On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/15 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Could the definition of official be simplified to signed?? If not,
what would be the difference between bicycle=official and
bicycle=signed?
As I have understood,
Jason Cunningham wrote:
Agree here. UK bridleways for instance should have foot=designated;
horse=designated; bicycle=designated as all three have equal right. It
would be a mistake to assume the horse rights are greater than
foot/bicycle; they are not.
I would similarly
+1
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Norbäck [mailto:mar...@norpan.org]
Sent: 14 August 2009 15:50
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM status POIs
When I have seen unmapped roads, I've put a small stub and on the end node
of that stub I've put
Roy
Could you give reference to your wiki quote? I can see for =designated at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
QUOTE
This tag indicates that a route has been specially designated (typically by
a government) for use by a particular mode (or modes) of transport.
If 'official' means exclusive access then it would rarely be used in England
and Wales except for public footpaths - as pedestrians have legal access on
all other rights of way (other than motorways) in addition to one or more
other classes of user. This is why I find =designated very helpful as,
Jason is technically correct. The use of England/Wales bridleways by
cyclists is a lesser right than that held by pedestrians and riders. It was
added relatively recently (before, cyclists were not allowed on bridleways
under common law) and is subject both to the 'give way to others' rule cited
But this implicates that if there is no different name, no name:xx-tag
should be set (even if it's not *bad* to have one, its also not
*necessary*). Do you agree with that, Marc?
I was replying in a hurry, and I see now that it is not as easy as I thought it
to be. I agree that most objects
Hi,
what's our present way: Someone makes a proposal, some other people make
their own suggestions, or refuse the proposal but seldom there are
suggestions to reach a consensus.
But no one collects the requirements for this topic in a structured manner!
I think, establishing a (small) working
Ach so... Thank you for the explanation! :)
Wish I had more time to spend on such a project.
/Erik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
So a public footpath which the council has converted into a cycleway
(part of a future cycle network if the council ever commit funds to
complete their decade old plan) which is segregated in some sections
and unsegregated in others is possibly a footway with
bicycle=permissive?
I think I’ve
Kai - this makes very good sense. But how do we set up a working group? And
would it - and its findings/recommendations - be acceptable to the majority
of the OSM community?
I am increasingly convinced that the discussion group is not going to cut it
when the subject is so complex.
Mike Harris
Hi Ed
1. I think that it is designation=public_footpath, foot=yes,
bicycle=permissive unless (a) it is a public bridleway, or (b) signed to
indicate that a local authority has added bicycle rights (as they may -
although this seems to happen almost always only in urban areas).
2. But if 1(a) or
Humble apologies to everyone, I have fallen into a trap!
I have been replying to messages and referencing the wiki page for 'designated'
(a value for the key 'access=')
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
when in every case it was my intention to refer to and
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Mike Harris wrote:
Kai - this makes very good sense. But how do we set up a working group? And
would it - and its findings/recommendations - be acceptable to the majority
of the OSM community?
I am increasingly convinced that the discussion group is not going to cut
it
Norbert Hoffmann wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/14 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
Are there any progress on the left/right situation on cycleway=lane/track
that
are only on one side of the street?
yes, there is a solution for cycleway=track. Map it separately and tag
2009/8/15 Jonas Häggqvist ras...@rasher.dk:
Norbert Hoffmann wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/14 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
Are there any progress on the left/right situation on cycleway=lane/track
that
are only on one side of the street?
yes, there is a solution for
2009/8/15 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
The wiki says 'Official' is stronger than 'designated'...'Offical' is
only for ways marked with a legal traffic sign.
the map-features main page states for access:
* official is used for ways dedicated to a certain mode of travel
by law. Usually
Am 15. August 2009 11:50 schrieb Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net:
For example, the German names for most European countries are different from
their native names. However, Portugal happens to have the same name (well,
spelling) in German and in Portugese. Would you therefore say, that Portugal
I think it would be very important - as you say - to get a good
cross-section of representation in order to have a fair chance of acceptance
of any conclusions.
While face-to-face is always best - in theory - I can see that this could
present real problems for people in the developing world or in
The ability to print to larger sizes than A4, A3 would be nice because
you can get a group of people around and gather local knowledge.
Ability to add a scaled grid. So I can walk down a road and map square
by square.
Jack Stringer
___
talk mailing
Hi!
