2013/1/7 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
In some cases, address interpolation may produce addresses that don't
exist on the ground. My parents lived for years on a street that has
several sharp turns. In order to keep the addresses more-or-less in sync
between the two sides of the
2013/1/7 Jo winfi...@gmail.com
But how do you propose to count those? There might be numbers missing in
the sequence or there might be 4A, 4B, 4C, etc in between. 2 and 6. At
least such discrepancies are possible in Belgium.
I try to remove those discrepancies as much as possible, but I
Am 06.01.2013 16:11, schrieb Janko Mihelić:
What about addr:interpolation? Do you count all the housenumbers in
between, or only the ones on the ends? I think all should be counted.
And not because I use those a lot :)
-1
address interpolations are exactly that: interpolations.
Often you find
Regarding housenumbers, I'm trying to render them with only the ones
around street corners at some zoom level.
It is not obvious and almost impossible with a standard osm2pgsql
schema. It looks like some db/osmosis schema is necessary for such
complex postgis queries.
Anyone tried something in
Hi,
On 01/07/2013 02:48 PM, Christian Quest wrote:
Regarding housenumbers, I'm trying to render them with only the ones
around street corners at some zoom level.
You could try to make a layer that returns the house number plus the
count of highway=residential ways within n metres of the
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
What about addr:interpolation? Do you count all the housenumbers in
between, or only the ones on the ends? I think all should be counted.
And
not because I use those a lot :)
Janko (1373) Mihelić
What about addr:interpolation? Do you count all the housenumbers in
between, or only the ones on the ends? I think all should be counted. And
not because I use those a lot :)
Janko (1373) Mihelić
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/12/12 22:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hey girls and guys.
The number seem to be OK for me.
I've made a program that counts how many house numbers someone has added.
It uses object history, so it should be able to correctly award the count
to
On 12-12-30 22:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It would be great if you could find your name on the list and do a quick
sanity check in your head whether this looks right or not.
Maybe you should explain the meaning?
No, the numbers don't look right when I see -7 for me - I moved some
house number
It says I've mapped 7232.
I expect I've done around 100 streets, so that works fine. But what's my
rank?
Extra points for postcodes (although often I leave these to the related
street), relations with street(s), and building outlines?
This list might encourage me to get some more, although more
Gregory writes:
It says I've mapped 7232.
I expect I've done around 100 streets, so that works fine. But what's my
rank?
WHERE ARE ALL YOU PEOPLE FINDING ALL THESE HOUSES?? I'VE ADDRESSED
EVERY HOUSE WITH AN HOUR'S BICYCLE RIDE OF MY HOUSE AND I'VE ONLY
GOTTEN TO 932.
I feel like I can't
On 02/01/13 15:31, Russ Nelson wrote:
Gregory writes:
It says I've mapped 7232.
I expect I've done around 100 streets, so that works fine. But what's my
rank?
WHERE ARE ALL YOU PEOPLE FINDING ALL THESE HOUSES?? I'VE ADDRESSED
EVERY HOUSE WITH AN HOUR'S BICYCLE RIDE OF MY HOUSE AND
On 2 January 2013 15:31, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Gregory writes:
It says I've mapped 7232.
I expect I've done around 100 streets, so that works fine. But what's my
rank?
WHERE ARE ALL YOU PEOPLE FINDING ALL THESE HOUSES?? I'VE ADDRESSED
EVERY HOUSE WITH AN HOUR'S BICYCLE
Hi,
Am 30.12.2012 um 22:53 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
According to this list, 208 accounts have added more than 10k house numbers -
if any one of them has actually surveyed that many houses they should be
awarded a prize! A further ~ 1400 have done between 1k and 10k numbers,
According to this list, 208 accounts have added more than 10k
house
numbers - if any one of them has actually surveyed that many
houses they
should be awarded a prize!
While I'm surprised that my entry is as high as it is, it is
entirely possible that I've added almost 40,000 house numbers
Hi,
I've made a program that counts how many house numbers someone has
added. It uses object history, so it should be able to correctly award
the count to the person actually adding the addr:housenumber tag.
I don't yet know what will happen with this, but before I make further
plans,
The number (10334) associated to me, Kjarrval, does seem correct. I did
a lot of walks last summer and gathered a lot of housenumbers on OsmPad.
Could send you the files if you want a rough verification of the number
of houses.
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 30/12/12 21:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
I've made a program that counts how many house numbers someone has added.
