Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

sent from a phone > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 14:28, Andrea Lattmann > ha scritto: > > E poi ho una domanda: si pensa al cuore, e la rianimazione respiratoria? si, ovviamente rianimazione vuol dire soffiare in naso o bocca e poi tenere qualche flusso di

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

>Se una persona ha un infarto e si >interviene nei primi 10 minuti ci sono >>speranze. dopo no.. ...e poi ci vuole tanta fortuna Dipende da cosa è dovuto l' arresto cardiaco. Comunque ho già in progetto di mappare nella mia zona quelli posti all' esterno dei fabbricati, che piano piano

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

On 20/06/16 15:38, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 12:04, Tomas Straupis >> > ha scritto: >> > >> > My main point is to get back to reservoir/basin being tagged as "landuse" > > why would that be desirable? Basically landuse is a

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

2016-06-20 15:03 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes : > I guess an example of what I am seeing as a poor quality edit, > http://osm.org/changeset/40156579 > > An embassy called Rachel? > Mistagging of a Monument? > well, this seems to be more the kind of "test" some newbies think

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

Ottima iniziativa! Mi sto muovendo localmente (per ora nessuna lista...) FabC Il giorno 19 giugno 2016 19:03, Francesco Piero Paolicelli < pierso...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Ciao a tutti. > > Sono qui a lanciare un'idea / richiedere un consiglio. > > Ho realizzato un bot su Telegram, uno dei

Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV CRAB import

Die beslissing werd genomen om uniforme data in OSM te krijgen, zo dat alle bisnummers op dezelfde manier genoteerd worden. Het is vergelijkbaar met een aantal straatnamen die met hoofdletters in CRAB zitten (i.p.v. enkel de eerste letter een hoofdletter). zie de code:

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

>> My main point is to get back to reservoir/basin being tagged as "landuse" > why would that be desirable? There will always be more than one opinion on which naming of tags is "better" because there is no "universal best way" (unless it's "42"). What I'm striving for is STABILITY for

Re: [OSM-talk-be] AGIV CRAB import

Hooi Sander, Met een "/" in plaats van een "_" zijn er geen missings meer, maar dat is toch niet helemaal juist. Ik ga de anderen met een "_" maar laten. Toch bedankt en groetjes. Sus 2016-06-20 15:24 GMT+02:00 Sander Deryckere : > Met de import hebben we geprobeerd om

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

2016-06-20 17:30 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine : > The simple fact is that there is not a consistent structure for > identifying 'landcover' on OSM and even natural=wood and landuse=forest > make it difficult to decide what is naturally occurring and what is man > made. >

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

Look at this edit:http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4253750089/history Is it not possible to use "special" characters lika åäö in the Maps.me app? Also, why is it suggesting adding opening hours to a school? Post codes are also a little dubious, since those aren't open data in Sweden and can

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

another issue: housenumber added to a building. This is not going to work in Italy, because every entrance of a building gets it's own housenumber. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242789192 Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

2016-06-20 17:48 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > another issue: housenumber added to a building. This is not going to work > in Italy, because every entrance of a building gets it's own housenumber. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242789192 > maybe there is more to

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

On 17/06/16 17:52, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > From my point of view, even as an experienced OSM mapper, it is > currently almost impossible to make meaningful edits (in well mapped > areas) with this app Not everywhere is "well mapped". :) I've personally used maps.me for quick simple edits in

[Talk-in] OpenStreetMap Hack Weekend at Mapbox Bengaluru

Hey everyone, I wanted to invite all of you to the OpenStreetMap hackweekend on July 2 and 3 at Mapbox in Bangalore. We will spend two full days working on projects like iD, openstreetmap-website, JOSM etc. You can see all the projects and ideas in the wiki

[OSM-talk-be] places to meet: Antwerp, Mechelen, maybe Brussels

Hi, There will be a few places where OSM people can meet in the following weeks: - Wed June 29th, Missing Maps in Antwerp: http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/230814982/ - Thu July 17th, Meetup in Mechelen: http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/232022440/ - week of

