On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 20:56 +0200, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
On 17-04-2010 14:38, Patrick Kilian wrote:
Hi all,
Count me as a complainer... I was wondering about that blue dashed line
too - it does not fit well with the surrounding estuary and open sea.
I'm in the process of mapping a
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 18:34 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 1 May 2010 18:27, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please don't get to personal here, it is not about my morals. It is
about consistency and clarity.
There isn't much I can do about the truth
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 07:06 +1000, Liz wrote:
but anyway as voting just finished and it was not
anounced on the list and the tag is not wide used, I would say we should
set it back to proposed and wait for some response.
What reason other your personal ignorance do you have for
Soon to be overloaded again, due to the backlog of traces and map
changes from the last 24hrs. :)
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 17:44 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
OSM Talk,
Website and API is now up and running again after earlier issues.
Happy mapping.
Thanks
Grant
OSM Sysadmin Team
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 06:47 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
Hi Martin,
The upgrade is to expand the DB storage RAID-10 array from 10x SAS
disks to 16x SAS disks.
We will be adding a 4 bay external JBOD exclosure with 4x ST3450857SS
(450GB, 15K, SAS).
Having just bought a new hard-drive, I found
Just wait til she finds out what her 'access' is like this weekend..
On a serious note, how many blind mappers do we have on OSM?
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 20:20 +0200, Lulu-Ann wrote:
Since today the wiki can not be edited any more calculating plus or
minus, now you have to be able to see a
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 20:37 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 3 July 2010 20:35, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 July 2010 11:18, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
As a few people pointed out, we always tag some things for the
renderer, like
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 19:44 -0400, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org
wrote:
How do you use speed limit tags when
only 5% of the roads are
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 00:42 +, John F. Eldredge wrote:
However, you can't be certain, without personally checking the street
in question, whether the street really has no speed limit signs, or
whether the person who added the street to the map simply failed to
add the speed limit tag.
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 07:45 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 13 July 2010 06:59, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
I would say the exact opposite. The tag 'name' is what you see on the
facade. The (optional) tag 'operator' is the name of the chain but we
should
not suggest
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 22:45 -0700, Sam Vekemans wrote:
it seems that fb cant use googlemaps as they are arch-rivals .
google tries to be its own facebook..
This is news to me, and obviously news to some fb developers who Ive
seen using googlemaps in their apps. 'Cities Ive visited' comes
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 13:12 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
This is a complex topic in itself; some governments might say you can
have the data, it is for noncommercial purposes only but you said you
are noncommercial...? and then you have to explain that yes, we are
noncommercial but the data
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 00:16 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Wont anything in writing have to be re-negotiated soon?
No. If you get something in writing that says you can use this for
OpenStreetMap then wherever OpenStreetMap goes, the data goes too.
If we cant even convince a mapping group
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 19:30 -0400, john whelan wrote:
Just a comment from a security point of view a message with just a
link in it is often a link to Malware. The links have two parts a
visible part and a nonvisible bit that takes you to a web site.
If one looks doubtful the recommendation
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:35 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Anyone interested in the openstreetmap tile downloader 5.0 ? It is now
available for only 29,95 $
http://www.bestsoftware4download.com/software/k-mapnik-t-free-easy-openstreetmap-downloader-download-cewueeck.html
I always love how
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 07:55 +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
Am 21.10.2010 23:29, schrieb Sean Horgan:
The definition of such a tag/key that is so common the database (3+%
according to taginfo: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/amenity),
needs more than a single line definition.
Do you have
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 19:06 +0200, Claudius wrote:
Am 22.10.2010 18:28, David Murn:
One way I heard it described, is an amenity is something youre likely to
want to navigate to. While that description is a bit vague, it seems to
fit most current applications of the key.
Like amenity
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 13:09 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/10/22 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
If you were visiting someone in an out-of-state prison, it certainly
would be somewhere one might want to navigate to, the same way you might
want to navigate to an ATM, fuel station
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 17:22 +, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I think that it is probably safe to predict that the general public
won't be able to update this map, at least not without government
censors checking the proposed updates.
