Perhaps a bot to auto-ban accounts that are running unauthorized bots ;)
Seriously though, I've all-but stopped contributing to the map until after
the SOTMs because of issues like this.
One of the other things that OSM desperately needs is a way to coordinate
tagging across editors and
Perhaps a bot to auto-ban accounts that are running unauthorized bots ;)
Seriously though, I've all-but stopped contributing to the map until after
the SOTMs because of issues like this.
One of the other things that OSM desperately needs is a way to coordinate
tagging across editors and
Definitely a good idea! My only concern would be to make sure the way is
correctly included in the route relationship(s) before deleting the ref=* tags.
Maybe a bot could do this?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 8
Interstates are still missing
supers.
I'm happy to use either method, but one of the reasons why I prefer the
1-relation-per-direction method is that it lets me quickly find areas that
need to be split into dual carriageways.
Chris Hunter
DiverCTH
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:07 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Why does there need to be 2 relations for this?
besides editing convenience a relation is directed and sorted since API
0.6 You can see
Interstates are still missing
supers.
I'm happy to use either method, but one of the reasons why I prefer the
1-relation-per-direction method is that it lets me quickly find areas that
need to be split into dual carriageways.
Chris Hunter
DiverCTH
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:07 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Why does there need to be 2 relations for this?
besides editing convenience a relation is directed and sorted since API
0.6 You can see
been re-reading the mailing list archives to confirm that the old way
still correct.
I'm also in the process of emailing NE2, but I haven't hit send yet.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Chris Hunter wrote:
User NE2 erroniously merged most
roles. I've already requested a roll-back on the area I was
working on, but I wanted to check if we still have a consensus on splitting
each interstate into separate directions at the state line.
Chris Hunter
DiverCTH
___
talk mailing list
talk
I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a
temporary ban on their account? They've been editing all day.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 2/7/10 9:23 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
What's more annoying is that he is
Oh, and yes I did contact them via both the OSM Messaging system and the
WIKI's messaging system.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a
temporary ban on their account? They've been
User NE2 erroniously merged most of the US Interstate relations back into
single relations. About 12 hours of my work was destroyed. Please roll
back changeset 381206 if possible.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
been re-reading the mailing list archives to confirm that the old way
still correct.
I'm also in the process of emailing NE2, but I haven't hit send yet.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Chris Hunter wrote:
User NE2 erroniously merged most
roles. I've already requested a roll-back on the area I was
working on, but I wanted to check if we still have a consensus on splitting
each interstate into separate directions at the state line.
Chris Hunter
DiverCTH
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
Oh, and yes I did contact them via both the OSM Messaging system and the
WIKI's messaging system.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a
temporary ban on their account? They've been
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:49:46
To: Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] script for adding layer=1 to bridges
I agree with Fredrick that this comes perilously close
Sorry about the formatting on the quoted part. I'm writing from my BlackBerry.
IIRC all of the correction stations (WAAS / EGNOS / etc...) are listed at or
above satellite number 45 on your satellite / accuracy screen.
An easy test is to go to an area with a clear view of the sky and take a
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
No, the code doesn't represent a geographic area. You can force it into a
geographic area, by defining the area in some particular way (e.g. a
multipolygon of all buildings which receive mail addressed to that zip
code). Of
Mike,
Take a look at Dave Hansen's work with the US Census Bureau's TIGER data.
I'm pretty sure he's on vacation at the moment, but some of his codebase
might be useful for your project.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-November/002064.html
Can anyone who's been following the licensing thread over on the talk@ list
summarize the current state of the discussion? I tried to follow it for a
while, but my mailbox was filling too fast.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
be useful to re-import once a review and a set
of tags are agreed on.
Sincerely,
Chris (DiverCTH)
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran across 2 misplaced / not immediately locatable points while mapping a
local airport. Since I agree with David's take, I
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:00 AM, David Fawcett david.fawc...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't support the import at this time either.
I think that this type of data is far better queried from the source
at the time it is needed and mashed on top of OSM. States are
continually improving this data
to promote
the issues and concerns of OSM users in the United States.
