As I promised in February I investigated with our North American counsel
what they would consider acceptable use of terms similar to the GEOCODE
trademark, they came back with examples that they all considered OK.
I've created a wiki page for future reference
On 2013-05-23 14:38, Simon Poole wrote:
As I promised in February I investigated with our North American
counsel what they would consider acceptable use of terms similar to
the GEOCODE trademark, they came back with examples that they all
considered OK. I've created a wiki page for future
Maarten, there is no need to start the discussion at square one again.
We did what our counsel recommended in February as reported then (so you
can safely assume that counsel saw a certain potential for trouble in
such usage). The list they provided is simply to illustrate usage that
is
On 2013-05-23 15:10, Simon Poole wrote:
Maarten, there is no need to start the discussion at square one again.
We did what our counsel recommended in February as reported then (so
you
can safely assume that counsel saw a certain potential for trouble in
such usage). The list they provided is
Am 23.05.2013 15:35, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2013-05-23 15:10, Simon Poole wrote:
Maarten, there is no need to start the discussion at square one again.
We did what our counsel recommended in February as reported then (so you
can safely assume that counsel saw a certain potential for trouble
Simon,
Thank you. IMO a good example of descriptive usage is also:
OpenRouteService including POI search, geocoding and reverse geocoding,
pedestrian, bicycle and car routing etc.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/University_of_Heidelberg_GIScience_(Geoinformatics)_Research_Group
On 2013-05-23 16:00, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 23.05.2013 15:35, schrieb Maarten Deen:
On 2013-05-23 15:10, Simon Poole wrote:
Maarten, there is no need to start the discussion at square one
again.
We did what our counsel recommended in February as reported then (so
you
can safely assume that
7 matches
Mail list logo
