On 9/9/2012 11:33 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
As for authentication: I don't buy the 'That would make me sign up to
a new thing and I would need to remember another password' argument
and in general I strongly support integrating OSM authentication with
existing authentication domains.
I
On 9/4/2012 7:10 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Hi all,
You may remember my TIGER 2011 rendered tile layer that's based on TIGER
shapefiles from late 2011. TIGER recently updated to include data from
2012, so I imported that data and have a new tile layer here:
On 9/7/2012 9:38 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
this is the imagery url. I have just copied the 2011 setting and replaced the
year and it works for me.
tms:http://{switch:a,b,c}.tile.openstreetmap.us/tiger2012_roads/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png
That works, thanks very much! One complication was
On 8/31/2012 11:17 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I want to add The Remap-A-Tron to the ever growing list of tools
designed to support the ongoing remapping effort.
That's a fantastic application!
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
I map in OpenStreetMap for fun, but when it comes to talking to local
governments or the media, I don't have a good idea of how to justify
open data.I'm thinking in terms of being able to tell local
government how open Geodata would benefit them.
Are there any resources that discuss the
On 8/22/2012 2:43 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
What happened to the data overlay on the slippy map? That might make
analysis of situations like this easier without having to fire up an editor…
It has been temporarily move to the Edit tab - click on the down
arrow or hover to be able to select
On 8/21/2012 10:44 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I wrote about the logic to detect those ways here:
That writeup sounds like it will detect the re-introduced deleted ways
I'm thinking of. Looking forward to seeing it in the tool!
___
Talk-us
On 8/18/2012 3:56 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
maybe the existence of an OSM-to-GTFS converter could be misunderstood
by some as an invitation to upload OSM transit data to Google's database?
I would go further and say that the existence of GTFS data itself
would be an invitation to upload to
On 8/18/2012 8:00 AM, Mike Dupont wrote:
This is openplans.org?
is the opentrip planner able to use osm data directly?
https://github.com/openplans/OpenTripPlanner
Yes, OpenTripPlanner can use OSM data directly to route for cycle,
foot, and even car traffic - although they don't optimize
This project falls in the Why would anybody want to do that? [1]
category.
- The OSM bus route paths and stops have all been surveyed in my area.
- There is no GTFS feed, and the transit provider isn't planning one
soon (no budget).
- I wanted to apply the data to OpenTripPlanner for
This project falls in the Why would anybody want to do that? [1]
category.
- The OSM bus route paths and stops have all been surveyed in my area.
- There is no GTFS feed, and the transit provider isn't planning one
soon (no budget).
- I wanted to apply the data to OpenTripPlanner for
Now that the redaction bot has finished, what is remaining to bless the
database as ODBL?
Just asking because it will be good to see some of the consumers be
able to switch to pulling their feeds from the new license rather than
displaying data from April 2012.
On 8/13/2012 12:48 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
The main new thing is that it now shows deleted ways as well
Very nice - this map and Toby's are very useful. I see that the
deleted ways are purple.
One thing I have noticed is that it would be nice to detect a new
roadway having been
On 8/13/2012 11:11 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
It’s all CC BY-SA right now so you’d be okay now, but I think it’d be a
problem in the future under both CC BY-SA and ODbL if you were mix the
data in this way.
I'd think this is not actually importing any information directly
from the redacted
On 8/4/2012 2:27 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I would like to know if this is useful to anybody, or what I can do to
make it more so.
Very nice - it makes it easy to find, check, and fix all the roads that
were touched.
___
Talk-us mailing list
On 7/30/2012 7:18 AM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
Wasn't someone working on importing address data from TIGER? I was under
the impression that may have depended on tiger:tlid tags on objects
already in OSM, but wasn't sure…
TIGER address data isn't nearly accurate enough to import into OSM.
On 7/29/2012 5:06 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
- Those with no members and no tags
- Those with no members and type=multipolygon as the only tag
Relations removed will be limited to those more than a day old to avoid
conflicting with any open changesets.
