Yours c.
Steve
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:56, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:44 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Can't you just get over yourself and admit that a newbie coming to
OSM has a crap time? It's not hard! Stop defending it all.
Steve, I don't
On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:16, Jean-Guilhem Cailton j...@arkemie.com wrote:
Thanks a lot Steve, for underlining the need to improve the
experience of new visitors.
And thanks for such a positive response and all your work.
This is right on spot with what we have been feeling regarding
Haiti.
On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:47, Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 6:21 AM, SteveC wrote:
You believe that feedback is a good thing, but, it seems, only if
the
feedback confirms your own ideas. You have railed against the UI,
against hard-working volunteer contributors
On Feb 24, 2010, at 13:18, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, SteveC wrote:
Andy, building community and moving things on is not just be nice to
everyone all the time. Sometimes it's also about being honest and
saying,
this is wrong, we can fix it.
* Steve apologies
Ha :-)
Believe it or not I only just found out mapzen is GPL
And as I pointed out before, it shares problems with PL like not
having an open community behind it.
Yours c.
Steve
On Feb 24, 2010, at 13:44, Jamie Smith jamiekrsm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 24 February 2010 09:42, SteveC
Recently I've been a bit negative about potlatch and by over-extension to
RichardF.
I apologise, sorry!
To make amends, I have ordered an amazing I love you bean:
http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/science/c6f0/
http://www.thinkgeek.com/images/products/front/c6f0_i_love_you_bean.jpg
and a
All we need are earthquakes on every square mile of the planet, and OSM will be
complete in no time! :-)
On Feb 27, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/2010_Chile_earthquake
Thanks to Harry Wood and others for getting the wiki up. Inquiries on
satellite
This is my 6-monthly-or-so call for people who want to contribute to
OpenGeoData.org to get in touch. It's now extra simple, you just mail an
address and it gets posted to the blog and the @openstreetmap twitter account.
Anyone can help out with things like posting the image of the week when it
whoops - this was meant for talk!
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter Batty peter.ba...@gmail.com
Date: March 9, 2010 9:32:48 AM EST
To: SteveC st...@asklater.com
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] UX Review
I very highly recommend this book on web
making sure this goes to talk@ too...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com
Date: March 9, 2010 9:36:37 AM EST
To: SteveC st...@asklater.com
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk...@openstreetmap.org,
p...@opengeodata.posterous.com
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] UX Review
On Tue
lots of dupe node removal?
On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Nic Roets wrote:
(since we got rid of the segments)
From 8.2 GB to 8.1 GB:
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Do you have what it takes to do a talk at the
Location Business Summit on April 28th - 29th at the Hotel Okura in
Amsterdam.
if so, get in touch because I can't face another flight across the atlantic.
Yours c.
Steve
___
talk mailing list
Hi all
We've narrowed down the OSMF logo's some time ago and have been waiting for
someone to write a voting script so that OSMF members can vote for the winner.
But that someone is very busy.
Does anyone here want to step up and make it happen?
Yours c.
Steve
yes there's a subset
On Mar 17, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I don't really care how it's done, what I'm looking for is someone to do
it...
Is there a particular set of logos from the logo page [0] you are
voting
cool - can you do it then?
On Mar 17, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Vincent Pottier wrote:
Le 17/03/2010 19:33, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) a écrit :
Well, you wouldn't be saying that if you had to sift through those 300
emails yourself!
Cheers
It's not very hard if you send an email (better
What are the thing or things you know know that you wish you'd known when you
started with OpenStreetMap?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
we've done it before at wherecamp over lunch, makes much more sense then than
friday when everyone wants to just go home or drink beer
On Mar 23, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Kate Chapman wrote:
There has been some discussion about having a mapping party the Friday
after Where 2.0.
Also I'm not sure,
As you've probably heard the Ordnance Survey is going to open some data next
week. We don't exactly know what data or what license it will be under but
there's a reasonable chance it won't be importable in to OSM because either the
data will be low scale or released with an incompatible
Google, Waze and OSMF have partnered on a common initiative to explore
crowd-sourced mapping solutions. Yes, this is real. See:
www.closedstreetmap.org
for the full press release. Contact me if you want to be involved.
