On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Rally de Leonrall...@gmail.com wrote:
We only need a few quality tracks.
Generally, I am in favor of uploading the GPX traces in OSM even if
you don't think your personal traces is not very much useful to
others.
Who knows in the future, some OSM hacker might:
1.
Totally agree,
the more tracks the better.
On your number 2, do we have time stamps as well for the tracks that are
submitted? Is this normally stored in the GPX trances?
If we have loads of tracks, that's potentially very useful data!
I think when I go back there and I buy a GPS, I might drive
Ok then, this may be good source of the (actual) average speed of vehicles
on a particular road (at specific times of day, eg. during rush hour, etc.).
This will give a more realistic ETA on gpsr autorouting.
As for averaging tracks, i think the roadguideph people (on motorbikes) have
been doing
Caveats: most GPX traces uploaded to OSM *are not* suitable for determining
traffic data. In most cases, the fact that one is surveying affects how one
drives and so the GPX data records how one surveys, not how one actually
drives.
Also, unless there's a fixed folksonomy, you cannot determine
One suggestion I can give is the McKinley Hills area in Taguig, south of the
American Cemetery. This is still mostly pristine unmapped area in OSM and
Google Map Maker without any updated satellite imagery in Yahoo! or Google
(at least for their default base imagery [the historical imagery
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Andre Marcelo-Tanner an...@enthropia.comwrote:
So more PR basically?
Yeah, more PR. And here's my contribution to that PR:
http://vaes9.codedgraphic.com/posts/google_map_maker_party
:-p
___
talk-ph mailing list
Yes, not yet, because we currently use trace for mapping purposes
only. I'm just sharing some options on how we can use the trace data
for some other purposes. Mining this information is a huge task but I
believe it is possible.
Still, I had fun looking at where, I was moving fast or slow
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Andre Marcelo-Tanner
an...@enthropia.comwrote:
What are is this exactly? by ISM and British School?
The fort area is a good area for a meeting for all people north and south.
If so this time we want to secure ourselves a good meeting area where we
can have
2009/6/9 Mathias Versichele mathias.versich...@gmail.com:
Has anyone ever attempted to get the same kind of permission from the
Belgian kadaster ?
Not that I know. We could do it
In the Brussels Region, I have already asked to use a version of the
URBIS data that are now the basis for the
Ik heb spijtig genoeg geen tijd meer om me in te zetten voor OSM (indertijd
groot stuk van Deurne en Borgerhout extra-muros gemapped).
Het is al zo lang geleden dat ik zelfs niet meer weet hoe alles werkt: kan
er daarom iemand de volgende wijziging doorvoeren op de kaart:
Eerste stukje St
Dag Wannes,
'k heb dat al eens aangepast. Maar iemand heeft het recent terug
gewijzigd naar de 'normale' situatie.
Het is een 'tijdelijke' situatie voor een bouwwerf in de Sint
Jacobsmarkt (oud VTB gebouw) die meer dan 4 jaar (!) zal duren. Vandaar
dat ik het als wijziging had opgenomen.
'k
Le mercredi 10 juin 2009 à 21:49, Sam Pastuer a écrit :
I'm Sam, when in Belgium I'm spending most of my time between
Molenstede/Diest and Blauberg/Herselt. I just bought myself a Garmin Edge
705 for road cycling and mountainbiking. I'm quite new to the whole
mapping thing, but have some
Matt Amos schreef:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:10 AM, 80n80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Henk Hoff o...@toffehoff.nl wrote:
So if you have a Produced Work based on:
- the database: no need for reverse engineering since the database is
freely available
I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets, giv=
en
that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle boulevard i=
n
OSM terms, though a bicycle boulevard might lack pedestrian facilities=
=2E
Frequently, these are not streets you would want to let the kids
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.dewrote:
is there any other way to get OSM data without going to the main server?
there are no other caches, right?
There is a whole ecosystem of servers providing OSM data
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Planet.osm
There is a perl script for summarizing length of highways
(osm-length-2.pl), is there one for summarizing type and number of
POI/node tags for an input osm file?
Not tagwatch, I just want to create a summary report of used tags
around my mapping area.
--
cheers,
maning
Hi!
I have idea about relative positioned node on the line (crossing,
bus_stop, railway stops) object with no direct relation to geometry,
but with topology relation.
Legend:
x node
o relative node
way
IDEA object model:
x--o--o-ox
API 0.7
x-- x-
I'm trying to run the polyshp2osm.py script on a shapefile I converted to
4326 format using ogr2ogr. I copied the script and all three files created
by ogr2ogr to the c directory.
