc but this time it's all been very quiet!
I presume someone somewhere is doing the vector data,
the
renderers to show them in a lighter colour until someone checks it and
takes the 'verified=no' tag off? This could alleviate the concerns
that people had that users will not survey an area if it looks
complete on the map?
Regards
Graham.
On 2 May 2010 13:14, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
I've just opened the VectorMap District from OS for my local area. I
loaded the Road-Line and was dismayed to see substantial developments in
the area build over the last 10 years were missing. I then loaded the
Settlement_Area and the new developments appeared with the spaces for
the roads.
Tim François wrote:
I've noticed that sometimes there are discrepancies even between OS
data. For example, there is a VAN DIEMENS LANE here in Bath. Here are
three sources of names:
OSM name: VAN DIEMENS LANE
OS StreetView name: VAN DIEMENS LANE
OS Locator name: VAN DIEMEN'S LANE
So the
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 19/04/10 17:18, Chris Hill wrote:
Each boundary needs to share nodes with adjacent ones. County and
district boundaries will also need to share nodes, so the process of
loading them individually might be quite tedious, and would involve
dealing with any existing
To the list too :)
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 19/04/10 17:18, Chris Hill wrote:
Each boundary needs to share nodes with adjacent ones. County and
district boundaries will also need to share nodes, so the process of
loading them individually might be quite tedious, and would involve
dealing
John Robert Peterson wrote:
There is also the quite high level question of what is the correct
position for these boundaries: if a boundary follows a river, and the
river has changed course by a few meters since this boundary was
established, does the boundary move with it, or does it stay
davidss wrote:
I have absolutely no experience with OSM sort of data and its mapping tools
(I have just registered in OSM few mins ago), Im used to work with MP
format in Mapedit and cgpsmapper. For sure decompiling IMG is not the best
way but I found that link with those free download IMG
Ed Loach wrote:
I know there are people out there with time on their hands, just itching to
find more uses for OSM. We've bus route maps, cycling route maps, and even in
the West Midlands a gritting routes map. Today I stumbled across the fact
that driving test routes are on the DSA website
The imports are not auto-merged. There is the NOVAM viewer:
http://mappa-mercia.org/novam/ which helps compare the existing and
imported stops. There are guidelines for dealing with the process of
checking and merging stops too:
Tim François wrote:
So the solution is to just leave it blank?
Maybe the soution is to encourage people to treat OSM as an outdoor
sport, gathering GPS tracks and LOTS of extra data that no one else's
maps have, rather than an armchair hobby copying other people's maps.
Cheers, Chris
P.S.
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Hi,
A couple of weeks back I took a week end trip walking from Penzance to Lands
End, on the way taking plenty of photos, some of which were of bus stops.
The first problem I've found is that none of them seem to have a naptan code
on them. Then there are several
Christoph Böhme wrote:
I found the time (or rather an easier solution to the problem): NOVAM
now uses the XAPI servers to retrieve the bus stop data. So, it should
be up-to-date again and hopefully in the future as well :-)
Good news, I have missed it.
Cheers, Chris
SteveC wrote:
What are the thing or things you know know that you wish you'd known when you
started with OpenStreetMap?
The stuff that I know now that I wish I had known includes:
* That joining ways together is important.
* That the right tag to use is not a black-and-white issue.
*
Thomas Wood wrote:
On 13 March 2010 17:25, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
... NaPTAN can add value but that is best
realised by someone local to the import managing it.
I would argue that NaPTAN does add value in undermapped parts of the
country - the vast majority of NaPTAN
I would certainly hope that any updates are not used to overwrite
existing local edits. I have spent far too many hours checking and
updating the data to have a newer version overwrite it. A smart merge
would be more useful, I would write it if required.
As too 'dumping in' the remaining
John F. Eldredge wrote:
On a related issue, since a way that forms a closed loop is interpreted as
the boundary of an area rather than as a way, how does one map a road or
trail that forms a closed loop?
It depends on the context. A closed loop tagged with a highway tag is
just a
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Steve Chilton wrote:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged
waterway=canal;lock=yes
and
single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not
mapped)
These are definitely sensible. (I have a preference for the
Ed Loach wrote:
I use Potlatch where you get a warning. is there not a similar
procedure
in JOSM?