I would suggest a longer time interval,
On 7/28/2012 3:33 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
Not
really sure about the zip code tags.
I find the county and zip code tags to be useful at times to tell me
where I'm located when doing Mapdust cleanup. I could probably come up
with some other way to find myself if they weren't there, but it's
On 7/24/2012 6:38 AM, Jo wrote:
It would be a lot easier if it were possible to create route part
relations, for example from one stop to the next and then be able to use
these relations in the actual route relations. This would enable to map
deviations for longer lasting road works as well.
On 7/24/2012 10:32 AM, Jo wrote:
Well, to be honest, I had hoped that everybody who is doing PT would
have been screaming for this by now. It's a message on talk-fr by
somebody who wants to start doing this for cycle route relations that
triggered me into proposing it yet again. I have proposed
FYI, please provide any feedback to the original author on the forum.
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=17526
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 7/23/2012 1:58 PM, Eric Wolf wrote:
Interestingly, in Phase 2 there were some structures that got changed
back to the initial state from GNIS. After a little digging, it was
noted that the first volunteer fixed incorrect information from the
GNIS import but then the second volunteer (during
On 7/22/2012 7:39 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
But it turns out the NPS has a boundary
shapefile for all National Parks, Historic Sites, Rivers, Parkways,
Lakeshores and more than a dozen other categories[4].
Is this something to consider for importing?
I am in favor of importing park
On 7/21/2012 8:48 AM, James Mast wrote:
Just thought I would give you a heads up guys, but a new guy to the
project has been doing some major damage to the Downtown Charlotte, NC
area putting in a ton of fictional stuff
Thanks for the heads up - otherwise I would have probably been
checking
On 7/21/2012 5:51 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote:
Would it work to do an import of TIGER 2011 data for most of the affected
area? The TIGER 2011 data is much improved over the data from the original
TIGER import that took place several years ago, and it would be a great way
to get both the roads and
On 7/19/2012 4:22 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Another thing I find is a lot of leftover stray nodes without any tags.
I select them in JOSM with type:node tags:0 -child and delete them in
one fell swoop.
In many cases, I find it easier to retrieve and plop the TIGER road
back in as a
On 7/20/2012 4:46 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I was just randomly browsing the map and happened upon the Epcot center:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.373lon=-81.5483zoom=17layers=M
That's one pretty looking map!
Agreed! I made use of it just a few weeks ago.
On 7/19/2012 1:42 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
Now that we're cleaning up after the license bot, what problems are
people seeing?
The biggest problem I have run into so far is the same 'foldback'
problem Kai saw. It's quite confusing when both sides of a dual
carriageway are folded back and
I spotted this today as I was entering survey information:
http://greenvilleopenmap.info/Airplane.jpg
I didn't realize that the Bing planes flew so high.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 7/12/2012 11:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I was wondering if something likehttp://frontdoor.cloudapp.net/ might be a
fun solution. Present some aerial imagery, the OSM data, and say is this a
track or a road?. Kind of like HotOrNot for the OSM generation. (For extra
efficiency, have a
On 7/12/2012 12:37 PM, Peter Dobratz wrote:
It seems that there are a handful of railroad enthusiast users that
are systematically adding current and former railways into OSM, and in
some cases re-adding railways that I have removed. I have been
operating under the assumption that if a physical
On 7/10/2012 5:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Oh, and South Carolina. Not going to touch that.
Don't Tread on Us - LOL.
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
On 7/11/2012 8:38 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/12 13:59, Mike N wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import
As part of the review and cleanup after the redaction bot, I am planning
to go through and review state routes and create relations for them.
There's been much good work in developing the Shields rendering
scheme, and I would like to prepare when / if it gets rolled out in the US.
Is
And a big thanks to the Bing Team for getting this imagery update out.
It's a huge help in keeping maps current!