___
talk mailing list
On Apr 1, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
Google, Waze and OSMF have partsnip
Just to users of OSM from countries and cultures that do not know about
April the 1st, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%
27_Day
I was born in Sweden. April fools is very popular
maybe we could get some of them to SOTM to explain their thinking?
On May 6, 2010, at 3:25 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 7 May 2010 07:15, Milo van der Linden m...@dogodigi.net wrote:
My personal opinion:
Let them.
It is a good thing they are figuring out how to enjoy OpenStreetMap
without
After several thousand man years of effort by the License Working Group and a
bit of help by TomH, the new contributor terms and license are up and to be
agreed to by new users.
Signing up here in OSM:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/new
will take you here:
this could be a good SOTM talk too?
On May 13, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Robert Martinez wrote:
Hello OpenStreetMappers,
I would love to offer a special contribution to the project: a new logo!
I hope the community (you) will give me some feedback and possibly
help me to get the launch done.
On May 13, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Gregory wrote:
On 13 May 2010 16:46, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
this could be a good SOTM talk too?
+1
But aren't we in the 'process' of changing the OSMF logo?
I think it's really important the two logos both share elements. A lot of
OSMF logo
Then please get in touch with this guy...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Vladimir Lepusina vl...@info.ba
Date: May 13, 2010 10:28:23 AM MDT
To: SteveC st...@asklater.com
Subject: RE: Bosnian editors
Please do, someone will eventually get back to me; looking by Banja Luka /
Sarajevo wiki
On May 13, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Robert Martinez wrote:
What exactly would you expect to be the talk about?
Explain in detail why you feel the logo needs help using examples, and show how
you think it can be improved / replaced.
On 05/13/2010 05:46 PM, SteveC wrote:
this could be a good SOTM
awesome
On May 14, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
The wording can doubtless be improved
On May 16, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Robert,
Robert Martinez wrote:
There has to be a design department for OSM with authority and
competence
[...]
My conclusion is a plea to the project management: please try to find a
capable design team as soon as you can!
Do
On May 16, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
He's just pointing out what I did a few months back - the design, usability
and aesthetic of OSM is a big mess.
My vote is that we just put him in charge of fixing it, but I don't really
want another fight with all of those who know little
On May 16, 2010, at 2:29 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
About your things have gotten old an crusty - do you remember how many
million times in the API 0.3 or 0.4 days we had some GIS acolyte parachuting
in and treating us like idiots because we weren't using PostGIS but MySQL
instead? Did we
On May 16, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Kai Krueger wrote:
There, we really could use some great designers, marketing and PR folk,
journalists or who ever else feels up to the task of presenting OSM to the
newbie in an appealing and accurate way to make sure they understand
kiss on stage at SOTM.
How about it?
Yours c.
Steve
On May 16, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
Only a large scale change is going to fix that, bar a few things that
you've already shot down like having a feedback tab. Something so
obvious
On May 16, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Time for a data model czar and throw away all this backward looking shit of
tagging freedom?
Well if you think about it Frederik, I was the data model czar.
You mean that to keep pace with Waze and Google Map Maker, we should simply
drop
On May 17, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El 17/05/2010 1:53, SteveC escribió:
I'll send you a I love you bean and give you a big kiss on stage at SOTM.
How about it?
That'd be quite gay, Steve.
You're just jealous :-)
Yours c.
Steve
If anyone wants the above domain name, let me know as it expires in a month.
Yours c.
Steve
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
link to contact info and a outline of an argument for
appealing why and how the data could be opened.
Andrew
On May 19, 2010, at 8:04 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
If anyone wants the above domain name, let me know as it expires in a month.
Yours c.
Steve
of an argument for
appealing why and how the data could be opened.
Andrew
On May 19, 2010, at 8:04 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
If anyone wants the above domain name, let me know as it expires in a month.
Yours c.
Steve
___
Geowanking
Why do you take responsibility for postal losses? That seems super bad luck.
You're running a business right not a socialist theocracy.
Just put a note on the checkout that says
uninsured postal delivery: £4
recorded, insured delivery: £10
or whatever.
On May 18, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Andy Allan
interesting:
http://reviews.ebay.co.uk/When-Items-Get-Lost-In-The-Post_W0QQugidZ103212591
out of interest, does RM actually compensate you then?