Anyone else have ideas?
DiverCTH (a.k.a. Chris Hunter)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.comwrote:
As many of you know, we're working on forming a US chapter of OSM.
To that end, we've been
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.comwrote:
Just curious,
What is a protectorite? And why is it needed?
Thanks,
Sam
It's a pretty archaic idea - see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protectorate#United_States
IIRC, only the Marshall Islands are still a
Oh, and Puerto Rico is a territory - although at least some of us
mainlanders wish they'd make up their mind and either declare independence
or ratify as a state.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Sam Vekemans
Oh, and $5/disk to burn it to DVD
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote:
Sensible government policy? When did that happen? My local county wants
$10,680.00 for the political GIS data, and it's got a non-redistributable,
non-commercial license on top
That's what database normalization addresses. BTW, this is the first time
I've heard of the semicolon approach.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Unfortunately, that doesn't work. The tags must be unique on the name
side. That's why you see name, name_1,
to blacklist any edits that come from 2417 as
well.
Thanks,
Chris Hunter
DiverCTH
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nakor nakor...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Possible destructive bug in JOSM build 2417 - need
someone to duplicate
To: Chris Hunter
Thanks. Is 2439 available on the server yet, or is it still in alpha? I
re-downloaded the latest beta a couple hours ago and the josm-latest.jar
link was still pointing at 2417.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 21:01 -0500, Chris Hunter
:
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 21:01 -0500, Chris Hunter wrote:
My apologies if this has already been reported to the dev mailing
list, but I've been running up against a critical/showstopper bug in
JOSM 2417 for the past few days.
I just tried with 2439 and can't seem to reproduce this.
-- Dave
I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree here. Different countries
*do*blur the line between shops and post offices. For example, I've
visited
Canada quite a few times, and quite a few drugstores sell stamps and accept
mail for delivery under the Canada Post (canadian equivalent to USPS) sign.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 09/09/2009 12:05 PM, Chris Hunter wrote:
yes, yes, yes - this is the most sane summary of the road/track debate
I've
seen in quite a while. Of course, it also reopens the track/path
argument,
but I'll leave
yes, yes, yes - this is the most sane summary of the road/track debate I've
seen in quite a while. Of course, it also reopens the track/path argument,
but I'll leave that to others to battle out.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been reading thru
Paul,
Thanks for the reminder about the US Tagging page, I forgot to add it to my
watchlist in the wiki and it's definitely grown since my last read-through.
Regarding the whole road vs. track vs. path debate, I think the only way of
resolving the whole track/tracktype (
separate line for each of the attribute abbreviations,
or does SHP2OSM require a line for each attribute in each possible
permutation?
Thanks in advance,
Chris Hunter
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
For those of us who live in areas that are pretty sparse on mappers, I don't
see this being a problem. Speaking from personal experience, just seeing an
undo button on your user history would prevent a lot of conflicts from
people trying to fix their mistakes.
Take a look at the history for this
Amen,
I just spent the last 3 hours cleaning up the butchery TIGER made of the
one-ways and ramp connections along I-75 from Exit 4 in TN to exit 350 in
GA. I haven't even *started* to feed in the speed limit changes along the
side-roads, which was the whole reason I started working on OSM (one
, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 10.07.2009 03:48, Chris Hunter:
I'm working on reviewing and updating the TIGER imports along the TN/GA
border, and I noticed that GA is extremely cluttered in both mapnic and
osmrender. I pulled up an area near my home in JOSM and it seems
this, but the way
the editors handle the tiger:reviewed=no tag would probably be a good
framework to build off of.
Chris Hunter
chunter...@gmail.com
From: Kevin Peat ke...@kevinpeat.com
To: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:00:26 +0100
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM
this, but the way
the editors handle the tiger:reviewed=no tag would probably be a good
framework to build off of.
Chris Hunter
chunter...@gmail.com
From: Kevin Peat ke...@kevinpeat.com
To: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:00:26 +0100
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM
40 matches
Mail list logo