I try to run from the command prompt
python c:\polyshp2osm.py -s 10 -o 4 -l c:/open C:/Zoning.shp.
But I keep
On 10 Jun 2009, at 03:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/6/9 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets,
given
that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle
boulevard in
OSM terms, though a bicycle boulevard might lack
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with
highway=cycleway.
As per the discussion on the talk page of the proposal.
Alternatively highway=(road type), access=no, bicycle=yes. There are
arguments I believe that in exceptions where cars are also allowed,
having a different highway type
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
These streets are completely analogous to highway=pedestrian, just for
bicycles. If pedestrian streets deserve their own highway type, these do too.
Regards, Marc
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Shaun McDonald wrote:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
plus designation=cycleroad
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Bicycle-boulevards-tp23949507p23959526.html
Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at
Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 03:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/6/9 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets, given
that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle boulevard in
OSM terms, though a
Shaun McDonald schrieb:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 03:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/6/9 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets,
given
that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle boulevard in
OSM terms, though a
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
plus designation=cycleroad
cheers
Richard
is there a benefit instead of just tagging these ways:
highway=cycleway + motor_vehicle=yes ?
cycleway just told,
Hi,
Mario Salvini wrote:
Even in germany on these roads there are no additional rights-of-way in
comparison to normal cycleways (except that bicycles get the
officially allowance to drive next to each other and not just inline.
buts that's piece of cake ;) ). A normal cycleway with
hanoj wrote:
I have idea about relative positioned node on the line (crossing,
bus_stop, railway stops) object with no direct relation to geometry,
but with topology relation.
Currently I describe it even in a step further.
Imagine that you could contraint lines based on these properties; for
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
Mario Salvini wrote:
Even in germany on these roads there are no additional rights-of-way
in comparison to normal cycleways (except that bicycles get the
officially allowance to drive next to each other and not just inline.
buts that's piece of cake ;) ). A
2009/6/10 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
there are some main differences though: usually they are normal
streets changed in designation. That is cars are allowed but don't
have the priority and must drive very slowly,
2009/6/10 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
tag both ways as:
highway=cycleway
motor_vehicle=yes
footway=right
parking:right=inline
parrking:left=diagonal
width=13
the rest you don't like is just a rendering issue but not about data, I
think.
the rendering is a way of visualizing the
Mario Salvini wrote:
is there a benefit instead of just tagging these ways:
highway=cycleway + motor_vehicle=yes ?
Yes.
cycleway just told, that's this way is bicycle=designated.
So why designation=?
designation= means this is the official designation of this way. It has
nothing to do with
Hi,
2009/6/10 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
tag both ways as:
highway=cycleway
motor_vehicle=yes
footway=right
parking:right=inline
parrking:left=diagonal
width=13
I won't have it. This feature is a road, not a 20 metre wide cycleway
with parking facilities.
Yes there are different
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/6/10 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
there are some main differences though: usually they are normal
streets changed in designation. That is cars are allowed but don't
2009/6/10 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
there are some main differences though: usually they are normal
streets changed in designation. That is cars are allowed but don't
have the priority and must drive very slowly, they have
pavements/sidewalks, they are wide like streets, the give
I think designation is about the legal status of a way, particularly where
that might not be obvious from, or in conflict with the physical
characteristics of the way.
On physical characteristics, you can get a fair way with highway=residential
+ maxspeed=(say)30. There wouldn't be too many
Mario Salvini wrote:
yes, it's all about designation. normal roads are designated for
motor_vehicles. But these roads are only designated for bicycles.
I would say: Normal roads are designated for all kinds of traffic and so
are cycleroads (but with special restrictions for motor_vehicles and
(highway=cycleway +)
cycleway=cyclestreet could also be a good solution (next to lane and
[additional] track)
--
Mario
Richard Mann schrieb:
I think designation is about the legal status of a way, particularly
where that might not be obvious from, or in conflict with the physical
Hey Nathan,
I was just fighting with this, I'm working on importing trails to the
national parks and forests in Washington state.
I used gdalwin32 [1] as my windows gdal (fwtools' python bindings appear
busted in Windows) I then had to get the python bindings from pypi
[2]. Then I had to fight
Karl Newman wrote:
*Avoid duplicate copies of messages?*
When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list
message, you can opt to not receive another copy from the mailing list.
