with
restricted mobility (like sticks).
So, absent local authorities putting in textured paving routinely, it might be
conceivable to think of an app that warned people of such dropped kerbs.
We could of course spend the next ten years mapping all of them and not get
halfway through.
Paul Bivand
1st series was
black and white, road importance was distinguished by both thickness (in some
cases supposed to be representative of actual width) but also the road edges
have differing thicknesses. The differing importance of roads are clear to the
eye.
Paul Bivand (paulbiv)
On Sunday 01 Nov
As this has dropped off the active thread list a bit.
I'd broadly agree with this, though I'm more corporate sponsors than members.
My feeling on responding with a greater emphasis on community rather than
techy stuff was that those OSM discussions I've been to (mapping parties in
Gravesend,
Looks like urViator has changed them back.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33222199
Thanks, urViator.
Paul Bivand (paulbiv)
On Sunday 09 Aug 2015 14:40:19 Paul Bivand wrote:
Noticed some changes that I think odd that appear to derive from mapper
urViator changing highway= primary
was not appropriate.
What do people think?
Paul Bivand (paulbiv)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
A small story about this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31117763/history
Laurie Gray Avenue, Bluebell Hill, Kent, used to have a street sign saying
Laurie Gray.
Various council documentation and OS locator referred to the 'Avenue' form.
After two discussions an openstreetmap mapper asked
.
More here on how to do the datashine maps.
http://oobrien.com/2012/02/reworking-booth-geodemographics-of-housing/
Paul Bivand
On Thursday 27 Nov 2014 23:05:42 David Woolley wrote:
On 27/11/14 14:09, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Nice initiative! I think adding building outlines is quite useful
always getting
linked to ratings as others do.
Paul Bivand
On Friday 23 Aug 2013 04:04:31 Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Colin Smale wrote:
Calling the transformation from OSM data to international format
trivial does not do justice to the creativity of mappers when
entering phone numbers
Probably easier for DfT to use an OSM base rather than go through the
bureaucracy required to use their Ordnance Survey licence.
However, looks like an opportunity to map anything that might put a spoke
in their wheel - they mention Ramsar wetlands and the North Kent Downs
AONB.
Doesn't seem
between B (signposted) and C (not
signposted).
Paul Bivand (paulbiv)
On Sunday 17 Mar 2013 09:54:22 sk53.osm wrote:
I've noticed that many minor roads in the Highland Region of Scotland have
been tagged with ref=[CU] based on a PDF document from the regions
transport department. I've
Small cautionary note on Housing development sales boards.
Development names may well be different from local authority final names.
In my patch we have had a development known as Capstone Heights with that name
on all the development signs including maps. However the local authority
Statistics attribution, that should be OK. However,
the perpetual attribution requirement (and its odd that National Statistics is
in there, as ONS has always been more open e.g. census output area shapefiles)
is quite well buried.
Paul Bivand
On Wednesday 11 Apr 2012 08:57:53 Robert Whittaker (OSM
to their
updating processes/costs)
Paul Bivand (paulbiv)
On Monday 30 Jan 2012 16:14:04 Ralph Smyth wrote:
DfT has launched a new consultation today on amending requirements
placed on traffic authorities in England when they propose and make
temporary and permanent traffic orders (TOs
13 matches
Mail list logo
