Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
Basically, you'll have to enter a brief description for every bunch
of edits (just as you have to do when you update a wikipedia page)
that you upload.
Strictly have the option of entering, not have to enter. Comments are
optional.
cheers
Richard
--
View this
John McKerrell wrote:
Ah yes, you did mention that the other day. Surely it would only make
the noise when you tried to unload the page though which wouldn't be
so bad?
Well, the way it works at the moment (in sane browsers) is that Potlatch
sends a message via JS every time the dirty
I wrote (with apologies for replying to myself):
I don't think I've customised my sound scheme on my work
notebook (XP Pro) or home machine (Vista) and checking there
the current sound scheme settings have no sound associated with
Begin Navigation or End Navigation so perhaps the defaults
On Wed, December 17, 2008 03:22, maning sambale wrote:
Is OSM Mapper ready for 0.6?
May I request the coders (I'm a mapper not a coder ;). To give us an
overview of what will the API 0.6 will be all about?
Basically, you'll have to enter a brief description for every bunch of
edits (just as
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
IIRC, you could catch the onunload event of the browser window
via javascript and tell potlach. Yes, I know this should go to the
-dev mailing list (and that patches are welcome, etc).
:) I posted about this the other day:
Iván Sánchez Ortega-3 wrote:
AFAIK, the 0.6 API requires a comment when opening a changeset (I might be
wrong on this
You are. :)
The wiki doc just says advised. There is no explicit reference to
comment, or any other tag, within the changeset model or controller.
If you think through how an
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:22 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Is OSM Mapper ready for 0.6?
Err what I mean here is the person (a mapper) not ITO's service
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of
7 matches
Mail list logo