Select /Yes/ to avoid receiving copies from the mailing list; select
/No/ to receive copies.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
*Avoid duplicate copies of messages?*
When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list
message, you can opt to not receive another copy from the mailing list.
Select /Yes/ to
Imagine if we scale this OSM and filter gps traces collected by cars, we
have an empirical data on the average traffic speed.
Unfortunately the GPS traces will be 'slow biased' as we all slow/stop to
take pictures of post boxes etc.
Somebody please code this.
I presume you did your plot in
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Mario Salvini wrote:
Even in germany on these roads there are no additional rights-of-way in
comparison to normal cycleways (except that bicycles get the
officially allowance to drive next to each other and not just inline.
buts that's piece of cake ;) ). A
Mario Salvini wrote:
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
plus designation=cycleroad
cheers
Richard
is there a benefit instead of just tagging these ways:
highway=cycleway + motor_vehicle=yes ?
On 9 Jun 2009, at 06:27, John Wilbanks wrote:
Puneet Kishor, who is a Science Commons Fellow looking at geospatial
data and climate change, will be attending and hoisting the facts
can't
be copyrighted flag.
Er, sounds like a red herring to me since they can have database
rights and be
Ed Loach wrote:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with
highway=cycleway.
As per the discussion on the talk page of the proposal.
Alternatively highway=(road type), access=no, bicycle=yes. There are
arguments I believe that in exceptions where cars are also allowed,
having a
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
2009/6/10 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
tag both ways as:
highway=cycleway
motor_vehicle=yes
footway=right
parking:right=inline
parrking:left=diagonal
width=13
I won't have it. This feature is a road, not a 20 metre wide cycleway
with parking
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/6/10 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
tag both ways as:
highway=cycleway
motor_vehicle=yes
footway=right
parking:right=inline
parrking:left=diagonal
width=13
the rest you don't like is just a rendering issue but not about data, I
think.
the rendering
Greetings,
There are sparse trail maps for the Olympics in Washington state both the
National Parks Service and National Forest Service have data available. The
national park has an older but still mostly accurate trail data available
at:
2009/6/10 si...@mungewell.org:
Imagine if we scale this OSM and filter gps traces collected by cars, we
have an empirical data on the average traffic speed.
Unfortunately the GPS traces will be 'slow biased' as we all slow/stop to
take pictures of post boxes etc.
Somebody please code
As a follow up question: Is there a preferred method for tagging nodes with
a uuid/NID?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Tyler tyler.ritc...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
There are sparse trail maps for the Olympics in Washington state both the
National Parks Service and National Forest
Richard Mann wrote:
I think designation is about the legal status of a way, particularly
where that might not be obvious from, or in conflict with the physical
characteristics of the way.
On physical characteristics, you can get a fair way with
highway=residential + maxspeed=(say)30. There
si...@mungewell.org wrote:
Imagine if we scale this OSM and filter gps traces collected by cars, we
have an empirical data on the average traffic speed.
Unfortunately the GPS traces will be 'slow biased' as we all slow/stop to
take pictures of post boxes etc.
Depends; some of us just
Michael Barabanov wrote:
Can we use relations same way as for more complex cycle routes for this one?
Yes, though you're not limited to just a specific kind of way for relations.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing
Karl Newman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
*Avoid duplicate copies of messages?*
When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list
message, you can
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 15:55:10 Richard Mann wrote:
I think designation is about the legal status of a way, particularly
where that might not be obvious from, or in conflict with the physical
characteristics of the way.
snip
We have a tag for special features for cyclists, so I'd use that
Richard Mann wrote:
This is a request for comments on the proposal for a new
Key:designation. Hopefully it's had it's rough edges removed already,
but I would appreciate your comments.
Richard
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Designation
I'm opposed; this seems like
Ted Percival wrote:
If it's not a through road for vehicles but is for bicycles that could
be a challenge to tag access restrictions on. Perhaps a node with
barrier=* if there is one.
The barriers aren't usually barriers as such, but rather turn
restrictions in place with exceptions for
Mario Salvini wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/6/10 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
there are some main differences though: usually they are normal
streets changed in designation. That is cars are
Cartinus wrote:
But all other cyclestreets I know of in the Netherlands are signposted with
signs that have no legal status at all. Using designation=cyclestreet there
would not be appropriate. Using highway=residential or unclassified plus
cycleway=cyclestreet sounds like a very good idea
Beste,
Ik zoek een manier om specifieke data uit OSM los in een laag te krijgen zodat
ik elke laat apart op een kaart kan aan- en uitzetten (met openlayers).
