Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 04/12/2009, at 06.49, Steve Bennett wrote:
This discussion is reminiscent of other discussions just like it.
Indeed it now reminds me of the mapping everything as areas thread
that I recently started.
There are two orthogonal approaches to mapping in the OSM.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
I'm sure that the whole project would benefit if arguments could be
articulated in a demonstration that would convince the wondering newbies
such as me. There is surely not a single best way, but the need for a
correct
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
I'm new too, and would also appreciate insight. My take in the brief period
of time that I've been doing this is that the connected graph is the first
priority, and everything else is eye candy. A correctly mapped out, but
disconnected, pedestrian
3 matches
Mail list logo