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 6/13/2012 4:06 PM, hbogner wrote:
Try to delete the cache :D
I posted this to talk-US - I have 2 instances of JOSM - one 'works',
and the other always shows the 'old imagery'. I removed all cached
images from the JOSM settings folder, and the shared
%TEMP%\JmapViewer_UserName cache
On 6/13/2012 5:58 PM, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
Remove bing.attribution.xml from the cache dir:
%APPDATA%\JOSM\cache\bing.attribution.xml on Windows
~/.josm/cache/bing.attribution.xml on Linux
This appears to be a JOSM bug, as the attribution file/config should not
be cached.
On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote:
I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis along I-64. JOSM
is still loading the old imagery, while Potlatch 2 is getting the newer
imagery.
From a similar thread on talk...
right-click on the editing area and select 'Flush tile cache'.
On 6/13/2012 12:13 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Perhaps you're zoomed in too far. PL2 also gives the old imagery at zoom
20:
It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to
different servers behind the load sharing server. So that might be why
some solutions work
On 6/13/2012 2:09 PM, Mike N wrote:
It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to
different servers behind the load sharing server.
OK, I'm officially stumped. I have 2 instances of JOSM - one 'works',
and the other always shows the 'old imagery'. I removed all
On 6/13/2012 5:58 PM, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
Remove bing.attribution.xml from the cache dir:
%APPDATA%\JOSM\cache\bing.attribution.xml on Windows
~/.josm/cache/bing.attribution.xml on Linux
This appears to be a JOSM bug, as the attribution file/config should not
be cached.
On 6/11/2012 10:54 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
Personally, I wish that all those that want to import building outlines
would first think about the existing street network (this, after all,
being OpenSTREETMap). So much of the US is still unedited TIGER 2005
data - mis-aligned, poorly connected,
On 6/6/2012 4:12 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
Without some object IDs it is hard to say exactly what blars did. If
you have some specific examples, select them in JOSM and hit
CTRL-SHIFT-I to open a browser window with a link you can send to the
list. A lot of what I saw in LA looked like legitimate
On 5/29/2012 1:09 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
I used to agree with you, but in terms of minimum labor, updates are
best performed by retaining the original upload data, then doing a
conflation between the original data and a later update. That will
highlight only changes from the original source,
On 5/27/2012 2:53 PM, Alan wrote:
As I discussed with you, I am no longer uploading data with the tag and will
go back to remove the tag from the existing data.
I object.
An ID tag is highly useful for future reconciliation and/or synchronization
later.
I used to agree with you, but in
On 5/12/2012 5:54 PM, Anthony wrote:
If so, this is good, but it does mean that road names are going to get
out of sync, if, for instance, tiger:name_base was removed from some
of the ways and not removed from others. This will complicate later
fixes/enhancements.
This also happens long
On 5/11/2012 1:36 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
Okay, so basically we're ignoring the on-the-ground rule in order to
map for the renderer.
Exactly :) Why that is ok, I don't know :(
Mapping for the renderer has never been wrong or discouraged.
Tagging incorrectly for the renderer is another
On 5/10/2012 9:48 PM, Anthony wrote:
You seem to be assuming all the changes are positive.
I didn't take it that way - it was just a quick test for orders of
magnitude. An actual script takes more review.
What happened to the on the ground rule, anyway?
That already doesn't
On 5/10/2012 10:19 PM, Anthony wrote:
What I'm questioning is why it doesn't apply. If the people call it
Whatever Ave, shouldn't the data read Whatever Ave?
Most of the US wouldn't call it 'Whatever Ave'; when spoken, it would
be 'Avenue'. Having it expanded makes programs with spoken
On 5/10/2012 10:40 PM, Anthony wrote:
Depends on what street you're talking about. I've certainly lived in
places where the vast majority of the locals called it Whatever Ave,
and not Whatever Avenue. Most of the US...wouldn't talk about the
street at all.
