Gervase Markham wrote:
I'm considering putting together the following proposal. As it's
somewhat intrusive, I thought I'd post here first to see if there was
significant opposition.
Clearly not :-) I'll write up a proposal.
Gerv
___
talk
Chris Hill schrieb:
The Map_Features page has really suffered. Having a single page with
a list of all the tags was easy to search, now there are various
places to search. Can we put it back to a single page plse.
FULL ACK - the current page is a PITA!
Regards, ULFL
P.S: If the templates
FULL ACK - the current page is a PITA!
+1
I restored the single page.
P.S: If the templates are the problem, remove them. It's a lot more
important to have a usable map features page than to have an easy way
for translations ...
Agreed, but again, the problem is not the templates but PHP
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Pieren Pieren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FULL ACK - the current page is a PITA!
+1
I restored the single page.
P.S: If the templates are the problem, remove them. It's a lot more
important to have a usable map features page than to have an easy way
for
www.cgpsmapper.com The program has support for shapefiles, but I'm not sure
if the free version does. Otherwise, you could use GPSMapEdit (
www.geopainting.com) and import your shapefiles, then save it as MP format
and then use cGPSMapper to compile it to an IMG format. (There are some
links set
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 21:16 +0100, Robert Vollmert wrote:
393 relations
235 with non-closed ways
53 with less than two members
32 containing ways with less than two nodes
56 modified relations
Examples of non-closed ways are relation 435 and 436. Both these have 2
ways which together
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Jon Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just so happens that the existing multipolygon handling code in
osm2pgsql will convert these ways into a closed area for the Mapnik
rendering. I can not remember whether this was by accident or design but
it would be
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:42 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Jon Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It just so happens that the existing multipolygon handling code in
osm2pgsql will convert these ways into a closed area for the Mapnik
rendering. I can
Hi everyone,
there is a new RFC regarding golf courses.
I tried to include a lot of Wikipedia links to make it comprehensible
even for non-golfers. Please take a look at it and share your opinion.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Golf_course
Greets,
Daniel
Has anyone else noticed the number of stares going up? I had about 5
in my hour or so of mapping. I waved at 3 of them and got one wave back.
have fun,
SteveC | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.asklater.com/steve/
___
talk mailing list
SteveC wrote:
Has anyone else noticed the number of stares going up? I had about 5
in my hour or so of mapping. I waved at 3 of them and got one wave back.
Yes, but that's mainly due to the fact that I've spent the last couple
of weekends mapping an area where wandering around with something
With its right wing?
Stephan.
Has anyone else noticed the number of stares going up? I had about 5
in my hour or so of mapping. I waved at 3 of them and got one wave back.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
SteveC wrote:
Has anyone else noticed the number of stares going up? I had about 5
in my hour or so of mapping. I waved at 3 of them and got one wave back.
No, but I'm definitely noticing an increase in the number of agressive
dogs :-(
Graham
SteveC | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
I think this might be the cause:
http://www.met.police.uk/campaigns/counter_terrorism/ct_camera_2008.pdf
More details:
http://www.met.police.uk/campaigns/campaign_ct_2008.htm
80n
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:52 PM, graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SteveC wrote:
Has anyone else noticed the number
k b k_b at yahoo.se writes:
I will give the scripts a try.
Since it seams like converting shape files into osm is
not a as easy as first thought ,is there some way to
convert shape files directly into garmin img files?
GPS Trackmaker software reads in shapefiles and lists 13 output
On 9 Mar 2008, at 20:33, 80n wrote:
I think this might be the cause:
http://www.met.police.uk/campaigns/counter_terrorism/
ct_camera_2008.pdf
Fight back with
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/03/05/remixing-the-london.html
More details:
I would think you'd go with creating a map removing from the stylesheets
things you didn't want. Then if you want specific ones add them in manually.
I know at layer 12 informationfreeway can be captionless (press the plus on
the right of the map for the option)
On 10/03/2008, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know of software that will allow you to pick and choose the
towns and other features that appear in a printed outline map? Suppose,
for example, that I was planning a Spurr Pilgrimage Tour: how could I
print an
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Gora Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.P.S. I have had someone claim to me that an Indian citizen is legally
required to register any GPS devices. Anyone from India who can cast
any light on that?
Lol, that was me. Someone claimed that to me and I,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Stuart Robinson wrote:
Links are by default oneway, I think that's what the other person is
getting at.
stuart.
so the use of secondary_link was possibly a shorthand to avoid oneway=true ??
___
Talk-au mailing list
Darrin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I read one part of the OSM wiki I see it talking about classifying
highways purely by their physical characteristics
..
The majority of pages talk about classifying roads by their state
funding designation and or highway reference which is fine
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:52:00 +1100
Ian Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, rest assured this is a live debate. Check out
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Highway_administrative/physical_descriptions
That's an interesting page, good to see people are addressing
Christoph Eckert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Insofern verstehe ich nicht, wo da ein Problem sein soll, zumal Fred Bugs
üblicherweise äußerst zügig ausbaut.
Jupp! Besser ist es IMO immer die neueeste Version zu haben als alle
6 Monate mal.
Ich hab schon darüber nachgedacht mir ein script zu
Daniel Schmidt schrieb:
Mapnik besitzt beim Rendern eine Art Kollisionserkennung, d.h. es
wird verhindert, dass sich zwei oder mehrere Labels überlagern. In
diesem Fall wird dann eben nur ein Element angezeigt. Erst in einer
größeren Zoomstufe können dann die weiteren Labels gezeichnet
Hi,
Sven Geggus schrieb:
Ich hab schon darüber nachgedacht mir ein script zu bauen, dass beim
start automatisch die jeweils neueste Version runterlädt.
Das könnte man noch einfacher per Java Web Start [1] erreichen. Eine jnlp-Datei
ist flott gebastelt, das jar-File muß nur signiert sein.
Hi,
seit einiger Zeit hat JOSM das an sich lobenswerte Verhalten, dass
ein Objekt beim Verschieben erst mal an seiner alten Stelle kleben
bleibt. Erst wenn man's mit der Maus eine bestimmte Anzahl Pixel
weit weg gezogen hat, springt es von seinem alten Platz weg und man
kann es nun
Hi,
Hier meine Frage: Kann man diese bestimmte Anzahl Pixel irgendwo
einstellen?
.josm/preferences
edit.initial-move-threshold=5
Beste Grüße,
ce
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
.josm/preferences
edit.initial-move-threshold=5
Perfekt! Besten Dank.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Johannes Lempp
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo,
Naja, es geht nicht um Dich und mich. Es geht um Leute, die fuer das
von Dir beschriebene Verfahren zu unsicher sind, die im Zweifel das
Strassenschild auf der anderen Seite nicht entziffern koennen und die
auf keinen Fall jemals irgendwo durch einen Grasstreifen oder ueber
Hallo,
Auf der Seite Featured image proposals steht ganz oben:
Once consensus is reached here... aber ich sehe nicht,
wo und wie dieser Konsens erreicht wird. Wo findet denn
die Dikussion statt, welches Bild als nächstes die Ehre
bekommt?
In der Praxis funktioniert es so, dass Du Dir
30 matches
Mail list logo
