On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:34 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 6 March 2010 01:24, Bernhard zwischenbruggerb...@datenkueche.com wrote:
Google Cache Time:
Cache-Control: public, max-age22 //feels like one month (I
didn't calculate)
I'd say it's a
Hi
That was a long mail.
How about some lines in apache setup?
virtualhost name=supercache.osm.org
cache: 1 year
rest: same as www.osm.org
/virualhost
For me I solved the tile cache problem I had here in Phnom Penh.
I have a super fast proxy.
The actual problem:
I made a javascript map
On 6 March 2010 17:52, Bernhard zwischenbrugger b...@datenkueche.com wrote:
In browser the load time is even worse.
What you really need is your own tile server, or a specalised proxy
that serves up what ever tiles it has cached and checks in idle time
if requested tiles have changed.
Forcing
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:34 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 6 March 2010 01:24, Bernhard zwischenbrugger b...@datenkueche.com wrote:
Google Cache Time:
Cache-Control: public, max-age= //feels like one month (I
didn't calculate)
I'd say it's a bad idea to specify a cache time, instead there
Hi Bernhard, all,
Very interesting proposal.
I think people in a position to do so should give attentive
consideration to your situation, facing Internet infrastructure
limitations in a developing country. (Beside your personal situation and
dedication which would certainly deserve a
On 6 March 2010 01:24, Bernhard zwischenbrugger b...@datenkueche.com wrote:
Google Cache Time:
Cache-Control: public, max-age= //feels like one month (I
didn't calculate)
I'd say it's a bad idea to specify a cache time, instead there is
other caching mechanisms to tell if a tile has
John Smith schrieb:
On 6 March 2010 01:24, Bernhard zwischenbrugger b...@datenkueche.com wrote:
Google Cache Time:
Cache-Control: public, max-age= //feels like one month (I
didn't calculate)
I'd say it's a bad idea to specify a cache time, instead there is
other caching
7 matches
Mail list logo
