Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Roy Wallace wrote:
Regarding search - ideally, I think the user should be able to say
that they want to eat a t-bone steak in mood lighting for under $20
less than 30min drive away
Whoa, that would be the killer app! Go out for cheap drinks with some
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM, wer-ist-roger juwelier-onl...@web.de wrote:
Am Samstag 19 September 2009 schrieb Maarten Deen:
I just saw an item on OSM in (a rerun) of Quarks Co on the German TV
station WDR. It was about mapping the inner city of Bonn for wheelchairs.
Nice example of
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM, wer-ist-roger juwelier-onl...@web.de
wrote:
Am Samstag 19 September 2009 schrieb Maarten Deen:
I just saw an item on OSM in (a rerun) of Quarks Co on the German TV
station WDR. It was about mapping the inner city of Bonn for
John Smith wrote:
This is one reason to do these sorts of routes as relations instead of
trying to cram lots of information into the way, you then should avoid
overlapping shields if the rendering process is doing it's job.
Relations hold a certain advantage in this case, but we have to
2009/9/20 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl:
Relations hold a certain advantage in this case, but we have to consider the
non-relation variants as well.
They end up in the DB more or less identical, it just means 2 queries
or a join etc instead of a simpler query.
Indeed, but I'm thinking ahead here, to
John Smith wrote:
They end up in the DB more or less identical, it just means 2 queries
or a join etc instead of a simpler query.
Now you're just thinking of a single renderer and its way of processing
the data. Did you take osmarender into account? How does it handle the
road relation at
2009/9/20 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl:
John Smith wrote:
They end up in the DB more or less identical, it just means 2 queries
or a join etc instead of a simpler query.
Now you're just thinking of a single renderer and its way of processing the
data. Did you take osmarender into account? How
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:49 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/20 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
That's an editor issue. If the editor wants to display lanes in a single
way as parallel ways, and let you edit them if need be, it can do that.
It's also a DB/framework issue,
2009/9/20 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
In most cases I don't think a relation is the only solution either. I don't
see it as an abuse, though. It is clearly being used to show a relation
Lanes aren't physically seperated so they shouldn't be split nor need
a relation to show they are physically
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/20 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
In most cases I don't think a relation is the only solution either. I
don't
see it as an abuse, though. It is clearly being used to show a relation
Lanes aren't physically
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
If it's a single physical section, ie a bridge with all the lanes
physically connected then it should only be one way and we should be
able to tag the
2009/9/20 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Yes they are. If they weren't physically separated, people would be driving
on top of each other. If they weren't physically separated, they wouldn't
be called multiple lanes - they'd be called one lane.
Pretty sure I left an if out, if the lanes are on top
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:04 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/20 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Yes they are. If they weren't physically separated, people would be
driving
on top of each other. If they weren't physically separated, they
wouldn't
be called multiple lanes
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
So this is a single way?
http://bikelaneblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/pulaski-bridge-walkway.jpg?w=324h=241
That's nutty.
And abusing relations to do the same thing isn't?
As long as you are free to change lanes, I disagree. The maxheight of a way
is
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:27 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
So this is a single way?
http://bikelaneblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/pulaski-bridge-walkway.jpg?w=324h=241
That's nutty.
And abusing relations to do the same thing
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Irrelevant. I never said you had to use relations. In fact, I said you
don't.
Others have suggested otherwise, to group ways that are on the same
physical bridge.
I wouldn't call the use of relations nutty, though.
I was referring to a specific use case.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:57 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Fine. You can add maximum height along with maximum speed to your
list
of lane-specific data.
I don't find it very important, but if you want to allow for this,
without
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I'd love for you to be able to do it. Come up with a way to do it that
doesn't require rewriting all the editors, all the routing software, and
combining multiple ways into single ways, and we can both be happy.
So you are telling me that the editors, the
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:39 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I'd love for you to be able to do it. Come up with a way to do it that
doesn't require rewriting all the editors, all the routing software, and
combining multiple ways into
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
The middle way should be reversible based on time - I'm not sure if this is
possible to do now or not.
Proposed solution is of the format oneway:time{0:00-4:00;12:00-24:00} =
yes and oneway:time{4:00-12:00} = -1.
