Re: [OSM-talk] We need to have a conversation about attribution

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 06:12:09PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote: > > Am 03.03.2019 um 12:54 schrieb Ineiev: > > ... > > So, when someone violates that license when using the work of > > those contributors, any of them may sue the violator, mayn't they? > > As the user

Re: [OSM-talk] We need to have a conversation about attribution

On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 08:09:11PM +0100, Simon Poole wrote: > > Any rights that you might have in your contributions remain yours and > there is no copyright assignment, as you may see for numerous open > source projects). Consumers of OSM data are doing so on a licence > offered by the OSMF

Re: [OSM-talk] We need to have a conversation about attribution

Hello, On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 04:13:12PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > So when relicensing the ultimate consequence is that you need to defend > your license - and thats was my first question. Is the OSMF willing > to enforce the license? Why OSMF? the copyright holders are still the

Re: [OSM-talk] A Better Map

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 02:00:34PM +, Paul Norman wrote: On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: Why are we here on these mailing lists? Why do we spend so much time making maps? I think ultimately because it’s fun. Just a data point: _I_'m here because I