On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know how to convince you that I'm not proposing changing the way
major roads and dual carriageways are mapped. This is about minor divisions
in minor roads.
I see your point but how can you avoid people using
On 04/12/2009, at 06.49, Steve Bennett wrote:
I don't know how to convince you that I'm not proposing changing the
way major roads and dual carriageways are mapped. This is about
minor divisions in minor roads.
Let me ask you: how do you think that a road with a painted traffic
2009/12/4 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.dk
There's nothing you can do with drawing that can't be done with
tagging, and there's in principle nothing being done with tagging that
can't be rendered beautifully on the final map. It only depends on the
richness of the tagging language and the
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 04/12/2009, at 06.49, Steve Bennett wrote:
This discussion is reminiscent of other discussions just like it.
Indeed it now reminds me of the mapping everything as areas thread
that I recently started.
There are two orthogonal approaches to mapping in the OSM.
2009/12/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2009/12/4 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.dk
There's nothing you can do with drawing that can't be done with
tagging, and there's in principle nothing being done with tagging that
can't be rendered beautifully on the final map. It only
Hi all,
I have rewritten the proposal, using the ideas from here. I've gone for
maximum simplicity, removing all the single-direction u-turn stuff and the
relations on adjoint roads.
Please have a read and comment:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divided_road
Perhaps I
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
I'm sure that the whole project would benefit if arguments could be
articulated in a demonstration that would convince the wondering newbies
such as me. There is surely not a single best way, but the need for a
correct
+1 (on tagging vs drawing models)
I think it's a good rule of thumb that if it can't be rendered easily, then
you need to look again at your tagging model - your data isn't structured in
a way that is usable
Never tag for a renderer. Always tag for the renderers.
Richard
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:04 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
This opens up a can of worms about micro mapping.
You either need to split the way to accomodate your suggestion or some
other micromapping technique to accomlish this, in any case you are
adding almost nothing that a
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've uploaded 10 examples of median strips here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Divided_road#Images_for_discussion
Hopefully we can use them to discuss whether this proposal is helpful, and
Peter Childs wrote:
There are two types of Dual Carrage-way.which I think is the problem here.
Type One.
Large Motor Way Type Roads (but also large Primary roads), with Slip
Roads, and the two separate carriageways are never joined, or maybe by
a roundabout from time to time or other
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.dk wrote:
In connection with a discussion we are currently having on the talk-dk
list
about how to map cycleways I recently made a page on the wiki [0]. The
purpose of the page is to explore the different problems/benefits you
Ben Laenen wrote:
Tobias Knerr wrote:
There is a concept that covers all of these and uses oneway:bicycle:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_conditions_fo
r_access_tags
The bicycle:oneway structure, to my knowledge, hasn't been part of a
solution that can be used
Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I've uploaded 10 examples of median strips here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Divided_road#Images_for_discussion
Hopefully we can use them to discuss whether this proposal
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
3 as actually just a wide road marking. Such cross hatch areas do need to
be
covered but this a single road with 'advisory' road marking rather than a
divider?
I don't know. I actually got a traffic ticket once for
Tobias Knerr wrote:
Ben Laenen wrote:
So that's completely incorrect, bicycle:oneway=no already appeared on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Access_restrict
ions a long time before the extended conditions for access tags proposal
was created (although, indeed, not
Quick question for which I didn't find an answer in the wiki:
* is there a maximum length of tags (keys and/or values)? (I'm sure there was
one, but I don't know if there's still a limit today)
* if there is, what is it (and is in it number of bytes, or number of
characters)?
Greetings
Ben
On 4 Dec 2009, at 18:07, Ben Laenen wrote:
Quick question for which I didn't find an answer in the wiki:
* is there a maximum length of tags (keys and/or values)? (I'm sure there was
one, but I don't know if there's still a limit today)
* if there is, what is it (and is in it number of
Hi,
I'm pretty sure there is. In JOSM we check for keys and values whose size
exceeds 255 characters, otherwise the server throws a Precondition
Violation. In JOSM we count Unicode code units (that what's
String.length() does in Java) which is closer to characters than to
bytes.