It uses object history, so it should be able to correctly award the count
to the person actually adding the addr:housenumber tag.
I
On 30/12/2012 21:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/housenumbers.html
It would be great if you could find your name on the list and do a quick
sanity check in your head whether this looks right or not.
According to this list, 208 accounts have added more than 10k house
On 30/12/12 21:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It would be great if you could find your name on the list and do a
quick sanity check in your head whether this looks right or not.
The numbers for me look about right.
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
, December 30, 2012 9:53 PM
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] House Numbers
Hi,
I've made a program that counts how many house numbers someone has
added. It uses object history, so it should be able to correctly award
the count to the person actually adding the addr:housenumber tag.
I
I did my own analysis for housenumbers in Belgium, but that only took the
last person who touched the object into account. The numbers look in the
right ballpark for the people I verified.
The real algorithm should be: the last person who added the housenumber the
object has in the latest version.
6137 Looks good for me. I collect a *lot* of addresses simply by walking.
Cheers,
ingalls
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
I've made a program that counts how many house numbers someone has
added. It uses object history, so it should be able
Frederik -
Very cool! My numbers look about right. (probably exactly right. ; ) )
Thanks, Jeff
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:05 PM, nicholas ingalls
nicholas.inga...@gmail.com wrote:
6137 Looks good for me. I collect a *lot* of addresses simply by walking.
Cheers,
ingalls
On Sun, Dec 30,
Frederik Ramm writes:
According to this list, 208 accounts have added more than 10k house
numbers - if any one of them has actually surveyed that many houses they
should be awarded a prize! A further ~ 1400 have done between 1k and 10k
numbers, and ~ 4600 have done between 100 and 1k
Hi Frederik,
Am Sonntag, den 30.12.2012, 22:53 +0100 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
It is quite possible that the program has bugs so if you notice
something strange, do mention it.
o.k. I'm at the bottom of the list:
-680 werner2101
What does the negative number mean?
I've not mapped many
From: Werner Hoch [mailto:werner...@gmx.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] House Numbers
That one looks strange to:
3490 OSMF Redaction Account
I don't think that the redaction bot actively mapped adresses.
I'd expect the redaction bot has mapped zero adresses.
In certain scenarios
Dear all,
house numbers are one of the areas where in OSM a lot of things are still to
do even in well mapped regions. To support mapping efforts, there are two new
tools available
http://overpass-api.de/api/hausnummern
shows the already existing house numbers. This allows to plan the next
Am 08.07.2011 04:59, schrieb Richard Weait:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com
wrote:
i'm currently adding house numbers to some properties in my locality
(and using this to prepare for an import).
the problem is this: some blocks of houses have both a
i'm currently adding house numbers to some properties in my locality
(and using this to prepare for an import).
the problem is this: some blocks of houses have both a street address
and a unit number. so we might have the situation of 12/8 mount eden
road, auckland
which means:
property number
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote:
i'm currently adding house numbers to some properties in my locality
(and using this to prepare for an import).
the problem is this: some blocks of houses have both a street address
and a unit number. so we might
Absolutely, and we will... in fact, I'm working on it right now. I just
thought it was worth making the point that housenumbers are (in my humble
opinion) key to enabling many wider applications of map data.
Cheers
b
i've been putting in some odd numbers
if i am tagging or shop or office
Maybe some words about how the whole house number stuff in Karlsruhe
came about, will help understand, what we had in mind:
We looked at the different proposals and saw that there was a difficult
problem that had gotten stuck. Many ideas, but no progress. But it needed
to be addressed, because
On Jul 29, 2008, at 00:40, Karl Newman wrote:
Don't overestimate the usage of the current data scheme, though. The
Germans are prolific mappers, but I would be surprised if there are
even a few thousand addresses entered in the current format, if that.
According to tagwatch, around 2
Hi,
I once had a look at the Karlsruhe Schema and i found it ugly from a
technical point of view. In my world one wants explicit links between
two objects but the proposal simply draws points or polygons next to
something which is not a explicit link.
