On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
Greg Troxel wrote:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of th=
e
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we=
all
think of that as
Greg Troxel wrote:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
highway=unclassified for now (and throw a fixme= tag explaining the
2009/5/29 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
Greg Troxel wrote:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
2009/5/29 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
residential doesn't imply sidewalks in my area
So is
Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might
be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted.
(But for routing purposes it's just the same.)
I suppose it is, except that really it's highway=motorcycle.
My real point was that the whole 'highway'
2009/5/29 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
Isn't that highway=pedestrian exactly? As for cars I think it might
be a physical impossibility rather than permitted / not permitted.
(But for routing purposes it's just the same.)
well, IMHO it's not, as pedestrian are streets not generally allowed
I'd have said a pedestrian street was one which (often through conversion)
is now primarily for access on foot, and pretty much unsegregated (ie no
kerbs, and not much paving differentiation). Access varies (can be bicycles,
motorcycles or even some cars - eg Lucca in Italy). It doesn't only apply
- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
Greg Troxel wrote:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of th=
e
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we=
all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
highway=3Dunclassified for now (and
Am 26.05.2009 12:29, Ben Laenen:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm
will be the same than a normal residential street
No, I guess, it will have a red dashed
Ben Laenen wrote:
It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway says about highway=service:
Generally for access to a building, motorway service station, beach,
campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc.. This is also
On Thursday 28 May 2009, you wrote:
Ben Laenen wrote:
It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service
here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway says about
highway=service: Generally for access to a building, motorway
service station, beach, campsite, industrial
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
So is there any objection to highway=pedestrian+bicycle=yes+motorcycle=yes?
Richard
On Thu, May 28,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
so highway=service has no meaning about public accessability. this is
done using the access tag.
highway=service just means this is a road that is not as wide as a
highway=residential.
No, the definition does not
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
residential doesn't imply sidewalks in my area
So is there any objection to
2009/5/28 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
residential don't have to have
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Paul Johnson wrote:
Ben Laenen wrote:
It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service
here.
Alleyways are clearly public roads, and those are highway=service
service=alley...
But I think there's a big difference in alleys that should be tagged
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia capisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
differentiate this allewys in the rendered map?
Best Regards.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Ivan Garcia
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm
will be the same than a normal residential street
No, I guess, it will have a red dashed transparent line drawn over
And I guess it should be rather highway=service than
highway=residental. That changes rendering a bit too (it is narrower
in Mapnik IIRC).
What was that again with the don't tag for the renderer meme? :-)
It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service here.
The
2009/5/26 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi, could you tell me by looking at this picture [1] how to tag this in
OSM ?
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8Y0T3EnBVPw/SJcJ13KnOII/BCg/ot4X2My6CvA/s400/vietnam%2Balley.jpg
It's an alley where only people/motorbikes can go.
2009/5/26 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
I normally use highway=pedestrian for this kind of streets in city
centres (especially mediterranean), here I'd add motorcycle=yes but
definitely wouldn't use access=no.
I would use highway=footway, as pedestrian I see for ways that are
broad
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia capisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
differentiate this allewys in the rendered map?
This looks like a:
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm
will be the same than a normal residential street
No, I guess, it will have a red dashed transparent
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
It's clearly a public road so you shouldn't use highway=service here.
Alleyways are clearly public roads, and those are highway=service
service=alley...
Why you don't create a highway=alley and just keep highway=service
2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia capisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use to
differentiate this
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia capisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use
Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi, could you tell me by looking at this picture [1] how to tag this in
OSM ?
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8Y0T3EnBVPw/SJcJ13KnOII/BCg/ot4X2My6CvA/s400/vietnam%2Balley.jpg
It's an alley where only people/motorbikes can go.
access=no
foot=yes
bicycle=yes (I assume
28 matches
Mail list logo
