Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-28 Thread Warin
On 28/2/23 02:09, Dave F via talk wrote: On 25/02/2023 21:44, Andy Mabbett wrote: shop = watch → shop = watches This could plausibly mean watch as in "monitor" - in other words "please watch for developments". No it can't. Well, it should not in OSM terms.

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-28 Thread Warin
On 27/2/23 20:30, Philip Barnes wrote: On 26 February 2023 09:09:53 GMT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: shop=map -> shop=maps or maybe it would be better to change in opposite direction? it is not too late as it is a rarely used tag There are few shops selling maps these days ..

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-27 Thread Dave F via talk
On 25/02/2023 21:44, Andy Mabbett wrote: shop = watch → shop = watches This could plausibly mean watch as in "monitor" - in other words "please watch for developments". No it can't. DaveF___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-27 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Feb 27, 2023, 08:19 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > > > > On 26/2/23 20:59, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > >> >> >> >> Feb 26, 2023, 10:20 by >> 61sundow...@gmail.com>> : >> >>> >>> On 26/2/23 06:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: >>> shop = opał → shop = fuel >>> >>> >>>

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-27 Thread Philip Barnes
On 26 February 2023 09:09:53 GMT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> shop=map -> shop=maps >> or maybe it would be better to change in opposite direction? >> it is not too late as it is a rarely used tag >There are few shops selling maps these days .. unfortunately. > Specialist

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-26 Thread Warin
On 26/2/23 20:59, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: Feb 26, 2023, 10:20 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: On 26/2/23 06:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: shop = opał → shop = fuel Opal is also a gemstone, Australia being a leading source. It is also a fuel in Australia

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Feb 2023, at 10:19, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Opal is also a gemstone, Australia being a leading source. It is also a fuel > in Australia ... but that would not be sold in shops but petrol stations. in Germany OPAL is the name of a fibre optic

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Feb 26, 2023, 10:20 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > > On 26/2/23 06:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > >> shop = opał → shop = fuel >> > > > Opal is also a gemstone, Australia being a leading source. It is also a fuel > in Australia ... but that would not be sold in shops but petrol

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-26 Thread Warin
On 26/2/23 06:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: I proposed some time ago to replace some surface values. The initial script run was recently done, after waiting for a potential feedback. Edit is documented at

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Feb 25, 2023, 22:50 by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 at 19:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > >> shop = Bag_shop → shop = bag >> > > Is this a shop that sells bags, or "things by the bagfull"? > >> shop = watch → shop = watches >> > > This could plausibly mean watch

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-26 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Feb 25, 2023, 23:11 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > Am Sa., 25. Feb. 2023 um 22:07 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk <> > talk@openstreetmap.org> >: > >> >> >> So shop = laundromat → shop = laundry + self_service=yes would be needed? >> > > > > it could be seen as equivalent, personally

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Feb 25, 2023, 22:00 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via talk >> wrote: >> >> There is no point in manual drudgery here, with values clearly >> replaceable by better matches. >> >> This values here do NOT require manual

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Sa., 25. Feb. 2023 um 22:07 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org>: > > So shop = laundromat → shop = laundry + self_service=yes would be needed? > it could be seen as equivalent, personally I would see a case for different main tags because these are quite

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 at 19:08, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > Please comment if any of proposed replacements are dubious in any way and > proposed migration of shop=* values: These, and the durface= values, are motsly good changes; thank you. But consider: > shop = laundromat → shop =

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > > There is no point in manual drudgery here, with values clearly > replaceable by better matches. > > This values here do NOT require manual overview. If this cases will > turn out to be an useful signal of

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Feb 25, 2023, 21:14 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via talk >> wrote: >> >> shop = laundromat → shop = laundry >> > > > I think the laundromat is about a diy place while shop=laundry can also be a > service where you drop

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Note: I want to mention for context that this was preceded with > If you reached here: I have some question about shop values that > I am NOT proposing to edit right now. Feb 25, 2023, 21:27 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > > >> On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > > shop=eggs -> shop=food food=eggs > maybe such migration would be a good idea? > having top value for every single shop type specializing in a given food > seems hopeless - we would need shop=pumpkin,

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > > shop = laundromat → shop = laundry I think the laundromat is about a diy place while shop=laundry can also be a service where you drop off your laundry and they’ll take care of everything. Wiki suggests

[OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

2023-02-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
I proposed some time ago to replace some surface values. The initial script run was recently done, after waiting for a potential feedback. Edit is documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_surface_tags I propose to expand