There is some problems in Mapnik layer. For example, in Riga one
island is missing:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.93228lon=24.12574zoom=15layers=B000FTF
. Another example, in Jelgava is missing river itself:
Marc Schütz schrieb:
But this implicates that if there is no different name, no name:xx-tag
should be set (even if it's not *bad* to have one, its also not
*necessary*). Do you agree with that, Marc?
I was replying in a hurry, and I see now that it is not as easy as I thought
it to be. I
On Saturday 15 Aug 2009 13:09:41 Mike Harris wrote:
Kai - this makes very good sense. But how do we set up a working group? And
would it - and its findings/recommendations - be acceptable to the majority
of the OSM community?
I also think Kai's proposal makes a lot of sense.
I suspect the
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 18:48 +0300, Aleksejs Mjaliks wrote:
There is some problems in Mapnik layer. For example, in Riga one
island is missing:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=56.93228lon=24.12574zoom=15layers=B000FTF
. Another example, in Jelgava is missing river itself:
HI there!
I am new to this list, so if this question is already answered, please
don't be harsh :)
I browsed archive, and I didn't saw anything for answer, but maybe I
didn't look hard enough.
As far as I understand mapnik render rules have been subject of change
recently. I did a string of
Tom Chance schrieb:
The one missing part to work out is how we respond to the proposal. The best
thing I can imagine is if we could set-up a poll that uses our OSM.org logins
and we notify as many users as possible through every channel available. We
could set the bar at something like
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 19:47 +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
HI there!
I am new to this list, so if this question is already answered, please
don't be harsh :)
I browsed archive, and I didn't saw anything for answer, but maybe I
didn't look hard enough.
As far as I understand mapnik
Hi,
Ulf Möller wrote:
The working group will just have to produce the better, more consistent
tagging scheme. If it manages to do that, then its results will be accepted.
+1. The working group will not have the powers to force mappers into
submission, it only creates a recommendation. (Which
Hey fellow OpenStreetMappers!I wanted to officially announce I’m running for
election for the OpenStreetMap Foundation.You can read my platform and
manifesto here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:HurricaneMcEwen#Foundation_boardI
will work to create a stronger, collaborative
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Bicycle=signed is IMHO not the best idea, because what do you do for
official or designated _and_ signed ways?
As I mentioned before, you would have to change the syntax to
something more like
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Mike Harrismik...@googlemail.com wrote:
Roy
Could you give reference to your wiki quote? I can see for =designated at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated
QUOTE
This tag indicates that a route has been specially designated (typically
Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
Which it is at literally every single point in space along most Danish
cycleways. This seems like a poor plan.
But else the mapping would mean: there is no connection.
This is why I think, creating a new way for the cycleway is often a poor
plan.
Norbert
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Richard
Mannrichard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've picked up Dave's point above, because it's clear that part of the
real problem is that adhoc committees sometimes don't take account of the
implications for particular data users (and stylesheets
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Ulf Möller wrote:
The working group will just have to produce the better, more consistent
tagging scheme. If it manages to do that, then its results will be accepted.
+1
access=official is a proposal (and one that appears to be in abeyance)
It's basically trying to create another access= value to try to sort out
some of the mess with access=designated, but I fear it just adds further to
the confusion.
Richard
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Roy Wallace
We in Oxford still hope to get to rendering cycle lanes and tracks on one
side of the road only. Ideally in such a way that we can use the likes
of cycleway:left=track rather than marking separate cycle tracks. This is
because it will give the renderer much more control over the output.
The
On 16/08/2009, at 2:20 AM, Tom Chance wrote:
Probably sensible to start with something more manageable than path/
highway.
Maybe the forest/wood debate.
Sounds good to me. The important thing is that the group has their
goals set out explicitly, so they know exactly what they should be
Richard Mann wrote:
The rendering can apparently be done using Mapnik's
LinePatternSymbolizer (which does at least now have some documentation
on the Mapnik site), but knowing that much and achieving the result are
two different things. I'm hoping it's months rather than years.
Very good
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
Nick,
Nick Black wrote:
I'm going to be standing for election to the OSM Foundation Board again
this year.
