On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the problem with continuing to allow CC distribution of the
data is that that would leave OSM unprotected in those jurisdictions
where CC isn't recognised for map data.
1) What jurisdictions would that be?
2) If
Michael Collinson mike at ayeltd.biz writes:
If you are a user of OpenStreetMap data, this does not affect you.
OpenStreetMap data continues to be licensed only under CC-BY-SA and
this will continue until we reach a critical mass of acceptance of the
new license.
Accepting the new licence
On 13 April 2011 15:15, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
What's the plan for deciding whether and when to cut off CC-BY-SA
distribution?
Would it require a 2/3 vote of contributors?
I guess the problem with continuing to allow CC distribution of the
data is that that would leave OSM
Dermot McNally dermotm at gmail.com writes:
What's the plan for deciding whether and when to cut off CC-BY-SA
distribution? Would it require a 2/3 vote of contributors?
I guess the problem with continuing to allow CC distribution of the
data is that that would leave OSM unprotected in those
On 14 April 2011 00:49, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
It's _a_ goal but I think the more important selling points for ODbL/DbCL
are the positive ones - more uses it would permit for the data, for example
distributing map tiles without having to follow any particular licence for
them.
5 matches
Mail list logo
