I would like to join my efforts to complete the map of the Forêt de Soignes
/ Zoniënwoud.
Is there a Belgian standard for the various highway tags applicable for
wooden areas, forests, etc.?
I see track, pedestrian, footway, cycleway and the rendering shows
different symbols for the same type of
I noticed that there seems to be something odd with the rendering at
lat=0, lon=0:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=0lon=0zoom=14layers=B000FTF
At zoom 14 it tells me that it is the North Pole... Zoom in a bit mnore
and you get a bunch of parking spaces. Both Mapnik and Osmarender seem to
This has been discussed before on this list.
See thread:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-June/037891.html
And the dev list:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2009-May/015566.html
Shaun
On 9 Aug 2009, at 09:57, Steve Hill wrote:
I noticed that there seems to be
Martin and I have had this conversation on private e-mail too, but one point
bears repeating:
I know that some people like this tidy-points-function to
work on TIGER-Data, but I tell you: if the TIGER-Data is
not good/precise, it won't get better using this function ;-)
That is evidently
Austin Martin wrote:
Also, does OSM need a collective icon set, because by looking at
this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. It seems
like just a random mishmash of icons, but maybe I'm wrong on this.
OSM is about the data, it's up to individual clients to decide what icons
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Turn on the Yahoo imagery, align the start and end points of the way, and
select the 'Tidy' function. Hey presto, the street is now correctly aligned
to the grid. You could have done this manually, but it would have taken 10
times as long and
A recent purchase of an Android phone has lead me to play with AndNav2 and
OpenRouteService. However, in some cases I get some unexpectedly crazy
routes.
OpenRouteService doesn't seem to understand the highway=road tag. So
presumably if your destination is on a highway=road, it should be
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Steve Hill wrote:
Moving the destination slightly closer to another road
causes sanity to be resumed.
I misread sanity as salinity
and wondered which ocean he was visiting next
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Stefan de Konink wrote:
And then you realise that the alignment of Yahoo Imagery is wrong
on most
places, and you have killed good vector material. Great job :)
Good vector material? Tell me, have you ever _seen_ TIGER?
Seriously, you're kidding me. Yahoo may be out-of-alignment here and
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
_That_ is why this function is here: to simplify the work of one of the most
tedious parts of TIGER fixup. As always, it's of no use for my mapping
should not be extrapolated to it's of no use and should be banned.
But maybe in those parts of the world where streets
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
And then you realise that the alignment of Yahoo Imagery is wrong
on most
places, and you have killed good vector material. Great job :)
Good vector material? Tell me, have you ever _seen_ TIGER?
Yes, and I have also
Tobias Knerr wrote:
But maybe in those parts of the world where streets are not perfectly
straight, it is of no use and even dangerous in the hands of newbies
should be extrapolated to it should not be included by default but
provided by a plugin/option?
Hm. I can think of plenty of towns
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Stefan de Koninkste...@konink.de wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
And then you realise that the alignment of Yahoo Imagery is wrong
on most
places, and you have killed good vector material. Great job :)
Good
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Most likely this is true because the TIGER dataset was
actually traced
from/for a much lower precision map, hence wavy because you
are plotting
it on a far higher resolution then it was created for. With
respect to
TIGER you
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
Assuming that yahoo is wrong, at least it will be consistently wrong
and it's trivially to mass move ways when you do get reference points to
re-align the data to.
Moving stuff in GIS is never trivial. You don't know why it is wrong, and
even if it looks
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Shaun McDonald wrote:
How does your town compare to Yahoo?
It seems to have an offset in both X and Y. But I can only see that
locally. I don't know if there is a more global problem.
I have only heard of trival shifts in the rectification being a problem.
I think it
Am Samstag 08 August 2009 14:42:43 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
An example from the result of the current tidy-points-function here:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/attachment/ticket/2148/090808_potlatch_tidy-p
oints_.png
In this case it looks more like an error of the tidy-function, or at least
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Moving stuff in GIS is never trivial. You don't know why it
is wrong, and
even if it looks 'locally' shifted it could be even
misrectified causing
it to be shifted and streched possibly rotated.
You get 4 or more points on the
2009/8/9 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
As I've said several times to Martin, once I have a spare minute I'll
add some sort of confirmation dialogue if you try to straighten a
street with more than n metres divergence. But for now, I'm off on
holiday.
Actually those confirmation
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Richard Fairhurstrich...@systemed.net wrote:
Austin Martin wrote:
Also, does OSM need a collective icon set, because by looking at
this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features. It seems
like just a random mishmash of icons, but maybe I'm wrong on this.