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

sicuramente no :) il 118 sa che nella scuola XY c'è un DAE. il problema si pone non tanto per l'ambulanza che arriva sul posto (che ha il DAE con se) ma per i migliaia di volontari "laici" che hanno fatto il corso di primo intervento. Se una persona ha un infarto e si interviene nei primi 10

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Meeting met RLRL

Dag Marc en Joost, Ik heb enkele weken geleden ook samen gezeten met iemand van Schelde-Durme rond het gebruik van OSM voor hun projecten. Blijkbaar was dat een collega en wisten ze niet van elkaar :-). We (Trage Wegen vzw) gebruiken dagelijks QGIS en OSM voor het vervolledigen van kaarten

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

One of the fundamental principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent is Impartiality: "It makes no discrimination as to nationality, race, religious beliefs, class or political opinions" [1]. I could not find anything about impartiality neither at the OpenStreetMap Foundation Core principles

[OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

2016-06-19 23:35 GMT+03:00 Ilya Zverev: > <...> the proposal about water=* was > accepted by 16 mappers, and if you have a problem with that, then I agree > that we should change our proposal process, but in all these years nobody > has even started. Accepted by 16(!) wiki editors but ignored

[OSM-talk-be] AGIV CRAB import

Dag Sander, In Balen 2490 zijn er missings omdat men daar bis-numbers gebruikt in de vorm van Nr_1, Nr_2, Nr_3, enz.. in plaats van NrA, NrB, NrC enz.. CRAB en OSM slikken die alsook de zoekfunctie van OSM. Zie: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139379759#map=19/51.15796/5.16556 In de

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

I guess an example of what I am seeing as a poor quality edit, http://osm.org/changeset/40156579 An embassy called Rachel? Mistagging of a Monument? Phil (trigpoint) Phil On Mon Jun 20 12:52:13 2016 GMT+0100, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 11:26 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

>non necessariamente soffiare. Questo mi preoccupa perché è molto importante ossigenare! Andrea Lattmann ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

Il giorno 20 giugno 2016 16:20, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 16:13, Andrea Lattmann < > andrea.guglie...@ga-2.it> ha scritto: > > > > Questo mi preoccupa perché è molto importante ossigenare! > > > quando

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

>Nella realtà non aiuta quasi mai >nessuno, guardano tutti, anche se ogni >>persona con una patente di guida >dovrebbe aver fatto un corso di pronto >>soccorso... Purtroppo hai ragione, l'ho constatato quanto stavo facendo un massaggio cardiaco e chiedevo a gran voce di chiamare il 118,

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

sent from a phone > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 16:13, Andrea Lattmann > ha scritto: > > Questo mi preoccupa perché è molto importante ossigenare! quando l'hai imparato? Pare che l'american heart association abbia cambiato le raccomandazioni per motivi di

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

sent from a phone > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 12:04, Tomas Straupis > ha scritto: > > My main point is to get back to reservoir/basin being tagged as "landuse" why would that be desirable? Basically landuse is a property of land, and generally it's not very

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

sent from a phone > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 16:28, Stefano ha scritto: > > Ma talk-it è diventato talk-118 ? ;-) ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

sent from a phone > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 14:28, Andrea Lattmann > ha scritto: > > Comunque una rianimazione è più facile a dirsi che a farsi. si, si vuole un po' di pratica. Con una mano tieni la mente in alto (per evitare che la lingua tappi il

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

>in realtà le ambulanze hanno un >defibrillatore non automatico (al meno >>qualche tempo fa era così). E' ormai da parecchi anni che hanno oltre al manuale, anche il DAE semiautomatico con personale certificato 118 all' utilizzo. Comunque una rianimazione è più facile a dirsi che a farsi. E poi

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

grazie alla tua mail ho mappato un defibrillatore in israele. a quanto pare, l'unico mappato. Mi impegno a mapparne altri :) Il giorno 20 giugno 2016 15:28, Andrea Lattmann ha scritto: > >in realtà le ambulanze hanno un >defibrillatore non automatico (al meno >