But you wouldn't be confused if
On 5/8/2012 6:23 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
He was active in several communities, with an interest in Free
Software / Open Source, OpenStreetMap
The follow-on question is: since he didn't have a chance to accept or
reject the CT, do we honor his contribution by unleashing the ODBL
deletion
On 5/5/2012 1:23 AM, Gregory Arenius wrote:
The OSM model isn't everything in a separate layer, it is
everything altogether. What makes plots unique in this
regard? Why do we want them separate?
If you compare land use to TIGER - the base road network from TIGER
is continually
On 5/1/2012 12:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying.
Automatically expanding abbreviations is a terrible idea. If an
abbreviation is unambiguous, then it can be expanded during the
preprocessing step. If, on the other hand, it is ambiguous, then you
are turning ambiguous data
On 5/1/2012 1:21 PM, Anthony wrote:
The preprocessing step between downloading the data from OSM and doing
something with it.
That assumes that the TIGER tags will always be present to assist
with proper automatic expansion.
And I'd rather have the US data in line with the world-wide
On 4/30/2012 10:24 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
I believe It was stopped after some
complaints about it not handling some situations correctly. But I
would probably be in favor of trying to complete it.
I would agree - there's no point in asserting that we have to spend
time manually expanding
On 4/19/2012 3:50 AM, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Mike Nnice...@att.net wrote:
...
But one newbie deleted about 300 streets, seemingly for a wedding-related
event map :-(
...
I couldn't help laughing, that's actually pretty funny.
Did you contact the
In this area, there's been a surprising number of new contributors in
the last 2 months: about 5 altogether. This is most likely from
publicity received from the news stories surrounding the #switch2osm
cases. In one case, they had actually registered a year ago, but made
no edits until
On 4/13/2012 5:12 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
I will filter out ones touched in the last 24 hours to avoid conflicting
with anyone.
Could this be extended to 30 days, or at least a week? I remember
creating a set from a survey on one weekend, and finishing it the
following weekend. I think
On 4/12/2012 11:13 PM, James Mast wrote:
It seems that they are just starting a new way and connecting each
old node to the new way without at least moving the old node, which
means if Lar created the node and nobody has moved it since, it still
will get deleted and mess up the highway
On 4/10/2012 10:17 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
A roundabout (or mini_roundabout) implies to me (although it is not
defined on the wiki) that there is more than one entry / exit road. So
intuitively I'd say that is not an appropriate tag.
I agree, this is not a roundabout. I use
On 4/9/2012 1:39 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Here's some NHD 'data':
Perhaps rice fields, based on a Google Street View, but I can't see
for sure.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 4/6/2012 10:24 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
Anyone else try to fix bugs off there? I have tried as I want to improve
OSM.
I am increasingly finding it a waste of time, too many bugs are labelled
'other' and just don't have enough info to work out what the problem
is.
In these cases I usually
On 4/6/2012 11:13 AM, Philip Barnes wrote:
Have spotted one problem, not got a clue if its what was reported, where
the route was going onto a roundabout, rather than using the bypass
lane. Have changed the bypass to 'Trunk link' from 'Primary link' to see
if that will fix it.
Are there any
On 4/2/2012 8:25 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
Richard Weait and I have been working on a rendering that uses route
relations to make individual shields that reflect what each state uses.
Superb! This will greatly assist OSM to make inroads in the US - for
those who glance at the map, see the
On 4/2/2012 8:25 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
please let me know what you think!
Looks great - does the US OSMF have server(s) that can host this
style yet?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On 4/1/2012 3:01 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
I attempted contact with 168 users. 105 of them accepted the new
terms.
That's much higher than I would have expected. My stats:
Contact about terms via OSM: 8 Response: 0Obviously I used the
wrong wording or was unlucky. But I did tailor
On 4/1/2012 4:42 AM, James Mast wrote:
So, who else here was at least somewhat successful in their objective in
data cleanup (I still think this whole thing was kinda stupid, as I'd
rather been fixing/adding new stuff instead of redoing stuff that others
added)?