Regards
Karl
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
I'm new too, and would also appreciate insight. My take in the brief period
of time that I've been doing this is that the connected graph is the first
priority, and everything else is eye candy. A correctly mapped out, but
disconnected, pedestrian
A greenway may be some sort of permissive path for bike and walkers in
London and Canda but in Edinburgh it is a bus lane (painted green)
http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/CEC/CityDevelopment/TransportandTravel/Parking/GreenwaysandBusLanes/Greenways_And_Bus_Lanes.html
A quick websearch in London only
As used by the city park system here in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, a greenway
is a paved footpath/cycle path located in a park, and generally adjoining a
stream or river.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
hi,
I suddenly noticed that the attribution to OSM on the bottom right of my
rendering of OSM has stopped showing - can anyone figure out why? I do not
think that I have changed any code. The link to the source code is on the
site:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 01:08, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
I suddenly noticed that the attribution to OSM on the bottom right of my
rendering of OSM has stopped showing - can anyone figure out why? I do not
think that I have changed any code. The link to the source code is on the
Hi Frederick,
Answers below. Oleg Shaniuk is the CM developer who presented about
Mapzen POI Collector at SOTM - he'll be able to give more detail than
me.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Nick,
Nick Black wrote:
Mapzen POI Collector is a free
On Thursday 03 Dec 2009 9:26:47 pm Guillaume Audirac wrote:
that a dot in domain with the openstreetmap word in it is not against OSM
policies, and we are free to use it (as long as we stick with OSM data
and licenses).
By the way, regarding the license, I do not see the Creative-Common
hi,
thanks to pradeep, openstreetmap.in also points to our server. btw, I have put
up a list things to be done here:
http://bitbucket.org/lawgon/osmindia/wiki/Home
please chip in and help make this site look real good.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Project Officer
NRC-FOSS
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Saturday 05 Dec 2009 12:04:13 am Sajjad Anwar wrote:
Another Mapping Party is planned at Trivandrum during 12-13 December
2009.
SciPy.in is happening at Technopark, Trivandrum. This would be a good
time
to
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
Trivandrum has excellent satellite coverage, so mapping can
be done even by people without GPS.
Just wondering what maps do people use in India for reference? I know that
Yahoo maps have a favorable license but don't
On Saturday 05 Dec 2009 11:29:46 am Harshad RJ wrote:
Trivandrum has excellent satellite coverage, so mapping can
be done even by people without GPS.
Just wondering what maps do people use in India for reference? I know that
Yahoo maps have a favorable license but don't support an
I observed many parts of India has nice OSM. To popularise (sell) it I
suggest take it on paper, flex print, display it on hoardings; in
colleges, schools, bus-stands, railway stations, post offices. Market
it, sell it. Get it published on back of school copies, registers.
Show your office, house
Qual è il modo migliore per far confinare due landuse=* contigui?
Ad esempio se mappo del terreno coltivabile (landuse=farmland) e un bosco
confinati (landuse=forest) utilizzando gli stessi nodi il validator di JOSM mi
segnala aree sovrapposte, se invece duplico i nodi mi segnala l'errore nodi
Luigi Chiesa wrote:
Qual è il modo migliore per far confinare due landuse=* contigui?
Condividere l'intero segmento di way tra i due.
Ad esempio se mappo del terreno coltivabile (landuse=farmland) e un bosco
confinati (landuse=forest) utilizzando gli stessi nodi il validator di
JOSM mi
2009/12/4 David Paleino da...@debian.org
Qual è il modo migliore per far confinare due landuse=* contigui?
Condividere l'intero segmento di way tra i due.
