On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 16:55, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
The problem connector is also named US81...etc, as well as containing the
routing relation 135 South. I believe that is what disrupted the
routing.
A further clarification - the connection from 81 to 254 would be a
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:25, Konrad Skerikon...@skeri.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
http://dl1050.dyndns.org:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
http://dl1050.dyndns.org:/images/osm/cfi.png
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 17:33, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some issues with
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:37, Alex Mauerha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 08/13/2009 01:24 PM, David Earl wrote:
realise we are missing a use case (say we discover motorways in Ecuador
permit learner drivers to use them [please don't tell me this isn't the
case - it's only an example]) we have
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 09:45, Morten Kjeldgaardm...@bioxray.au.dk wrote:
So using the surface=* tag is a
better approach IMHO to warn that a road is in a bad shape for ordinary
traffic.
Surface alone doesn't tell you enough. A standard car can handle just
about any surface except mud, as long
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:02, Martin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/5 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
I'd agree that it should be importance for
trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary. The stuff about not using trunk for
single-track roads just doesn't match
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:31, Martin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/5 David Lynch djly...@gmail.com:
no, I don't agree. A highway becomes motorway when it get's legally
promoted to be a motorway (by the motorway-sign this is indicated).
The USA has no such sign, nor do
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 20:13, Martin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/5 David Lynch djly...@gmail.com:
That indicates that it's part of the Interstate system. Every highway
on the Interstate system is a motorway-class (high-speed and
grade-separated) road, but not every
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 06:56, Martin Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/2 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
So the question is:
is there anything about a road inside an industrial or commercial area which
would be important inside a renderer or a routing engine
and is different to a
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:40, Cartinuscarti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
3) The people who do not care/know about the difference are still going to tag
a physical maxheight with the maxheight tag.
Agreed. In countries where there are separate signs for a warning
about the physical height of an object
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 08:59, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is that there is a continuous hierarchy of roads in terms of
importance, and when you get huge numbers of roads in the city the jump
From tertiary to residential/unclassified is too big and people tag
Accidentally hit send there...
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:12, David Lynchdjly...@gmail.com wrote:
To paraphrase a post in one of the US tagging talk pages on the Wiki,
this is what my tags end up being:
Motorway: More than one grade-separated intersection in a row, high speed,
oncoming
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 13:33, Gustav Foseidgust...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:10 PM, David Lynch djly...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also thinking that deprecating both landuse=forest and
natural=wood might be a good idea if this goes forward. Replace it
with natural=trees, which
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:10, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote:
An even more aggressive fix would be to
disconnect everything that isn't a motorway_link. That's probably
correct, but more aggressive than I would choose to implement.
Not a good idea at all, IMO. I can think of numerous
Because I and numerous other mappers have put a hell of a lot of time
and effort into getting things right, and I don't want anyone breaking
it because an algorithm assumes it isn't right.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:15, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2009, at 8:27 AM, David
, 2009, at 9:29 AM, David Lynch wrote:
Because I and numerous other mappers have put a hell of a lot of time
and effort into getting things right, and I don't want anyone breaking
it because an algorithm assumes it isn't right.
Well, I guess that's an argument for only editing data still owned
I've been using it for electronic toll collection, even though it
doesn't require stopping.
There probably should be some tag like highway=toll_collection to
cover places where tolls are collected in addition to
barrier=toll_booth where an actual stop is required.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:45,
Thanks to a couple different mappers and myself, I-35 looks to be good
from the Mexican border to north of Austin. I've done some cleanup for
35 in the remainder of Texas, but finishing it is on my to-do list.
I'll probably move north to Oklahoma after that. Oklahoma's a mess -
most of the
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:14, Paul Fox p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us wrote:
if it's an option I wouldn't wast a second to write about the pro/con.
why does anyone try to force users to do it?
I have patched josm already but not every user knows how to do it.
you sound very angry about
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 14:45, David Lynch djly...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 14:25, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
If both from and to ways continue after the via point and neither is
one-way, there's two possible ways to interpret it: the restriction
could apply when
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 19:00, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
- with API 0.6 the size of relations is limited to 1000 members. many
interstates have more segments. relations have to be split into
smaller pieces and a super relation.
Ouch! Who failed
If you go to the Board of Geographic Names site
(http://geonames.usgs.gov/), it indicates that all elevations are from
the National Elevation Dataset. (Which is probably what Garmin uses as
well.) NED doesn't really have the spatial resolution to resolve
features as small as the exact tops of
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:36, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
No one has been able to refute my claim that if someone would enter it
by hand, it belongs in OSM regardless of its source. And if it comes
from surveyed data, then it makes no sense to edit its position.
Metadata, perhaps.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 13:54, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
On Mar 9, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
if someone has data that must not be modified
(because of course it is 100% error free...?) then don't put that data
in OSM!
*I* see OSM as an API for all possible
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 04:57, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look at the license plan you'll see it comes in the following stages:
1) Make the plan and the draft public. Ask for feedback.
2) Wait for feedback to be taken into account and expect/hope for a
final version of the
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 08:19, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com writes:
Suppose I split a way into two parts. The second part now gets uploaded
as a completely new object, with nothing in its history pointing
towards its origin.
Although the way is new, don't the
There's another question brought up by the example below that's
somewhat tangential: Does the group think that short connectors at
intersections, such as a separate lane that allows traffic turning
right (left in the UK, Australia, Japan, etc.) to bypass traffic
lights, should be tagged as
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:08, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Would it be appropriate to continue this conversation on legal-talk?
Talk is very busy at the moment and we have a lovely list of our own :)
Why do the non-lawyers need to go to the lawyers if they're making
proposals
Is the mapnik render now updating more frequently than once a week?
I'm seeing buildings that I added a couple hours ago appearing on
there before even ti...@home/osmarender gets to them.
--
David J. Lynch
djly...@gmail.com
___
talk mailing list
What I've tended to do in my part of Texas is:
Motorway - two or more consecutive intersections with grade separation and
no driveways, or any interstate (some very rural locations do have the
occasional turn off directly from the main travel lanes)
Trunk - US highways without any other reason to
I think that temporary and historical prefixes are the best answer
to this, possibly with a relation for roads that are different due to
the same event, project, etc. Tag things with what they are generally
at the current day, and add exceptions as needed. I would envision an
example like:
31 matches
Mail list logo
