disagree?
Andre
On 3:59 AM, maning sambale wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Collinsonm...@ayeltd.biz
Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:39 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
To: OSM talkt...@openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap
Subject: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
To: OSM talkt...@openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins this Sunday. A full
announcement has gone to the Announce list and there is full
information at the Find out more about OpenStreetMap's upcoming
Hi,
(Thread moved over from talk)
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many imports listed
as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this category, too (rather than
in category 3 as CC-BY).
To be clear, my category 3 was meant for
On 15 April 2011 19:35, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many imports listed
as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this category, too (rather
than
in category 3 as CC-BY).
I haven't seen this list so cannot comment.
[snip]
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 09:16 PM, Francis Davey wrote:
In addition, it is imho not clear that not some of the many
imports listed as Attribution licensed wouldn't fall into this
category, too (rather than in category 3 as CC-BY).
I haven't seen this list so cannot comment.
Sorry for that. I had
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:08 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
So my understanding now, from Francis' comment, is that CC-By-SA and
CC-By are not compatible (you can't accept the CTs if you've
contributed data obtained under those licenses, without infringing
those licenses?),
On 15 April 2011 00:38, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
If data is tainted in a way that makes in incompatible with the currently
used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the project
at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is independent of
the
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Hi,
David Murn wrote
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:49:20 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Eric Marsden wrote:
It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read
on the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision,
or whether one would still be able later to accept
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 10:13 AM, David Groom wrote:
There's also a third kind of tainted that sits in the middle of these
two, namely data that has e.g. been released CC-BY. Such data looks
compatible at first, but closer inspection (see current discussion on
legal-talk) reveals that CC-BY
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 10:13 AM, David Groom wrote:
There's also a third kind
Johnwhelan is the account name. Unfortunately I have made a fair number of
edits. The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new
standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't. I'm happy to reenter
data following the new guidelines. I'm not happy to have some one
On 15 April 2011 13:28, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Johnwhelan is the account name. Unfortunately I have made a fair number of
edits. The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new
standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't. I'm happy to reenter
Frederik Ramm wrote:
It would be very hard to construct something of that kind. The most
common thing is certainly going to be the above third case, where you
have the right to distribute data under CC-BY-SA or maybe even ODbL or
maybe you even have the right to distribute it under any
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:36:34 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
Frederick, it has occurred to me that if you
What worries me here is that there are all these versions of the document,
the licenses etc. How are you going to deal with different people agreeing
to different contracts at different times?
mike
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:08 AM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote:
On 14 April 2011
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 20:36 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
We dont care if you answered on a podcast sent to the moon. The
question was asked
2011/4/16 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 20:36 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have answered on legal-talk.
that disagree and believe the issue is of great enough importance to not
be hidden away.
it is not hidden away, and you don't even have to be subscribed to
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
Date: Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:39 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
To: OSM talk t...@openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins this Sunday. A full
OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins this Sunday. A full
announcement has gone to the Announce list and there is full information
at the Find out more about OpenStreetMap's upcoming license change
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License
link on
mc == Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz writes:
mc In summary: This only affects you if you are an OpenStreetMap
mc contributor who registered before 12th May 2010 and have not taken
mc part in our voluntary re-licensing program. Before being able to
mc edit, you will have accept or
Hi,
Eric Marsden wrote:
It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read on
the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision, or
whether one would still be able later to accept the licence + CT.
Decline is reversible. Accept isn't. Once we've got you, we'll
Unfortunately I some of my edits used some sources that looked fine under
the for CC-by-SA terms but on closer inspection of the ODBL terms, which was
done after I blindly followed the advice of another contributor, I am not at
all comfortable that the work would stand up legally for CC-by-ODBL
On 14 April 2011 17:26, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately I some of my edits used some sources that looked fine under
the for CC-by-SA terms but on closer inspection of the ODBL terms, which was
done after I blindly followed the advice of another contributor, I am not at
On 14 April 2011 18:26, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately I some of my edits used some sources that looked fine under
the for CC-by-SA terms but on closer inspection of the ODBL terms, which was
done after I blindly followed the advice of another contributor, I am not at
- Original Message -
From: andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
To: john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com
Cc: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
On 14
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 16:49 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Eric Marsden wrote:
It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read on
the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision, or
whether one would still be able later to accept the licence + CT.
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
What about if you become aware that once youve got someone, who has
agreed and who has contributed tainted data? Will you (or someone else
wielding the magical OSMF+3 wand) reverse it?
If data is tainted in a way that makes in incompatible with the
currently used
If data is tainted in a way that makes in incompatible with the currently
used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the project
at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is independent of
the license change.
I assume that the currently used license means to
On 15 April 2011 00:49, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Eric Marsden wrote:
It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read on
the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision, or
whether one would still be able later to accept the licence +
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 01:08 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
What about if you become aware that once youve got someone, who has
agreed and who has contributed tainted data? Will you (or someone else
wielding the magical OSMF+3 wand) reverse it?
If data is tainted in
On 15 April 2011 12:51, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
This was a question in regards to whether you will reverse the selection
of someone accepting the new licence/terms, if you (or they) become
aware the data is tainted.
Wouldn't breach of clause 1 break the entire contract ?
On 14 April 2011 21:06, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
- Original Message - From: andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
Under the Contributor Terms 1.2.4 I believe it will be the
OpenStreetMap Foundation's responsibility to remove such data before
switching the license, you
東です。
フェーズ３への移行は4/17(日)だそうです。
(日付はおそらくUSTベース)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:39:16 +0200
Subject: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
To: OSM talk t...@openstreetmap.org
OpenStreetMap License
35 matches
Mail list logo
