Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Spam] Re: License Telephone Debate

2009-03-12 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Grant Slater wrote: We're made up of native English and Dutch speakers, we need assistance from people who speak other languages. I have already done a lot of translation work into German for the license process (as have others), and have generally tried to inform the people on talk-de

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Spam] Re: License Telephone Debate

2009-03-12 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Peter Miller wrote: The voice call idea might work, however I would ask the working group to provide any answers they already have to questions on the Open Issues page before the event so that we don't waste time and also ask you to be sensitive to Frederik's observation that voice

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Spam] Re: License Telephone Debate

2009-03-12 Thread Peter Miller
On 12 Mar 2009, at 08:55, Nick Black wrote: On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Hi, SteveC wrote: In the past couple of license working group meetings we've been trying to figure out how to get more input from the community on everything

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Spam] Re: License Telephone Debate

2009-03-12 Thread Grant Slater
Richard Fairhurst wrote: As long as the phone conference is _additional_ to the existing processes, not replacing them, I don't really see a problem. Existing avenues for feedback are of course: - this list and talk@ - international mailing lists - co-ment - the wiki - odc-discuss -

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Spam] Re: License Telephone Debate

2009-03-12 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Existing avenues for feedback are of course: - this list and talk@ - international mailing lists - co-ment - the wiki - odc-discuss - (have I missed any?) Yes, the ODC (OKFN) wiki have meanwhile started their own FAQ section which partly overlaps with