Nathan Edgars II writes:
If a way is tagged tiger:reviewed=no, JOSM puts a highlight behind it,
and when you select it the red is a lot fatter. How do I disable this?
Delete tiger:reviewed=no after you've reviewed a road. The highlight
is supposed to be ugly and annoying, by way of
For some time I've been looking for an easy way to import some OSM formatted
data back into OSM.
It's not that easy. This is what it takes at the moment:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BMO
So I'm now contemplating the much simpler path of rendering the data and
then tracing. But before I
On 8 August 2010 18:43, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'm now contemplating the much simpler path of rendering the data and
then tracing. But before I do that I really want to be sure that there
isn't a better way of doing this. Does anyone have any suggestions?
I think some people have
For anyone still fence sitting over the new contributor terms and the
ODBL this is what you have to look forward to in the near future:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-August/003908.html
Basically those in favour of PD but not directly effected by or
benefiting from data
Probably if you live in an area with a fairly large number of mappers
on the ground imports have less impact, reality is trying to map
Canada from GPS traces is a bit unrealistic. I tend not to go for
walks at minus thirty, or even minus twenty come to that.
Cheerio John
On 8 August 2010 05:38,
2010/8/8 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-August/003908.html
Basically those in favour of PD but not directly effected by or
benefiting from data imports would like to have them all ripped out
and replaced with surveyed data.
I
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
I respect PD guys, but in overall, I start to grow to openly
dislike their attitude.
Could you cite who these alleged PD guys are, please? Thanks in advance.
I'm getting increasingly exasperated with people projecting this big
bogeyman (or strawman. A big man made
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Nathan Edgars II writes:
If a way is tagged tiger:reviewed=no, JOSM puts a highlight behind it,
and when you select it the red is a lot fatter. How do I disable this?
Delete tiger:reviewed=no after you've reviewed a
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
I respect PD guys, but in overall, I start to grow to openly
dislike their attitude.
Could you cite who these alleged PD guys are, please? Thanks in advance.
I'm getting increasingly
80n wrote:
Isn't it going to present some complicated management problems if the
LWG changes the contributor terms at this stage in the process?
No, not in this case. The proposal is a subset of the powers currently
available to OSMF, not a superset. It is the existing CT _minus_ the
option
2010/8/8 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
I respect PD guys, but in overall, I start to grow to openly
dislike their attitude.
Could you cite who these alleged PD guys are, please? Thanks in advance.
Sorry, it wasn't meant PD supportive persons in OSM in
On 8 August 2010 13:25, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't it going to present some complicated management problems if the LWG
changes the contributor terms at this stage in the process? There are
already some 30,000 accounts that have signed up to CT 1.0, if the next
batch agrees to a
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
80n wrote:
Isn't it going to present some complicated management problems if the
LWG changes the contributor terms at this stage in the process?
No, not in this case. The proposal is a subset of the powers
On 8 August 2010 13:25, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
What mandate does LWG have to change the contributor terms anyway? Would
they need to put it to a vote of OSMF members or would they need to follow
the
Hey folks,
I started an own Routing-Engine project.
Sorry, it's only freeware and not OpenSource
but it might be interesting for people who are looking for an inhouse
solution.
The focus is on car-routing. It also supports the pgRouting / PostGIS
format.
Regards,
Carsten.
Alias PIMapper
Ups! This is the address http://osm2po.de
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 08:43, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
So I'm now contemplating the much simpler path of rendering the data and
then tracing. But before I do that I really want to be sure that there
isn't a better way of doing this. Does anyone have any suggestions?
You could import it as
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
PD has nothing to do with it. Full stop.
What's the difference between PD and DBCL?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
John Smith schrieb:
For anyone still fence sitting over the new contributor terms and the
ODBL this is what you have to look forward to in the near future:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-August/003908.html
Don't fight his conclusion, but his if in that sentence: |If
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
John Smith schrieb:
For anyone still fence sitting over the new contributor terms and the
ODBL this is what you have to look forward to in the near future:
On 8 August 2010 23:23, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Let's go what if and weigh the grand outcomes logically, not not fight
over some people pointing out some details of some possible outcome.