On May 21, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Why do you take
Anyone help?
Yours c.
Steve
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jessica Heinzelman jheinzel...@ushahidi.com
Date: June 4, 2010 4:27:11 MDT
To: SteveC st...@asklater.com
Subject: Re: OpenStreetMap featured on Ushahidi/Uchaguzi site
Please do! Thanks!
Jessica
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:58 PM
So I've had phone and email chats with stephen wolfram about everything they're
doing because incidentally I had an internship there a decade ago.
They love OSM. What's good is we're at a nice tipping point with many who want
to use OSM and help it succeed but are having trouble figuring out
I think you're concentrating on tiles, but that's not really the bottleneck I
would jump on first.
The conversation goes like this:
steve we have 300 million people a day look at our site and we would like to
send their edits and feedback to OSM
Really it's the API we're talking about. Tiles
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:27 PM, SteveC wrote:
I think you're concentrating on tiles, but that's not really the bottleneck I
would jump on first.
The conversation goes like this:
steve we have 300 million people a day look at our site and we would like to
send their edits and feedback to OSM
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Anthony wrote:
OTRS?
huh?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:30 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well let me take that back a bit - actually even doing some very simple
cleanup of the interface and having a feedback mechanism *at all* would be a
good first step
that's a good problem to have :)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:30 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well let me take that back a bit - actually even doing some very simple
cleanup of the interface and having a feedback mechanism *at all* would be a
good first step, as people jumped on my recent
Ticket Request System)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:50 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Anthony wrote:
OTRS?
huh?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:30 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well let me take that back a bit - actually even doing some very simple
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:27 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Anthony wrote:
OTRS?
huh?
Does anyone think it would be a good idea to set up OTRS for OSM?
If your question was what OTRS is, http
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:12 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 18 June 2010 11:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
But the sad thing is it applies for much lower numbers too - if you wanted
to scale to 1 million / day editors let's say.
I'm wondering if bulk uploaders are already hitting these kinds
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:31 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think we can do better
Well then, feel free.
that's a valid point but a nauseatingly pithy one when overused in response to
simple comments.
Yeah that's Fredericks point
On Jun 17, 2010, at 9:08 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:31 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think we can do better
http://customer.otrs.org/otrs/customer.pl
is a horrible interface. I'd like something that works like uservoice.com but
is integrated
On Jun 17, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Just to chime in on the topic...
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
To paraphrase (not specifically Wolfram, but the unnamed other megacorps
you're chatting with):
1. they'd like to link to us directly but our infrastrucutre
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Ben Last wrote:
On 18 June 2010 11:49, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
That's super interesting though - can you give a deep feel for what the
volume and content of those emails is?
Generally hey, my street's not in the right suburb
well at least this one
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Ben Last wrote:
On 18 June 2010 12:19, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Generally hey, my street's not in the right suburb
well at least this one is what I want to capture, super simply, and have a
queue
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, if your point in this thread is just defending yourself against what
you see as an attack from Frederick, feel free to ignore this. But if you'd
like some ideas on how to create a system to allow OSM users to easily get
feedback quickly
random question that came up on IRC - are the timezones mapped in OSM?
Steve
stevecoast.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Ben Last wrote:
On 18 June 2010 12:32, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Well, fixing it isn't trivial, since there may be a bunch of reasons why
it's wrong (or it may not actually be wrong!). We could store
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:40 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, if your point in this thread is just defending yourself against
what you see as an attack from Frederick, feel free
On Jun 17, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:54 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
OTRS is a horrible system, whereas uservoice is easypeasy.
From whose perspective? Send an email, wait 3 minutes and 42 seconds,
receive a response that your issue has been
On Jul 17, 2010, at 12:06 PM, 80n wrote:
In other words, we were wrong, we chose the wrong license out of ignorance.
Shit happens.
Yeah, shit happens, OSM becomes outrageously successful and nobody abuses the
spirit of the license. What kind of shit is that?
People abuse it all the
On Jul 18, 2010, at 2:59 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 18 July 2010 22:51, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Did imports and Nearmap tracing in Australia start before the relicensing
effort, or were you simply not aware of it, or did you not take it
seriously?