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I'm going to focus on the 8 traffic lanes. The rest should be separate
ways, if they are separate lanes (whether the 2 railway lines are 2 ways or
1 I really don't know or care), and if we care to bother mapping them
correctly. Currently, I'd represent the
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
That isn't tagging reality, the bridge doesn't have multiple ways
You clearly define way differently than I do, and differently than the
current definition. The bridge most certainly has multiple ways in OSM
today.
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
You clearly define way differently than I do, and differently than the
current definition. The bridge most certainly has multiple ways in OSM
today.
However that doesn't reflect reality and we should just accept that's
just the way it is because that's how
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
You clearly define way differently than I do, and differently than the
current definition. The bridge most certainly has multiple ways in OSM
today.
However that doesn't reflect
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
True. But it is the best way to do it.
Says who?
But there are multiple ways in reality. A way is a path of travel, not a
piece of asphalt.
Why is it?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
But there are multiple ways in reality. A way is a path of travel, not a
piece of asphalt.
If that's the case why are most ways a lane in each direction?
Surely if what you are saying is true we should plot each direction as
an individual way.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
True. But it is the best way to do it.
Says who?
Says the person who made the statement.
But there are multiple ways in reality. A way is a path of travel, not
a
piece of
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
True. But it is the best way to do it.
Says who?
Says the person who made the statement.
That doesn't justify anything, using that logic I
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:24 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
But there are multiple ways in reality. A way is a path of travel, not
a
piece of asphalt.
If that's the case why are most ways a lane in each direction?
I'm not sure that is
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Not if you are free to cross the center line, for instance to make a left
turn across oncoming traffic to turn into a driveway.
I didn't know you can u-turn on most trunk roads legally so why aren't
we showing those as 2 seperate ways?
My justification was in
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:52 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Not if you are free to cross the center line, for instance to make a left
turn across oncoming traffic to turn into a driveway.
I didn't know you can u-turn on most trunk roads
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Using 2 separate ways implies that you can't U-turn, except in places where
the two ways are connected.
Then why aren't we using multiple ways to indicate this for all
teritary, secondary, primary, trunk etc?
Are you suggesting that we should never express
Hi
Is this correct that boundary=administrative;border_type=county is
rendert the same way as highway=primary?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.628756lon=-108.687472zoom=18layers=B000FTT
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:52 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Not if you are free to cross the center line, for instance to make a
left
turn across oncoming traffic to turn into
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I reread the question and realize I didn't answer it. U-turn laws vary
greatly by jurisdiction. Here in Florida you are allowed to U-turn on any
road which isn't separated by a barrier or painted median, unless it is
unsafe to do so or doing so obstructs
2009/9/21 Peter Herison pheri...@web.de:
Hi
Is this correct that boundary=administrative;border_type=county is
rendert the same way as highway=primary?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.628756lon=-108.687472zoom=18layers=B000FTT
Usually country borders are indicated by admin_level=2
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:19 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
In general, the more important question than whether or not you can
U-turn
is whether or not you can cross the center line in order to make a left
(right if you drive on the other
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Mapping ways should follow the legal paths of travel, not the existence or
non-existence of concrete. If concrete is the only form of legal barrier,
then fine, concrete can determine how we map. But if a painted median is
Where do you draw the line over
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:39 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Mapping ways should follow the legal paths of travel, not the existence
or
non-existence of concrete. If concrete is the only form of legal
barrier,
then fine, concrete can
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
If you're allowed to cross it, for instance to make a turn, it should be
represented as one way. If you aren't, it shouldn't. In Florida and I
As I point out below, you can't turn depending on the centre line not
being solid. Should we create multiple ways
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:10 +0200, Peter Herison wrote:
Hi
Is this correct that boundary=administrative;border_type=county is
rendert the same way as highway=primary?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.628756lon=-108.687472zoom=18layers=B000FTT
That would be because way for Phillips
John Smith wrote:
2009/9/21 Peter Herison pheri...@web.de:
Is this correct that boundary=administrative;border_type=county is
rendert the same way as highway=primary?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.628756lon=-108.687472zoom=18layers=B000FTT
Usually country borders are indicated by
I didn't find a newbie list so I've been reading the wiki and this list
for the last week.