So those people that have been importing cc-by-sa go what if and
conclude that most of their
On 8 August 2010 23:31, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Who's talking about changing the direction of OSM? There's no consensus for
any change of direction that I'm aware of. Arguing that imports should not
be allowed because there *might* be change in direction is very
presumptuous.
He wasn't
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
John Smith schrieb:
For anyone still fence sitting over the new contributor terms and the
ODBL this is what you have to look forward to in the near future:
John,
On 08/08/2010 11:38 AM, John Smith wrote:
Basically those in favour of PD but not directly effected by or
benefiting from data imports would like to have them all ripped out
and replaced with surveyed data.
It's nothing to do with PD. It's that I'm sick and tired of hearing we
cannot
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I don't see any reason for an outcry other than this might make the
coastline less precise for a while. Chances are it is going to be fixed very
quickly in areas with Yahoo imagery, and might retain some of the typical
On 9 August 2010 00:07, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It's nothing to do with PD. It's that I'm sick and tired of hearing we
cannot go ahead with ODbL because someone in Australia imported some
coastline.
And I've tried to explain numerous times that it goes well beyond
coastlines,
On 9 August 2010 00:39, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
If the license change is important, why don't the people who want the
license change make their own coastline, on the dev server. This can
be done quickly, right? *Then* you can delete the import, and replace
it with the one on the dev
On 9 August 2010 00:59, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 August 2010 00:58, Erik Johansson e...@kth.se wrote:
Australia 2 people per km^2
Sweden 21 people per km^2
Canada is ~3 people per km^2...
Oh and most people in Canada live within 100km of the US border, and
in
Hi,
On 08/08/2010 04:39 PM, Anthony wrote:
If the license change is important, why don't the people who want the
license change make their own coastline, on the dev server. This can
be done quickly, right? *Then* you can delete the import, and replace
it with the one on the dev server.
I
On 9 August 2010 01:00, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
In fact, this is exactly what I said I would do - not delete the existing
coastline, but replace it with a version that has a suitable license. For
some reason John Smith does not seem to share our view that this is a
reasonable
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 08/08/2010 04:39 PM, Anthony wrote:
If the license change is important, why don't the people who want the
license change make their own coastline, on the dev server. This can
be done quickly, right? *Then*
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
John,
On 08/08/2010 11:38 AM, John Smith wrote:
Basically those in favour of PD but not directly effected by or
benefiting from data imports would like to have them all ripped out
and replaced with surveyed data.
Hi,
On 08/08/2010 05:13 PM, Anthony wrote:
No, what I said is that you need to start from a blank map. If you
want to create a map which isn't CC-BY-SA, you aren't allowed to use
the CC-BY-SA map to do it.
Depends on how exactly you use it. If you use the CC-BY-SA map to flag
stuff that
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 08/08/2010 05:13 PM, Anthony wrote:
No, what I said is that you need to start from a blank map. If you
want to create a map which isn't CC-BY-SA, you aren't allowed to use
the CC-BY-SA map to do it.
Depends
Doesn't seem _that_ complicated. I guess it's a choice between using
technology and doing manual labor (I know which one I would choose...).
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:43 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
For some time I've been looking for an easy way to import some OSM
formatted data back into
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:15 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
There's likely to be 20% data loss based on the feedback I'm getting.
I can't imagine it'll be anywhere near that low. What percentage of
contributors are even still active? Maybe 20% of active contributors
will disagree with the
Am 08.08.2010 16:59, schrieb John Smith:
On 9 August 2010 00:58, Erik Johansson e...@kth.se wrote:
Australia 2 people per km^2
Sweden 21 people per km^2
Canada is ~3 people per km^2...
You seem to forget that the most interesting Data (to most people) is
also where the people are.
