--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
But the point I was trying to make was more that of 'We get
stopped and told
we have to ask permission' while Goggle stick two fingers
up and just carry on
regardless. It is about time there was a level playing
field, and just
John Smith wrote:
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
But the point I was trying to make was more that of 'We get
stopped and told
we have to ask permission' while Goggle stick two fingers
up and just carry on
regardless. It is about time there was a level playing
Hi!
to make my question more precise, please have a look at this tunnel that
crosses a railway track (the railway is a subway that runs at ground level):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=48.1325961lon=16.3109488zoom=19way=29205957
The tunnel tag implies layer=-1 and that leads to a
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
more inclusive than is necessary. So from my perspective
they ARE
intentionally going out of their way to invade privacy by
showing views that
are simply not normally visible? If we want to see what is
over a wall we can
now
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Harald Kleinere9625...@gmx.at wrote:
Do you think, this tunnel is OK the way it is or should someone add a
small piece of way on layer 0 at the eastern end next to the T-junction
to avoid a T-junction of different layers?
What is the situation at that
Frederik Ramm schreef:
Hi
Marc Coevoet wrote:
004E4800,47N2000
002W2300,57N
001W0547,51N4823
013E2600,47N3400
013E2600,47N3400
013E2600,47N3400
013E2600,47N3400
013E2500,47N3343
to something where 001W0547 becomes -1.0547
That can actually be done with sed on the Unix command
add a mode tag to see what the [[OSM Server Side Script]] is returning
for each one:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=-33.87lon=151.21mode=raw
in this case, the only state information seems to be in the Is_In
tag on the city boundary
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:23 AM, John
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
add a mode tag to see what the [[OSM
Server Side Script]] is returning
for each one:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=-33.87lon=151.21mode=raw
in this case, the only state information seems to be in the
Is_In
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:16 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I also checked the Australian state borders and they are marked as
admin_level=4;10 which may interfere with things if the script was only
looking for a single number, however the boundary is used for local and state.
OJ W wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:16 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I also checked the Australian state borders and they are marked as
admin_level=4;10 which may interfere with things if the script was only
looking for a single number, however the boundary is used for local
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Two boundary relations is also the way to map the
Australian example.
I actually merged boundaries because there was 2 slightly wrong ones and I made
one correct one from them both.
Using a relation for the state boundary
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Harald Kleinere9625...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi!
to make my question more precise, please have a look at this tunnel that
crosses a railway track (the railway is a subway that runs at ground level):
El día Thursday 30 July 2009 13:31:25, Maarten Deen dijo:
I have never seen a different sign for mopeds, HGV's or vehicles with a
caravan, it is always the maximum for all vehicles.
http://www.joseramonmartinez.com/2005/11/25/senales-para-tanques/
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Cartinuscarti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
For three reasons:
1) In the part of my e-mail you did not quote I just pointed out lots of
people don't read those definitions. The difference between
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:59:27 +0200, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Cartinuscarti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
For three reasons:
1) In the part of my e-mail you did not quote I just pointed out
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
No, you can only ASSUME that the current maxheight only use
the legal form.
Have you counted usages in countries where the physical
maxheight are
signed? Do you even know which countries such signs are
available?
to make my question more precise, please have a look at this tunnel that
crosses a railway track (the railway is a subway that runs at ground
level):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=48.1325961lon=16.3109488zoom=19way=29205957
The tunnel tag implies layer=-1
No, it doesn't.
and
Wrong, osm2pgsql does process relations properly. If they aren't then
Jon Burgess is happy to take a look to see if he can fix the problem
with osm2pgsql. Second there has been no planet reload for a few weeks
now.
There's definitely something wrong here:
2009/7/31 Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net:
Wrong, osm2pgsql does process relations properly. If they aren't then
Jon Burgess is happy to take a look to see if he can fix the problem
with osm2pgsql. Second there has been no planet reload for a few weeks
now.
There's definitely something wrong
John Smith wrote:
It's basically there to decide whether to use colons as in
your example
or switch to something like
maxspeed[wet][forward][motorcycle]. Why?
Well, because those time conditions tend to have colons in
You split based on the equal sign and it doesn't matter that the time
The building called Angewandte Informatik is a multipolygon, which has
been moved one and a half weeks ago. Both the old and the new shape are
rendered now, and the hole is filled too.
I know that there have been problems with multipolygons and diffs. Are
they supposed to be fixed?