2009/8/9 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
Assuming that yahoo is wrong, at least it will be consistently wrong and it's
trivially to mass move ways when you do get reference points to re-align the
data to.
no, unfortunately according to my gps-traces and knowledge of the
actual situation
On Sunday 09 August 2009 01:29:27 John Smith wrote:
What about Uranium mining areas?
Australia just announced they were going to let 2 more mines start.
landuse=surface_mining
mining_resource=uranium
name=*
operator=*
and a bit further out
barrier=fence
Since you are probably not allowed
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Since you are probably not allowed to go inside that fence,
you can't know
where the radioactive areas are.
Don't know if the mining area would be much higher than background, but the
mined ore is transported to a processing facility,
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, John Smith wrote:
You get 4 or more points on the ground by GPS and you align to that, I
meant suburb level, not an entire city or states or countries.
Already saw an OSM editor supporting realigning Yahoo Imagery based on
existing points?
Stefan
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Already saw an OSM editor supporting realigning Yahoo
Imagery based on
existing points?
Not automatically, but JOSM can shift the yahoo image to align it to known
points then you just move nodes/ways as needed.
On Sunday 09 August 2009 14:57:46 John Smith wrote:
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Since you are probably not allowed to go inside that fence,
you can't know
where the radioactive areas are.
Don't know if the mining area would be much higher than background, but
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
The reasoning stays the same. Dangerous industrial/mining
activity tends to be
fenced in to prevent accidents. I don't see why
radioactivity needs any
special handling compared to other dangerous activities
like:
I wasn't asking
isn't the issue here that radioactivity is like height, i.e. a
smoothly-varying value that exists everywhere and is typically
represented as gridded data (which gets converted to contours for
display).
with height, people said that the grid data was unsuitable for going
into OSM because OSM is
Hi!
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:29:23PM +0200, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
looking at the foundation web site and the wiki, there is very few
information on the local chapter working group - only a draft of the
federation agreement is linked withought an information on the version
or date it
I had to pick up an eBay purchase in Haverhill (Suffolk, UK) today and relied
on my Suffolk street atlas to get me there. Unfortunately the place the seller
lived wasn't listed. They lived in ** Walk, and being a Walk this
generally leads between two streets that cars can access. So their
they must have known - living in a place like that you soon get used
to explaining no, your address lookup won't work or don't bother
asking me for my postcode, you won't find it whenever someone asks
for your address.
I seem to remember some banks won't let you open accounts if your road
isn't
Roy Wallace schrieb:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Kevo...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
Hi All,
While trying (and failing miserably) to find a parking space in Birmingham
(UK) the other day (terrible sign age - talk about leaving it to the last
minute - AND to top it all I must have parked in
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, Cartinus wrote:
What about Uranium mining areas?
Australia just announced they were going to let 2 more mines start.
landuse=surface_mining
mining_resource=uranium
name=*
operator=*
and a bit further out
barrier=fence
Since you are probably not allowed to go
Hi!
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
I want to point attention to the potlatch-funtion tidy-points (similar
to JOSM simplify way). I encourage everybody not to use these
functions (at least not on data someone else entered) as it harms
severly the data.
First of all, I agree with you that these
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Nop wrote:
Some people mentioned that the default settings of these tools are very
agressive - this is true and a more lenient approach might produce much
better results. But then, I have not seen any options to change this (in
JOSM).
It was in advanced preferences. Can't
Some people mentioned that the default settings of these tools are very
agressive - this is true and a more lenient approach might produce much
better results. But then, I have not seen any options to change this (in
JOSM).
I think you can change the presets in Einstein-mode.
cheers,
Martin
2009/8/9 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Already saw an OSM editor supporting realigning Yahoo
Imagery based on
existing points?
Not automatically, but JOSM can shift the yahoo image to align it to known
points then you just
2009/8/9 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
I concur
I found about 350 -400 km of highway uploaded (twice) with points at one per
second at 100kmh travel speed
Once uploaded and made into a way, and then the way deleted without removing
the points, then uploaded again
and while we have editors that
On Aug 9, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Liz wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Nop wrote:
Some people mentioned that the default settings of these tools are
very
agressive - this is true and a more lenient approach might produce
much
better results. But then, I have not seen any options to change
this
Just an idea.
Issues:
Multiple, presumably high resolution, maps overlaying the same space. One per
floor.