Most likely ODBL is fine,
this made my day :-)
As OSM has gone on I've found more and more that I'm attacked when people
simply don't listen (I got flames in David Earls talk at SOTM when I said 'tag
equivalences were going to be part of the original tagging system', people
flamed me saying they thought that me hating
On Jul 18, 2010, at 7:46 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 03:36, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Why? Because the project is growing very fast and attracting more data all
the time. If Google or Nearmap don't want to play ball that's fine - just
look at the hundreds of other
On Jul 18, 2010, at 7:48 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 03:36, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
It's similar to those people saying that we should do whatever Google says
we should do, so they can just use our data.
Since you're bringing up Google, what about Yahoo, any official
On Jul 18, 2010, at 8:01 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 03:54, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
John, you're painting a dystopian view based on a couple of key things -
that 1) nearmap would never change their mind and 2) the 'same thing' could
happen at any point.
The email I
On Jul 18, 2010, at 8:05 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 03:56, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
We had this discussion years ago now and they were fine with it. As with
everything else, they weren't allowed by legal to say anything publicly and
were just waiting for the actual
On Jul 18, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:11 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The companies I talk to today come down in to two camps on PD. The first
basically lick their lips and want us to go PD so they don't have to
contribute anything (in effect make
On Jul 18, 2010, at 8:18 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 04:11, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The companies I talk to today come down in to two camps on PD. The first
basically lick their lips and want us to go PD so they don't have to
contribute anything (in effect make
On Jul 18, 2010, at 11:23 PM, Liz wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Did imports and Nearmap tracing in Australia start before the
relicensing effort, or were you simply not aware of it, or did you not
take it seriously?
We started imports a while ago, with the first I
On Jul 19, 2010, at 12:08 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:56 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:11 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
The companies I talk to today come down in to two camps on PD
to this and yet you
pick bitter dissent. That's not the 80n I remember, where's it coming from?
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jul 19, 2010, at 3:17 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:29 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2010, at 12:06 PM, 80n wrote:
In other
(and daughters?), are less equal than others.
Perhaps this should not merely be implied, but written out in the
bylaws.
I thought it was just a mindless attack, since I'm currently a stay-at-home
father, not a stay-at-home son, and I don't even have a basement. When facts
aren't on his side, SteveC
On Jul 19, 2010, at 3:34 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 19 July 2010 23:19, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
And honestly, if at any future time two thirds of active OSM contributors
want to change to a non-SA license, why should we keep them from it? In one
or two years, two thirds of
Come on that wasn't a flame - now any reasonable point is a flame?
Can you restate the question as I don't have mail archives etc here (on my
phone)
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/19 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
On Jul 19
We did have a vote, remember? You just disagree with the outcome an the remit
the OSMF has.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:31 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:05 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jul 19, 2010, at 3:34 PM, John Smith wrote
On Jul 20, 2010, at 2:20 AM, Liz wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, SteveC wrote:
From my experience off list with all the people frustrated both in email
and in person, those 20 or so people here just don't represent everyone
else who'd prefer all this discussion to go to legal-talk and just move
On Jul 20, 2010, at 2:43 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 20 July 2010 10:38, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I'm left wondering if this problem is being over engineered by lawyers...
Go ask on odc-discuss?
Is there much point if I'm only likely to get a biased answer?
You're right, much
That's really for the LWG to answer...
On Jul 19, 2010, at 8:55 PM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
2010/7/19 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
Can you restate the question as I don't have mail archives etc here (on my
phone)
Ok, there it goes: I suggest to add SA clause and Attribution clause
Ben if I read this right then you're hiding the users from OSM and we'll see a
stream of edits from NearMap which are actually from multiple users. This is
why CM/matt/others built the OAuth code so that mapzen etc didn't do that,
because it's horrific.
The reason is pretty simple - the first
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:25 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
You essentially have 2 camps here, the pragmatists who think anything
but minor data loss is unacceptable, and you have the idealists who
think even if we loose a most of
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:22 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 5 August 2010 22:43, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I agree, FUD isn't fun. But it's you and a couple of others having a
significant time sink effect on the people trying to move it forward.
I'm not the one that came up with ambiguous
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:23 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 5 August 2010 22:44, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Oh and BTW this exact dragging on is why I suggested we bound the problem by
signing up new users - so the problem doesn't grow every day with more and
more people.