Ovviamente entrambe le aree devono essere chiuse, quindi devi passare due
volte sul segmento centrale.
quale strategia ritenete sia
2009/12/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
+1, anch'io lo faccio generalmente cosí, pero ultimamente si parlava in
altre mailing liste di utilizzare anche i way in comune: usare 2
multipolygon relazioni, una per ciascuno way (e inserire il way in mezzo in
tutte le 2, mettendo i tag
- Original Message -
From: David Paleino da...@debian.org
To: talk-it@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-it] Aree sovrapposte
Luigi Chiesa wrote:
Qual è il modo migliore per far confinare due landuse=* contigui?
Condividere l'intero
Luigi Chiesa wrote:
[..]
Che versione di josm e del validator usi?
JOSM 2561 con validator 18848, sistema opertivo Windows Vista. Ho
aggiornato JOSM ieri ma sono mesi che lo segnala.
Ok, avevo provato con 2255 e 17722.
Appena provato con le stesse tue versioni, e l'errore continua a non
On 12/4/09, Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
+1, anch'io lo faccio generalmente cosí, pero ultimamente si parlava in
altre mailing liste di utilizzare anche i way in comune: usare 2
multipolygon relazioni, una per ciascuno way (e
On 12/4/09, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
Ok, avevo provato con 2255 e 17722.
Appena provato con le stesse tue versioni, e l'errore continua a non
comparire. Forse stai facendo qualcosa di sbagliato?
Forse sei tu che hai disabilitato quella segnalazione in modo
permanente e non ti
2009/12/4 iiizio iiizio iiizio.iii...@gmail.com:
Dove e' scritto che 2 aree non possono avere un bordo sovrapposto?
Da nessuna parte, però è scomodo. Ad esempio in questo caso: vuoi
rendere più preciso il confine tra le due aree, quindi vuoi aggiungere
un nodo alla way di confine. Ma le way sono
iiizio iiizio wrote:
On 12/4/09, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
Ok, avevo provato con 2255 e 17722.
Appena provato con le stesse tue versioni, e l'errore continua a non
comparire. Forse stai facendo qualcosa di sbagliato?
Forse sei tu che hai disabilitato quella segnalazione in
Federico Cozzi wrote:
2009/12/4 iiizio iiizio iiizio.iii...@gmail.com:
Dove e' scritto che 2 aree non possono avere un bordo sovrapposto?
Da nessuna parte, però è scomodo. Ad esempio in questo caso: vuoi
rendere più preciso il confine tra le due aree, quindi vuoi aggiungere
un nodo alla
iiizio iiizio wrote:
Dove e' scritto che 2 aree non possono avere un bordo sovrapposto? Se
lo e' inventato validator?
In realtà, come ho già scritto nell'altro messaggio, forse è un errore
dell'OP, perché validator non fiata (e ha tutto abilitato) :)
Piuttosto, chi dice che non possano
2009/12/4 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
Piuttosto, chi dice che non possano esserci _way_ sovrapposte?
Purtroppo ho avuto questo problema: dovevo mappare due way, ma su due layer
diversi, che però seguono lo stesso tracciato.
La way layer=0 è un highway=footway, la layer=-1 un
-Original Message-
From: talk-it-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-it-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Luigi Chiesa
Sent: venerdì 4 dicembre 2009 13.04
To: openstreetmap list - italiano
Subject: Re: [Talk-it] Aree sovrapposte
quello che pensavo, in Lombardia sono decine di
Ciao,
sono mariangela, ho iniziato a mappare da pochi mesi, mi sono concentrata
sulla zona del lago maggiore sopra Verbania.
Il motovo principale è che lo sto facendo per la mia tesi di laurea
all'università statale di milano, laurea in geografia.
A tal riguardo sto mappando il comune di Ghiffa.
Il 04/12/2009 17:17, mariangela pasi ha scritto:
Siccome non sono espertissima, vorrei capire bene cosa riguarda questa
segnalazione
Quale segnalazione?
--
.' `. | Registered Linux User #443882
|a_a | | http://counter.li.org/ .''`.
\_)__/ +---
2009/12/4 mariangela pasi mari.pas...@gmail.com:
sono mariangela, ho iniziato a mappare da pochi mesi, mi sono concentrata
sulla zona del lago maggiore sopra Verbania.