How to get unencumbered by copyright floor plans
Opportunities:
Hospitals, College, Government, public or business buildings
Has this been done/suggested yet?
Cheers
--
Greg
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009, noh way jose wrote:
Has this been done/suggested yet?
I know it is been discussed, but it is only limited by your client. A
client should be able to do something like Xapi, selecting only a specific
layer, with dynamic filtering.
This would be great for all other sorts of
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, noh way jose noh.way.j...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
Has this been done/suggested yet?
I suggested something similar to the talk-au list, I even mailed the contact
address on the website of major shopping centre operators but they never
replied.
I'm using netbook with just your average $30 GPS dongle to collect data.
Today I took a 5 mile out-and back hike under dense forest canopy. The GPX
traces for the same trail out and back are separated by as much as 100
meters.
I didn't record PDOP information and such, but are there any
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
I didn't record PDOP information and
such, but are there any solutions to
record decent GPS traces on trails under forest canopy data
collection other
than a high end professional GPS datalogger?
If a phone network and the phone
Hiya all,
Thanks for making it to the mapping party. (Sameer please pass this mail to
Abhinav too).
It was definitely fun mapping eCity with you all today.
The GPX files have been uploaded and and can be seen here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pradeep%20B%20V/traces/473720
and
Hello all,
It was nice mapping around E City.I have added post event summary
herehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Electronics_City_Mini_Mapping_Party_August_2009#Post_Event_Summary.
The difference we made
todayhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Bangalore_ECity_09Aug2009_Mapping_Party.png.
Il giorno 19 luglio 2009 22.57, Alessandro Pozzatoapozz...@libero.it
ha scritto:
Stamattina mi sono guardato con molta calma una descrizione del BT747 e alla
fine mi sembra di essere (parlando piano...) sulla buona strada.
Com'e' andata a finire poi?
Non ci hai piu' informati ...
:-)
luca
--
Ciao! A fine agosto si svolgerà l'ESC, un evento molto interessante vicino
Venezia. Ci saranno molti TalksSeminari su vari argomenti soprattutto inerenti
al Software libero. Che ne dite di organizzare un Talk su OpenStreetMap???
E'
una bella occasione per parlare di osm e diffondere il
nono, non mi sono spiegato bene, basta una proposta con una
chiave/valore. Oramai è deciso per natural (o sbaglio?), quindi
lasciamo perdere...
ciao,
Martin
Ciao Martin,
beh al momento la chiave natural=* e' ancora draft
ma anche
Ciao a tutti,
vorrei avere qualche consiglio su come correggere degli errori che a
mio parere sono stati introdotti con una importazione di un sentiero
CAI: nei tratti in comune con strade di altro tipo sono stati aggiunti
operator=CAI Siena e ref=113 (mi sono accorto del problema vedendo il
vorrei avere qualche consiglio su come correggere degli errori che a
mio parere sono stati introdotti con una importazione di un sentiero
CAI: nei tratti in comune con strade di altro tipo sono stati aggiunti
operator=CAI Siena e ref=113 (mi sono accorto del problema vedendo il
numero
2009/8/9 brunetto brunetto.zi...@gmail.com:
ciao a tutti! mi è capitato qualche volta che per alcune città/paesi
il nome scompaia in alcuni livelli di zoom per poi ricomparire... ad
esempio feltre ogni tanto se ne va... è normale?
diciamo sta ancora sviluppando...
Fino poco tempo fa, anche
2009/8/9 giar...@blu.it giar...@blu.it:
Ciao! A fine agosto si svolgerà l'ESC, un evento molto interessante vicino
Venezia. Ci saranno molti TalksSeminari su vari argomenti soprattutto
inerenti
al Software libero. Che ne dite di organizzare un Talk su OpenStreetMap???
io ci sono...
-S
Roger Slevin wrote:
The PlusBus zone data comes from PlusBus – so please don’t try to change
it. If you think it is wrong, then let me know and I will ask PlusBus
to review the information.
The Wrexham and Ruabon PlusBus zone has been imported without any
reference to Wrexham (the more
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:37:11PM +0100, Peter Miller wrote:
We need a decision on the 'Public Transport' vs 'Transit' question.
Which term should we use on the wiki because I don't want a muddle.
