Dec 10, 2020, 18:32 by bainton@gmail.com:
> though can't see how to set up Push to Talk
>
big blue cog => audio input tab (selected by default) -> Transmission panel
Change dropdown from "voice activity" to "Push to talk"
Seems that it should work
> The > wiki
Dec 2, 2020, 09:49 by nickw4...@gmail.com:
> I have contacted the company asking them if it was OK to delete their
> panoramas (as the content is arguably 'inappropritate' for a walking-oriented
> site) nd they replied to me, in a friendly and cooperative way, saying they
> would setup
om various sources vs a
> government agencies that produce their own data.
>
>
> Pierre
>
> Le vendredi 6 novembre 2020 11 h 08 min 52 s UTC−5, Mateusz Konieczny via
> legal-talk a écrit :
>
>
> See > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility
"License terms are compatible, but the licenser does not guarantee for it.
4c of the license explicitly states: "Affirmer disclaims responsibility for
clearing rights of other persons that may apply to the Work or any use
Is
"it is good enough for us to be named as the data owner here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Kartverket_.28Norwegian_Mapping_Authority.29
"
(see http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2014-August/004831.html for the
original text)
sufficient to solve problems of CC BY 4.0?
As
But license is still needed, right?
Or is it OK to interpret "Agency has no objections"
as "sounds like CC0" (I would not do this but maybe...)?
Oct 9, 2020, 20:40 by legal-talk@openstreetmap.org:
> Yes, it's fine. That is simply a disclaimer, not a limitation on use.
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020
Sep 23, 2020, 15:16 by gi...@gmx.de:
> On 09/23/2020 at 01:16 PM Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>>
>> On 23.09.20 12:34, GITNE wrote:
>>
>>> (for profit) which presumably is not covered either by the ODbL
>>>
>>
>> Assuming that the data is covered by ODbL, then "These rights explicitly
>> include
Sep 23, 2020, 12:18 by ajt1...@gmail.com:
> On 23/09/2020 08:49, GITNE wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, no. I do not use Slack. So, I cannot provide a specific link
>> or
>> something. What I know is that @SomeoneElse reported that Slack has an
>> automated
>> feed which pulls changesets comments
Sep 22, 2020, 23:43 by gi...@gmx.de:
> Hello OSMF Legal Team,
>
> due to a quite troubling revelation by @SomeoneElse that changeset comments
> are
> automatically republished by the third party private company Slack, I would
> appreciate if you could share your legal assessment of this
Sep 21, 2020, 03:59 by legal-talk@openstreetmap.org:
> Hello,
> In New Caledonia we have some geo data available
> https://data.gouv.nc/explore/?disjunctive.theme=explore.popularity_score
>
> The Licence of some of them is "Licence Ouverte v2.0"
>
Jul 20, 2020, 20:35 by mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com:
> OSM surely incorporates data in Virginia which was not prepared by suitably
> licensed entities (per
> https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title54.1/chapter4/section54.1-402/).
>
> According to Virginia law, OSM must therefore display the
14 Jul 2020, 14:54 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
>> On 14. Jul 2020, at 12:40, Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk
>> wrote:
>>
>> Such data is incompatible with
>> OSM requirements, must not be
>> imported, must be
14 Jul 2020, 11:37 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> Can we guarantee that the contained information is not "misrepresented"?
>
No. ODBL has no such restrictions.
Therefore OSM data can be used in
several evil or non-evil ways
that would violate such clauses.
Such data is incompatible with
OSM
Jun 17, 2020, 10:19 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> Am Di., 16. Juni 2020 um 16:00 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via legal-talk
> <> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> >:
>
>>
>> I opened deletion request for one of items at
>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wi
Jun 16, 2020, 13:13 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> I have noticed that people have been importing OSM data into wikidata.
>
It appears to be against advise of Wikimedia Foundation advise.
See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Database_Rights
> Whenever possible, the best course is to
Not a lawyer, but I will try to answer obvious ones.
Mar 12, 2020, 16:54 by legal-talk@openstreetmap.org:
> Hello, everybody!
>
> Please deal with the issue of legal regulation of OSM data.
>
> If we collect data from your API in XML format or perhaps directly from the
> front of the API in
16 matches
Mail list logo