Do you and Steve have any comment on Richard Weait's suggestion that
from every commercial organisation, at
Wish someone undertake this project (school's location) and do it with OSM.
http://gndec.ac.in/~hsrai/tmp/cbse_map.jpg
--
H.S.Rai
___
Talk-in mailing list
Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:38 AM, H.S.Raihardeep@gmail.com wrote:
Wish someone undertake this project (school's location) and do it with OSM.
http://gndec.ac.in/~hsrai/tmp/cbse_map.jpg
Interesting. I couldn't find the tender's details on their website[*] however.
*
ATTENZIONE!
Vi riporto il messaggio passato in Talk@ e ve lo riassumo
A causa di lavori alla rete elettrica del University College di Londra,
dove sono ospitati i server di OSM, gli stessi non saranno raggiungibili
approssimativamente dalle 5 GMT (6 di mattina in italia) di sabato 22
alle
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:06:50 +0200, Gian Paolo wrote:
Ciao,
ho provato ad utilizzare we-travel sul cellulare. Oltre ai problemi di
stabilità (era una versione vecchia, la 0.26) una delle maggiori
differenze rispetto ai software commerciali era che, utilizzando la
mappa che avevo generato,
Thank you for the welcome
First off a couple of queries about transit talk.
Is T-T purely email client based or is there a web page listing the posts?
I receive a digest of previous posts can't see a way to reply individually to
specific posts, where I get the Re: in the subject box.
The
@ Chris M.
Excuse my ignorance but what is a namespaced tag? I can't see an explanation in
the Wiki.
Thanks
Dave F.
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Dave F wrote:
First off a couple of queries about transit talk.
Is T-T purely email client based or is there a web page listing the posts?
There's a web archive here:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/ (this is linked to in
the footer of each of the posts)
I receive a
Hi all, if anyone could give me some assistance with a few tags that
would be great. I'm trying to get St Ives showground mapped
( http://osm.org/go/uYqBCJiO6- ). I can do about 45 minutes of wandering
around there every few weeks, so it is slowly getting better.
There are a couple of things it
We had a pretty good turn out today of 7 people, include 2 geocachers that were
introduced to OSM.
Additionally a person came over to talk to us while we were trying to figure
out a plan of attack at mcdonalds, they took a copy of the walking paper print
out I had made and they seemed
On 13/08/2009, at 11:18 PM, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
If anybody knows any federal government datasources that would be
useful, the Government 2.0 taskforce is looking for data sources that
the community would find useful but currently aren't available for
technical reasons [1]. This will
Also they talk about only adding ref's to relations that
have the entire highway.
I've been playing about with this marking a tourist route and this makes a lot
of sense. When highways and/or tourist routes share the same physical piece of
road you can have each with it's own relation route,
Good to meet some fellow mappers. We arrived back about 3:30 and left about
4:15. Spent the time in Macca's showing Neek how to use Potlatch and start
adding some of the bits we marked out (yesterday was her first OSM/GPS
experience). Neek will be using this towards a Scout badge activity
There is a narrow-gauge tag which I used for the Big Pineapple railway. Maybe
that's a better one?
From: John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, 15 August, 2009 8:07:31 PM
Subject: [talk-au] Nambour mapping party that
Hi all,
While looking at the wiki page describing the highway tag[0] recently,
I noticed that the Australian entry in International Equivalence
doesn't match what is on the Australian Tagging Guidelines page, and
what actually gets mapped.
For example it says that in states with MABC
I have downloaded the NSW routable map from
http://www.osmaustralia.org/garminroute.php only to find most addresses in
my GPS 6ocsx assigned the state of Vic - when they should be NSW.
Any reason for this?
___
Talk-au mailing list
--- On Sun, 16/8/09, Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com wrote:
There is a narrow-gauge tag
which I used for the Big Pineapple railway. Maybe
that's a better one?
That's still twice the width or more of this model railway track:
http://scrms.org.au/
I've seen another one like it in
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 09:20 +0700, Denise or Gavin wrote:
I have downloaded the NSW routable map from
http://www.osmaustralia.org/garminroute.php only to find most
addresses in my GPS 6ocsx assigned the state of Vic - when they
should be NSW.
Any reason for this?
I've just downloaded the
--- On Sun, 16/8/09, Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com wrote:
There is a narrow-gauge tag
which I used for the Big Pineapple railway. Maybe
that's a better one?
Took me a bit, but I found another minature railway line traced, it's in the UK
and they used railway=narrow_guage
I've had the same issue. When searching for cities or suburbs it will come up
with results such as Newcastle, VIC Newtown, VIC etc.
