[OSM-talk] Import guidelines review

2012-06-06 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. Ich read current import guide lines. They are long. Hard to understand. Easy to ignore. Even established mappers some times fail following. Even when they want. Look: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines I did a redraw of them. To make understanding easier.

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] Import guidelines review

2012-06-06 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello Jaak. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/WorstFixer/diary/17025 Do you have any comments? What to add? What to remove? 1. I think that the discussion with community should be much earlier, probably right after you have found some data. Is it really useful data, if not then do not

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] Import guidelines review

2012-06-06 Thread Worst Fixer
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/WorstFixer/diary/17025 Do you have any comments? What to add? What to remove? 1. I think that the discussion with community should be much earlier, probably right after you have found some data. Is it really useful data, if not then do not waste your time

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] Import guidelines review

2012-06-06 Thread Worst Fixer
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/WorstFixer/diary/17025 Do you have any comments? What to add? What to remove? 1. I think that the discussion with community should be much earlier, probably right after you have found some data. Is it really useful data, if not then do not waste your time

Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines review

2012-06-06 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello Frederik, I did a redraw of them. To make understanding easier. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/WorstFixer/diary/17025 Do you have any comments? What to add? What to remove? I am very reluctant to have someone who ... (4) continues to make misleading and offensive statements in

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] Import guidelines review

2012-06-06 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello Pieren, And constantly refering to contacting the community is simply a joke because the mailing lists, forums and mapping parties are just a little fraction of the contributors and I'm still looking for a mean to contact the community. Or the word has to be replaced by the 5

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands

2012-05-31 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. But what would be the best tags to use? Would natural=wetland wetland=swamp (An area of waterlogged forest, with dense vegetation.) be correct? I currently have no objection to this tag change. I have to propose a bit more. Sorry for delay. I looked at data. If you limit your edit

Re: [OSM-talk] Changing capitalization (Lima)

2012-05-31 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. 2012/5/31 Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com: We're currently working with Ruben (user Rub21) on fixing street name capitalization in Lima - a lot of the street names are ALL CAPS where they should be properly capitalized. We're doing this work manually right now and are well under way.

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: intermittent waters

2012-05-30 Thread Worst Fixer
Because if people are still editing like this, then I don't see the problem that WorstFixer is fixing as actually being fixed. Users of the map will still have to deal with both the format that WorstFixer doesn't like AND the format he does like. Less of the former and more of the latter, but

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: intermittent waters

2012-05-30 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello Paul, You use HTML letters in mailing list. Using blue color shows your power. 2012/5/30 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com: Could you post the code used to generate the changesets? Ich may not. Some parts of it are not open source. I think of clean rewrite. That would be the easiest way

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] proposed automated edit: forested wetlands

2012-05-30 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. The landuse import for Georgia (which IMO is poor-quality and should be deleted, but that's not going to happen) has a bunch of areas tagged as note = Forested Wetland with no useful natural=* tags (since natural=wood and natural=wetland both apply). Example:

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: intermittent waters

2012-05-29 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. I used reply to instead of reply to all in my mail agent. We had a small thread with Thomas. Here is major result we achived. Thomas expressed opinion that not 100% of water=intermittent have other tags, so we have no way count them as water. In my sub-extract of water=intermittent:

[OSM-talk] Import of buildings in Chicago

2012-05-27 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. There is on going import of Buildings in city Chicago. Import is held by following account: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chicago-buildings I found no discussions of this import. No announcement. I searched bad? It is absent from following web page:

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: ele=0

2012-05-20 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. 2012/5/20 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org Hi, On 05/19/2012 03:57 PM, Worst Fixer wrote: If no good and valid responses come until 2012-05-22, I will upload this. You will not upload anything until there is a consensus that what you're planning to do is good, else your account

[OSM-talk] Edit review: building=levels=N

2012-05-20 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit. There are 400+ ways tagged building=levels=N in database. I propose changing tags to building=yes; building:levels=N for these ways. Also I propose removal of addr:housenumber=? on these objects, and move name=N to addr:housenumber=N.

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: building=levels=N

2012-05-20 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello. 2012/5/20 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki page with the details of the proposed upload, as well as contact info (i.e. main account). Thanks. I created a wiki page on this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/WorstFixer I also

[OSM-talk] Edit review: ele=0

2012-05-19 Thread Worst Fixer
Hello, all. I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit. Main changed tag is ele=0. While doing this edit, I also want clean other tag. Also is_in tag was parsed into a set of more detailed tags. I also created overview.html that might help your review.

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: ele=0

2012-05-19 Thread Worst Fixer
what kind of problem you see with the ele=0 tag? On 05/19/2012 03:57 PM, Worst Fixer wrote: Hello, all. I ask you to review my planned mechanical edit. Main changed tag is ele=0. While doing this edit, I also want clean other tag. Also is_in tag was parsed into a set of more

Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: ele=0

2012-05-19 Thread Worst Fixer
different from imports. 2012/5/19 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de 19.05.2012 15:57, Worst Fixer: While doing this edit, I also want clean other tag. Also is_in tag was parsed into a set of more detailed tags. Which other tags does this affect besides ele and is_in? This is basic