Hi,
Marc Coevoet wrote:
Nice, I was thinking about looking for my shell prog book, and trying
awk some manips on the degrees and minutes, as there is no number 59
In that case I'd use a famous write-only language and do something like
% perl -ne
...or
locally-maintained rural roads that are important for local
navigation, such as connecting a shortcut between two nearby highways
which don't intersect.
I'm happy that there seems (until now, few contribution in this
thread) a consensus on the proposed modification of the basic
John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com writes:
--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
it's a different meaning in urban areas as in rural areas.
Many of
what you tag as primary and secondary in rural areas
(especially low
density ones) has 2 (1+1) lanes, while
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
were that important it probably would be bigger. If
you are about
#lanes, there's a lanes tag for that.
Does any renders currently use the number of lanes to vary the outputted
images, or should this be something submitted as a wish
This is possibly a bit off-topic, but I'm looking forward to being able to
map the new long-distance continuous coastal path around England, which is
being proposed via the Marine and Coastal Access Bill!
Natural England (the agency that will be responsible for building the paths)
have just
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/31 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
--- On Thu, 30/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
- residential roads (just in residential areas, no
connecting
function, you will not take this if you don't live in the
2009/7/31 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
No, no, no. maxheight until now was clearly the legal maxheight. It is
not explicitely writen on the wiki because you don't see the physical
height in many countries here in Europe but only the legal traffic
sign and the max height traffic sign is displayed
2009/7/31 Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org:
No, no, no. maxheight until now was clearly the legal maxheight. It is
not explicitely writen on the wiki because you don't see the physical
height in many countries here in Europe but only the legal traffic
sign and the max height
2009/7/31 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
someone with interest in this topic could set up a page for
maxheight:physical, so this discussion doesn't get lost:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Key:maxheight:physicalaction=editredlink=1
cheers,
Martin
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Please check your 42 occurrences, whether they are physical
or legal
and this issue would be resolved.
Some of us are in Australia and there will only be one sign posted in Australia
which is the legal height, but the
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I just see it as a hierarchical line:
residential
unclassified
tert
sec
prim
trunk
motorway
it's simple as that, and I don't see any problem.
Maybe to you, but I don't see it that way based on reading the
2009/7/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
I object to the notion that there should be a different relationship
between residential/unclassified in urban vs rural areas. We already
have too much of that, and I think it's a sign our definitions are off
base. There's no clear boundary, and we have
David Lynch djly...@gmail.com writes:
Motorway: More than one grade-separated intersection in a row, high
speed, oncoming traffic separated.
A Motorway should meet the physical standards of what the best national
Motorway/Interstate/etc. roads are. Generally entirely divided and
limited
2009/7/31 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
Some of us are in Australia and there will only be one sign posted in
Australia which is the legal height, but the person you are responding to is
in Brazil and you said none for South America so that answers that I guess.
there were no
2009/7/31 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I just see it as a hierarchical line:
residential
unclassified
tert
sec
prim
trunk
motorway
it's simple as that, and I don't see any problem.
Maybe to you, but I
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know where you are mapping and which streets you
are mapping
Sorry, I was thinking of the Australian guidelines...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Roads_Tagging
Well, I'm in Italy but occasionally
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/31 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I just see it as a hierarchical line:
residential
unclassified
tert
sec
prim
trunk
motorway
it's simple as
Some of the areas where I am mapping show untagged green nodes in
Potlatch, and I delete these, but where do they come from? In one case,
I think a series of them may have been generated when my computer lost
the connection to the OSM server while I was tracing a way, and then
could not restore
I'm currently trying to do up a flier to promote a mini-map event, and I
wondering if I would be able to use a couple of images from SteveC's key note
talk?
Specifically the 20 live 20 minutes from somewhere example given.
Those images were really striking in showing the benefits that can be
2009/7/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
So probably the renderers need a way to show unclassified as less
important than tertiary.
they (t...@h, mapnik, cyclemap) are already doing this.
And perhaps 'residential' should be redefined as only used by people
who are traveling to a location on
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the suggestion. I have not tried JOSM yet, but mean to, and this is
another reason for me to move that up my list of things to do. For the student
projects, I'll leave the choice up to them at this stage. But my real reason in
writing was to be able to answer a question
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2009/7/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
So probably the renderers need a way to show unclassified as less
important than tertiary.
they (t...@h, mapnik, cyclemap) are already doing this.
