-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists) wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Clinic can apply to other medical folks, such as chiropodists and
physiotherapists too.
And physical rehabilitation, dementia care, psychiatric counseling...
the list might be quite a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists) wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Clinic can apply to other medical folks, such as chiropodists and
physiotherapists too.
And physical rehabilitation, dementia care, psychiatric counseling...
the list might be quite a
i think
amenity=clinic
medical=servicelist
emergency=yes|no
would work great,
here in spain we have centro de salud (=health center)
wich is public health care.
there is one in each village or suburb.
they are meant to liberate mayor hospitals of 1st aid
and not so important/critical
sergio sevillano escribió:
i think
amenity=clinic
medical=servicelist
emergency=yes|no
would work great,
here in spain we have centro de salud (=health center)
wich is public health care.
there is one in each village or suburb.
they are meant to liberate mayor hospitals of 1st aid
and
For the UK we should also flag which PCT (Primary Care Trust) each
clinic etc is in. Is is_in appropriate for organizational membership?
Graham
Andrew Chadwick (mailing lists) wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Clinic can apply to other medical folks, such as chiropodists and
physiotherapists too.
On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 10:14 +0100, graham wrote:
For the UK we should also flag which PCT (Primary Care Trust) each
clinic etc is in. Is is_in appropriate for organizational membership?
Graham
That would be a horrible overriding. is_in represents the physical (and
legal to some extent)
Mark Williams wrote:
Actually, having gone back re-read the actual proposal, the O.P.
wanted this tag to _distinguish_ other clinics from the specific ones...
so it's the bit about merging them, above, that I didn't like, not the
actual proposed feature, in case that last mail was unclear :)
Thomas Wood wrote:
The operator= tag already is used for similar puposes, and would fit
well (Mostly bus routes I believe)
It might clash slightly with the suggestion for public to be used in the
operator tag to differentiate it from private medical establishments.
+1. I'd be happy with
What are peoples' thoughts on medical facilities that can't really be
represented as either hospitals or pharmacies? For example small clinics
for minor surgery, doctors (UK: General Practitioners' surgeries) and
dentists? There are a few proposals out there already (still):
Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote:
What are peoples' thoughts on medical facilities that can't really be
represented as either hospitals or pharmacies? For example small clinics
for minor surgery, doctors (UK: General Practitioners' surgeries) and
dentists? There are a few proposals out
Chris Hill wrote:
Clinic can apply to other medical folks, such as chiropodists and
physiotherapists too.
And physical rehabilitation, dementia care, psychiatric counseling...
the list might be quite a long one.
I'm coming round to the opinion that the different kinds of surgeries
are all
11 matches
Mail list logo