Heeft iemand enig idee hoe ik snel (binnen een dag) die data uit OSM kan halen,
in een database stoppen, serveren via een mapserver? Of
Berlo, L.A.H.M. (Leon) van wrote:
Ik zoek een manier om specifieke data uit OSM los in een laag te krijgen
zodat ik elke laat apart op een kaart kan aan- en uitzetten (met
openlayers).
Heeft iemand enig idee hoe ik snel (binnen een dag) die data uit OSM kan
halen, in een database stoppen,
Berlo, L.A.H.M. (Leon) van wrote:
Ik zoek een manier om specifieke data uit OSM los in een laag te krijgen
zodat ik elke laat apart op een kaart kan aan- en uitzetten (met
openlayers).
Heeft iemand enig idee hoe ik snel (binnen een dag) die data uit OSM kan
halen, in een database stoppen,
Op 10 juni 2009 13:37 schreef Lennard (l...@xs4all.nl) het volgende:
Berlo, L.A.H.M. (Leon) van wrote:
Ik zoek een manier om specifieke data uit OSM los in een laag te krijgen
zodat ik elke laat apart op een kaart kan aan- en uitzetten (met
openlayers).
Heeft iemand enig idee hoe ik snel
Rob wrote:
vergeet even niet dat je met een proxy probleem zit..
dat moeten we nog aan het werk zien te krijgen
Dat is alleen een 'ajax' issue, die club heeft wel meer problemen de
laatste tijd ;)
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Onderstaande is misschien ook interessant voor de Nederlanders:
OSM-CAFE in Antwerpen op 21 juni.
Beetje hetzelfde idee als de MappersBabbel Amsterdam een paar dagen
later (24 juni).
Ben benieuwd naar de opkomst daar, ik kan er zelf jammer genoeg niet heen.
martijn van exel
http://www.data360.org ?
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Bas de Lange
06 166 26 950
Hoofdorganisator Software Freedom Day Nederland
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0_KiVdIOtc
http://softwarefreedom.nl/
Op Di, juni 9, 2009 08:23 schreef Berlo, L.A.H.M. (Leon) van:
Hallo,
Ik ben op zoek naar
Ronald wrote:
Graag zie ik een link naar de volgende website:
http://openstreetbugs.appspot.com/
Geregeld :)
Stefan
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Gefeliciteerd met de nieuwe website van openstreetmap.nl
Dit is echt een grote verbetering in vergelijking met de oude website.
Toch heb ik nog een verzoekje.
Graag zie ik een link naar de volgende website:
http://openstreetbugs.appspot.com/
Zodat passanten (de gebruikers die niet aan streetmap
Ik ben een rondritje per trein aan het maken voor wat mensen en wil daar een
leuke kaart voor printen. Een kaart zoals de OSM relation analyzer maakt [1]
zou
perfect zijn.
Nu begrijp ik best dat OSM er niet voor is dat jan en alleman maar even wat
random routes gaan maken. Iemand een tip hoe
Hi,
Mijn eerste post op deze mailinglist was een beetje een rant over de
usability van Openstreetmap [1]. Een van de dingen die ik noemde:
| Andere voorbeelden van een omslachtige ontsluiting zijn de manier waarop
| je de kaarten met overlays kunt embedden op een webpagina (een grote lap
Hoi,
Ook nog een andere opmerking: http://www.openstreetmap.nl laat een
totaal andere site zien dan http://openstreetmap.nl (wel of geen www.
ervoor zetten). Volgensmij is de site met www. de juiste site. Zou dit
gelijk getrokken kunnen worden? :).
Groeten, Tijn
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Tijn buijs wrote:
Ook nog een andere opmerking: http://www.openstreetmap.nl laat een
totaal andere site zien dan http://openstreetmap.nl (wel of geen www.
ervoor zetten). Volgensmij is de site met www. de juiste site. Zou dit
gelijk getrokken kunnen worden? :).
Zoals al eerder aangegeven;
Ronald,
Dank je wel. Wellicht is het nog beter om een NL versie van
openstreetbugs te maken op:
bugs.openstreetmap.nl
?
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:02:02 +0200
Ronald stroe...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Gefeliciteerd met de nieuwe website van openstreetmap.nl
Dit is echt een grote verbetering in
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Tijn buijs wrote:
Ook nog een andere opmerking: http://www.openstreetmap.nl laat een
totaal andere site zien dan http://openstreetmap.nl (wel of geen www.
ervoor zetten). Volgensmij is de site met www. de juiste site. Zou dit
gelijk getrokken kunnen worden? :).