That's correct. Many people seem to
On Tue, 2008-07-29 12:02:34 +0200, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tagging house numbers onto intersections or ways is just a lame
workaround employed by many existing data sets because they can't
model every single house. I have absolutely zero doubt that sooner or
later, OSM
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Sent: 29 July 2008 11:33 AM
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion
On Tue, 2008-07-29 12:02:34 +0200, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tagging house numbers onto intersections or ways is just a lame
workaround
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The reason I don't like ideas like this is that the data you are adding to
the way (or as Frederik pointed out possibly also the intersections) is not
actually anything to do with the physical
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
To be clear, I don't have a problem with tagging the actual location of the
house or building. I think it's unnecessary, but the problem I have with the
scheme is that it doesn't definitively link the node with the way (what's a
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
To be clear, I don't have a problem with tagging the actual location of
the
house or building. I think it's unnecessary, but the problem I have with
the
Karl Newman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 29 July 2008 6:17 PM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Cc: Jan-Benedict Glaw; Frederik Ramm; talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Karl Newman wrote:
Sent: 29 July 2008 6:48 PM
To: Jochen Topf
Cc: talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Jochen Topf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
To be clear, I
Jochen Topf schrieb:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
To be clear, I don't have a problem with tagging the actual location of the
house or building. I think it's unnecessary, but the problem I have with the
scheme is that it doesn't definitively link the node with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frederik Ramm wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I really have a problem with this 'way' linking address nodes in the
| Karlsruhe schema. We know that the relation has been created for that.
| This 'way' is just here because some people do not know (or don't want
| to
Juillet 2008 17:48:54 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frederik Ramm wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I really have a problem with this 'way' linking address nodes
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Charlie Echo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
If things are clear, and if there is a consensus about using this Karlsruhe
schema, let's have a vote on it.
This will make things easier: we would then have a clean situation. This
would enable people to enter the data.
With the current scheme how would one numbering blocks of flats?
there is no explicit allowance in the current scheme as far as i can see.
On 7/28/08, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Charlie Echo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
If things are clear, and if there
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 25 July 2008 6:13 PM
To: Charlie Echo
Cc: talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] House numbers... One more suggestion
Hi,
I added one suggestion to the House Numbers page. It's the eighth one.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/House_numbers
I find
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find that very confusing.
I'm using the Karlsruhe Schema
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/House_numbers
Ok, I've looked at this and I'm missing the case where a building has
a number of street
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using the Karlsruhe Schema
These interpolation rules are explicitly modeled as a new way connecting
the
nodes, which may look a but unusual at first but (a) it's going to go
away once editors learn how to dim these
Hi,
I really have a problem with this 'way' linking address nodes in the
Karlsruhe schema. We know that the relation has been created for that.
This 'way' is just here because some people do not know (or don't want
to know) how to use relations in the editors.
Then use a relation
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jonathan Bennett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
A completely different (and quite OSM-like!) option is dropping all this
complex logic, left-right-blah tagging, number schemes, relations and
all, and just put simple nodes: This is B street
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Martijn van Exel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pitfalls include:
* what if way direction is reversed?
* what if way is extended, merged, split?
That will be a problem indeed. Could theoretically be solved with
strong editor support, but that does not
Hi,
* what if way direction is reversed?
* what if way is extended, merged, split?
That will be a problem indeed. Could theoretically be solved with
strong editor support, but that does not fix the intrinsic flaw. You
never know when a script comes around that reverses direction for
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jonathan Bennett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
A completely different (and quite OSM-like!) option is dropping all this
complex logic, left-right-blah
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
* what if way direction is reversed?
* what if way is extended, merged, split?
That will be a problem indeed. Could theoretically be solved with
strong editor support, but that does not fix the intrinsic
Hi,
As you can see, I employ four tags to indicate house number ranges:
* houseno:left-min
* houseno:left-max
* houseno:left-scheme
* houseno:right-min
* houseno:right-max
* houseno:right-scheme
Left and right are relative to the direction if the way.
Min is the first house number on
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A completely different (and quite OSM-like!) option is dropping all this
complex logic, left-right-blah tagging, number schemes, relations and
all, and just put simple nodes: This is B street number 25. This
brings
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 17 April 2008 1:00 PM
To: Martijn van Exel
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] house numbers revisited
Hi,
As you can see, I employ four tags to indicate house number ranges:
* houseno:left-min
* houseno:left-max
* houseno:left-scheme
* houseno:right
Op 17 apr 2008, om 14:00 heeft Frederik Ramm het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
As you can see, I employ four tags to indicate house number ranges:
* houseno:left-min
* houseno:left-max
* houseno:left-scheme
* houseno:right-min
* houseno:right-max
* houseno:right-scheme
Left and right are
60 matches
Mail list logo