Il motovo principale è che lo sto facendo per la mia tesi di laurea
all'università statale di milano, laurea in geografia.
A
Federico Cozzi wrote:
2009/12/4 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
aggiungere un nodo (lo stesso) a ciascuna. JOSM non aiuta: devi
aggiungere un nodo a ciascuna (due nodi diversi) e poi farne il merge.
Eh?
Basta creare un nodo, e lo beccano entrambe le way. E se lo sposti
vengono modificate
Federico Cozzi wrote:
2009/12/4 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
Piuttosto, chi dice che non possano esserci _way_ sovrapposte?
Purtroppo ho avuto questo problema: dovevo mappare due way, ma su due
layer diversi, che però seguono lo stesso tracciato.
La way layer=0 è un highway=footway, la
In data venerdì 04 dicembre 2009 15:29:22, David Paleino ha scritto:
Piuttosto, chi dice che non possano esserci _way_ sovrapposte?
E come comportarsi nel caso di sovrapposizione di una way ed un'area? Ad
esempio una strada che costeggia una piazza, o un landuse...
--
* Matteo Gottardi |
Matteo Gottardi wrote:
In data venerdì 04 dicembre 2009 15:29:22, David Paleino ha scritto:
Piuttosto, chi dice che non possano esserci _way_ sovrapposte?
E come comportarsi nel caso di sovrapposizione di una way ed un'area? Ad
esempio una strada che costeggia una piazza, o un landuse...
2009/12/4 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com
2009/12/4 iiizio iiizio iiizio.iii...@gmail.com:
Dove e' scritto che 2 aree non possono avere un bordo sovrapposto?
si, anzi, è (era) il modo consigliato finche le relazioni funzionavano ( e
secondome ancora oggi se si tratta di pochi nodi). Il
2009/12/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
n...se usi il + devi sciacciare un modifier
è ALT, appena provato
ciao,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
ciao a tutti,
premetto che sono un newbie totale per quanto riguarda i wms, ma
proprio non riesco a far partire quello relativo a yahoo su josm: mi
compare immancabilmente un bello sfondo rosso con E' stata generata
una eccezione...
- versione josm 2561
- installato ovviamente il wmsplugin (v.
On Četvrtak, 03. Prosinac 2009. 11:58:16 Željko Filipin wrote:
Ne znam prati li Marko ovu listu, ali očito je pisao o mapiranju u nedjelju,
a nije ovdje javio. :)
http://akuzativ.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/tumarati-s-neznancima/
Ma pratim, ali stalno odgađam javit ovo ili ono pa na kraju i
Iako duze vrijeme imam i koristim i-gotU gt200 tek sam sada uhvatio
vremena napraviti upute kako koristiti igotu2gpx alate na Fedori.
Kost je napravio i ubuntu paket... probat cu ugurati ovaj paket u Fedora
pozozitorije a do tada evo malo bezobrazne samopromocije ;)
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:17:26 +0100, Marko Dimjasevic wrote:
Ako je ovo bio pokušaj nagovaranja na pisanje dnevnika na OSM-u,
podržavam
Je ;)
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:41:18 +0100, Željko Filipin wrote:
http://track.opengts.org/track/Track?page=map.device
http://track.opengts.org/track/Track?page=map.fleet
Moze screenshot jer bez logina se ne vidi nista :(
--
pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt
On Četvrtak, 03. Prosinac 2009. 19:20:27 hbogner wrote:
Radim po ovome vec neko vrijeme, ali sam dosao do zakljucka da bi
drzavne ceste(primary) ipak mogli oznacavati sa Dxx a ne samo xx,
Nekako mi ljepse zvuci D1 nego samo 1.
Za secundary i tertiary bi ostao na samo brojevima koji ih
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@... writes:
From: paul everett tap...@...
What happens if the user imports an OSM file and I convert it to a
virtual city model ?
