Hi,
> Ok, so it is basically (ab)using the only locationless entity available
> in OSM model to store some data, which _may_ be referenced by other
> relations. It is still not clear to me how could one reference it
> without having it retrieved in some bbox.
You could retrieve it by id, by a
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> While analyzing current uses of relations (relations-latest.osm) it came
>> to my attention that relations with no members can exist in the DB while
>> they probably have no meaning in the real world.
>
> That's a leftover of the time when relations were planned to
Hi,
> While analyzing current uses of relations (relations-latest.osm) it
> came
> to my attention that relations with no members can exist in the DB
> while
> they probably have no meaning in the real world.
That's a leftover of the time when relations were planned to be
generic "entities"
Hi!
While analyzing current uses of relations (relations-latest.osm) it came
to my attention that relations with no members can exist in the DB while
they probably have no meaning in the real world. What's more, current
editors never show such relations because they can't be related to the
are
4 matches
Mail list logo
