On Monday 13 August 2018, SelfishSeahorse wrote:
>
> Thanks for the tip; I din't think of it. Actually my computer had
> more difficulties to calculate that i had to find the errors. :-)
Note checking this kind of errors on large multipolygons is not really
that difficult. For each of the big
Yeah those great "lakes" are such a massive relations... I think I can make
toast on my computer while it's calculating the errors. Thanks for fixing
it Selfish Seahorse
On Mon., Aug. 13, 2018, 9:12 a.m. SelfishSeahorse, <
selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 14:01,
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 14:01, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
>
> Note you can easily check if there are broken multipolygons in the OSM
> inspector:
>
> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas=-84.14378=46.10509=8
>
> If a lake multipolygon is broken the lake outline will be shown as
> context
Hi!
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 13:50, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> You should see the changes at z13+ but z0-12 are only rendered once a
> month or when the style changes.
Thanks for your explanation. This also explains why it was not noticed
that the lakes had disappeared until about a month after the
Note you can easily check if there are broken multipolygons in the OSM
inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas=-84.14378=46.10509=8
If a lake multipolygon is broken the lake outline will be shown as
context there and the location of the error usually in red (self
interaection)
You should see the changes at z13+ but z0-12 are only rendered once a
month or when the style changes.
Tom
On 13/08/18 12:36, SelfishSeahorse wrote:
Apparently I sent the message only to James ... So here it is for the
rest of you. eanwhile the lakes are rendered):
-- Forwarded
Apparently I sent the message only to James ... So here it is for the
rest of you. eanwhile the lakes are rendered):
-- Forwarded message -
Hi
There were quite a few problems with these multipolygons (overlapping
and unclosed ways, no role, inner ways belonging to wrong
7 matches
Mail list logo
