Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Nicely answered, I appreciate that! SteveA > On Nov 8, 2019, at 4:02 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > >> On 9. Nov 2019, at 00:48, stevea wrote: >> >> I wouldn't say "all" addresses, as Facebook isn't "all" of us. > > > of course, I apologize if this came

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

sent from a phone > On 9. Nov 2019, at 00:48, stevea wrote: > > I wouldn't say "all" addresses, as Facebook isn't "all" of us. of course, I apologize if this came along like a campaign just with facebook, it was just an example that facebook was mentioned, because they are our biggest

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

I wouldn't say "all" addresses, as Facebook isn't "all" of us. Also, it's an ambition, a gleam in a collective eye, a vision, something ahead in the future as a goal. There will be, rightly, many paths to get there, rather than a single one. This is true of any major goal in OSM. SteveA >

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

sent from a phone > On 8. Nov 2019, at 13:59, Simon Poole wrote: > > Just imagine that we increase the number of new OSM contributors by an > order of magnitude, to ~2'000'000 per year, and just as magically we get > them to make the single edit they typically make to be adding an > address

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Simon Poole: >> how can the new contributor wishing to add an address find this tool? > That doesn't make the slightest difference, because the only people > adding addresses in any meaningful way are those 1% of contributors. it's the problem of the egg and the chicken : if effective tools were

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Am 08.11.2019 um 13:19 schrieb marc marc: > Hello, > > Simon Poole : >> The issue with addresses is definitely not due to a lack of tools >> for OSM contributors. For example >> https://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/anzeige_dynamisch.html?land=Schweiz=8.71423=47.05777=8=B > lack of tools

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Hello, Simon Poole : > The issue with addresses is definitely not due to a lack of tools > for OSM contributors. For example > https://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/anzeige_dynamisch.html?land=Schweiz=8.71423=47.05777=8=B lack of tools not only mean "no tool exist", it also means "tool

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Just as a further data point for the discussion: we are currently adding roughly 10'000'000 addresses per year relatively constant since 2013, with some exceptions due to imports (mainly NL in 2014 I believe). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

The issue with addresses is definitely not due to a lack of tools for OSM contributors. For example https://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/anzeige_dynamisch.html?land=Schweiz=8.71423=47.05777=8=B which covers essentially all the analytics needed for comparison with open data datasets and

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Hello, > We've been "addressing the address topic" for more than > 5 years in France with our BANO project. and despite the amount of opendata information available, 5 years later, there is still a lot of red (missing road name or mismatch between osm and opendata). I agree with the original

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Wait,. .. when was the 'noname' layer gone? Yves Le 7 novembre 2019 08:06:27 GMT+01:00, Christian Quest a écrit : >We've been "addressing the address topic" for more than 5 years in >France >with our BANO project. > >Here is an overlay I created back then to show existing and missing >address

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/Quests and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete for more info, including full list of available predefined tasks. 6 Nov 2019, 20:40 by talk@openstreetmap.org: > For

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

We've been "addressing the address topic" for more than 5 years in France with our BANO project. Here is an overlay I created back then to show existing and missing address data in OSM compared to available OSM compatible sources.

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

For your usecase, Tom, perhaps Street-Complete would work for you if you turned on all the building-related quests and turned off the other quests? https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetcomplete=en_US On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:33 AM Tom Russell wrote: > Am Mi., 6.

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Oleksiy Muzalyev mailto:oleksiy.muzal...@bluewin.ch>>: On the main osm.org site one can right-click on a building and select "Show address" or "Add a note here" . What if a new type of a note is introduced, a structured address note?

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 09:17 Uhr schrieb Oleksiy Muzalyev < oleksiy.muzal...@bluewin.ch>: > On the main osm.org site one can right-click on a building and select > "Show address" or "Add a note here" . What if a new type of a note is > introduced, a structured address note? > > The structured

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

On the main osm.org site one can right-click on a building and select "Show address" or "Add a note here" . What if a new type of a note is introduced, a structured address note? The structured address note entry form will consist of several input fields: Building number: ... Street (avenue):

Re: [OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

It's a pretty cool concept, but doesn't necessarily invoke ALL addresses have been found, what happens if a few addresses are there? What happens if someone adds 1 or 2 addresses? Pretty good QA tool I'm guessing? ___ talk mailing list

[OSM-talk] Addressing SIG

Hello Maps have three basic components: Display (does it look nice?), Routing (Can I get from a to b?) and Geocoding (Where is this address?). OSM is extremely good at the first one, and pretty good at the second one. But it’s pretty deficient in the third area: address data. The question is,