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

> You need to decide if you want to abolish the water=* or if you just > prefer using waterway=riverbank instead of natural=water + > water=river - which does not in any way conflict with the water=* tag. Once again: I do not want to abolish water=*. My main point is to get back to

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

On Mon, 2016-06-20 at 11:26 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2016-06-19 22:35 GMT+02:00 Ilya Zverev : > > As for the maps.me, I am glad that foreign names issue is basically > > the only one that most people agree on. > > > > there are lots of different issues, and even

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

Maps.me editor has got the principal difference from other editors, - it can be used without an active Internet connection. It means it is possible now to map in wilderness, in mountains, while traveling without worrying about roaming fees. Couple of years ago I used the Google maps on

Re: [Talk-it] DAE e furti

Andrea Lattmann wrote on 20/06/2016 14:17: > ...ho già in progetto di mappare nella > mia zona quelli posti all' esterno dei fabbricati, che piano > piano stanno aumentando. Approfitto del thread per segnalare una cosa che spero sia solo una mia paranoia. L'anno scorso, in occasione di un

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

sent from a phone > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 19:43, Francesco Piero Paolicelli > ha scritto: > > mi sembra 7min per la precisione in realtà dipende dalle circostanze, hanno rianimato un bimbo dopo quasi un ora in acqua ghiacciata e ce l'ha fatto, ma per un

Re: [Talk-it] contribuire a qualità di openstreetmap su aree verdi

Il giorno ven, 17/06/2016 alle 10.46 -0700, Alecs ha scritto: > Inizialmente qualche tempo fa mi pare che chiedesse se si era d'accordo con > la classificazione dell"area verde" attuale in OSM oppure no, non ho capito > se a scopi di ricerca o di modifica eventualmente dei dati (mi sembra di più

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

mi sembra 7min per la precisione. Inviato da iPhone Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 14:17, Andrea Lattmann ha scritto: >> Se una persona ha un infarto e si >interviene nei primi 10 minuti ci sono >> >speranze. dopo no.. > > ...e poi ci vuole tanta fortuna

[OSM-talk] Invitation to Rio de Janeiro Olympics Mapathon

Hi folks, I'd like to invite you to virtual mapping party - a mapathon - happening this weekend (June 25th and 26th), about Rio de Janeiro area. We need your help to create a better map for the city hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Games. Please head to the wiki page for more details:

Re: [Talk-it] DAE e furti

2016-06-20 21:42 GMT+02:00 Alecs : > Ho usato un > paio di volte defibrillator=yes che è quasi un unicum mondiale, c'è qualche > altro tag? > userei automated_defibrillator > oppure è meglio lasciare perdere un approccio di questo tipo e > mappare solo i

[OSM-talk-be] Radio 2 Programma De Inspecteur & navigatiesystemen

Jaren geleden stond er een note op die wijk dat de straten zouden veranderen. Op de website van Mechelen was niets te vinden.Ik ben een paar keer gaan fotograferen maar de meeste straten waren nog in aanleg. Bovendien is het een fotoönvriendelijke buurt.Indien iemand mij had kunnen

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

2016-06-19 22:35 GMT+02:00 Ilya Zverev : > As for the maps.me, I am glad that foreign names issue is basically the > only one that most people agree on. > there are lots of different issues, and even if many of them have not yet commented on them, I still believe they do have

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

> I'd like to add to this that on a semantic / natural language level, > waterway=riverbank (deliberately ignoring long standing, widespread use and > acceptance) would seem to indicate a riverbank, i.e. the bank of a river, or > in other words, the area along a river, which will occassionally but

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

2016-06-20 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tomas Straupis : > I do not want to „eliminate“ water=* > I want to go back to the situation before the water proposal - with > landuse=reservoir, waterway=riverbank, landuse=basin, etc. etc. As it > used to be, and as it was and is still

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

> actually the way it was before HAD big issues, you could not even state if > something was a lake or just the basin of a fountain (most kind of water > areas just mapped as natural=water). Everything what can be mapped with new water schema can be (and is) mapped with old schema. The