I think there is an issue with JOSM where if you download the
relation, then download the ways that make that relation, it isn't
aware of other relations those ways are in. That means if
SteveC wrote:
[snip]
Right up front we have the school of thought that everything is perfect the
way it is. That uservoice is some kind of inherently crappy system (see the
uservoice ideas page at http://osm.uservoice.com/ ). That we shouldn't allow
people to use tools which make fixing
SteveC wrote:
2) We have to be very clear that the openstreetmap.org website is _awful_.
Horrendous. A total PITA. We're all here because we're persistent with it.
But the wonderful thing is - we don't have to make the tools and site easy to
use if we can expose a simple bug system. It's
Jonas Stein wrote:
http://www.troiki.de/karte.jpg
http://www.troiki.de/anfahrt.html
if so, should someone contact troiki and explain
how to use the osm maps correct.
They don't have any attribution on the pages, otherwise is the kind of
use of OSM I would hope to see. If my schoolboy
NopMap wrote:
Hi!
A consistent, easy-to-use set of tags would spare mappers from spending time
trying to figure out how to do something that has been figured out many
times before or which contradictive information to follow.
As I map a road I've not visited before, I don't consider
Steve Hill wrote:
Since the out of copyright 1:25K maps appeared, there has been rather a
lot of tracing going on. On the whole, I think the availability of this
data is good. However, I have noticed that around the Gower peninsula,
quite a few nonexistent roads, etc. have appeared and
Daniel Neugebauer wrote:
Hi again!
I didn't expect that my previous question would make such a great fuss. Since
I now volunteered for implementing an icon for amenity=veterinary, I couldn't
get my mind off the icon itself today.
The approved proposal - which I now know should not have
Colin Smale wrote:
Would it be OK to derive tagging in this way? Should we get explicit
permission from KCC first? Anyone got any experience with this, or
example emails for this kind of request?
I'd certainly ask permission first. The document will be copyright even
if it doesn't bear
I've just noticed that AlexanderF is changing all the maxheight=2.0 to
maxheight=2. In fact he's changing anything ending with 0 after the
decimal point to drop the zero. This is not good, he is lowering the
accuracy of the tag, which is why they are displayed with a trailing
zero on signs.
Bryce McKinlay wrote:
Recently I noticed a cluster of London bus stops from NapTAN which
were missing indicator/stop_ref fields. I'm sure there are many more
of these. I'm wondering about the best practice when making
corrections or adding missing data which will ensure that these
changes
John Smith wrote:
So what exactly is it in your opinion that I could be doing that I'm
not already?
Cut down the number of trolling posts you make to the mailing lists.
Cheers, Chris
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Steve Bennett wrote:
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y instead of X.
2) I tag Y, fallback:X
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up whenever.
My strategy:
1) I want to tag Y
2) I tag Y
3) I get on with my life. Renderers will catch up
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Anthony wrote:
Ah, but I don't plan on ever visiting the OSM website when and if
they switch to the ODbL.
Best. Reason to switch to ODbL. Ever.
Richard
+1
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Steve Bennett wrote:
Alight, I've had enough of this.
You've had enough of it!!! After nearly fifty emails about how to tag a
ditch with a bridge over it in a few hours I think everyone in OSM has
had enough of it. I've rarely seen so much crap in such a small space.
Haven't any of you
Peter Miller wrote:
I was wondering if 'type approval' for powered hang-gliders allows for
bolt-on vertical cameras. Thinking about it I am going to worry a bit
more about hang glider pilots dropping phones and cameras etc next
time they are wandering about overhead!
A powered
I have contacted the East Riding of Yorkshire council about NaPTAN
data. They would welcome our feedback about the quality of NaPTAN in
the county. The mappers in the county have checked about 20% so far, so
I expect to be able to send this feedback early next year.
The quality of the data
by your name I guess you're an English native speaker, so I guess
you're right, still the definition in WIkipedia states:
In modern usage, a *causeway* is a road or railway elevated on a
sandbank http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbank, usually across a
broad body of water
I have found some edits by LenoXx
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LenoXx which were damaging. They
look like random changes by someone who didn't realise they were
actually changing the data. I have corrected the one that I know well
enough to change - basically removing extra tags from a
201 - 300 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
