Subtle vandalism will always be the hardest to spot. If it is
imagined that it might become a problem, then perhaps uploading a
change to anything which already existed could notify the last 1 or
2 people that amended that feature, as they are the most likely to
know what is correct or be in
I now use itoworld to give me a RSS feed for sessions of updates in my
area (or indeed any defined area)
Tristan
2008/10/14 Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subtle vandalism will always be the hardest to spot. If it is
imagined that it might become a problem, then perhaps uploading a
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:34:11PM +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
A completely different community project Discogs has following policy:
- You can subscribe to news in area of your interest.
- Voting on new data: Tell, how correct and accurate are these changes
are.
...
- Data with more
Matthias Julius wrote:
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subtle vandalism will always be the hardest to spot. If it is
imagined that it might become a problem, then perhaps uploading a
change to anything which already existed could notify the last 1 or
2 people that amended that
- Vote is a privilege, new users don't have vote privilege.
-1, sorry.
cheers,
maning
--
|-|--|
| __.-._ |Ohhh. Great warrior. Wars not make one great. -Yoda |
| '-._7' |Freedom is still the most radical idea of all
Stanislav Brabec wrote:
A completely different community project Discogs has following policy:
- You can subscribe to news in area of your interest.
- Voting on new data: Tell, how correct and accurate are these changes
are.
- Vote is a privilege, new users don't have vote privilege.
PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 October 2008 12:53
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Barnett, Phillip; Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] vandalism on OSM
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Using OSM Mapper it is already possible to identify who is changing data
within
Stefan Monnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subtle vandalism will always be the hardest to spot. If it is
imagined that it might become a problem, then perhaps uploading a
change to anything which already existed could notify the last 1 or
2 people that amended that feature, as they are the most
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A good diff tool or better a diff API call would be helpful as well.
With that you could periodically look over the changes in your area.
The first step will be a proper way back machine. But it hasn't been
discussed
Nic Roets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A good diff tool or better a diff API call would be helpful as well.
With that you could periodically look over the changes in your area.
The first step will be a proper way back
Using OSM Mapper it is already possible to identify who is changing data
within an defined area. I use this to monitor for changes in areas I care
about using RSS setting up an RSS feed to check for all changes made by
people other than me in the area.
We developed the functionally in the
Jeffrey wrote:
Well, none of the schemes proposed so far actually deal with
the case of subtle vandalism.
Subtle vandalism will always be the hardest to spot. If it is
imagined that it might become a problem, then perhaps uploading a
change to anything which already existed could notify the
12 matches
Mail list logo