I've been working on streets in and around Wichita and Newton, Kansas
for the last week, it seems there has been little done since the tiger
data import, as most freeway(motorway) intersections also
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:03 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
If you're allowed to cross it, for instance to make a turn, it should be
represented as one way. If you aren't, it shouldn't. In Florida and I
As I point out below, you can't
One of the boundary ways had highway=primary on it. I'm resolving that now.___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:45 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/20 Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@gmail.com:
I suppose it would be possible to get osm2pgsql to assign columns
based on country locations, if the relevant polygons were available in
another table. Handling
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:03 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I'm not talking about where passing is allowed, I'm talking about where
turning is allowed. In any case, once again
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:19 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Even if there is a concrete barrier or other form of barrier that would
prevent a car crossing? Why are bridges different?
Usually because bridges narrow things to make it
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Timothy C Litwiller t...@litwiller.net wrote:
I didn't find a newbie list so I've been reading the wiki and this list
for the last week.
Welcome, Tim.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
;-)
I don't know how busy that list is, so I signed up too.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Because that's the primary purpose for which maps are created. To inform us
how to get from place to place.
Be careful...big assumption.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:27 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
it simply isn't treated that way in all
situation or each residential street would be 2 parallel ways, instead
we use a single way to indication a pair of lanes, so which is it
going to be do we need to split
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:09 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
If we are tagging lanes not ways then we need to do so en masse, not
have 2 different systems that exists at present.
First things first - 1) propose a way to tag lanes, 2) start using it
in parallel to the current
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Timothy C Litwiller wrote:
also - more questions about roads in a rural setting.
we have dirt and/or sand or gravel roads every mile - I think I'll put
surface=unpaved and surface=dirt, is there a preferred way to designate
, like the UPS and Fedex men have maps, of
On 9/20/2009 3:52 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Timothy C Litwillert...@litwiller.net
wrote:
I didn't find a newbie list so I've been reading the wiki and this list
for the last week.
Welcome, Tim.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
Timothy C Litwiller schrieb:
I didn't find a newbie list
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
I've been
disconnecting and making sure that the entrance and exit ramps match
the yahoo image. and adding bridges to the appropriate way.
Do not rely to much on Yahoo images. Sometimes
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Anthony wrote:
Because that's the primary purpose for which maps are created. To inform
us how to get from place to place.
No, a map is a statement about the world, and a person's view of that world.
That's why I mentally marked up
However that doesn't reflect reality
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:09 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Define physically separated.
The road base finishes or there is a concreate barrier or other form
of barrier that
I have written a new JOSM plugin that assists with Address Interpolation -
it follows the newg Wiki instruction page for tagging address
interpolation ways.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/AddrInterpolation
___
talk mailing list
Lots of the streets have abbreviated types. OSM wants Road instead of
Rd, and Avenue instead of Ave. That's tedious work though. Change
them as you touch them, I guess.
Re: Tiger in the US - in nearly all cases, I will change something that is
signed as XYX rd to XYZ road, following
I've been working on streets in and around Wichita and Newton, Kansas
for the last week, it seems there has been little done since the tiger
data import, as most freeway(motorway) intersections also connect
directly to the crossing street. I've been disconnecting and making sure
that the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:04 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
While my patch works, I don't know if this is the best solution to the
problem or not:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/attachment/ticket/1666/osm.xml-patch
I have a similar local hack and decided not to pursue it. In
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Because that's the primary purpose for which maps are created. To inform
us
how to get from place to place.
Be careful...big assumption.
You're
Hi,
Mike N. wrote:
I have written a new JOSM plugin that assists with Address Interpolation -
it follows the newg Wiki instruction page for tagging address
interpolation ways.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/AddrInterpolation
There have been a lot of member encapsulation
2009/9/21 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
In earlier discussions with Paul (cc:'d) we talked about using the
network key to distinguish road networks that use shields[1]. We had
agreed on using a : separator like US:I but I'm arguing against
that now. First we are not separating equal
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Okay, I looked up the law. A double white continuous line is equivalent to
our double double yellow line. You may not pass across it, and you may not
enter or leave the road across it (such as at a driveway). So I would
represent that as a dual
2009/9/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
If it doesn't affect any routing information, then we shouldn't, because
it's a waste of time, but I don't mind if you do.
