The concept is understood outside Germany and actually rendered in CyclOSM
It's more or less the same concept as cyclestreet=yes, we render it the
same way.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet
Example in Netherland
https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/51.56239/5.07029/cyclosm
Example
May 26, 2020, 15:53 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 09:19, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>
>>
>> sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
>> (usually residential)
>>
>> and it isn't a cycleway as it is a regular road that is either blocked
>> for most motor
Hello,
Le 26.05.20 à 17:52, Hartmut Holzgraefe a écrit :
> it doesn't even really matter: such rows should be
> visible in the overlay, even if simply rendered the same
> as "normal" cycleways ...
on the contrary, it probably matters !
I'm not surprised that a tag that is incomprehensible
On 2020-05-26 15:53, Dave F via talk wrote:
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 09:19, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
>>
>> sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
>> (usually residential)
>>
>> and it isn't a cycleway as it is a regular road that is either blocked
>> for most motor
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:22 AM James wrote:
> and if pedestrians are allowed on it:
>
> highway=path
> segregated=no
>
Maybe. If it clearly has lanes marked out, I tend to consider this a
cycleway even if there's no sidewalk as it was clearly built for bicycles a
forethought with minimal, if
and if pedestrians are allowed on it:
highway=path
segregated=no
On Tue., May 26, 2020, 9:58 a.m. Dave F via talk,
wrote:
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 09:19, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> >
> > sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
> > (usually residential)
> >
> > and it isn't
On 26/05/2020 09:19, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
(usually residential)
and it isn't a cycleway as it is a regular road that is either blocked
for most motor vehicles,
Then that's a cycleway. Irrelevant of construction (width,
On 2020-05-26 10:00, Marc M. wrote:
>> I'm missing highway=bicycle_road being rendered
>
> only one https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=bicycle_road :)
> why it isn't a highway=cycleway ?
sorry, my fault, it is bicycle_road=yes in addition to highway=*
(usually residential)
and it
Hello,
Le 26.05.20 à 09:36, Hartmut Holzgraefe a écrit :
> I'm missing highway=bicycle_road being rendered
only one https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=bicycle_road :)
why it isn't a highway=cycleway ?
Regards,
Marc
___
talk mailing list
On 2020-05-25 16:19, Florimond Berthoux wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For a local project we worked on a new cycle layer map with only road
> cycling infrastructure : cycle track, lane, bus lane, opposite.
> The idea is to use this transparent layer over other map where full
> cycle map is not desirable.
Hello,
For a local project we worked on a new cycle layer map with only road
cycling infrastructure : cycle track, lane, bus lane, opposite.
The idea is to use this transparent layer over other map where full cycle
map is not desirable.
It's based on CyclOSM and a demo is available on
11 matches
Mail list logo