Forests,
2010/8/9 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net:
With enough (motivated) people we can take any data loss, and rebuild
our database to be better within a short timeframe.
It may sound arrogant, but if you look at it rationally, we could even
compensate for mappers demotivated by any data loss
80n schrieb:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
And if we want to change the
direction os OSM, [...]
Who's talking about changing the direction of OSM?
Hehe, another case of jumping on the conclusion, rather than the if. ;-)
I should probably noted that I
One alternative way for selecting only roads that aren't present in OSM
would be RoadMatcher (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geobase/NRN_-_OSM_Map_Feature ), though
some programming will definitely be required, as the currently described
process process takes .gml at the final stage.
On Sun,
John Smith schrieb:
On 8 August 2010 23:23, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
Offending them doesn't help either. We are still ONE community in ONE
He seems to be doing a good job of offending Australians and anyone
else that has been involved with either importing or cleaning up
imports in
On Sunday 08 August 2010 17:40:40 John Smith wrote:
You've made a couple of big incorrect assumptions, firstly we have a
big lack of contributors at present in Australia
Which probably has the same cause as the lack of contributors in the
Netherlands: Too many imports!
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
Anthony schrieb:
And I'm sure if you do it that way you'll be infringing on the
copyright of the CC-BY-SA data.
Gah, what are we? I thought we were an OPEN project that likes
share-alike licensing, mostly without that the explicit terms of those
licenses really matter. Only lawyers can
John Smith schrieb:
You've made a couple of big incorrect assumptions, firstly we have a
big lack of contributors at present in Australia
Well, here in Austria, we lack contributors in areas where we had a (80%
botched) import of some existing data, and the community is thriving in
those
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Anthony schrieb:
And I'm sure if you do it that way you'll be infringing on the
copyright of the CC-BY-SA data.
Gah, what are we? I thought we were an OPEN project that likes share-alike
licensing, mostly without that the
On 9 August 2010 01:57, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Which probably has the same cause as the lack of contributors in the
Netherlands: Too many imports!
No, too few people, and a VERY VERY big land area.
___
talk mailing list
On 9 August 2010 02:03, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Well, here in Austria, we lack contributors in areas where we had a (80%
botched) import of some existing data, and the community is thriving in
those areas where we didn't have an import. Interesting, isn't it?
The problem here isn't
2010/8/8 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net
Am 08.08.2010 16:59, schrieb John Smith:
On 9 August 2010 00:58, Erik Johansson e...@kth.se wrote:
Australia 2 people per km^2
Sweden 21 people per km^2
Canada is ~3 people per km^2...
You seem to forget that the most interesting Data
On Sunday 08 August 2010 18:20:01 John Smith wrote:
On 9 August 2010 01:57, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Which probably has the same cause as the lack of contributors in the
Netherlands: Too many imports!
No, too few people, and a VERY VERY big land area.
Wrong metric: As pointed out
Am 07.08.2010 10:09, schrieb Mitja Kleider:
We actually do:
http://toolserver.org/~osm/locale/
Working with overlays might lead to overlapping objects, though.
That's not quite true, as the overlays respect the POIs position by
rendering them in memory with opacity=0. It's about to discuss
On 9 August 2010 02:38, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Wrong metric: As pointed out before, the metric you want is contributors per
number of inhabitants.
It doesn't take as many manhours to map a desert as it takes to map downtown
Melbourne.
Nice stereotyping... but not everything
On Sunday 08 August 2010 18:29:07 80n wrote:
The
following figures, from Nick Black, show a 1% drop in active contributors
in one month. This suggests that the size of the community may already
have peaked. Data loss will not improve this picture.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Nick Black
Am 08.08.2010 18:29, schrieb 80n:
With enough (motivated) people we can take any data loss, and rebuild
our database to be better within a short timeframe.
Any data loss will be a serious morale blow. Just the talk of data loss
is already having an impact.