It is a waste of time, I'm just trying to show that ways are treated
differently depending on the type of way, which doesn't reflect
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/21 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
[ ... ]
So I suggest we pattern on network=us_i for Interstates, us_us for US
Routes, us_ny_ny for New York State Routes, us_ny_ny_co for New York
county roads, etc. These
2009/9/21 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
They will tag it. Absolutely they will tag it. When Mapnik support
for local shields is adopted on osm.org and announced on talk-US it
will take less than 7 days for the US Interstate system to have shiny
new shields from coast to coast. I'll send
2009/9/21 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
S and I are so lacking context as to approach line-noise.
us_ny_ny_co even hints at the right answer, without reading the
docs.
On second thoughts, drop the network tag and just tag a file name:
shield_file_name=us_ny_ny_co__interstate_shield.png
Thanks I think I've got it fixed now - Eclipse was checking out updates into
one directory, but building from another, so my current source was weeks
old. The accessors will be a good thing in the future.
Note to general users wishing to try it out; the plugin will now require
running
Thanks everyone - I've learned some new things and I've found and joined
the newbie list also now. It looks like I'll have plenty of local fixes
to work on for a long time without even importing gps traces.
There are a few places tho where I have gps traces of new street but I
wanted to get
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 9:38 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/9/21 Richard Weait rich...@weait.com:
[ ... ]
So I suggest we pattern on network=us_i for Interstates, us_us for US
Routes, us_ny_ny
2009/9/21 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
you shouldn't use well established tags in the wrong way. us_ny_ny_co is not
a network name. the network is I, US,
The US but is redundant, we just need to know what shield type, not
where it is located since there is a country polygon
On 20 Sep 2009, at 20:20 , John Smith wrote:
2009/9/21 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
you shouldn't use well established tags in the wrong way.
us_ny_ny_co is not
a network name. the network is I, US,
The US but is redundant, we just need to know what shield type, not
2009/9/21 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
US is meant for US highway http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Highways
They uses signs with US printed on it. So the symbol needs the same
which is different from US interstates where only a capital I is printed on
the shield
Sorry I thought you
possible?
--
cheers,
maning
--
Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden
wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/
blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
--
Fis mega ekki fljúga yfir höfuðborginni nema með sérstöku leyfi.
Það gæti verið áhugi einhverra með önnur svæði en höfuðborgina sjálfa.
Kveðja
Ágúst
-Original Message-
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [mailto:ava...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19. september 2009 17:42
To: Ágúst Guðmundsson; Arni
2009/4/1 Stefano Pedretti stefano.pedre...@gmail.com:
2009/3/31 Stefano Pedretti stefano.pedre...@gmail.com
Vi terrò aggiornati.
pietro_le...@regione.lombardia.it
bellesinigu...@tin.it
Salve,
seguo con interesse i progressi del progetto della rete sentieristica
nazionale. Collaboro da
Il 19 settembre 2009 09.04, ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto:
Buongiorno lista,
vista la dipartita di un cellulare e un palmare in due mesi,
devo acquistare un cellulare; la specifica principale è LOW COST (giusto per
ribadire la mia genovesità :-) ) e NO FRILLS, che riceva il
io uso un Nokia N70, è un modello vecchio e lento ma funziona bene,
l'ho testato con TrekBuddy e GpsMid e devo dire che va bene.
Ciao,
Stefano
Il 19 settembre 2009 09.04, ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto:
Buongiorno lista,
vista la dipartita di un cellulare e un palmare in
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:52:35 +0200, Michele Mordenti wrote:
Ha due piccoli difetti:
1) le applicazioni java non dialogano con il bluetooth
Il mio Samsung (SGH D880) sì -- il trucco forse (che ho scoperto dopo ~1 mese
di tentativi) è attivare manualmente il bluetooth prima di lanciare
On ven, 2009-09-18 at 19:30 +0200, Ruggero wrote:
Perché nello shapefile della ctr non ci sono i nomi della cascine,
mentre sul wms della lombardia si?
I nomi delle cascine si trovano nello strato Località significativa,
non nello strato Cascina (anche i nomi dei boschi si trovano lì e non
Odakle se Zagreb pojavio na karti? Vidim da je dosta toga ucrtano, ali
lose. Ceste nisu spojene i tako, nema naziva ulica, ulice uopce ne prate
gpx trackove nego su precrtane s neceg, a nije evidentirano iz cega.
Dajte neki info.