Zoals
A shoe-maker, Aetrex Worldwide, and GTX Corp, a company that makes
miniaturized Global Positioning Satellite tracking and location-transmitting
devices, are teaming up to make shoes for people suffering from Alzheimer's
Disease. The technology will provide the location of the individual
Puxa, bacana isso, hein!
Criei uma para o Rio também:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/RJ/Rio_de_Janeiro/Distritos
[]
2009/6/10 Vitor George vitor.geo...@gmail.com
Olá pessoal,
Observando a página de status de Berlin, vi que eles usam um esquema de
divisão
Am Mittwoch 10 Juni 2009 schrieb Werner König:
Hi,
ich denke, zu diesen Themen sollte es Standards geben (haben sich oft
bewährt, Ausnahmen bestätigen die Regel), klar beschrieben und von der
Mehrheit
der Mapper bevollgt werden.
ach was... genau darum geht es hier doch ;-)
man kann zwar
Moin !
an vielen Ecken stehen Wegweiser für Rad und Wanderwege die dann wieder
Pfeile in die unterschiedlichsten Richtungen haben. Ein Wegweiser ist
aber für mich noch nicht eine ausreichende Grundlage für die Erstellung
von Relationen.Darüber hinaus hällt das sehr auf wenn man an jeder
Moin !
ich erstelle gerade eine Doku und wollte einen Screenhshoot des Cursors
machen.
Strg+Druck und das Programm führt nicht zum Erfolgt.
Hat einer von Euch das einmal unter Windows hinbekommen - oder ist das
hier wieder einmal so ein Spezialverhalten?
Gruß Jan .-)
2009/6/10 Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net
Wie denkt Ihr darüber ?
Von dieser Art der temporären Erstellung dieser Informationen halte ich
nichts. Dann lieber nur den Wegweiser als solches eintragen und sich extra
auf nem Zettel aufschreiben, wo welche langgehen und die entsprechende
Hi,
Andreas Labres schrieb:
http://futurezone.orf.at/stories/1604103/
Freie Straßenkarte ohne GPS aktualisieren
Naja, der Nutzen ist noch etwas beschränkt, wenn keine Einbahnstraßen
und sonstige bereits in der Karte befindliche POIs auf dem Ausdruck
erscheinen, dann ist das daraus
Jan Tappenbeck (OSM) wrote:
Hat einer von Euch das einmal unter Windows hinbekommen - oder ist das
hier wieder einmal so ein Spezialverhalten?
Google.de: cursor windows screenshot , erster Link :
http://www.wer-weiss-was.de/theme11/article2122767.html
Irfanview ist dort genannt und dort
Hi,
habe niemals gegen diese Offenheit votieren wollen, die ich heute schon
schätze, wollte nur darauf hinweisen dass Standards nicht per se schlecht
sind.
Übrigens was ist ORS. Gibt es noch andere Beispiele, die ich noch nicht
kenne. Bin erst recht neu bei OSM dabei.
Gruß
Werner
Hi,
beantwortet nur den zweiten Teil der Frage, bleibt immer noch handelt es
sich um diakratische Zeichen (nur der Neugier halber :-) )
Gruß
Werner
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: talk-de-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-de-boun...@openstreetmap.org] Im Auftrag von Martin
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:13:34 +0200
Von: Werner König werner-koe...@t-online.de
An: \'Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch\' talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] User: Kraftfahrstra?e Edit-War
Hi,
ich finde es etwas mau, sich so aus der
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:46:50AM +0200, Carsten Schwede wrote:
Subject: Re: [Talk-de] Walking Papers @ FutureZone
Hi,
Andreas Labres schrieb:
http://futurezone.orf.at/stories/1604103/
Freie Straßenkarte ohne GPS aktualisieren
Naja, der Nutzen ist noch etwas beschränkt, wenn
Den Zettel kennen andere aber nicht und können diesen Nutzen !
Etric Celine schrieb:
2009/6/10 Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net mailto:o...@tappenbeck.net
Wie denkt Ihr darüber ?
Von dieser Art der temporären Erstellung dieser Informationen halte ich
nichts. Dann lieber nur
hi!Wir haben hier einige Fußgängerzonen mit Zeitbeschränkungen für
Radfahrer. Für ein Routing wäre es also wichtig zu wissen, zu welchen Zeiten
ein Radler da rumfahren darf.Wie gebe ich diese Zeiten an?
opening_hours = Mo-Fr 21:00-09:00 ?