Since the website is about giving out maps and data
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 22:58 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell writes:
I consider it improving osm by a human mapper according the spirit
of the project instead a container full of imports with not much
value. If a human surveys on ground or based on personal knowledge
and
Just out of interest, what does this email have to do with OSM? Other
than a link to an OSM map showing the location of this group, I see no
other part of this email with any relevance to OSM, or even mapping of
any sort. Was there meant to be more to this post? Is this group
hosting mapping
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 22:25 +0100, Laurence Penney wrote:
For the record, I'm 100% against OSM becoming a place for general
historical data ...
Just out of interest, are you 100% against OSM keeping recent history
data? If a building is demolished, do you believe that deleting the way
should
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 00:45 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
OSM, by its nature, is excellent for retaining historic data, for
example if a road is realigned, you have a history that shows how it was
realigned, or if a road changes name, there exists a history
From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is quite telling
what areas support the licence and which areas will be devastated by the
data loss. Compare for example:
London city:
http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=13lat=51.49734lon=-0.12444layers=B0
Sydney city:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 22:52 +0100, Mike Dupont wrote:
Are the sheets with the gas stations from austraila imported yet? we
can use that as the test data.
Assuming you mean fuel stations, and not gas stations, then yes a lot
have been imported. A lot of this information was released under
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 10:54 +, Ed Avis wrote:
David Murn davey at incanberra.com.au writes:
From looking at a few different cities in this map, it is quite telling
what areas support the licence and which areas will be devastated by the
data loss.
Please. _Would_ be devastated
On Sat, 2010-11-13 at 18:06 -0500, john whelan wrote:
The decisions have been made, so it's time to accept them or if you
don't, to leave.
Maybe I missed something, but when were the decisions made? Last I
heard, people were still being asked for their opinion. Did I miss the
announcement of
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:18 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/11/16 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
Maybe I missed something, but when were the decisions made?
back in 2008
Maybe thats the problem then. Ive been a mapper since 2007 but only
actively involved in ths
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 08:13 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 12:06 -0500, Richard Weait wrote:
http://opengeodata.org/openstreetmap-founder-steve-coast-joins-bing
http://blog.stevecoast.com/im-working-at-microsoft-and-were-donating-ima
I am a little confused - who
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 09:23 -0500, Gerald A wrote:
Just a small point -- legal-talk is an open and publicly available
list. I don't think
suggesting and steering the discussion to the topical list is
hiding.
If there was a proposal to change the name to OpenMap instead of
OpenStreetMap,
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 22:25 +, Ed Avis wrote:
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
Speaking personally about what large orgs and what they want, I think it's
pretty simple. Have a look at commercial data and OSM and do a diff, what are
the main things missing? Addressing for geocoding
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 15:30 +, Ed Avis wrote:
Not all park land is walkable - some can be trees or bushes - so some extra
tagging is needed.
Another problem, is that you may not be able to traverse the park in all
directions. It may have a fence with only a couple of access gates, or
you
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:43 -0500, Anthony wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:29 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 15:30 +, Ed Avis wrote:
As a rough rule, leisure=park and landuse=grass could be considered
walkable,
unless tagged access=no or access
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:01 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
That's nonsense. A way does not show a right of passage. A
particularly tagged way shows a right of passage. And a park is a
particularly tagged way.
No, a park *CAN BE* a particularly tagged way. Just like a road, if it
isnt
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 19:14 -0500, Anthony wrote:
That's nonsense. A way does not show a right of passage. A
particularly tagged way shows a right of passage. And a park is a
particularly tagged way.
No, a park *CAN BE* a particularly tagged way.
Can be? How can you represent
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:24 -0500, Anthony wrote:
One day OSM will be able to route me from Linkwood Avenue to Pine Bay Drive
through the park
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.07187lon=-82.550402zoom=18layers=M),
saving me 50 minutes of walking.
Imagine if you tried to save 50min
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 00:00 -0500, Anthony wrote:
Alternatively, I guess it wouldn't be horrible to add something like a
highway=shortcut tag, so mappers could be explicit about it. If we've
gotta add foot=permissive by hand anyway, it's not that much more work
to add a few extra ways.
I
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 01:29 +0300, Upliner wrote:
Imagery plugin which combines wmsplugin and slippymap plugin is now
available. It's in experimental stage and there is some questions
about future of these plugins, however tracing the Bing imagery with
offset correction seems to work well.