Then the city model has to be licensed the same way as the OSM data. At
least, that is the current interpretation of the
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote:
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@... writes:
From: paul everett tap...@...
What happens if the user imports an OSM file and I convert it to a
virtual city model ?
Then the city model has to be licensed the same
Inderdaad, een aantal namen die in de AND data zaten zijn voor mij nu voor
het eerst verklaart :)
Niet te geloven hoe weinig huizen er vroeger in Noord-Holland stonden.
Buiten de steden dan tenminste...
groet,
floris
Geert Schuring wrote:
Bedankt voor de tip. Deze kaarten zijn inderdaad super.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:29 PM, cam_...@fastmail.fm wrote:
The best tag I could find for this would be:
man_made=survey_point
name=Q150
website=http://sssiq150.org/
ref=Q150
There are better values for the ref. See
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/4 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com:
I know this was discussed in a while back. But I lost track of what
the final decision was.
I don't think there was a final decision, some people move the way and
remove the duplicated way, some people use 2
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
honestly, roads move. local authorities move them.
Rivers and creeks can move in flood time and follow another course.
Aren't there cases where the boundary is defined by the course of the creek
though?
Incidentally, what's the
Hi.
2009/12/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Aren't there cases where the boundary is defined by the course of the creek
though?
In places where this is the case, and there is no good survey data for the
creek, I generally re-use the way to be the creek as well.
- Ben.
Interesting, this view shows a latest imagery date of 21 November for me... yet
no tweet ...
http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.671647,152.89602z=19t=k
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
2009/12/5 Brendan Morley morb@beagle.com.au:
Interesting, this view shows a latest imagery date of 21 November for me...
yet no tweet ...
http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-27.671647,152.89602z=19t=k
Same thing with the last Sydney imagery...
___
Não podemos esquecer do seguinte: o fato de aparecer uma distância no HTML
significa que as cidades estão interligadas, mas não necessariamente pelo
caminho correto!
Exemplo: Montenegro - Porto Alegre:
Dado que a conectividade entre das cidades que escolhemos agora está muito
baixa, cerca de 12%, sugiro que comecemos com estas e em uma próxima fase
aumentamos o número de cidades.
Podemos definir uma meta de 90% de conectividade na primeira fase.
Eu tenho um script que identifica
É verdade. As rotas em amarelo são aquelas que tem distância maior que 50%
da distância em linha reta. Em cidades muito próximas talvez ocorram estas
distorções...
Podemos reduzir este fator, se percebemos que há muita coisa errada.
2009/12/4 Rodrigo Avila rodr...@avila.net.br
Não podemos
Fiz um texto para divulgarmos em listas de discussões e sites:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Divulga%C3%A7%C3%A3o/Release_2
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Hallo,
Mirko Küster wrote:
PD ist in Deutschland schlicht nicht existent.
Diese Leier hoere ich immer wieder. Das stimmt auch. Aber wenn wir hier
von PD reden, dann meinen wir:
Hiermit raeume ich jedem ein zeitlich unbefristetes, unbegrenztes und
unwiderrufliches Nutzungsrecht an dem von
Karl Weber schrieb:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 22:03 schrieb Markus:
Jetzt ist es so, dass Mapper die Luftbilder aus Lauf abzeichnen diesen
Thread bald nicht mehr lesen werden - und das fände ich schade.
Und Leute, die sich nicht fuer Luftbilder aus Lauf interessieren, bekommen
Am 04.12.2009 08:44, schrieb Michael Rathai:
Gibt es denn schon mal eine Anfrage an die Deutsche Siegelverwaltung, ob
wir die Siegelliste bekommen können um damit einen Abgleich gegen die
OSM Daten zu machen können? (Anlaog Straßenliste)
Ja, gibt es und eine Liste gibt es auch. Wir melden
Hallo,
Sebastian Hohmann wrote:
Wieviele tatsächlich etwas gegen PD hätten, lässt sich nur raten, wenn
man keine Umfrage unter allen Nutzern durchführt.
