On 06.06.2009 15:14, Christoph Böhme wrote:
in Germany a living_street is a designated type of street with a
special sign [1]. So, I would only use living_street for this type of
streets.
Living streets are actully _zones_, so any alley at a living street is
itself a living street.
Jens Müller wrote:
On 06.06.2009 15:14, Christoph Böhme wrote:
in Germany a living_street is a designated type of street with a
special sign [1]. So, I would only use living_street for this type of
streets.
Living streets are actully _zones_, so any alley at a living street is
itself a
On Sunday 07 June 2009 23:11:16 Paul Johnson wrote:
Jens Müller wrote:
Living streets are actully _zones_,
Oh, then it should be tagged area=yes. Surely this isn't what you
meant, though.
area=yes is for things that are physically an area.
A zone in (European?) traffic law is not an area,
Hi,
the wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
suggests that 'living_street' objects should be attributed with a 'name'
tag. Meanwhile it is not uncommon for residential areas to have unnamed
alleys inside, and the latter may form a complicated network that
2009/6/6 USHAKOV, Sergey usha...@int.com.ru:
the wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
suggests that 'living_street' objects should be attributed with a 'name'
tag. Meanwhile it is not uncommon for residential areas to have unnamed
alleys inside, and the
Hi Sergey,
in Germany a living_street is a designated type of street with a
special sign [1]. So, I would only use living_street for this type of
streets. I usually tag alleys either as service or if they are in a
very bad condition as track.
Perhaps it would make sense to introduce
Perhaps it would make sense to introduce highway=alley?
+1
Just start using highway=alley, there have been enough questions to
think it is required.
In this part of the UK they are known as a ten-foot, but alley would be
a fine.
Cheers, Chris
Am 6. Juni 2009 15:43 schrieb Chris Hill chillly...@yahoo.co.uk:
Perhaps it would make sense to introduce highway=alley?
+1
Just start using highway=alley, there have been enough questions to
think it is required.
Probably you might also have a look at highway=service service_type=alley
...@int.com.ru
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Is 'name' tag mandatory for a 'living_street'?
2009/6/6 USHAKOV, Sergey usha...@int.com.ru:
the wiki page
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
suggests that 'living_street
USHAKOV, Sergey wrote:
Hi,
the wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
suggests that 'living_street' objects should be attributed with a 'name'
tag. Meanwhile it is not uncommon for residential areas to have unnamed
alleys inside, and the latter may form
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 6. Juni 2009 15:43 schrieb Chris Hill chillly...@yahoo.co.uk:
Perhaps it would make sense to introduce highway=alley?
+1
Just start using highway=alley, there have been enough questions to
think it is required.
Probably you might also have a look at
2009/6/7 Sebastian Hohmann m...@s-hohmann.de:
I think you mean service=alley [1].
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service
yes, sorry for the wrong quote, using always presets for those ;-)
Martin
___
talk mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