I note that the article on Wikipedia is called 'Public transport',
with 'mass transit' and
Hi guys,
Jochen Toph (of Germany) updated the wiki page on Local Chapters:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters
It contains more info especially on the meeting that took place at
SOTM 2009. So it seems that the draft agreement between OSMF and local
chapters is *far* from
Hi,
Zie http://www.openstreetmap.org/?way=34611587. Volgens mij is dat de
Noord-Zuid lijn van de metro die in aanbouw is in Amsterdam. Is nu
tagged met enkel een railroad:construction, in ieder geval op sommige
plaatsen. Is dat alles dat er moet zijn?
Hoe gaan we om met de layer informatie
++ 09/08/09 10:44 +0200 - Maarten Deen:
Hoe gaan we om met de layer informatie voor dat ding? Het is immers
in ondergronds, maar er is op zat plekken bovengronds ook van alles
gaande. Ik zou zeggen dat op veel plaatsen layer:0 correct is. Wat
doen je dan met de kruisingen? Dat zijn geen
Rejo Zenger wrote:
++ 09/08/09 10:44 +0200 - Maarten Deen:
Hoe gaan we om met de layer informatie voor dat ding? Het is immers
in ondergronds, maar er is op zat plekken bovengronds ook van alles
gaande. Ik zou zeggen dat op veel plaatsen layer:0 correct is. Wat
doen je dan met de
Hij staat genoteerd!
Heb er weer zin in :)
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 09:56:40 Rejo Zenger wrote:
Hi,
Na het succes van de 1ste Amsterdamse OSM Babbel heb ik alvast maar de
datum geprikt voor de volgende babbel: donderdag 10 september 2009, om
20:00 uur. De locatie is De Bekeerde Suster, aan de
Thanks all for the input.
I was just double checking because it turns out I've been using the
shelter property pretty loosely. I've got a number of them scattered
around the place which I've probably mistagged as a result.
I'll have to go back through my edits and see if I can fix them up. _
Did I miss this on this list? any Oz implementations?
http://mapstraction.com/
with osm support and demo:
http://mapstraction.com/demo.php?map=openstreetmap
jim
--
_
Jim Croft ~ jim.cr...@gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
http://www.google.com/profiles/jim.croft
... in pursuit of
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Jim Croft jim.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
Did I miss this on this list?
any Oz implementations?
OpenLayers can do that too I think.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Hi.
2009/8/8 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
Can someone marking in these cycle paths comment on if there is common
widths or what width would people deem to be a footway, cycleway, bridleway,
etc?
For me the important point is whether you can cycle on the path or not. For
the purposes
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Lized...@billiau.net wrote:
i think we should mark highway=cycleway where it is a cycleway
What is a cycleway? Is it defined in a verifiable way?
i accept that highway=path could be subdivided into everything
but to me path is primarily foot use first
This is
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
A normal road:
bicycle=unspecified or no
As I said, I don't cycle much so I'm just trying to think through the
possibilities, if you're looking for a primary purpose maybe that's how to look
at this.
To play devils advocate here
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
What is a cycleway? Is it defined in a verifiable way?
Yes they have signs up with pictures of bicycles.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:02 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Sun, 9/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
What is a cycleway? Is it defined in a verifiable way?
Yes they have signs up with pictures of bicycles.
So you seem to be suggesting:
1. for a way signed
I've had a couple of nibbles from posting an event on Geocaching.com, and even
if they don't turn up they become aware of OSM's existence. I've had no feed
back from the emails I sent to 4wd/bushwalking/computer groups.
http://coord.info/GC1WAGA
Guten Morgen!
Seit einiger Zeit erfassen wir in Landshut auch Hausnummern nach dem
Karlsruhe-Schema
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema).
Auf der Wiki-Seite steht ja recht klar, dass es dem Mapper überlassen
bleibt, ob er jetzt das
Johann H. Addicks:
Selbst wenn da noch das 250er drüber hinge, eine merkwürdige
Kombination:
http://www.addicks.net/gallery/bizar/P8080188
Erinnert mich an die ähnliche Kombination aus Österreich:
30 mit Zusatzschild ausgenommen Alois
http://www.witzbild.de/lustig70.htm
CU
Andreas
Karl Eichwalder schrieb:
Übrigens sind viele fußgängerzonen nur von mo-sa von 10-19 uhr oder so
für radverkehr gesperrt...
Eigentlich eher für die restliche Zeit freigegeben, da Radfahrer auf dem
Rad ohne Zusatzschild da drin nix zu suchen haben ;)
Grüße
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Gernot Hillier wrote:
Auf der Wiki-Seite steht ja recht klar, dass es dem Mapper überlassen
bleibt, ob er jetzt das addr:street-Tag oder die Relation
associatedStreet verwendet.
