On 14/01/2008, Brent Easton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chill out guys,
I'm merely pointing out an interesting anomaly with the current voting
scheme. I don't particularly care if you change it or not. I am not having a
go at you Robin, who are doing a terrific job.
not at all, i didn't
Robin Paulson wrote:
Sent: 14 January 2008 2:41 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] voting closed - swimming_pool
this proposal has been rejected, with 11 yes votes and 3 no votes
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Swimming_pool
it has been moved
Brent Easton wrote:
Interesting.
If there are votes both for and against, then it requires 14 Yes votes to
get something through, but only 1 No vote to can it.
In fact, the No voters are more likely to prevent a proposal by NOT voting
against a proposal once the first No vote is
Brent Easton wrote:
Interesting.
If there are votes both for and against, then it requires 14 Yes
votes to get something through, but only 1 No vote to can it.
In fact, the No voters are more likely to prevent a proposal by
NOT voting against a proposal once the first No vote is
Ian Sergeant wrote:
This is pretty much what Brent said. The proposal only needs one more No
vote to succeed. Is there anyone out there who doesn't like the proposal,
who can disapprove quickly? We can then move it to Map Features.
Ian.
No, Brent said ...it requires 14 Yes votes to get
On 14/01/2008, Brent Easton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are votes both for and against, then it requires 14 Yes votes to
get something through, but only 1 No vote to can it.
In fact, the No voters are more likely to prevent a proposal by NOT voting
against a proposal once the first
Chill out guys,
I'm merely pointing out an interesting anomaly with the current voting scheme.
I don't particularly care if you change it or not. I am not having a go at you
Robin, who are doing a terrific job.
Cheers,
Brent.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 14/01/2008 at 7:54 PM
7 matches
Mail list logo