Ich hoffe, dass es mit dem geplanten Lizenzwechsel zu ODbL entweder (a)
die Moeglichkeit fuer den einzelnen Mapper gibt, zu erklaeren, dass
RalfGesellensetter schrieb:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 schrieb Chris-Hein Lunkhusen:
PS: Ich persönlich hätte auch mit einer wirklich freien (PD) Lizenz
keine Probleme...
Hallo. Das erinnert an den Streit zwischen BSD und GNU/Linux, welche
Lizenz freier ist.
Aber es gibt einen
Hallo,
Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Und die neue Lizenz, wie auch immer sie aussehen wird, wird wohl inkompatibel
mit nahezu allen anderen freien Lizenzen sein, so daß man keine
kombinierten Werke erstellen können dürfen wird.
Nein, das ist ein grosses Missverstaendnis. Die neue Lizenz wurde
Moin !
ich wollte gerade eine meiner Karten [1] aufrufen und leider wurden
diese nicht aufgebaut.
Dann kam ich auf den Gedanken vielleicht liegt es an den eingebundenen
JS-Scripen von OpenLayers und beim Klick auf
http://www.openlayers.org/api/ajax.js kommt:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD
Mathias Kemper schrieb:
Hallo Bernd,
Wie gesagt, ich kenne weder den Ring selbst noch die Hinweistafeln an der
Zufahrt. Sondern nur das was man im Netz darüber liest und was man auf
Und nach verbreiteter Meinung soll man in OSM
das erfassen was real da ist, nicht was der Inhaber/Betreiber
Am 04.12.2009 um 10:06 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Durch die neue Lizenz ist zum Beispiel jemand, der einen
OSM-Routingservice betreibt, haerteren Anforderungen unterworfen; er
muss nun seine fuer das Routing optimierte Datenbank (in der ja durchaus
einiges an Knowhow stecken kann, dass er
Am 4. Dezember 2009 09:12 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
oder dass es (b) wenigstens zu einer Umfrage kommt, die hier endlich mal
Klarheit schafft. Dass OSM in Kuerze PD wird, ist sehr unwahrscheinlich,
aber wenn sich herausstellen sollte, dass Share-Alike einem Grossteil
der
Am 4. Dezember 2009 07:36 schrieb Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org:
Am Freitag 04 Dezember 2009 06:56:58 schrieb Mathias Kemper:
wenn du mit geschlossenen Augen an der Zufahrt vorbei fährst und alle
Hinweistafeln der Nürburgring GmbH sowie die aufgestellten Schilder der
StVO ignorierst, dann
Am 4. Dezember 2009 10:23 schrieb Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Für mich ist das ganz klar eine Rennstrecke.
+1, aber m.E. als route-relation, nicht im highway-tag.
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo,
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
ich fürchte, das wird auch eine Umfrage nicht klären können. Würde mich
ja freuen, wenn da viele mitmachen würden, sicher werden es viel mehr
sein als bei den Abstimmungen im Wiki, aber ob es repräsentativ wird
müssen wir wohl abwarten...
Die Umfrage
Hallo,
Gehling Marc wrote:
Das würde ja bedeuten, das Cloudmade ihr Routingdatenbank offenlegen
müsste. Das ist doch aus Sicht von denen ( SteveC ) erst mal
schlecht, und dennoch ist er für die neue Lizenz.
Andererseits kann Cloudmade leichter ein Copyright an den erstellten
Karten-Tiles
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Was die Polizei und die Behörde zum Thema Rennstrecke ja oder nein
sagt, ist mir in dieser OSM Beziehung erstmal ziemlich egal. Die können
das gerne auch private Mautstraße mit teilweisem Rennbetrieb oder wie
auch immer nennen, für mich bleibt das eine der bekanntesten
Am 4. Dezember 2009 11:39 schrieb Martin Siegel martin.sie...@sdas.de:
Volle Zustimmung. Grundsätzlich würde sich ein solches Problem vielleicht
lösen lassen mit einem raceway=yes oder vielleicht besser mit einer
route-relation und route=raceway.