But that has it's
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:36 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Anthony wrote:
And who told you that OSM is a collection of unoriginal facts?
I did, last time I did some mapping. I faithfully recorded where the paths,
gates and stiles were, rather than pulling some fictitious locations out of
my
On Aug 6, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
The reason is pretty simple - the first line of copyright defense if we get
an
email from TeleAtlas Legal saying 'user NearMap copied our data' is that we
will remove _all_ NearMap data.
Wouldn't you tell
On Aug 6, 2010, at 11:09 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 7 August 2010 03:04, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Sounds like you've never been to court. Who's right or wrong is a secondary
consideration here, the first order of magnitude issue is who has more
money. We lose on that one.
So
On Aug 6, 2010, at 4:21 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 7 August 2010 03:14, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
If they have several orders of magnitude more money then probably the
cost/benefit tradeoff would suggest throwing out the data is the better
option.
Even wikipedia doesn't take
OSM is mostly a consensus-based community, or a do-ocracy. It was never a
benevolent dictatorship, and I have given up (as far as I know, anyway) all
power I have in OSM. I used to write the code, own the domain names, run the
mailing list(s), run the servers, evangelize, talk to the press and
On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Peter Körner wrote:
Am 10.08.2010 18:59, schrieb Nathan Edgars II:
Personally I think this idea of labeling people as poisonous is itself
poisonous, and anyone who agrees with it is at least slightly poisonous.
It's the dose that makes the poison, and when
the
community.
What are you talking about? The guidelines SteveC proposed are to moderate
how the discussion should be conducted, not how the project is defined!
TimSC
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Simon Ward wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:50:26PM -0600, SteveC wrote:
Someone mentioned that in addition there should be some topic
guidelines per mailing list too, eg newbies@ should not be a debate
list but a questions list... should we add that in too? I
I agree with all Andy said.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Aug 11, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:29 PM, steve brown st...@evolvedlight.co.uk
wrote:
Hey
As BFDL, do you still want a Code of Conduct, or does your wiki page
suffice? I'm
Please move all legal discussion (except announcements of course) to
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
or
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-general
Steve
stevecoast.com
___
talk mailing list
The list has become sane again, and I've not had to use any Evil Powers.
But, is this what you want going forward?
My own inclination is that list moderators are elected per list for, say, a one
year period. But I suspect that finding people who want to be a moderator might
be hard.
Thoughts?
I didn't mean to - I was discussing the legal CT stuff on legal-talk, I thought
I dropped the talk@ in the to: unless someone else put it in there?
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
OK, this stupidity has gone too far.
Now the 'moderator' is arguing with the trolls on a
I keep thinking an editing app for the 3G / wifi iPad would be awesome. It's
always on the network, GPS and compass are built in.
It would be a sweet surveying device, but would have to be super fault tolerant
in doing things like waiting for the network.
Steve
stevecoast.com
The problem with a remote app is that connectivity will really, really suck
while you're out wandering around with an ipad. You'll be hopping cell towers,
going on to broken wifi networks and half the time things will be very slow or
timeout. It strikes me it'll be easier to handle all that in
talk@ is not the place for acrimonious posts about the license like this
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-August/053323.html
Both sides have had their say in the Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA
2.0continuation thread.
Please, when responding to that thread now
when
it will be available, but soon. The best part: it will be free.
Best regards,
Zsombor Szabo
IZE, Ltd.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 21:30, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I keep thinking an editing app for the 3G / wifi iPad would be awesome. It's
always on the network, GPS and compass
I have pinged waze with this.
Have fun,
Steve | stevecoast.com
On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:11 AM, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
Last night in the process of responding some comments to our GPS
selling campaign
Awesome.
As I said on opengeodata - this is a cool example of a firm taking swift action
on an unintended problem and working well with a community. +1 to waze.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Noam Bardin wrote:
Guys,
we saw your post on Chile (thanks for letting us
Did you read the minutes where all the CT issues are being discussed?
Have fun,
Steve | stevecoast.com
On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:03 AM, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:39:11PM +0100, Rob Myers wrote:
On 09/02/2010 11:24 AM, TimSC wrote:
1) How is the future
301 - 400 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