Re: [Talk-in] OpenStreetMap Hack Weekend at Mapbox Bengaluru

HI, What kind of expertise(programming?) is required to participate in this event? Shibu Narayanan From: Kushan Joshi [mailto:0o3...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 1:06 PM To: talk-in@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-in] OpenStreetMap Hack Weekend at Mapbox Bengaluru Hey

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

2016-06-20 11:29 GMT+02:00 Tomas Straupis : > My main point is that existing tagging (especially widely used one) > should not be changed unless it gives some ontological benefit (new > features/properties being added, features split etc.). > actually you do not have

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

2016-06-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Tomas Straupis : > > actually the way it was before HAD big issues, you could not even state > if > > something was a lake or just the basin of a fountain (most kind of water > > areas just mapped as natural=water). > > Everything what can be

Re: [Talk-in] OpenStreetMap Hack Weekend at Mapbox Bengaluru

Hey Shibu, > What kind of expertise(programming?) is required to participate in this event? You don’t necessarily need to have an expertise, familiarity with languages that the OSM projects use would do. For e.g., in iD editor you need to be comfortable with Javascript and maybe a little bit

Re: [Talk-in] OpenStreetMap Hack Weekend at Mapbox Bengaluru

Hey Shibu, > What kind of expertise(programming?) is required to participate in this event? You don’t necessarily need to have an expertise, familiarity with languages that the OSM projects use would do. For e.g., in iD editor you need to be comfortable with Javascript and maybe a little bit

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

On Monday 20 June 2016, you wrote: > > I'd like to add to this that on a semantic / natural language level, > waterway=riverbank (deliberately ignoring long standing, widespread > use and acceptance) would seem to indicate a riverbank, i.e. the bank > of a river, or in other words, the area along

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

On Monday 20 June 2016, Tomas Straupis wrote: > > > > If you want to eliminate use of water=* from OSM you'd need to > > convince the community of this. A formal proposal can be used but > > without convincing arguments on the matter this stands little > > chance in being approved. > > I do not

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

2016-06-20 8:16 GMT+02:00 Francesco Piero Paolicelli : > > il 118 sa che nella scuola XY c'è un DAE. il problema si pone non tanto > per l'ambulanza che arriva sul posto (che ha il DAE con se) ma per i > migliaia di volontari "laici" che hanno fatto il corso di primo

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Radio 2 Programma De Inspecteur & navigatiesystemen

betere link :http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/9xwkLAM7oIUTUu_UbWvaEg/photo ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

Il 20 giugno 2016 16:28:34 CEST, Stefano ha scritto: >Il giorno 20 giugno 2016 16:20, Martin Koppenhoefer > >ha scritto: > >> >> >> sent from a phone >> >> > Il giorno 20 giu 2016, alle ore 16:13, Andrea Lattmann < >> andrea.guglie...@ga-2.it> ha

Re: [Talk-it] DAE su osm con la scusa di un bot Telegram

>quando l'hai imparato? E un bel po di anni fa, circa 14/15 anni fa quando ero in C.R.I. ed ero primo soccorritore. Comunque non facevamo mai i classici 15 massaggi 2 ventilazioni ma i primi minuti massaggiavamo molto, i 100 massaggi al minuto vanno benissimo, poi ventilavamo 1/2 volte ma

Re: [Talk-it] DAE e furti

Succede ogni tanto che vengano rubati, sono oggetti che devono essere facilmente alla portata di tutti, sono anche alla portata dei vandali purtroppo, anche due defibrillatori che ho mappato io, appena inaugurati, sono spariti qualche tempo dopo (già sostituiti per fortuna). Piccolo OT: se

Re: [Talk-it] contribuire a qualità di openstreetmap su aree verdi

Hai ragione, ora sono passati alla fase di modica dei dati, me ne sono accorto dopo anche io :) Concordo sul difetto di prendere un pezzo alla volta Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi wrote > Invece è il secondo. Per partecipare è anche obbligatorio accedere con > l'account osm... > L'altro giorno ne ho

