2009/9/29 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Peter Childs wrote:
2009/9/28 Mark Williams mark@blueyonder.co.uk:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about this from a very different perspective -
that of parks
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Sent: 24 September 2009 10:30 AM
To: Mike Harris
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
Hi Mike,
OS one-inch (or 1:50k) mapping does not show field boundaries. But is
anyone working on out-of-copyright 1:25k (or larger scale) mapping?
Mike
Dave F. wrote:
Sent: 24 September 2009 6:36 PM
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
Mike Harris wrote:
Dave makes a good point - the most important thing for walkers in farmed
rural areas is often to know on which side of the hedge / fence they
ought
to be. OS 1
Peter Childs wrote:
Sent: 28 September 2009 3:42 PM
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
2009/9/28 Mark Williams mark@blueyonder.co.uk:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about
Dave F. wrote:
Sent: 29 September 2009 10:29 PM
To: Peter Childs
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
Peter Childs wrote:
2009/9/28 Mark Williams mark@blueyonder.co.uk:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote
Or better still, train dogs to walk only under hedges and fit them with a
GPS :-)
I can't help thinking that this would open up a whole new genre of
geographical-based games, ranging from geocaching (where did I hide that bone?)
and orienteering to canine endurance records (my dog walked 100
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Or better still, train dogs to walk only under hedges and fit them with a
GPS :-)
What tag should we use for territorial pissings? ;)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/9/30 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Or better still, train dogs to walk only under hedges and fit them with a
GPS :-)
What tag should we use for territorial pissings? ;)
I think that would have to be an admin_level=11 or maybe 12.
Peter.
2009/9/30 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com
Whoooh! That’s a bit ancient. With a modern high sensitivity receiver you
should be generally around 5m of error and certainly not more than 10m if
you are in sight or an SBAS Egnos/Wass satellite and your GPS can use it.
Emilie Laffray wrote:
2009/9/30 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.com
mailto:ajrli...@googlemail.com
Whoooh! That’s a bit ancient. With a modern high sensitivity
receiver you
should be generally around 5m of error and certainly not more than
10m if
2009/9/30 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Emilie Laffray wrote:
2009/9/30 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) ajrli...@googlemail.commailto:
ajrli...@googlemail.com
Whoooh! That’s a bit ancient. With a modern high sensitivity
receiver you
should be generally around 5m of error and
: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
Dave F. wrote:
Sent: 24 September 2009 6:36 PM
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
Mike Harris wrote:
Dave makes a good point - the most important thing for walkers in
farmed rural areas is often to know on which side
Peter Childs wrote:
2009/9/28 Mark Williams mark@blueyonder.co.uk:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about this from a very different perspective -
that of parks and other open public areas where you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about this from a very different perspective - that
of parks and other open public areas where you might not have a chance to
walk the perimeter ... for instance, you've a dog who
2009/9/28 Mark Williams mark@blueyonder.co.uk:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
courtland.yoc...@mindspring.com wrote:
I've been thinking a bit about this from a very different perspective - that
of parks and other open public areas where you might not have a chance to
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the
3D
navigation stuff I'm working on.
I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles
btw.
Nick
We do,
I know, because I'm one of them ;-)
but sometimes that's not quite enough. I had a path that
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the
3D
navigation stuff I'm working on.
I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles
btw.
Nick
We do,
I know, because I'm one
@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in
the
3D
navigation stuff I'm working on.
I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles
btw.
Nick
We do,
I know, because I'm one of them
Hi Mike,
OS one-inch (or 1:50k) mapping does not show field boundaries. But is
anyone working on out-of-copyright 1:25k (or larger scale) mapping?
Mike Harris
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the 3D
navigation stuff I'm working on.
I think most people who
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great help in the 3D
navigation stuff I'm working on.
I think most people who map the countryside do map gates and stiles btw.
Nick
We do, but sometimes that's not quite enough. I had a path that ran
parallel to a hedge but there was
[mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk]
Sent: 24 September 2009 10:30
To: Mike Harris
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
Hi Mike,
OS one-inch (or 1:50k) mapping does not show field boundaries. But is
anyone working on out-of-copyright 1:25k (or larger scale) mapping
with OS mapping!
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Dave F. [mailto:dave...@madasafish.com]
Sent: 24 September 2009 13:18
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Mike Harris; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
I believe Andy R is. Field boundaries would also be a great
Mike Harris wrote:
Dave makes a good point - the most important thing for walkers in farmed
rural areas is often to know on which side of the hedge / fence they ought
to be. OS 1:25k is fairly useless for this as the difference between one
side of the hedge and the other is usually less than
In the UK, certainly large-scale Ordnance Survey maps show field boundaries.
There is some incomprehensible (to me) information about 'field parcel numbers'
at http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/site/contact/fieldparcels.html.
It would be great to add them to OSM but I don't think walking
The OS have their own aerial survey 'plane, currently based in Blackpool
I think. A large part of their rural mapping updates comes from this hi
res photography. They don't choose to release these photos for general
use of course. An OS 'plane used to be based at an airfield I used to
fly
Ed Avis wrote:
In the UK, certainly large-scale Ordnance Survey maps show field boundaries.
I suspect that it depends on region, but in my experience the Ordnance
Survey field boundary data as printed on their Explorer is based on
actual boundaries some considerable time in the past. That
Someoneelse lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk writes:
In the UK, certainly large-scale Ordnance Survey maps show field boundaries.
I suspect that it depends on region, but in my experience the Ordnance
Survey field boundary data as printed on their Explorer is based on
actual boundaries some
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Ed Avis wrote:
Perhaps
we could install GPS devices on every tractor in the country
where I live tractors have GPS devices already
perhaps you just need to ask if they record where they have been?
___
talk mailing list
Well if somone does map the fields please could they put the gates on there.
It would be nice to route people to the nearest gate. We do have the right
to roam but those of who live in the countryside have always had that option
we just used our common sense by not walking down the middle of
They record tracks so they can calculate the next leg on the field,
the question is wether we can use the data for some reason or other.
brgds
Aun Johnsen
On 23/09/2009, at 17:53, Liz wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Ed Avis wrote:
Perhaps
we could install GPS devices on every tractor in the
Ed Avis wrote:
Someoneelse lists at mail.atownsend.org.uk writes:
http://maps.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/
NottsCC.InteractiveMapping.Web.Internet/
?e=461177n=360114mpp=160layers=SEA.PLA.FP.BR.RB.BOAT
/hLayer=hField=hValue=
suggest that they might.
Hmm, where do you see field information
I've been thinking a bit about this from a very different perspective - that of
parks and other open public areas where you might not have a chance to walk the
perimeter ... for instance, you've a dog who really doesn't want that boring
walk around the edge, but bobs and weaves all about the
2009 22:07
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Field boundaries
Well if somone does map the fields please could they put the gates on there.
It would be nice to route people to the nearest gate. We do have the right
to roam but those of who live in the countryside have always had
33 matches
Mail list logo