I just switched on my Legend HCx and did a search for nearest cities. Currently
I'm in Lismore and despite most of the results being in NSW it still came up
with:
Alternatively if the area is named model railway and tagged recreation/hobby,
and the rail route just marked as a recreation track? I was thinking along
similar lines as the remote controlled race car track question yesterday/today.
From: John Smith
--- On Sun, 16/8/09, Jeff Price jeff.pr...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Alternatively if the area is
named model railway and tagged recreation/hobby,
and the rail route just marked as a recreation track?
I was thinking along similar lines as the remote controlled
race car track question
Parabens Diogo!
Hoje mesmo vou dar uma entrada e ajudar nesse esforço!
Cadê o Vitor e o Julison? :-)
2009/8/15 Diogo diogownunes2...@yahoo.com.br:
Ola pessoal,
Nas ultimas semanas tenho dedicado bastante tempo para fazer o mapeamento de
SP no OSM atraves das fotos do Yahoo. Exceto por
Legal Diogo!
Na zona oeste ainda tem umas poucas partes vazias, mas vou trabalhar
nisso...
Abs, Vitor
2009/8/15 Claudomiro Nascimento Junior claudom...@claudomiro.com
Parabens Diogo!
Hoje mesmo vou dar uma entrada e ajudar nesse esforço!
Cadê o Vitor e o Julison? :-)
2009/8/15 Diogo
Hi!
Melchior Moos schrieb:
Hi,
ich hab gerade mal reingeschaut, zumindest die Linie 2 (rel 195707) hast
du erst gestern eingetragen, deshalb kann sie ja garnicht auf der Karte
erscheinen... Ansonsten sollte die Aktualisierung ganz normal laufen,
d.h. heute Nacht werden deine Daten
Verdacht: osm.xml passt nicht zur osm2pgsql-Configdatei
default.style, genauer: Die Configdatei improtiert bestimmte Werte
nicht in Deine PostGIS-Datenbank, die das osm.xml aber braucht. Dann
gibts beim Rendern Fehler a la Spalte xyz nicht
gefunden (PostGIS-Logfile checken).
In dem
Moin moin,
gibt es eine Karte, die das surface-Tag rendert bzw. als Overlay darstellt?
Gruß, Falk
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Ich habe festgestellt, dass aktuelle Verkehrsnachriochten über TMC nicht
bei der OSM Karte berücksichtigt werden, wenn diese nur aktiviert wird,
jedoch bei der installierten Karte, welche mit dem Gerät ausgeliefert wurde.
Ich benutze Karten von: Team-Oid
Jürgen
FrauSuhrbier schrieb:
Ich habe festgestellt, dass aktuelle Verkehrsnachriochten über TMC nicht
bei der OSM Karte berücksichtigt werden, wenn diese nur aktiviert wird,
jedoch bei der installierten Karte, welche mit dem Gerät ausgeliefert wurde.
Ich benutze Karten von: Team-Oid
Dazu muss
Andreas Pothe (osm mobil) schrieb:
Moin,
wir hatten vor ein paar Tagen hier eine Diskussion über merkwürdige
Schilder. Leider habe ich heute versehentlich mein OSM-Mailarchiv
gelöscht, deswegen kann ich diese Mail nicht mehr an den Thread anhängen :-(
Heute habe ich in Rinteln eine sehr
Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 13:38:41 schrieb Garry:
FrauSuhrbier schrieb:
Ich habe festgestellt, dass aktuelle Verkehrsnachriochten über TMC nicht
bei der OSM Karte berücksichtigt werden, wenn diese nur aktiviert wird,
jedoch bei der installierten Karte, welche mit dem Gerät ausgeliefert
Eben, sowie z.B. Abbiegebeschränkungen in Form von Relationen anscheinend auch
noch nicht implementiert sind.
Das sollte aber gehen, bzw geht bei mir mit dem Garmin 60csx
--
Wikipedia -- http://tools.wikimedia.de/~flacus/IWLC/
OSM -- http://osm.flacus.de/
Hallo Liste,
der neue Tilesplitter hat es echt in sich und schafft jetzt mal eben
ganz Europa zu splitten ohne extrem viel Speicher zu fressen.
