Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread Vincent Pottier
Le 28/05/2010 16:00, Vincent Pottier wrote : ... I beg your pardon. The link : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Definition -- FrViPofm ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread Pieren
I think you should rename your proposal as 'defaults' instead of 'definition' (type=defaults). And the prefix def: is not really necessary in your def:key=value tags. Pieren ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread John Smith
I wouldn't use the '' symbol as it might be a value, not sure what to use instead. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [proposal] Default values in a relation definition

2010-05-28 Thread Roy Wallace
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote: I think you should rename your proposal as 'defaults' instead of 'definition' (type=defaults). Agreed. And the prefix def: is not really necessary in your def:key=value tags. Perhaps not, but it does help to make it clear