Anfangs wollte ich das mit hour_on und hour_off erledigen,
Werner König schrieb:
wie ruft man dieses Tool in josm eigentlich auf. Habe bisher noch
nichtmal gewusst, dass es dieses gibt.
Das Tool kommt mit dem utilsplugin und steht dann unter dem Menue
Werkzeuge zur Verfuegung.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hallo Werner,
gehören die Striche über den a,o,u also den deutschen Umlauten ä,ö,ü auch zu
den diakratischen Zeichen
Ja.
(Antworten auf solche Fragen findet man meist recht schnell bei
Wikipedia: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diakritische_Zeichen)
und wie müssen sie dann bei b) behandelt
wenn man ein entsprechendes Netz bzw. Area etc. mappt und in die OSM-DB
hochlädt, wie lange dauert es bis es in
http://www.öpnvkarte.dehttp://www.xn--pnvkarte-m4a.dedargestellt
wird.
Bis ich die Daten neu in die Datenbank spiele. Momentan sind die Daten vom
7.6. und ich habe schon vor
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Werner König wrote:
auch wenn es vielleicht eine dumme Frage ist (dumme Fragen gibt es
eigentlich nicht, nur dumme Antworten) und ich mich als Newby oute, wie
Diese Behauptung stammt von denjenigen, die dauernd dumme Fragen stellen.
Natürlich gibt es dumme Fragen.
Hallo,
Johannes Huesing johan...@huesing.name writes:
Sebastian Waschik sebastian.wasc...@gmx.de [Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 12:09:28PM
CEST]:
[...]
wohl sicherlich auch nicht so oft vor.
Ein Klassiker ist die Sierichstraße in Hamburg, die hat sogar einen eigenen
Wikipedia-Eintrag.
genau
Hallo Jörg,
den Wegweiser als solches eintragen
Dazu könne man folgendes Schema nutzen:
wegweiser=wanderwege|Radwege|...
+ wegweiser:wanderwege:standort=*
+ wegweiser:wanderwege:höhe=,# (angeschriebene Höhe in m.Ü.M)
+ wegweiser:wanderwege:alt-calc=,# (umgerechnete Höhe in m.Ü.M)
+
Moin.
Ich bin glaub ich gerade ein bisschen blöd.
Ich möchte eine BB angeben (2x lat/lng) und eine Zielgröße in Pixel
(breite x höhe des bildes).
Die einzige ähnliche API dazu verlangt Mittelpunkt (1x lat/lng), zoom und
die Bildgröße.
Kann mir jemand einen Tipp geben?
Gerrit
Am Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:45:48 +0200
schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
[Quoting repariert]
Etric Celine schrieb:
2009/6/10 Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net
mailto:o...@tappenbeck.net
Wie denkt Ihr darüber ?
Von dieser Art der temporären Erstellung dieser
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:28:09AM +0200, Melchior Moos wrote:
wenn man ein entsprechendes Netz bzw. Area etc. mappt und in die OSM-DB
hochlädt, wie lange dauert es bis es in
http://www.öpnvkarte.dehttp://www.xn--pnvkarte-m4a.dedargestellt
wird.
Bis ich die Daten neu in die Datenbank
Jochen Topf wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:04:12AM +0200, Jörg Thomsen wrote:
wir haben jetzt den Stand-, bzw. Hallenplan:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_at_Linuxtag_2009#Stand-Layout
Der ist ja winzig! Letztes Jahr haben wir einen Preis vom LinuxTag
bekommen für den schönsten
Hallo,
Gerrit Lammert wrote:
Ich bin glaub ich gerade ein bisschen blöd.
Ich möchte eine BB angeben (2x lat/lng) und eine Zielgröße in Pixel
(breite x höhe des bildes).
Die einzige ähnliche API dazu verlangt Mittelpunkt (1x lat/lng), zoom und
die Bildgröße.
Kann mir jemand einen Tipp geben?
Am 10. Juni 2009 08:31 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck (OSM) o...@tappenbeck.net:
Moin !
ich erstelle gerade eine Doku und wollte einen Screenhshoot des Cursors
machen.
Strg+Druck und das Programm führt nicht zum Erfolgt.
Hat einer von Euch das einmal unter Windows hinbekommen - oder ist das
hier
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