I was somewhat successful in
On 4/1/2012 7:51 AM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
I cleaned up most of I95, I20 and I26 in SC,
I saw those come through - thanks for fixing them!
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 4/1/2012 8:07 AM, James Mast wrote:
Hopefully I can finish the I-81 rebuild off-line before the database is
live so it can be one of the first uploads.
And a small caution - if the ODBL removal bot happens to hit it before
your upload, there will be version conflicts. I have no idea on
On 3/28/2012 2:55 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
I've seen a little work being done
on interstates but so far it's been a drop in the bucket.
My logic is that data consumers will shut off their feed, so we won't
have instant chaos on Mapquest.com for example. After the license
change, any
There haven't been many 'OSM Moments' for me; you know, out of the blue,
you see one of your major map works in use in a completely unexpected
context. I actually had 2 of those moments in 2012 - where 2 unrelated
planning documents featured OSM maps which were much more detailed and
up to
On 3/26/2012 10:52 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
What incentive would it take to push you over the edge to make you
actually do it?
I tend to be a hands-on person, and ultimately the motivation would be
that there is an immensely useful data consumer. It doesn't help that
the first project I
On 3/24/2012 9:06 AM, Alexander Jones wrote:
What do we do about user balrog-kun? He apparently declined the new terms,
but he is using an alternate account that has accepted the new terms. He is
a prolific editor in the areas I work in (San Antonio and California). Would
we end up deleting
On 3/23/2012 8:36 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
User chdr (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chdr) seems to be running a
script to automatically replace street name abbreviations with the full
word.
They don't look like mass automated edits to me - these are smaller
quantities of changes made via
On 3/22/2012 9:12 AM, Nick Chamberlain wrote:
I
was getting a proxy error and the uploads were timing out when I
attempted to upload the entire batch.
This is a common problem with uploading large changesets with JOSM,
where upload failures result in a partial upload. We're hesitant to put
On 3/15/2012 8:52 AM, Hillsman, Edward wrote:
In the interest of figuring out how to attract more people to participate in
OSM, I'd like to see some more discussion of this. Is it generally true that
people who work on OSM don't like to map subdivisions? And, if so, why? Because
these are
On 3/14/2012 11:10 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
You might not be sick of nonsense survey authors requesting our
personal information to study our project. You might even be
tempted to reply and to fill in their survey.
I noticed that the first survey redirected 40% of the users to
something
On 3/14/2012 6:40 AM, Alexander Jones wrote:
Hey, is there some sort of tutorial for a beginner (me) to import TIGER 2011
data for a really small town (Wheatland, CA)? I'm going to be doing a bus
route there, but half the streets on it aren't even in OSM.
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The good
On 3/14/2012 11:44 AM, Alexander Jones wrote:
Yikes, I already uploaded it! :X The changeset is here[1]. Please revert if
necessary. I'll be asleep the rest of the day, and I'll be back at around 7
PM Central.
I'd say you did a good job - everything looks to be connected. Per
latest
On 3/14/2012 11:44 AM, Alexander Jones wrote:
I personally
believe, and I think consensus is growing, that none of the tiger:*
tags should be imported (I delete all of them after working on a way).
Ref tags should be populated with the route number, such as SR 20,
and oneway tags seem to be
On 3/11/2012 10:28 PM, Josh Doe wrote:
Do you find the new subdivisions manually as well?
Yes, I just used the overlay method as outlined on the Wiki where new
roads are highlighted. The only trick was that deleted roads also would
show up as new roads, and recognizing that someone had
On 3/11/2012 6:48 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
I just wrote up a quick
blog post about it and would welcome any comments on the subject.
Last year I did all the new subdivisions in my whole county using
TIGER 2010 against the original import. There were approximately 120
new subdivisions to
I looked at the .CA lists and couldn't tell if this was due to removing
data that isn't even CC-SA compliant, or making it easier to get a jump
start on remapping. If the purpose is to make remapping easier, I
think it is disrespectful of data consumers. Data consumers are aware
of the 1
On 3/7/2012 7:50 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
...and the consensus is that the data is from some time late March/early
April 2010. Yes, really.