Re: [Talk-it] DAE e furti

>Piccolo OT: se passando davanti a una >scuola/palestra o altro si nota un >cartello che indica che all'interno è >presente un defibrillatore, c'è un >modo per mapparlo? Intendo dire, per >segnalare che la struttura è dotata di >defibrillatore, anche se non si conosce la >posizione esatta.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Radio 2 Programma De Inspecteur & navigatiesystemen

Ik merkte gisteren dat als je op Geopunt kijkt, een verschillend resultaat krijgt kwa huisnummers tussen de view die enkel huisnummers toont en dewelke ook de gebouwen toont. De eerste is juist denk ik als je de foto bij het krantenartikel bekijkt. m Op 20 jun. 2016 22:11 schreef "joost schouppe"

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

I'm using Go Map for quick editing on the go. It's only available for IOS though: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!! It's pretty much as powerful as iD (at least to my knowledge, I never use iD for anything more complicated than adding poi's or changing tag values) and pretty easy to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Radio 2 Programma De Inspecteur & navigatiesystemen

Ik heb ze (stad Mechelen) via tweet gevraagd om ons (osm_be) op de hoogte te houden vanzulke wijzigingen of het eventueel zelf te doen. Ben benieuwd of ze gaan reageren. m Op 20 jun. 2016 23:24 schreef "Philippe Casteleyn" < philippecastel...@hotmail.com>: > > > betere link : >

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

On Monday 20 June 2016, Tomas Straupis wrote: > 2016-06-19 23:35 GMT+03:00 Ilya Zverev: > > <...> the proposal about water=* was > > accepted by 16 mappers, and if you have a problem with that, then I > > agree that we should change our proposal process, but in all these > > years nobody has even

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

> You are either deliberately or due to misinformation distorting things > here. The water=* is widely used and accepted, there are >700k uses in > line with the proposal (an additional 255k for the deprecated > water=intermittent). > > The waterway=riverbank tag is considered equivalent to

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

On 20/06/16 08:54, Tomas Straupis wrote: > Accepted by 16(!) wiki editors but ignored by thousands of mappers. > 5 years after acceptance according to tagwatch: > "new" tag usage > water=reservoir 79937 > water=riverbank 1085 > > "old" tag usage > landuse=reservoir 387793 >

Re: [OSM-talk] Failed water proposal reversal

2016-06-20 10:48 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > If you want to do something productive you could clean up the frequent > occurences of duplicate and sometimes contradicting tags on member ways > and multipolygon relations for river mapping. One of the problems of > the

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

I've been using Maps.me myself and find it easy to add shops - although I'm missing many presets (I change them when I come home to the right one but other users will not do that generally). Maps.me was perfect for one activity that is usually painful - updating shops inside Iceland's largest

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

On 20 June 2016 at 22:48, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: > Maps.me editor has got the principal difference from other editors, - it can > be used without an active Internet connection. I've been editing in JOSM for years and just started editing with Maps.me, and the fact

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

2016-06-20 19:14 GMT-03:00 Frederik Ramm : > Hi, > > On 06/20/2016 11:49 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: >> The down side of course is that the Maps.me data isn't updated very >> frequently so I might be duplicating data which has been added after >> Maps.me last generated the data

Re: [OSM-talk] MAPS.ME edits - partly sub-standard

Hi, On 06/20/2016 11:49 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote: > The down side of course is that the Maps.me data isn't updated very > frequently so I might be duplicating data which has been added after > Maps.me last generated the data extracts, Isn't Maps.me Open Source - could not someone else simply

[OSM-ja] 愛知県の佐久島

Tomです。 今週末に、愛知県の佐久島に合宿に行きます。 たぶん、レンタサイクルでログを取ることができると思います。 夜には、コツコツとマッピングできるかと思われます。（飲みながら？） もし、お時間ある方、後方支援、写経等・・・、いただけると嬉しいです。 http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/34.7236/137.0423 -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= はやかわ ともみち (Tomomichi Hayakawa) tom.hayak...@gmail.com