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 00:00 -0500, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, I looked around at a few places labelled leisure=park, and the
usage is all over the place. I'd say based on that very unscientific
sample that it's probably best for routers to use a default of
access=unknown for leisure=park areas,
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 08:55 -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
This should really be taking place on the legal list but nonetheless:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So, this is awkward. According to my profile, I've agreed to the
new Contributor
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:15 +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Am 06.12.2010 17:58, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is who runs this project.
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is part of the ~3 people
who runs this project :-)
If the OSMF board
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:56 +, Dave F. wrote:
- which, if all they
know about is the perimeter, is probably a good thing.
Eh? I thought you said you'd love it if it cut directly across an area??
They don't have to *follow* the perimeter just use it to find the best
exit then
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:18 +, Dave F. wrote:
On 06/12/2010 21:06, David Murn wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 20:56 +, Dave F. wrote:
- which, if all they
know about is the perimeter, is probably a good thing.
Eh? I thought you said you'd love it if it cut directly across
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 18:21 -0500, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:42 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
However, please understand that
most of us use routing software, expecting it not to try and take
shortcuts across unmapped areas.
Who said anything about taking
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:31 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Failing that, would it be possible for you to create me a new account
(stevage1), and unset the flag on that account?
Failing that, maybe its time that more people
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 08:06 -0500, Antony Pegg wrote:
Hi all,
Very very proud to announce that we have launched the US
http://open.MapQuest.com site
Just out of interest, why did you choose to extract only the continental
united states out of the entire worlds data that the project has?
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 22:33 +0100, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen wrote:
On 23000 nodes approximately 5 % were duplicate.
Who of you will thank Blake for 95% new data ?
None !
Ive seen a few thanks for the addition of the data, maybe you missed
them, or only read emails
an unwritten rule that
everyone complies with?
David
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:12 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 08:06 -0500, Antony Pegg wrote:
Hi all,
Very very proud to announce that we have launched the US
http://open.MapQuest.com site
Just
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 20:14 -0500, Mike N. wrote:
Ive also noticed while you have attiribution at the bottom, I cant find
a permalink. Is (was?) it not a requirement of the licence to have a
permalink on the map display, or is this just an unwritten rule that
everyone complies with?
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 11:28 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
I cannot sign every edit I've ever done over, because I don't have the
rights to do so. I can OK many of them, however, that were based
purely on my own work, and not CC-BY-SA sources.
I suspect this is a big issue. Pretty much any
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 19:00 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
On 20 December 2010 12:53, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Because of the impossibility to be able to distinguish whats what, any
user who has ever made a change in this situation will have to have all
their edits removed from
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:31 +, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Bear in mind though that many of us have to make do with VMs, for
financial reasons.
Not entirely sure what you mean by 'for financial reasons', but I agree
in part. I do wonder though, if youre using a windows host simply for
financial
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 23:34 -0500, Anthony wrote:
This only gives one of the possibly many acceptable city names for a
zip code (e.g. for 12205 it gives ROESSLEVILLE). A zip can have more
than one acceptable city name. See
http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown_zip.jsp
For geocoding, you
Hi Ciprian,
Was this positive response you received, in response to licensing their
data under the previous OSM licence or the proposed new one? This is
something to be mindful of if requesting permission from EEA, and
continuing to use the data long-term.
The issues with them changing their
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:14 -0800, Steve Coast wrote:
I’m curious. So here’s a little survey, people like you take a second
to answer it;
Specifically I’m wondering if everyone has androids because we’re all
open source nuts or if it’s more balanced? Only the data will show.
I have an old
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 21:52 -0500, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Being curious in return, why are you curious?
Well, he does work for Microsoft...
Explains the assumption that everyone has a latest and greatest brand
name GPS-enabled
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 22:05 +0100, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
On 05.01.2011 23:45, SteveC wrote:
Results from my crude little survey;
For my point of view this is somehow the same as the distribution of
phones sold. Except: the very low number of BB-Devices.
I think also one bit missing is
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 10:18 -0800, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Let those broken routers choke on real-world cases where nodes really are in
the same place (double-decker bridge that crosses a state line, for
example). I'll continue to map correctly.
Just because you have ways crossing each
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 12:00 -0800, SteveC wrote:
That's kind of interesting. Sold over what time period though?
The article I posted gave figures (in both volume and $ sales) for
per-quarter periods, compared with other quarters in 2010 and the
previous year.
