Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

If anyone has opinion either way (this edit should be done/this edit should not be done) that is a good moment to express them - before I will make it. Mar 14, 2023, 20:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org: > There is noticeable (but not very high) number of surface=granite / > surface=marble and other

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

Am Mi., 15. März 2023 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org>: > > > > Mar 15, 2023, 10:21 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > I'd prefer "surface:material" compared to "material", it is in modest use > (800) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surface%3Amaterial >

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

Mar 15, 2023, 10:21 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > I'd prefer "surface:material" compared to "material", it is in modest use > (800) > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surface%3Amaterial > because the "highway" represents not just the surface. > material represents primary material of

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

Le 15.03.23 à 10:21, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : I'd prefer "surface:material" compared to "material", it is in modest use (800) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surface%3Amaterial because the "highway" represents not just the

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

I'd prefer "surface:material" compared to "material", it is in modest use (800) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surface%3Amaterial because the "highway" represents not just the surface. Generally, maybe another subtagging step like "surface:material=stone" "stone=granite" could make sense?

[OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

There is noticeable (but not very high) number of surface=granite / surface=marble and other similar tagging type of stone into surface tag. --- There was some discussion on