Re: [Talk-cz] doplnění souřadnic rozcestníku na openstreetmap.cz

správné by měly být souřadnice 50.2074461 16.8473917 Povedlo se mi to tím, že jsem omylem stiskl enter před úpravou souřadnic po vložení ctrl+V Dne 20. června 2016 17:10 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > > latitude: 50.2074461.16.8473917 > longtitude: 0 > > Pěkný. Jak se ti to

Re: [Talk-cz] doplnění souřadnic rozcestníku na openstreetmap.cz

latitude: 50.2074461.16.8473917 longtitude: 0 Pěkný. Jak se ti to povedlo? :-D V tomhle případě si s tím aplikace neví rady, protože se vygeneruje odkaz: http://www.openstreetmap.cz/?mlat=50.2074461.16.8473917=0=16#map=16/50.2074461.16.8473917/0 *@walley*: neměly by se ty souřadnice

Re: [Talk-cz] doplnění souřadnic rozcestníku na openstreetmap.cz

ono to nefunguje i v jiných případech U rozcestníku ref JE275 se po odkliknutí dostanu na http://openstreetmap.cz/#map=16/50.2104/16.9903 a rovněž nemohu rozcestník přesunout na správné souřadnice 50.2133853 16.9928883 Dne 20. června 2016 17:10 Marián Kyral napsal(a): > >

[Talk-ca] Fusions ou remplacement de chemins et les attributs originaux

Bonjour, Depuis plusieurs semaines je vois apparaitre des réseaux cyclables bizarres sur la vue cycliste de osm.org. En examinant de plus près je constate que de nombreuses fusions de chemins occasionnent une duplication des tags ou relations cyclables à des portions qui n’en sont pas et en

Re: [Talk-ca] Fusions ou remplacement de chemins et les attributs originaux

Bonjour Claude Avec tous les contributeurs qui interviennent, le monitoring des éditions est bien sûr important.  L'approche thématique, par exemple piste cyclables, peut se faire via des requêtes Overpass.  Il est possbile par exemple de voir les éditions au cours de la dernière semaine, du

Re: [Talk-de] Neues vom deutschen OSM-Kartenstil

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > wenn jemand gut icons machen kann, aber kein Interesse an git hat oder ihm > das zu schwierig bzw. zeitaufwändig ist, dann willst Du ihn nicht für die > Mitarbeit am deutschen Stil? Leute was ich echt nicht brauchen kann ist eine

Re: [Talk-de] Neues vom deutschen OSM-Kartenstil

gmbo wrote: > Das System GIT muß ich erst verstehen. https://xkcd.com/1597/ > Vieleicht kennt ja jemand einen Link auf eine einfache Erklärung oder > kann es grob erklären. Kennst Du andere Systeme wie svn oder cvs? > Muß ich nicht mindestens postgress und postgis

Re: [Talk-de] Neues vom deutschen OSM-Kartenstil

Michael Reichert wrote: > Kennst du schon git commit --author "Joe Average "? Das kann man hinterher aber nicht mehr ändern ohne den commit hash zu ändern. Gruss Sven -- If you can spend five minutes on the Internet and do not run Linux, you're a

Re: [Talk-de] Neues vom deutschen OSM-Kartenstil

> Weil die AFAIK aus unerfindlichen Gründen immer noch keine hstore-Datenbank > verwenden und dann sind halt neue tags schwierig. Siehe auch > Burgen/Schlösser. Die unerfindlichen Gruende sind, dass "die" einen riesengrossen Rundumschlag und alles auf einmal machen wollen, das muss einfach

Re: [Talk-de] Neues vom deutschen OSM-Kartenstil

> Wer einen Eindruck kriegen will wie das jetzt aussieht, hier ist eine URL, > die auf meinen Testserver Zeigt: > http://osm.geggus.net/map/ (Links OSMDE rechts OSM Carto) Gibts auch irgendwo eine solche Vergleichsseite osm-carto-de <-> alter-osm-de? Wie weit ist das ganze denn deiner Meinung

Re: [Talk-cl] Como mapear paraderos y recorridos de micros?

