Re: [OSM-talk] QA tool for finding nameless highways that are armchair-fixable

I am a bit unsure on how to proceed from here... Maybe let's start with some technical facts: > IMHO a highway=service, track etc typically do not have names. > Hopefully you account for that. > And i am not shure the assumption that other road classes > always have names holds up. In the

[OSM-talk] QA tool for finding nameless highways that are armchair-fixable

Hi all As you might know, OSM data contains a lot of highway=* without name=*. Check your region using the following query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=way%0A%20%20%5Bhighway%5D%5B!name%5D%0A%20%20(%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D)%3B%0Aout%20body%3B%0A%3E%3B%0Aout%20skel%20qt%3B I wrote a Python tool (using

Re: [OSM-talk] QA tool for finding nameless highways that are armchair-fixable

Hi all Thank you for your feedback so far. > I can see a use when you have three consecutive segments > of a road, where the first and the last are named (the same) > and the middle is not. This might indicate an omission. This is what I do. See