Arguing with anonymous strangers
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 17:17 -0800, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
If the name or ref is different on either side of the state line, then it
needs to be split in the middle.
Thats fine, but does the state line need a node directly on-top of the
road? Does the state line change as it crosses over
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 20:27 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:25 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 17:17 -0800, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
If the name or ref is different on either side of the state line, then it
needs to be split
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:47 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 10/01/11 19:00, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
American usage would be to refer to that as a road, just not a very
high-quality road. I take it that, in Britain, there are certain minimum
standards for being called a road?
Nothing
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 10:13 -0500, Anthony wrote:
Sure, but if you read you will notice that I was specifically answering
a question about what that would be called in the UK, not what it would
be called in Australia.
The more important question is what the tag means. Or is highway=road
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 23:01 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
Now, maybe Im off the mark here, but it
sounds like that is *EXACTLY* the outcome we want when mass changing
tags,
We are not going to mass-change tags.
'we' being who? Are you speaking on behalf
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 20:39 -0500, Anthony wrote:
So, while 'road' may mean a tarred bit of bitumen in the UK, and it
means something passable by a vehicle in Australia, in the OSM context
it means an unknown classification, temporarily tagged until the
required re-survey is complete.
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:00 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi all,
Wondered if anyone has ever put effort into producing a street
directory from OSM data.
What about either TownGuide[1] or MapOSMatic[2]? If theyre not exactly
what youre looking for, they might be a good starting point.
[1]
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 21:47 -0500, Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Ido Omer ido.o...@microsoft.com wrote:
I am a researcher at Microsoft and I am currently working on the road
detector.
Hi Ido. The code to the road detector isn't at all open, is it?
Unlikely. If it was,
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 15:33 -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Stephan Knauss wrote:
Oh, I was tricked by the wiki page stating it's GPL...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potlatch2
Wow. Who on earth added that?
You mean, as author of potlatch, you dont have the potlatch wiki page on
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 12:30 -0500, Anthony wrote:
In other words, that's just the impact from deleting the contributions
of one user, who didn't even contribute that much. Multiply by tens
of thousands to get the impact on the world map when the contributions
of tens of thousands of
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 09:12 -0500, Mike N wrote:
On 2/10/2011 9:01 AM, Anthony wrote:
Tracing aerials does not involve copying data.
Tracing from Google's imagery not only violates their terms of usage,
their spokespeople say that it's explicitly not allowed. There's
nothing to
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:50 +0100, Maarten Deen wrote:
I could even make a case that they are even more interested in OSM.
Since Nokia wants to offer navigation and since map coverage in
little-travelled area's is low, it would make sense for any company
offering maps to use
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:52 +0100, Chris Browet wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 19:25, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com
wrote:
Busy implementing in Merkaartor
A bug:
you output osmchange while it is osmChange, with a capital
C. see
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 10:44 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Oscar Orbe oskaro...@yahoo.com
wrote:
hello list,
here is a ranking of the cities/towns in Spain which need the
most OSM love.
click 4 times on the last column to see
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 03:22 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that we
have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to have been
auto-generated by simply placing a buffer around the coastline.
My first question is, do
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:23 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
My assumption - and I'm not a boating person so I may be wrong - is that
if you're out on a boat with any working kind of navigation, you will
know where the coastline is, and therefore you will automatically know
where the 12nm
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:26 -0500, Andrew Guertin wrote:
I have a few buildings that are not simply at ground level, and I can't
find how to map them on the wiki.
First off, a skywalk between two buildings. Nothing fancy, although it
does go over a road.
As said before, use
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 15:24 +0200, Nic Roets wrote:
And for view the map I use the unreleased (still in development)
version of Gosmore.
Nic,
Do you mean gosmore on android, or gosmore on CE? If you mean android,
is there any ETA on when this might be released, or escape from your
system? :)
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 01:52 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
-1,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for
every opinion ;-)
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 19:57 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:56:54 -0500
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every
place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done.