Gracias Julio, me pondré a experimentar con esto de las relaciones de rutas, creo que es algo nuevo para mi. saludos. 2016-06-19 11:38 GMT-04:00 Julio Costa Zambelli : > Hola Danilo, > > El tema del recorrido se hacía (en los tiempos en que se importaron los >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Bonnes et moins bonnes visibilités OSM

Christian Rogel wrote > Tony nous parle d’adresse cadastrale, il veut, bien sûr, dire « adresse > enregistrée dans le cadastre », sans qu’elle acquière une « nature » > cadastrale. > Fondamentalement, c’est un bien commun créé par l’autorité municipale et > laissé à la disposition de tous. Une

Re: [Talk-cz] doplnění souřadnic rozcestníku na openstreetmap.cz

Toto nějak nefunguje - omylemnahrál jsem rozcestník s REF: UO016 se špatnými souřadnicemi a chtěl jsem jej tedy opravit: Dosadím UO016, odkliknu, objeví se tabulka, kliknu na osm.cz, objeví se bod na mapě - ale dále jsem nepřišel na to, jak jej přesunout na správné místo. Nefunguje ani poklikání

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Majuscule à l'article défini sur les lieux-dits ?

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Philippe Verdy wrote: [...] > > * Pour aider les moteurs de rendu, OpenStreetMap pourrait ajouter un > >champ 'ign_name' ou 'suggested_name_on_map' (nom du champ à définir) > >avec le nom suivant les règles de l'IGN. Mais je vois ça comme une > >question

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Majuscule à l'article défini sur les lieux-dits ?

Osmose n'a pas à imposer cette norme, un point c'est tout. Il fait ça à l'aveugle... En revanche Osmose ferait bien de s'occuper de détecter l'usage des abréviations impropres ("Bvd" au lieu du mot générique "boulevard", qui lui aussi devrait garder sa minuscule...), et s'il veut peut aussi

Re: [OSM-ja] 愛知県の佐久島

そか、Mapillary って手がありますな。 自転車に付けて走り回れるかな。 バッテリーいっぱい持って行こうかな。 2016年6月21日 1:45 Shu Higashi : > Tomさん、楽しそうなマッピング、いいですね。 > 離島はいろんなタグが使えるので結構好きです。 > 折を見て遠隔参加させて頂きます。 > 現地調査よろしくお願いします。 > MapillaryでひたすらPOIの写真を撮りまくるのがいいかも。 > 東 > > > 2016/06/21 Tomomichi Hayakawa

Re: [OSM-ja] 愛知県の佐久島

Tomさん、楽しそうなマッピング、いいですね。 離島はいろんなタグが使えるので結構好きです。 折を見て遠隔参加させて頂きます。 現地調査よろしくお願いします。 MapillaryでひたすらPOIの写真を撮りまくるのがいいかも。 東 2016/06/21 Tomomichi Hayakawa : > Tomです。 > > 今週末に、愛知県の佐久島に合宿に行きます。 > たぶん、レンタサイクルでログを取ることができると思います。 > 夜には、コツコツとマッピングできるかと思われます。（飲みながら？） > > >

Re: [Talk-cz] doplnění souřadnic rozcestníku na openstreetmap.cz

Potvrzuji. Zkoušel jsem a háže mi to chybu "400 - Bad request" Není mi jasné proč :-( Nahlásil jsem wallymu na osmcz/api: https://github.com/osmcz/api/issues/26 Marián Dne 20.6.2016 v 18:29 Zdeněk Pražák napsal(a): > ono to nefunguje i v jiných případech > U rozcestníku ref JE275 se po

[Talk-de] JOSM: keine Daten gefunden

Hallo, es scheint mir, was mit dem TLS (https://api.openstreetmap.org/api) nicht zu stimmen. In wireshark sehe ich als letztes (vorm RST) Version TLS 1.2 Alert Message: Encrypted Alert hat noch jemand ähnliche Probleme? Gruß, Toni ___ Talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Majuscule à l'article défini sur les lieux-dits ?

