On 16 April 2010 19:55, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2010 20:29:41 Upliner wrote:
Current situation is real edit war. I consider some interference is needed.
Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
side gets bored with it.
I've
Frederik,
there are NO bots, it's just Upliner fantasy. But there were some people on
the complaining side who were discussing creation of bots for osm wiki :)
But they decided not to do it and to accuse others of doing that - talking
is always easy, doing - hard.
Please do not pay any attention
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com:
Please do not pay any attention to this stuff - small kids always prefer to
complain to the grownups, than to try to solve problems.
K.
Kirill, are you sure that creating a bot will really solve the
problem? If that, I can do it.
--
Best
Edit war with bots is not a way of solving problems... If you do not
understand that - then my words about small kids were more than right...
That's very sad...
K.
2010/4/17 Upliner upli...@gmail.com
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com:
Please do not pay any attention to this
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com:
Edit war with bots is not a way of solving problems... If you do not
understand that - then my words about small kids were more than right...
That's very sad...
I don't think that edit war will solve the problem. I just don't
understand what
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com:
Frederik gave a great advice - if you say that wiki is not a law, just
recommendations, then do not take it seriously, let those who want write
what they want.
Complaining is silly - there is no law, so there can be no punishment.
Hey, wait!
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Upliner wrote:
2010/4/17 Kirill Bestoujev bestou...@gmail.com:
Frederik gave a great advice - if you say that wiki is not a law, just
recommendations, then do not take it seriously, let those who want write
what they want.
Complaining is silly - there is no law, so
2010/4/17 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
We have started to discuss different solutions, but we haven't really had much
feedback from the PocketGis people on which solutions are more suitable.
I thought that Kirill and Eugene is already made the position of
PocketGis community clear. If it is
2010/4/15 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
Of cause what is missing here is that since this 'vote' was only in Russian
then
the vast majority of us would not even be able to vote anyway. There should
perhaps be a rule about needing all votes to carry an English translation,
since
the
On Friday 16 April 2010 20:29:41 Upliner wrote:
Current situation is real edit war. I consider some interference is needed.
Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
side gets bored with it.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
side gets bored with it.
Surely this needs to be improved. Perhaps learn from Wikipedia and
appoint Wiki moderators.
Our wiki plays a very important
Hi,
Nic Roets wrote:
Our wiki plays a very important role in ensuring convergence of
tagging standard, esp. homonyms, abstract concepts and those tags that
are misnomers. In fact, it can be argued that some community members
have become de facto moderators on the basis of the bots they
2010/4/16 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl
On Friday 16 April 2010 20:29:41 Upliner wrote:
Current situation is real edit war. I consider some interference is needed.
Sorry, experience has learned that edit wars on the wiki only end when one
side gets bored with it.
There are some hackers on
Kirill Bestoujev wrote:
2010/4/15 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk
Of cause what is missing here is that since this 'vote' was only in
Russian then
the vast majority of us would not even be able to vote anyway. There
should
perhaps be a rule
Good day.
You should know about flame war about military objects and government
secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
results may be considered as and only as recommendation, but not as
invariable law.
At 2010-04-13 user Zkir
Alex,
Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
Since that user Vctos http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Vctos
removed this warning 3 times with comment: I deleted text about
applicability of voting results that added after RFC (translation).
I recommend to ignore it. If you insist that the Wiki site
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alexandr Zeinalov shu...@sbin.ru wrote:
Good day.
You should know about flame war about military objects and government
secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
results may be considered as and only as recommendation, but not as
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alexandr Zeinalov shu...@sbin.ru wrote:
Good day.
You should know about flame war about military objects and government
secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
results may be considered as and only as recommendation, but not as
Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alexandr Zeinalovshu...@sbin.ru wrote:
Good day.
You should know about flame war about military objects and government
secrets in Russian OSM community. And you should know that any voting
results may be considered as and only as
19 matches
Mail list logo