The point being
On 9 August 2010 02:48, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
2) The numbers say there is an _increase_ in the number of active mappers from
13,675 to 14,018. drop of 1% of users actively contributing 1% drop in
active contributors
What is the current projection of active contributors?
An
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sunday 08 August 2010 18:29:07 80n wrote:
The
following figures, from Nick Black, show a 1% drop in active contributors
in one month. This suggests that the size of the community may already
have peaked. Data loss
On 9 August 2010 03:24, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 August 2010 02:48, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
2) The numbers say there is an _increase_ in the number of active mappers
from
13,675 to 14,018. drop of 1% of users actively contributing 1% drop in
active
2010/8/9 80n 80n...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Nick Black nickbla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
The % of users actively contributing to OSM each month has fallen
from 5.7% in March 2010 (13,675 / 238,985) to 4.7% in June (297,041 /
14,018).
Nick, how do you calculate the
John Smith is saying that the idea that there aren't many Australian
contributors is incorrect. In other words, he is saying that there _are_ a lot
of Australian contributors.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Frederik declares war on data imports...
From
On 9 August 2010 03:47, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
John Smith is saying that the idea that there aren't many Australian
contributors is incorrect. In other words, he is saying that there _are_ a
lot of Australian contributors.
No, there is a distinct lack of contributors
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:24:03PM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
I'm a little surprised that there has been no flame^Wdiscussion about
the order of the buttons yet, as the UI designers always observe that
the defaults is always what 90% of users will choose.
You started it… :P
I thought
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:39:43AM -0400, Anthony wrote:
If the license change is important, why don't the people who want the
license change make their own coastline, on the dev server.
I want to be seeing coastlines as good as these:
Why is this island not rendered on mapnik and osmarender maps ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4119119
I tried to remove the island from the multipolygon relations that had no
other ways than this island but it seems not to make any difference.
ablansinger / Carsten Nielsen
On 9 August 2010 04:06, Carsten Nielsen list_re...@toensberg.dk wrote:
Why is this island not rendered on mapnik and osmarender maps ?
I don't think natural=island renders., it should be natural=coastline
or natural=land.
___
talk mailing list
Carsten Nielsen wrote:
Why is this island not rendered on mapnik and osmarender maps ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4119119
You need to add a natural=coastline tag. Make sure the direction of the
way is correct, land on the left. It will not render in Mapnik until the
coastline
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:43 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html
12,094 active users in the past month. How many in the past 6 months?
Even if we assume 12,094 times 6 (which vastly overestimates things),
and assume that 100% of
On 9 August 2010 04:38, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
12,094 active users in the past month. How many in the past 6 months?
Even if we assume 12,094 times 6 (which vastly overestimates things),
and assume that 100% of such users agree to relicensing (another
overestimate), that still leaves
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Therefore OSMF need not treat the two groups separately as long as it
does not exert the future licence change option for the 30,000 'CT 1.0'
signups.
For OSMF not to treat them separately it cannot exert a future licence change
option at all
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I don't see any reason for an outcry other than this might make the
coastline less precise for a while. Chances are it is going to be fixed
very quickly in areas with Yahoo imagery, and might retain some of the
typical blockiness of the PGS import in
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that is considerably on the high side of things, since someone
gave an estimate of total number of contributors at about 75k
Good call. There are 5,404,188 changesets. Only 11,631 changesets
are completely
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Cartinus wrote:
It doesn't take as many manhours to map a desert as it takes to map
downtown Melbourne.
Cartinus
Please don't come up with this sort of nonsense
Imports have increased our number of contributors, not decreased them.
I have mapped, with my partner, a VERY
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Incidentally, I'd also guess the 30,000 'CT 1.0' signups is a
similarly misleading figure.
What's the UID of the first user to sign up under CT 1.0? Can I
assume that any higher uids have likewise agreed to the contributor
terms,
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Incidentally, I'd also guess the 30,000 'CT 1.0' signups is a
similarly misleading figure.