Dann sollte das mal jemand fixen. :-)
Jetzt scheint es aber so zu
Hallo
da habe ich auch noch eine Variante:
http://www.hannebrook.de/osm/Hund.jpg
maxspeed=30
dogs=poop
poop=no
Herbert
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am Sonntag, 9. August 2009 07:39:06 schrieb DarkAngel:
André Riedel schrieb:
Am 8. August 2009 14:34 schrieb André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com:
... sowie eine kleine Anleitung, wie man diese ins
Garmin-Gerät
bringt.
confused 8-/
Ein Zitat von deren Website:
150 Euro geschenkt
Am Samstag, 8. August 2009 15:10:50 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 8. August 2009 09:00 schrieb Sven Sommerkamp s_sommerk...@gmx.de:
Ich meinte eigentlich beides.
Argumentation die Überwachung durchzuführen ist die hohe
Unfallwahrscheinlichkeit.
Und gleichzeitig ist die Überwachung
Tag!
Jochen Topf schrieb:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:16:17AM +0200, Gernot Hillier wrote:
Auf der Wiki-Seite steht ja recht klar, dass es dem Mapper überlassen
bleibt, ob er jetzt das addr:street-Tag oder die Relation
associatedStreet verwendet.
Dann sollte das mal jemand fixen. :-)
Am 9. August 2009 07:39 schrieb DarkAngel darkan...@ms-team.de:
Ein Zitat von deren Website:
150 Euro geschenkt – wer will das nicht? Von uns können Sie‘s haben,
zumindest ...
Navi-Hersteller um nichts nach – nur im Preis, denn sie sind völlig
kostenlos, während ansonsten zwischen 150 und 200
Gernot Hillier schrieb:
Ok, verstanden. Habe die Seite ganz eigenmächtig mal ein wenig
aufgeräumt. Oder eigentlich habe ich sie ziemlich aufgeräumt, weil ich
sie schon immer furchtbar unübersichtlich fand. :-)
Was mich an der Seite wundert, ist, dass einige Infos gegenüber dem
Proposal
Kannm man das im Inspector bitte nachrüsten oder gibt es mittlerweile
einen Konsens, das Tagging zu bevorzugen?
Es gibt weltweit etwa 3800 Relationen mit type=associatedStreet und 248000
ways
mit addr:street=*. Ich glaube das kann man einen Konsens nennen.
Siehe auch:
Seehundeführer schrieb:
Hallo zusammen, das Problem mit dem Tagging anstelle der Relation ist, dass
u.U.
ein Haus nicht zugeordnet werden kann,
... wenn jemand statt Siemensstraße Siemenstraße schreibt.
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Selbst wenn da noch das 250er drüber hinge, eine merkwürdige Kombination:
http://www.addicks.net/gallery/bizar/P8080188
Vielleicht ein privat ohne Sachkenntnis aufgestelltes Schild an einem
Privatweg,,,
Garry
___
Stephan o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
es fehlt ein Leerzeichen zwischen -Xmx256m und -Dsun.java
Wenn das so gestartet wird sucht er die Datei josm-tested.jar im
Verzeichnis C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\x
Ich habe versucht, mich über das cmd.exe Fenster ein bißchen schlau zu
machen und
Am 9. August 2009 15:07 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
... Trinkwasserbrunnen in routingfähig ...
^^^ Habe ich noch nicht gebraucht ;o)
Ich wollte nur darauf aufmerksam machen, dass die Anwendungen schon
gut vermarktet werden. Wie die Ausführung im Magazin ist, das ist eine
Hallo Tirkon,
wo hast du die josm-tested.jar oder josm-latest.jar gespeichert? Ich
gehe jetzt mal von C:\osm\josm aus. Eingaben müssen immer ohne die
Anführungsstriche erfolgen.
Um die Eingabeaufforderung zu starten (das ist kein DOS-modus) gehst
du wie folgt vor:
Windows XP: Start - Ausführen
Ergänzung:
In der Eingabeaufforderung werden jetzt alle Fehlermeldungen und
Statusberichte des Programmes aufgezeichnet. Dies unterstützt die
spätere Fehlersuche, wenn irgendetwas wie in deinem Fall nicht
funktioniert.
Wenn alles Funktioniert, kann man java durch javaw ersetzen. Der
Unterschied
Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de writes:
Die Garmin-Version der Wanderkarte ist jetzt für Deutschland,
Österreich, die Schweiz und Südtirol verfügbar.