Sorry, I meant 'lower than tertiary and more
2009/7/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
In that case we need a parallel tag to unclassified, meaning local-only
but without the residential notion. But around me there aren't enough
such roads to worry about, and they're all tagged residential from
massgis import anyway :-)
well. Propose what
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
did you give JOSM a try? It doesn't suffer from partly loaded
data, which might be the issue in your case.
I doubt that very much indeed. Potlatch can't load a way without loading its
constituent nodes; nor can it find a node which is part of a way without
loading
I saw some strange rendering effects when a side road was straight onto a
bridge. The bridge was layer=1, so the side road was rendered on top of the
main road. That's why all the ways approaching a junction should be on the
same layer. You can either achieve this by inserting a short way between
2009/7/31 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
I don't know where you are mapping and which streets you are mapping
as residential. Maybe you could post an example so I can try to
understand you better.
The English page for residential states:
Hillsman, Edward wrote:
Some of the areas where I am mapping show untagged green nodes in
Potlatch, and I delete these, but where do they come from?
Those untagged nodes sometimes show up quite a lot, depending on the
area. In one case there were a lot of untagged nodes along a way, each
very
John Smith wrote:
I also checked the Australian state borders and they are marked as
admin_level=4;10 which may interfere with things if the script was only
looking for a single number, however the boundary is used for local and state.
We usually Tag only the highest (1=highest) admin_level
Jon Burgess wrote:
2009/7/31 Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net:
Wrong, osm2pgsql does process relations properly. If they aren't then
Jon Burgess is happy to take a look to see if he can fix the problem
with osm2pgsql. Second there has been no planet reload for a few weeks
now.
There's definitely
Frederik Ramm schreef:
Hi,
Marc Coevoet wrote:
Nice, I was thinking about looking for my shell prog book, and trying
awk some manips on the degrees and minutes, as there is no number 59
In that case I'd use a famous write-only language and do something like
% perl -ne
Does the script also take boundaries in relations into account? I'm a
little puzzled by
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=42.8145lon=20.365
which is inside Kosovo with two relations as border,
#1057;#1088;#1073;#1080;#1112;#1072;, admin_level 2, which is seen
and Kosovo,
Sometimes it's physical, sometimes administrative. Generally it's
administrative where that is clearly defined (ie the higher road classes in
developed countries), and more physical when it isn't.
So saying either is correct wouldn't be entirely true.
Richard
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:16 PM,
2009/7/31 Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com:
2009/7/31 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
This tag is used for roads accessing or around residential areas but
which are not a classified or unclassified highway.
This is a useful guideline if you are not sure whether to use
residential
OJ W wrote:
I put a wrapper around the rather excellent
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Server_Side_Script which can
tell you which town/county/state/country something is in:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=51.51lon=-0.05
- which replies that the specified
2009/7/31 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
Sometimes it's physical, sometimes administrative. Generally it's
administrative where that is clearly defined (ie the higher road classes in
developed countries), and more physical when it isn't.
So saying either is correct
2009/7/31 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
did you give JOSM a try? It doesn't suffer from partly loaded
data, which might be the issue in your case.
I doubt that very much indeed. Potlatch can't load a way without loading its
constituent nodes; nor can it
Dear OJ,
I put a wrapper around the rather excellent
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Server_Side_Script which can
tell you which town/county/state/country something is in:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=51.51lon=-0.05
- which replies that the specified numbers
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 23:40, Cartinuscarti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
3) The people who do not care/know about the difference are still going to tag
a physical maxheight with the maxheight tag.
Agreed. In countries where there are separate signs for a warning
about the physical height of an object
2009/7/30 OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com:
I put a wrapper around the rather excellent
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Server_Side_Script which can
tell you which town/county/state/country something is in:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=51.51lon=-0.05
- which
that would be a lack of disk space on dev's /home - I'll see if it's
anything of mine that I can delete
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Roland Olbrichtroland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote:
After some playing around, I get some error messages with
should be working again now?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=51.8478lon=9.0282lang=es
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=51.8478lon=9.0282lang=de
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=51.8478lon=9.0282lang=nl
___
talk mailing list
Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
However, it seems not to work as expected - in fact it breaks the service
quite horrifically:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=56.0366lon=12.514
Okay, it no longer breaks - it just doesn't list the point as being in
Helsingør (rel#184034).
--
Jonas
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
might be, that I didn't understand exactly how this error is caused,
but it definitely is a Potlatch-error. Also I can tell you that I was
quite pleased to see the recent progress of potlatch. It also has some
cool unique features (like undelete). It is stylish. It
2009/7/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
But, as I understand trunk, it's meant to be a physical upgrade from
primary, which is a national-level highway.
