[OSM-talk] [tagging] Crossing access types (was: Road crossings proposal - status?)

2008-05-13 Thread Andrew Chadwick (email lists)
Steve Hill wrote: bicycle=yes|no foot=yes|no horse=yes|no Doing this for crossings is not right, IMO. It's a bad usage of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Key:access , or more specifically its 'helper' tags like foot=yes|no or bicycle=*. Consider: * If two ways cross at a crossing

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Crossing access types (was: Road crossings proposal - status?)

2008-05-13 Thread Steve Hill
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote: * If two ways cross at a crossing Node, access keys would logically apply to both. Declaring that crossings are somehow special and that access tags on them apply only to the crossing traffic is worse. Ok, sounds like we would need

Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Crossing access types

2008-05-13 Thread Andrew Chadwick (email lists)
Steve Hill wrote: On Tue, 13 May 2008, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote: * If two ways cross at a crossing Node, access keys would logically apply to both. Declaring that crossings are somehow special and that access tags on them apply only to the crossing traffic is worse. Ok,