What's the UID of the first user to sign up under CT 1.0? Can I
assume that
2010/8/8 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net:
Am 08.08.2010 16:59, schrieb John Smith:
On 9 August 2010 00:58, Erik Johansson e...@kth.se wrote:
Australia 2 people per km^2
Sweden 21 people per km^2
Canada is ~3 people per km^2...
You seem to forget that the most interesting Data (to
Nathan Edgars II writes:
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Nathan Edgars II writes:
If a way is tagged tiger:reviewed=no, JOSM puts a highlight behind it,
and when you select it the red is a lot fatter. How do I disable this?
Delete
On Thursday 05 August 2010 20:31:39 Malcolm Herring wrote:
Bernhard,
The * is a wild card for the light number.
The Render Hint has one additional parameter, the suggested radius of the
sector arc that will appear on the chart. All the previous items are to
create the annotation.
The
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:58:35AM +0200, Samuele Battarra wrote:
di combinazioni di rimorchi che qui da noi non esistono. lhv invece non ho
capito se fa riferimento a un caso particolare tra quelli sopra o se è
semplicemente un camion ancora più grosso.
E' una sigla che sta per longer and
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:56:22 +0200, Heiko Jacobs wrote:
So this words don't satisfy me ...
I'm searching something like traceless, virtual, very, really very
abandoned, ...
Does anybody has an idea?
How about omitting the line entirely? If it's no longer part of the
ground truth, why try
Cool!
Do we need a bank account? I'm guessing that if sponsors would sponsor in
cash, then they will probably give a check. Also, we would need to give
receipts if ever so we can all account for tax purposes.
As for being an NGO. I know that there are some requirements for that. But
what's the
Andy Allan writes:
Never mind what Richard says, there's also some other points
1) You can't actually put anything into the public domain in most
jurisdictions. The best you can do yourself is use a special license,
such as CC0, which achieves similar results, but strictly isn't the
same
SteveC writes:
As in, why is the PD camp so loud here?
First and foremost, because we believe that all the licensing
kerfluffle will frighten people away from using the map. Because we
all want a map that will actually be USED by the most people possible.
Because we aren't afraid of forks
On 8 August 2010 17:03, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
copyright on it and claim it as their own. Because the ODbL and
CC-By-SA impose a cost on the community. I mean, if we're going to
get rid of contributors on purpose, then at least let's get rid of the
people who think a reciprocal
Russ,
On 08/08/2010 06:34 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
Here are the
questions we arrived at (thanks to Skud aka Kirrily Robert for taking
notes):
Good observations. Might be worth to discuss with folks at
odc-disc...@lists.okfn.org as well. I'll forward your post there for
people to be aware of
Hi,
On 08/08/2010 09:25 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 8 August 2010 17:03, Russ Nelsonnel...@crynwr.com wrote:
copyright on it and claim it as their own. Because the ODbL and
CC-By-SA impose a cost on the community. I mean, if we're going to
get rid of contributors on purpose, then at least
Liz,
On 08/08/2010 10:21 AM, Liz wrote:
You are welcome to join a 48,000 km kayak trip to survey the Australian
coastline.
I'll completely replace it with the PD PGS shoreline if anyone ever
again says we cannot do X because of the imported Australian shoreline.
Honestly, I will.
Bye
On 8 August 2010 18:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I'll completely replace it with the PD PGS shoreline if anyone ever again
says we cannot do X because of the imported Australian shoreline.
I'm starting to think 80n was right, if you were really serious about
wanting a PD fork
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'll completely replace it with the PD PGS shoreline if anyone ever
again says we cannot do X because of the imported Australian shoreline.
The PGS shoreline has been removed because it isn't as accurate as the
imported one.
On 8 August 2010 18:43, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'll completely replace it with the PD PGS shoreline if anyone ever
again says we cannot do X because of the imported Australian shoreline.
The PGS shoreline has been removed because it isn't as
Why we need a SA for all merged Data?