Das wiederum gibt mir die Möglichkeit die Europakarte regelmäßig auf
Svens Server berechnen zu lassen. (Update jeden Mittwoch)
Des weiteren stelle ich
Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 14:52:38 schrieb FlaBot:
Eben, sowie z.B. Abbiegebeschränkungen in Form von Relationen anscheinend
auch noch nicht implementiert sind.
Das sollte aber gehen, bzw geht bei mir mit dem Garmin 60csx
Also, ich habs an einer Straße probiert, die Links abbiegen nicht
Jan-Benedict hat mir eine sehr gute Anleitung geschrieben, die super
funktioniert.
Habe sie etwas verbessert und kann sie dir Montag schicken.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Dirk Stöcker schrieb:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Sebastian Klemm wrote:
Der Dialog erschließt sich leider nicht auf Anhieb, erst durch wildes
Probieren verstand ich dessen Funktion. Das ist verbesserungswürdig, ich
mach mir mal Gedanken, so ganz spontan fällt mir nämlich auch nichts
ein...
Da
was sagen die anderen dazu ? klappt das nicht bei allen Garmin Modellen ?
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo,
gibtes eigentlich eine offzielle Stelle des OSM, die evtl. Behörden
anschreibt mit der Bitte um Daten?
Wenn ein kleiner Mapper das macht, sind die sicherlich weniger
beeindruckt als bei einer offiziellen Stelle.
(Es geht hier um die Knotenpunktdaten und die Routen dazwischen des
Hallo,
wir haben in Rostock jetzt von der Stadt auch die Hoehendaten der
Gebaeude zur Verfuegung gestellt bekommen. Ich versuche diese Daten
einzupflegen, habe damit aber so meine Probleme.
Ziel ist es:
- OSM Daten des Bereichs Rostock runterladen
- Script darueber laufen lassen, welches die
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
kann man sowas irgendwie gebrauchen bzw. an die Daten offen rankommen, weil es
von einem
Bundesland gemacht wird?
http://fr-online.de/frankfurt_und_hessen/nachrichten/hessen/1880385_Landvermessung-Hessen-aus-der-Luft.html
Oder sind die
Fis Schneider Chrissie:
Hallo,
kann man sowas irgendwie gebrauchen bzw. an die Daten offen rankommen,
weil es von einem
Bundesland gemacht wird?
http://fr-online.de/frankfurt_und_hessen/nachrichten/hessen/1880385_Landvermessung-Hessen-aus-der-Luft.html
Oder sind die Höhenzüge schon
Sven Sommerkamp schrieb:
Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 14:52:38 schrieb FlaBot:
Eben, sowie z.B. Abbiegebeschränkungen in Form von Relationen anscheinend
auch noch nicht implementiert sind.
Das sollte aber gehen, bzw geht bei mir mit dem Garmin 60csx
Also, ich habs an einer Straße probiert, die
Am 15. August 2009 18:17 schrieb Martin Garbe
martin.ga...@informatik.uni-rostock.de:
Hallo,
wir haben in Rostock jetzt von der Stadt auch die Hoehendaten der
Gebaeude zur Verfuegung gestellt bekommen.
tut mir leid, dass ich Dir zu Deinem eigentlichen Problem nicht
weiterhelfen kann, aber was
Am 15. August 2009 19:55 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Am 15. August 2009 18:17 schrieb Martin Garbe
Hoehendaten _der Gebaeude_
sorry for the noise :(
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 19:56:23 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 15. August 2009 19:55 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Am 15. August 2009 18:17 schrieb Martin Garbe
Hoehendaten _der Gebaeude_
Du wills dann die Gebäude 3Dimensional machen?
sorry for the noise :(
Hallo Liste,
ich erinnere mich dunkel, dass es mit einem der letzten Firmware-
Updates Probleme mit OSM-Karten gab.
Zwischenzeitlich sind wohl wieder ein paar neue Updates
herausgekommen, das letzte ist wohl 4.00.
Ist es sinnvoll, dieses zu installieren oder bestehen die Probleme
immer
Hallo Liste,
gibt es ein Tool (aehnlich wie GMapTool oder img2ms die Konvertierung
nach MapSource), das gmapsupp.img Dateien, die direkt in's Garmin
geladen werden koennen, in .gmapi-Dateien wandelt?
Juergen
___
Talk-de mailing list
Am Sa, 15.08.2009, 17:41 schrieb Wolfgang Wienke:
Hallo,
gibtes eigentlich eine offzielle Stelle des OSM, die evtl. Behörden
anschreibt mit der Bitte um Daten?
