Le lundi 30 mars 2009 à 05:46, PAA a écrit :
Request for comments on creating the key:h and making it synonymous with
key:highway.
That's just ridiculous.
Don't start duplicating tags with the same meaning.
As i understand things, this has four huge benefits:
-reduce data entry time when
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Le lundi 30 mars 2009 à 05:46, PAA a écrit :
Request for comments on creating the key:h and making it synonymous with
key:highway.
That's just ridiculous.
Don't start duplicating tags with the same meaning.
No it's not. It's called convenience.
And once you start with
Chris Hill wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
Can we implement this tomorrow?
When hell freezes over maybe.
I meant day after tomorrow BTW. Maybe that clears it up a bit.
Maarten
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Maarten Deen wrote:
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Le lundi 30 mars 2009 à 05:46, PAA a écrit :
Request for comments on creating the key:h and making it synonymous with
key:highway.
That's just ridiculous.
Don't start duplicating tags with the same meaning.
No it's not. It's
Le lundi 30 mars 2009 à 15:00, PAA a écrit :
Request for comments on creating the key:h and making it synonymous
with key:highway.
That's just ridiculous.
Don't start duplicating tags with the same meaning.
It's definitely not something to be done with all tags, but i don't
think you
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of PAA
Sent: 30 March 2009 14:01
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - h==highway
Request for comments on creating the key:h
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
PAA schrieb:
There are more than 1500 misspellings of the tag in the european
database right now.
Which you can fix within a few minutes if you are sure that they aren't
intended.
It's possible that somebody could do
[Snip]
(I replied quickly this morning before leaving for work and forgot
to
write
my main argument, should never reply in a hurry)
With two synonymous tags you can get inconsistent tagging, like a
way
tagged
highway=primary
h=secondary
Now *that* is a good argument. Well, i had
Request for comments on creating the key:h and making it synonymous with
key:highway. As i understand things, this has four huge benefits:
-reduce data entry time when editing OSM (e.g. 6/7ths less characters to
type)
-reduce data entry errors when editing OSM (current obvious errors from
tagwatch
9 matches
Mail list logo