I understand ODbL like this: If you Merge some Data with OSM Data and
create something (e.g. a map) from that you have to publish the merged
data under ODbL(or compatible).
so why we need that?
With SA we intend that no one can fork OSM under a
Hi all -
I'm doing an animation for a promotional corporate video, including an animated
3D model of Sydney, which I'd like to overlay with the OSM map of Sydney.
Presumably this is ok as long as I include the appropriate accreditation in the
credits - could someone please clarify for me?
The
For anyone still fence sitting over the new contributor terms and the
ODBL this is what you have to look forward to in the near future:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-August/003908.html
Basically those in favour of PD but not directly effected by or
benefiting from data
For those of you that dislike the new wiki look, you can revert it by going to:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Preferences
Click on 'Appearance', and then select 'MonoBook' and save...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Hi again everyone,
Only one week to go until the next OSM meetup at Grange library.
Please RSVP by this Friday (13th August) if you haven't done so
already so I know how many drinks to buy. Details are in the email
below.
Happy mapping, and see you soon,
- David
On 2 August 2010 21:04, David
Olá pessoal
Sei que a lista é do OSM Brasil, mas como atualmente vivo em Luanda queria
pedir uma forcinha.
Tenho uns 650 Pontos de Interesse, de Angola, que atuamente estão em formato
KML e queria inserir no OSM. Tenho a área toda ja no QGIS, evito usar o Editor
online do OSM devido a
Olá Luiz,
Antes de tudo, verifique se os dados estão de acordo com a licença do
OpenStreetMap, que é a Creative Commons BY-SA. Se os pontos foram obtidos a
partir de um mapa proprietário, como o Google Maps, não é possível fazer a
importação.
Se isto não for uma restrição, no link abaixo há
Moin !
ein großer Jakobsweg ist ausgeschildert worden - der Via Scandinavia von
Fehmarn nach Lübeck.
Vielleicht findet sich der eine oder andere im Rahmen seines
Sommerurlaubs oder einer Sommertour an der Lübecker Bucht und erfaßt ein
Teilstück mit.
Die Wegebeschreibung ist unter [1] zu
Am 07.08.2010 22:03, schrieb Claudius:
Inkompatibel sind die nicht. Du kannst für eine einfache Bushaltestelle
einfach
einfach?
highway=bus_stop
public_transport=stop_position
bus=yes
taggen.
Warum braucht man drei Tags für eine Information? JOSM generiert für das
H-Symbol nur
Hallo Norbert,
Der OSMI nimmt es genau - gut so. In Wirklichkeit ist das Polygon nur
geschlossen, wenn die Wege jeweils *an den Enden* miteinander verbunden
sind und nicht mit einem inneren Punkt.
Way 26131222 aufgeteilt und das überstehende Ende aus der Relation
entfernt. Jetzt müsste es
Hallo,
am 08.08.2010 10:42 schrieb Alexander Matheisen:
Oh, da habe ich wohl etwas nachlässig gearbeitet... ;)
Warst du derjenige, der das verbessert hat? Vielen Dank!
Ja, ich bekenne. Gerne geschehen.
In diese Falle bin ich mehrfach gestolpert. Sehr hilfreich zum Auffinden
dieser
Hallo,
In diese Falle bin ich mehrfach gestolpert. Sehr hilfreich zum Auffinden
dieser überschüssigen Wegstücke ist die Reihenfolge-Anzeige (hat die
Spalte einen Namen?) im JOSM-Relationseditor. Das Ding zeigt gnadenlos
jede fehlende oder falsche Verbindung an - wenn man denn die Ways
Am 08.08.2010 10:32, schrieb Stephan Wolff:
Möglicherweise liegt es an dem komplizierten Schema, dass die Erfassung
der Buslinien (zumindest in SH) kaum vorankommt. Ich erzeuge
Ist das Schema kompliziert oder sind die Linien kompliziert? Gerade in
der Fläche ist es doch leider üblich, daß
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