Nicht nach den Daten direkt fragen, das geht manchmal böse nach hinten los.
Aber nein: Nichts Offizielles, aber u.a. haben die
Am Sa, 15.08.2009, 18:24 schrieb Fips Schneider:
kann man sowas irgendwie gebrauchen bzw. an die Daten offen rankommen,
weil es von einem
Bundesland gemacht wird?
*verzweifel*
Oder sind die Höhenzüge schon erfasst, wie in der Reit- und Wanderkarte
bspw. zu sehen?
(wo kommen die da denn
Am Sa, 15.08.2009, 18:17 schrieb Martin Garbe:
Gibt es noch andere Bibliotheken oder hat jemand eine bessere Idee wie man
eine grosse Anzahl Daten runterladen, veraendern und danach wieder
hochladen kann?
Mit de XAPI alle Gebäude runterladen, mit den Höhen versehen.
Die restlichen Punkte mit
Fips Schneider schrieb:
kann man sowas irgendwie gebrauchen bzw. an die Daten offen rankommen, weil
es von einem
Bundesland gemacht wird?
Sicher wie üblich für private Zwecke.
Und diejenigen, die das sagen fühlen sich dabei sicher sogar noch
richtig großzügig.
-jha-
Andreas Pothe (osm mobil) schrieb:
Anlieger, die schneller fahren dürfen als der Rest. Auch ohne Zusatz ist
das eigentliche Schild noch sehr interessant...
Was sind Intrezenten? Handelt es sich dabei um den Plural von
Intrezent und man darf mit einem Intrezentenausweis dort langfahren?
Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 18:55:59 schrieb SLXViper:
Sven Sommerkamp schrieb:
Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 14:52:38 schrieb FlaBot:
Eben, sowie z.B. Abbiegebeschränkungen in Form von Relationen
anscheinend auch noch nicht implementiert sind.
Ich hatte den Fall an jener Stelle:
Labas,
Tomas Straupis rašė:
Sveiki
Gal kas gerai žino šalių lietuviškus pavadinimus?
http://cassini.toolserver.org/~mazder/multilingual-country-list/?lang=lt
Aš esu vienas iš paketo iso-codes vertėjų, ir konkrečiai ISO-3166
(country names) vertėjas. Taigi turėčiau žinoti (bent
Rättar mig själv - menar naturligtvis under wood. :P
/Erik
Erik Lundin skrev:
I beskrivningen för surface, under path, står det
some times used for bridges and plank walkways for foot traffic through
swampy areas
___
Talk-se mailing list
Pablo Cascon Katchadourian escribió:
Hola,
usé Gosmore hace tiempo pero me pareció poco maduro de momento. Es una
pena pero no acaba de salir nada para windowsCE, habrá que pillarse
algo con Android o Linux sin más. No parece que haya versión más
moderna de gosmore. Quizás haya que
Hola,
sergio sevillano escribió:
Pablo Cascon Katchadourian escribió:
Hola,
usé Gosmore hace tiempo pero me pareció poco maduro de momento. Es
una
pena pero no acaba de salir nada para windowsCE, habrá que pillarse
algo con Android o Linux sin más. No parece que haya versión más
Hi all,
first, thanks Gernot for the mapping work done. And thanks Francisco
for the So.. don't risk, thats all I say. message.
Now on the issue, even if the data is actually copied from Google
maps to wikipedia, I don't think Google (or the source, Teleatlas...)
can proof that this is
I just joined OSM today. Was so excited I jumped in the car immediately and
started making traces and uploading them. I was also excited to see that
OSM is working on an import of the GeoBase information. Can someone point
me in the right direction as to where I can catch up on what is involved
I live in the west central part of Saskatchewan. Kindersley is the name of
the town. I do IT for my job and it involves me driving all over the place.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
welcome to OSM,
There's of info on the wiki, search
Jim Shaver wrote:
I just joined OSM today. Was so excited I jumped in the car immediately
and started making traces and uploading them. I was also excited to see
that OSM is working on an import of the GeoBase information. Can
someone point me in the right direction as to where I can
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Ben Konrathb...@bagu.org wrote:
Ok, I did some more poking around and it seems that the land border
with the US is really borked. For BC and Alberta, there are 3 - 4
different border lines with the US. I'm willing to do the work
required to clean this up by
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