-1 is used for
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 14:04 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
On 17 February 2011 12:21, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Ive fixed quite a number of spots where keepright has picked up a river
and highway on the same layer (=0), generally without a junction node.
i wonder what would
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 18:50 +0100, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:10 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
wrote:
Second, an underground building. Connects to other buildings
that are at
ground level and have basements
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 11:16 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/18 David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au:
Because the use of (min_)levels,height is in use by 3D renderers and
IMHO this min_level-part of the advanced building proposal is not
working (is using wrong semantics), at least
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 16:59 +, Grant Slater wrote:
The new java based XAPI is running and responding to test queries, but
be warned it is still under active development. See:
Am I missing something here...? People are complaining about how bogged
down and slow the current service is, so
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:33 +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Am 18.02.2011 22:47, schrieb David Murn:
If the service isnt designed to be portable (it only runs on one system
currently, in the world), then who cares about java,
What makes you think, that it only has to be running on one system
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 19:40 -0800, Daniel Sabo wrote:
Maybe you don't like it, but you are not the entire OSM community. Yes,
in this case someone overwritten what I presume was good surveyed data
with an import was stupid. But in general the fact that data was
gathered by a government
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 09:54 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
On 19 February 2011 12:06, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Your search - murn site:svn.openstreetmap.org - did not match any
documents.
i think this does not move us forward - david is as valued as anyone
when making
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 15:35 -0800, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I find tracing endless residential subdivisions from aerials to be a chore
and no fun.
I know many who disagree, fortunately. Last year I was laid up in bed
for around 3 months after surgery, just after hi-res aerial imagery
became
On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 13:54 -0700, flambe...@gmail.com wrote:
There are currently three (3) main files - one for the United States,
one for Canada and one for Europe.
This is great, but the US is 300m, Canada 34m and Europe 700m. The
world population is just under 6.8 million. Is there any
I think this could even be extended to newsagencies too? Most
newsagencies in Australia are often dominated by stationary supplies.
David
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 08:16 +0100, Matthias Meißer wrote:
This week, we suggest to put your eyes on the local stationery shops
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 03:45 -0800, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Joseph Reeves wrote:
without explaining in layman's terms what this means.
http://old.opengeodata.org/2008/01/07/the-licence-where-we-are-where-were-going/index.html
Follow-ups to legal-talk please, so that those here who have
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:03 +, Ed Avis wrote:
I would hope that this new state of play has changed the timetable a little
bit.
Has the OSMF board discussed the new Creative Commons offer?
I believe the board (or possibly lwg) has discussed it before, as Im
fairly sure Ive seen it in
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:34 -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
Hi,
Mapping the tolls of a highway a found that there is no tag to assign
the cost of the toll. I haven't found examples in taginfo or tagwatch.
Are you using something for this?
I know this is a little complex because the cost of
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 20:52 -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
This is the matrix showing how the tolls are calculated:
http://www.westlinkm7.com.au/cmsAdmin/uploads/Tollmatrix_Janto_Mar2011.pdf
What do you think about something like:
cost:car_2axle = $X
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 14:01 +0100, Matthias Meißer wrote:
Might be the legal talklist a better place to discuss this very specific
topic? I guess there are more users that are familar with the process
itself.
This isnt a legalese issue. Well, as much as someone stealing your car
is a
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:45 +1300, Robin Paulson wrote:
the question becomes (in my mind): why do we have a single way mapped
'coastline'? this implies the boundary between land and water is
static, but of course it moves - a number of times per day.
The coastline is (as generally accepted on
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 13:16 +0100, Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Exactly start an OSM Meetup group now? How to explain to them
that if they make certain types of corrections, their work will be
deleted?
Are we forced to read
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 00:11 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
Y'know, I'm not understanding something. People whinge about CC-By-SA
not being free enough, and that OSM should be public domain. The
proper response to them (which I think most people agree with) is: if
you don't like the license, fork
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 09:50 +, Grant Slater wrote:
On 25 March 2011 05:49, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
The problem is, any fork under the existing licence can continue without
problem. Any fork under the new licence, cannot use any data unless the
user who contributed
Is there a reason why you decided to split this proposal into a
different page for each section (with 2-3 paragraphs per page) instead
of just one large page like most other parts of the wiki? Im upto the
4th page and still dont quite understand what you're proposing.
David
On Mon, 2011-03-28
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 22:51 +0200, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Oandrzej zaborowski wrote:
For the record, in East Europe where Google Street View has no
coverage, there's a an almost identical service provided by Norc.ro,
who explicitly allow usage in OSM.
There's a similar service in Germany:
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