Well, you could argue that it would be valid to adopt this standard in
a country where it was deemed useful. But that's not how it is here.
2009/7/31 Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com:
2009/7/31 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
Well, you could argue that it would be valid to adopt this standard in
a country where it was deemed useful. But that's not how it is here.
Ireland has two grades of National road, primary and secondary
2009/7/31 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
This is exactly my point. The highway class already represents the
importance of the road, not it's physical build standard, but the wiki
defines the latter to be relevant. I was suggesting to update the
definition according to
for some reason my javascript isn't working so well - anyone want to
try and make this more reliable?
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/PlaceBrowser/?lat=51.51lon=-0.12zoom=14
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, John Smith wrote, replying to Martin Koppenhoefer:
Well, I just see it as a hierarchical line:
residential
unclassified
tert
sec
prim
trunk
motorway
it's simple as that, and I don't see any problem.
Maybe to you, but I don't see it that way based on
2009/7/31 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Martin mentions http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Residential
The history for this shows that was written after we wrote our Australian
tagging guidelines - nearly a year later.
yes, this page is indeed dating back just to April 2008, what means,
there has
Works great for me, what would you like to enhance/correct ?
Le 31 juil. 09 à 23:12, OJ W a écrit :
for some reason my javascript isn't working so well - anyone want to
try and make this more reliable?
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/PlaceBrowser/?lat=51.51lon=-0.12zoom=14
Le vendredi 31 juillet 2009 à 03:23, Roy Wallace a écrit :
What about a way that has either a physical limitation or a legal
limitation (not both). Perhaps there is some argument that the tag
should differentiate between these situations? Though I admit I can
only think of a weak one - that it
2009/8/1 Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com:
Le vendredi 31 juillet 2009 à 03:23, Roy Wallace a écrit :
What about a way that has either a physical limitation or a legal
limitation (not both). Perhaps there is some argument that the tag
should differentiate between these situations? Though
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Done. See:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2118
I add add tickets for the other two issues I referred to later today.
Thanks!
As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance
of nodes missing from the
Jon Burgess wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Done. See:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2118
I add add tickets for the other two issues I referred to later today.
Thanks!
As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance
of nodes
Jon Burgess wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Done. See:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2118
I add add tickets for the other two issues I referred to later today.
Thanks!
As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance
of nodes
On 31/07/09 23:55, Andrew Ayre wrote:
I think if the OSM API was improved so it could accept large changesets
faster then that would greatly help out the people who are trying to add
large amounts of data. So far I haven't see a fast and reliable method.
Excuse me a minute while I find my
On 01/08/2009, at 1:36 AM, SLXViper wrote:
Those untagged nodes sometimes show up quite a lot, depending on the
area. In one case there were a lot of untagged nodes along a way, each
very close to another node belonging to the way. All untagged ones
were
created by a potlatch user, I think
Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
However, it seems not to work as expected - in fact it breaks the service
quite horrifically:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=56.0366lon=12.514
Okay, it no longer breaks - it just doesn't list the point as being in
Helsingør (rel#184034).
I fixed
Is there any method of adding photos etc. to OSM like there is for
Google Maps. For instance, if you navigate to somewhere on Google Maps,
it comes up with user submitted geo-tagged photos. Is there anything
similar for OSM? If not, should there be?
Regards
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Tristan Thomas wrote:
Is there any method of adding photos etc. to OSM like there is for
Google Maps. For instance, if you navigate to somewhere on Google Maps,
it comes up with user submitted geo-tagged photos. Is there anything
similar for OSM? If not, should there
Tom Hughes wrote:
On 31/07/09 23:55, Andrew Ayre wrote:
I think if the OSM API was improved so it could accept large changesets
faster then that would greatly help out the people who are trying to add
large amounts of data. So far I haven't see a fast and reliable method.
Excuse me a
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Matthias Versen s...@mversen.de wrote:
We usually Tag only the highest (1=highest) admin_level
on a border in
Germany because an admin_level=2 (country) border is always
the same
border for the lower admin_levels.
The different admin_levels have of course always
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
areas, that's why your aussie-way might produce slightly
worse routing
results (don't know, just an idea).