On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Christian Rogel wrote: > > La question se résume à ceci, vu de ma fenêtre : > > 1) Il ne doit être fait mention des pratiques l’IGN ou l’INSEE que > pour information, car, ils ne sont pas compétents pour ce dont il est > parlé, c’est-à-dire, les noms de lieu délibérés par

[Talk-cz] velké multipolygony

Zdravím, poradil by někdo jak je to s velikostí multipolygonu? Na Wiki se píše o libovolném počtu inner, outer cest ale o velikosti ne. Je lepší jeden velký multipolygon, nebo plochu rozdělit na několik menších, případně proč? A poslední dotaz, čím je možné velké multipolygony editovat, všechny

Re: [Talk-de] JOSM: keine Daten gefunden. nachtrag

On 20.06.2016 20:55, Walter Nordmann wrote: Starte Josm im Terminalfenster und schau dir den Output an. oh ja, hätt' ich auch selber drauf kommen können: Liegt nicht am JOSM, irgenwas scheint in der DB falsch zu laufen? Toni INFO: GET

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Majuscule à l'article défini sur les lieux-dits ?

Le 20/06/2016 01:50, Francois Gouget a écrit : > > Je pense que tout cela sort largement du cadre d'OpenStreetMap et relève > plutôt du cadre de la commission de réformation des noms de lieux-dits > français ;-) > > Bref, c'est aux historiens de rétablir la vérité historique et >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Majuscule à l'article défini sur les lieux-dits ?

Et pourquoi veux-tu absolument que les *données* d'OSM soient utilisées uniquement comme phrases nominales ? OSM ne code pas que pour reproduire les panneaux (qu'ils soient normalisés ou non). Ce sont des données qui sont intégrables et pas seulement pour dessiner une carte avec un noeud

Re: [Talk-transit] GTFS, tools and pt tags generally

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > On 2016-06-20 16:18, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Sprunk >> wrote: >> >>> >>> The situation with GTFS data itself is so bad that Google stopped >> offering

Re: [Talk-de] Neues vom deutschen OSM-Kartenstil

Am 20. Juni 2016 um 09:40 schrieb Sven Geggus : > Ohne technische basiskenntnisse hilft man mir halt nun mal nicht wirklich. > Das Problem der Maintenance am deustchen Kartenstil (ich wiederhole mich) > sind nicht neue features. > klar, technische Basiskenntnisse

Re: [Talk-de] Neues vom deutschen OSM-Kartenstil

Am 20. Juni 2016 um 10:29 schrieb Sven Geggus : > > Ich habe mit views und hstore only eigentlich gute Erfahrungen gemacht. > > > https://github.com/giggls/openstreetmap-carto-de/blob/master/hstore-only.style ja, ich muss zugeben, ich verstehe auch nicht, warum

Re: [Talk-de] JOSM: keine Daten gefunden

Nö, JOSM geht bei mir (hab mal geraten, dass du Josm verwendest). Ich hab aber in Erinnerung, dass IPv6 bei manchen Usern Probleme gemacht hat. Wurde dann wohl durch Java 8 erledigt. Und falls du Latest verwendet, könnte es sein, dass Java 7 nicht mehr unterstützt wird. Der nächste Tested

Re: [Talk-de] JOSM: keine Daten gefunden. nachtrag

Starte Josm im Terminalfenster und schau dir den Output an. Gruss walter ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Majuscule à l'article défini sur les lieux-dits ?

La question se résume à ceci, vu de ma fenêtre : 1) Il ne doit être fait mention des pratiques l’IGN ou l’INSEE que pour information, car, ils ne sont pas compétents pour ce dont il est parlé, c’est-à-dire, les noms de lieu délibérés par les communes. 2) On ne peut qu’être prudent avec ce

  1   2   >