With an update rate of at least 2 years, I don't expect they'll see a
problem with temporary license data deletion.
On 2/17/2012 10:05 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On the topic of TIGER layers: Harry Wood made an interesting
suggestion in the comments section of my blog post on road analysis
(see other post): wouldn't it be interesting to crowdsource
particularly problematic (in terms of alignment) areas of
On 2/16/2012 6:38 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi,
I did an state-by-state and county-by-county analysis of the road
network in the US. I focused particularly on TIGER and user-related
metrics.
Results (with maps of course) are here:
On 2/15/2012 12:41 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
(nodes contained in only one highway way)
... and first or last node of the way?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 2/7/2012 2:19 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
Any chance we could get on the front page of slashdot with a
relicensing post from some official blog? The google-vandalising-osm
story got there somehow...
Using a slant of searching for missing / long-lost contributors and
losing their work would
On 2/7/2012 7:04 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
One other question. Sunny added streets using TIGER data. (Imported?)
If I replace the data, all the TIGER data goes away. Is that
something I should worry about?
Don't worry about losing the TIGER reference tags - just copy the
street name and
On 2/6/2012 11:47 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
andrzej wrote
my personal appeal is that you spend
the time between now and April 1 mapping one of the so many blank
spots in OSM
I totally disagree,
There are real people out there actually using OSM Data for
car navigation, cycle navigation etc..
On 2/6/2012 11:02 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
Just yesterday I managed to track down a phone number for the biggest
remaining non-decider in Kansas. I gave him a call, had a pleasant
conversation and then he logged in and agreed a few minutes after we
hung up.
I often wonder - do these guys never
On 1/14/2012 1:20 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
As you can see, the situation for highways / interstates is
particularly bad in SC / GA. I'd say that is a priority if you want to
help out.
I've not had any reply back from my 'Decliner'-contact in SC about a
public domain option. At this
On 1/25/2012 6:13 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Lots of you will have seen the interest recently in switching from
proprietary mapping providers to OpenStreetMap - blog postings by Nestoria
and StreetEasy, Wired's article, and so on. We started a Twitter hashtag,
#switch2osm, and it's rather
On 1/22/2012 4:06 PM, Bryce2 Nesbitt wrote:
And here is where the rusty old TIGER data still has something to offer
OSM: address data.
A very common map use case is show me a map around this address.
Bringing in that data from TIGER might not bring any more /mappers/,
but it could bring a lot
On 1/15/2012 8:01 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
and the script ignored the TIGER subtags and improperly expanded it to
West Avenue East
I'm not sure what you mean about ignoring the TIGER subtags, but this
street has tiger:name_direction_suffix = E, which the script used to
expand the name.
On 1/15/2012 8:28 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Actually the script also expanded the W to West. But my point is that it
is a TIGER entry error, and any future script needs to take into account
that these exist and people may have already fixed them to the correct
names.
Agreed- if we're
On 1/15/2012 12:47 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Perhaps checking if either the name= tag or the direction_suffix tag
has ever been edited by a human would be a good measure. The ways
which have been edited might need to be manually reviewed if they
contain an unexpanded N, E, W or S.
I
On 1/15/2012 12:45 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I only map two separate ways when there's a median you can't cross, so
the two directions are physically separate. By that rationale, it should
be one way feature. I am curious if other mappers use the same convention.
I agree with that method.
On 1/14/2012 1:20 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
As you can see, the situation for highways / interstates is
particularly bad in SC / GA.
I'm still checking the PD option for most of one of the SC decliner's
work - I should hear back this weekend.
On 1/13/2012 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
* Remap data that remains at risk of being removed, following the
guidelines on the wiki (see links below).
Assuming that the April 1 delete is a smart delete, is it better to wait
until afterward? I'm thinking of this -
1 TIGER - agreer
2
301 - 400 of 770 matches
Mail list logo