___
Talk-hr mailing
Ok so we finally have all the incorporators and officers together. Eugene
agreed to be President, and I will be Tres/Sec. So from everyone who agreed
So Villar is the new President! :) joke
to be an incorporator here I need the following information to proceed with
the preparation of papers:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 7:16 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok so we finally have all the incorporators and officers together. Eugene
agreed to be President, and I will be Tres/Sec. So from everyone who
agreed
So Villar is the new President! :) joke
Akala mo!
to
Hi,
I created a wikipage for brainstorming what should the osm-ph local
chapter do. I compiled some discussions we had in the list, please
add more info. This is not a binding document which the planned
osm-ph local chapter should adopt. But I hope others can add input
and insights on how
Hallo,
Ik zag op
Bestaande_geodata_hergebruiken_woonplaatsbesluitenhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bestaande_geodata_hergebruiken_woonplaatsbesluitendat
er van meer gemeenten woonplaatsgrenzen beschikbaar waren dan in OSM
zijn ingevoerd. Ik heb de afgelopen week de grenzen van Nijefurd
Hallo,
Ik gebruik sinds enige tijd OSM van Lambertus op mijn Venture HC. Ik
gebruik de MapSource installer van NL normal en af en toe van de
routeable kaarten als ik naar het buitenland ga.
Het werkt prima en ik heb er veel plezier van, met name tijdens het
geocachen. Daarnaast gebruik ik ze ook
Maarten Deen wrote:
Voor een andere bron: het CBS heeft ook wijk en buurt grenzen [1].
Bij de bronvermelding staat:
Publicatie van digitale geometrie is toegestaan, mits het CBS en de
Topografische Dienst Kadaster als bronnen worden vermeld
Is dat dan voor OSM beschikbaar?
[1]
I'm wondering at this point in time if the Dept. of Fair Trading in
NSW made it intentionally difficult to do your own association rules,
they don't provide a .doc version of their model rules, just a pdf
file.
I'm doing up a google doc version of their file, let me know if you
want edit rights
3971 is a similar size, and also hasn't been imported so it might pose
similar problems.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Brisbane mappers (and other interested parties),
I have arranged two more OpenStreetMap meetups for October and November
respectively.
The October will be a social pub meet at the Breakfast Creek Hotel on Friday
9th October to try and get together to discuss boring mapping stuff and
maybe
Hi.
The issue is more one of how the current static image gets there. I can't
see any tag in the page itself that would render it.
The wiki has tags for static and slippy maps. The current image is only for
the inner city and it is very out of date.
- Ben.
2009/9/20 John Smith
Hi Jeff,
That's awesome. As a Scout Leader myself, I'd be very interested to hear the
kinds of things that you are getting your venturers to do.
I've been thinking for a while about getting our troop involved in mapping
some of the less popular walking tracks and trails in nearby national parks,
John Smith,
Is the Australian osm.xml (as in that rendered on BigTinCan) file readily
available?
If so where can it be downloaded from.
--
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
2009/9/21 Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com:
Hi.
The issue is more one of how the current static image gets there. I can't
see any tag in the page itself that would render it.
The wiki has tags for static and slippy maps. The current image is only for
the inner city and it is very out of
2009/9/21 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
John Smith,
Is the Australian osm.xml (as in that rendered on BigTinCan) file readily
available?
If so where can it be downloaded from.
I can make it available, however it's not the best way to do things
and there is a discussion on the dev list
Hallo Ulf,
Vielen Menschen ist es wichtig, daß sie ein verlässliches
Regelwerk bekommen, um ohne bei jedem Eintrag erstmal 15 Minuten drüber
nachdenken zu müssen, welcher Tag denn wohl in Frage kommt.
+1
Valide verständliche nachvollziehbare Doku ist hilfreich.
Sie spart Zeit für das
Zitat Jan Tappenbeck:
Moin !!!
Naturschutz- / Biosphärenreservat werden doch per Gesetz / Verordnung
deklariert und definiert - damit müßten doch auch die Grenzen
gemeinfrei sein oder ???
Dann hieße es nur noch irgendwie an die betreffende Datei zu gelangen
?!?!??!
Moeglicherweise
hallo,
Was mich aber interessiert, ist die Frage, ob diese ganzen auf unsere
PostgreSQL Datenbank ausgeführten Operationen die Laufzeit für das
Finden der Straßennamen und den dazu passenden Koordinaten nicht sehr wären?
Liegt es an der Geschwindigkeit bzw. dem Rechenaufwand, sodass sich
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