The navit routing engine prefers residential to tertiary in some cases... So
not all poor routing is because we
--- On Fri, 31/7/09, Matthias Versen s...@mversen.de wrote:
I also checked the Australian state borders and they
are marked as admin_level=4;10 which may interfere with
things if the script was only looking for a single number,
however the boundary is used for local and state.
We
OJ W wrote:
I put a wrapper around the rather excellent
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Server_Side_Script which can
tell you which town/county/state/country something is in:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/WhatCountry/?lat=51.51lon=-0.05
There is really something broken, compare :
John Smith wrote:
I've redone all the admin_levels=4 like you suggested, however I'm not sure
if the NSW/ACT state borders are correct and would like a second opinion or
third on this.
This is the relation for the NSW state border.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/80372
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:33:53 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/31 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
Some of us are in Australia and there will only be one sign posted in
Australia which is the legal height, but the person you are responding
to
is in Brazil and
Il giorno 31 luglio 2009 08.56, Accurimbonoaccurimb...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
Anch'io ce l'ho quel navigatore ma non l'ho mai utilizzato, in ogni
caso non credo che utilizzi il db di metanoauto.it
.com, scusate :)
___
Talk-it mailing list
In data giovedì 30 luglio 2009 20:00:41, Gianmario Mengozzi ha scritto:
: allora,
sul sito [1] i dati dei distributori di metano (x ora considererei
quelli italiani) sono disponibili in formato
1) .asc
2) .cvs
3) .gpx
i file contengono apparentemente
a) indirizzo (prov, comune, frazione,
In data venerdì 31 luglio 2009 09:15:54, Matteo Gottardi ha scritto:
Intanto provo a fare uno scriptino che converta il gpx ottenuto da
metanoauto in osm.
Premetto che non ho _nessuna_ esperienza riguardo all'import massivo di
dati...
La mia idea era di fare l'import iniziale a mano con josm
Ciao,
Queche commento a ruota libera:
Hai verificato che le coordinate siano WGS84?
Ma il nome del distributore (che poi è quello che appare sulla mappa) non
sarebbe meglio che fosse AGIP, ESSO, etc? Ti sembra utile leggere LT FONDI VIA
SANTA ANASTASIA (SP102, KM 0,400) - LOC. Lapos;ISOLA.
2009/7/31 Marco Certelli marco_certe...@yahoo.it:
Ma il nome del distributore (che poi è quello che appare sulla mappa) non
sarebbe meglio che fosse AGIP, ESSO, etc? Ti sembra utile leggere LT FONDI
VIA SANTA ANASTASIA (SP102, KM 0,400) - LOC. Lapos;ISOLA.
immagino che nel name andrebbe solo
In data venerdì 31 luglio 2009 13:46:01, Marco Certelli ha scritto:
Ciao,
Queche commento a ruota libera:
Hai verificato che le coordinate siano WGS84?
In realta' mi sono principalmente fidato del file di metanoauto.com (secondo lo
standard gpx tutte le coordinate devono essere wgs84).
--- Ven 31/7/09, Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com
Oggetto: [Talk-it] svincoli dalla crt
A: openstreetmap list - italiano talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Data: Venerdì 31 luglio 2009, 14:54
Faccio notare che la precisione degli
svincoli dalla crt è molto
2009/7/31 Matteo Gottardi matg...@tin.it:
Purtroppo il gestore non e' specificato nel file gpx di www.metanoauto.com, e'
una serie di record strutturati cosi':
Quello che mi sembra manchi è un identificativo univoco del
distributore all'interno di metanoauto. Se ci fosse sarebbe più comodo
Il giorno 31 luglio 2009 15.10, Marco
Certellimarco_certe...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
--- Ven 31/7/09, Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: Ruggero giurr...@gmail.com
Oggetto: [Talk-it] svincoli dalla crt
A: openstreetmap list - italiano talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Data: Venerdì 31 luglio
2009/7/31 Marco Certelli marco_certe...@yahoo.it:
secondo me il name di metanoauto, che potrebbe andare in un tag OSM tipo
metanoauto:name=... è un identificativo univoco che può servire per
ritrovare il distributore e verificare necessità di aggiornamento.
purtroppo anche i nomi possono (e
Il giorno 31 luglio 2009 08.54, Accurimbonoaccurimb...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
Ti assicuro che il database è super aggiornato, nel senso che esiste
già ed è molto utilizzata la funzione per segnalare
aggiornamenti/errori/modifiche (prezzo carburanti, apertura/chiusura,
segnalazione nuovi
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