+1
Das löst jedoch noch nicht das
Am 4. Dezember 2009 11:37 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Gehling Marc wrote:
Das würde ja bedeuten, das Cloudmade ihr Routingdatenbank offenlegen
müsste. Das ist doch aus Sicht von denen ( SteveC ) erst mal
schlecht, und dennoch ist er für die neue Lizenz.
Andererseits kann
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Diese Strecke als unclassified zu taggen widerspricht IMHO jeglicher
Intuition. Es ist halt einfach kein Bestandteil des
Straßenverkehrsnetzes.
nach dem Erläuterungen hier würde ich Dir widersprechen: es ist ein
Bestandteil davon, im Bundesbesitz,
Am Do Dezember 3 2009 glaubte Markus zu wissen:
Ja, das ist das eigentliche Problem:
brauchen wir nach ein paar solcher Abmahnungen auch
keine schnelleren Server mehr.
Da könnte die Aktion eines Einzelnen das ganze Projekt gefährden.
ACK!
Markus hat im Forum allerdings auch nicht
Am Do Dezember 3 2009 glaubte Thomas Hog zu wissen:
Markus schrieb:
PS: ich stecke grad bis zur Halskrause in den Vorbereitungen für die
boot - und habe von Lizenzrecht so gut wie keine Ahnung.
Ach, betreibst du nicht dieses Gemeindeseiten-Beispiel Simmelsdorf? Da
fehlt auch die
Am 4. Dezember 2009 11:56 schrieb Martin Siegel martin.sie...@sdas.de:
Abgesehen davon fände ich es aber auch irgendwie seltsam, im Navi
Mautstraßen vermeiden zu müssen, um auschließen zu können, nicht auf der
Nordschleife zu landen.
spricht denn ausser der Maut was dagegen, die Strecke als
Am Do Dezember 3 2009 glaubte Friedhelm Schmidt zu wissen:
Das Forum als solches ist nicht böse
doch, Foren an sich sind böse :)
+1 :-)
+1 leider wuchern die immer mehr.
flo
--
Und jetzt sag nicht das Ich dir meine Wognaturen mailen soll. Ich
sammele solchen Sinnigen Unsinn
Halloele,
So weit ich weiÃ, ist die Strecke im Besitz der Nürburgring GmbH. Land
und Kreis sind Gesellschafter der GmbH.
Jepp, zu 90% oder so
Abgesehen davon fände ich es aber auch irgendwie seltsam, im Navi
MautstraÃen vermeiden zu müssen, um auschlieÃen zu können, nicht auf
Am Freitag 04 Dezember 2009 11:31:48 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
nach dem Erläuterungen hier würde ich Dir widersprechen: es ist ein
Bestandteil davon, im Bundesbesitz, allerdings mautpflichtig (daher wird
Dich Dein Navi da bei entspr. Einstellungen sowieso nicht drüberleiten).
Wie kommst du
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Am 4. Dezember 2009 11:56 schrieb Martin Siegel martin.sie...@sdas.de
mailto:martin.sie...@sdas.de:
Abgesehen davon fände ich es aber auch irgendwie seltsam, im Navi
Mautstraßen vermeiden zu müssen, um auschließen zu können, nicht
auf der Nordschleife
Mathias Kemper schrieb:
Abgesehen davon fände ich es aber auch irgendwie seltsam, im Navi
MautstraÃYen vermeiden zu müssen, um auschlieÃYen zu können, nicht auf
der Nordschleife zu landen.
Nun ja, wenn wir schon nicht für die Renderer mappen, dann doch sicherlich
erst recht nicht für
Ob und wie man permanente Rundkurse von temporären (oder auch
historischen) Rennstrecken unterscheiden kann, ist dabei eine ganz
andere Diskussion ...
Hallo Ulf,
Diese Interpretation ist einfach falsch. Wenn wir jetzt anfangen alle
Landstraßen als racetrack zu definieren auf denen
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