Ich habe nun erstmal die karte auf ein Garmin kopiert und muss sagen,
dass das viel besser ist, als ich noch kürzlich dachte. Großes Lob!
Spätestens im
André Riedel schrieb:
Am 9. August 2009 15:07 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
... Trinkwasserbrunnen in routingfähig ...
^^^ Habe ich noch nicht gebraucht ;o)
Ich wollte nur darauf aufmerksam machen, dass die Anwendungen schon
gut vermarktet werden. Wie die Ausführung im
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Selbst wenn da noch das 250er drüber hinge, eine merkwürdige Kombination:
http://www.addicks.net/gallery/bizar/P8080188
-jha-
schaut eher so aus, als hätte das 30 Schild oben gehangen dadrunter ein
durchfahrt verboten (roter Ring auf weißem Grund) und jemand hat
Am Sonntag, 9. August 2009 15:26:10 schrieb Seehundeführer:
Kannm man das im Inspector bitte nachrüsten oder gibt es mittlerweile
einen Konsens, das Tagging zu bevorzugen?
Es gibt weltweit etwa 3800 Relationen mit type=associatedStreet und
248000 ways mit addr:street=*. Ich glaube das
Am So, 9.08.2009, 19:49 schrieb DarkAngel:
[...]
*g*
Das ähnelt der Diskussionen bei der Erfindung des Telefons :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Allgemein denke ich das Relationen so wenig verwendet werden liegt
hauptsächlich daran das sie so umständlich und unverständlich und wenig
einheitlich zu handhaben sind.
Und dann werden die auch gerne versaut, übersehen oder verschwinden auch
gerne einmal ganz. Deswegen nutze ich wo es nur
Am So, 9.08.2009, 20:47 schrieb Mirko Küster:
Hier auf den Dörfern ist das ganz normal das ein Haus mal weitab
der
eigentlichen StraÃe steht und nur über irgendwelche verwinkelten Gassen
direkt angefahren werden kann. Der Router muss den Weg so oder so dahin
suchen.
Mappst du denn diese
Mappst du denn diese Gassen? Tragen sie den gleichen Straßennamen?
Kommt auf den Fall drauf an. Ist der Weg öffentlich zugänglich dann wird er
auch gemappt. Mit den Straßennamen ist wieder ein Thema für sich. Manchmal
laufen da z.B. zwei Wege paralel. Die eigentliche Straße vor dem Haus und
Mario Salvini schrieb:
Selbst wenn da noch das 250er drüber hinge, eine merkwürdige Kombination:
schaut eher so aus, als hätte das 30 Schild oben gehangen dadrunter ein
durchfahrt verboten (roter Ring auf weißem Grund) und jemand hat sich
den Spaß erlaubt da was umzumontieren. Sinn macht
Jochen Topf schrieb:
Hi!
Auf openstreetmap.de werden schon seit längerem die lokalen Gruppen
aufgelistet
und sie können auch auf der Karte angezeigt werden. Das ging bisher immer
komplett manuell und war daher umständlich und schwer aktuell zu halten.
Was meinst du, sollte man die Icons
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Mario Salvini schrieb:
Selbst wenn da noch das 250er drüber hinge, eine merkwürdige Kombination:
schaut eher so aus, als hätte das 30 Schild oben gehangen dadrunter ein
durchfahrt verboten (roter Ring auf weißem Grund) und jemand hat sich
den Spaß erlaubt da
Gernot Hillier schrieb:
Und nebenbei noch eine Frage an die Relations-Verwender: warum darf der
Member street nur einmal enthalten sein? Üblicherweise ist eine Straße
doch in mehrere Teilstücke aufgeteilt. Dort müsste es also entweder
Recurrence: one or more heißen - oder es müsste erlaubt
Sven Sommerkamp schrieb:
Am Sonntag, 9. August 2009 15:26:10 schrieb Seehundeführer:
Kannm man das im Inspector bitte nachrüsten oder gibt es mittlerweile
einen Konsens, das Tagging zu bevorzugen?
Es gibt weltweit etwa 3800 Relationen mit type=associatedStreet und
248000 ways
Am 10. August 2009 00:30 schrieb SLXViper slxvi...@gmx.net:
Ich finde die Relation-Lösung deutlich einfacher und schneller zu
benutzen, da man nicht zigmal für jede Nummer sämtliche Information
redundant mitgeben muss. Selbst wenn man explizit angeben möchte, dass
alle 200 Häuser in dieser
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
