I've been asked a few times for examples of companies that are using OSM and as
the list keeps getting longer I keep forgetting examples. Anyone fancy setting
up a wiki page to keep a track of them?
Steve
stevecoast.com
___
talk mailing list
On Sep 14, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
On Sep 14, 2010, at 12:06 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Michal Migurski wrote:
I'm downloading London, in small sections. I just exceeded my API bandwidth
limit.
Get
When I see announcements flying around like MapQuests $1M commitment to OSM, or
CloudMades $12M VC round it begs the question of how big is the OSM economy?
Purely as an academic exercise it's interesting to think of OSM as an ecosystem
around which people find work and provide goods and
On Sep 23, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Nic Roets wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:05 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Once you have the criteria of what goes in to the measuring pot of the OSM
economy you further have large error bars on the data for each thing. For
example, are those
I've written previously about OSM usability studies, and now it's happening.
Nate Bolt from the fantabulous Bolt|Peters is going to help OSM run usability
tests and we need your help.
The timeline looks something like this: This week or next we're going to switch
on some javascript on the OSM
On Sep 29, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Dave F. wrote:
On 29/09/2010 16:13, SteveC wrote:
On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Dave F. wrote:
On 29/09/2010 12:22, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
kevin wrote:
The issue here is a licence has been chosen, that appears incompatible
with current practise
Think you've
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 15:34, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Those people fill out a form and are invited later to use some simple online
screen capturing software while asked to do some simple tasks and this is
where you come
On Sep 30, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 16:20, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 15:34, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Those people fill out a form
Just my few cents!
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:42 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Sep 30, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 16:20, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed
Jochen this is level 17 awesome.
The first thing I wanted to look at was this
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/FIXME
and then go fix things near me. Maybe if I click on the map it could redirect
to a nominatim search for that tag, if you can constrain the search to a bbox
near
but the point is hooking the two things together?
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:56:00AM -0600, SteveC wrote:
The first thing I wanted to look at was this
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/FIXME
and then go fix things near me. Maybe if I
On Oct 6, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Nic Roets wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
Op 06-10-10 15:12, Nic Roets schreef:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:55 PM, TimSC
On Oct 15, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Randy Meech wrote:
Why would you expect that?
Randy
Anthony is just trolling. He's been kicked out of wikipedia, as noted multiple
times. Ignore him.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Mike N.
On Oct 15, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:22:56 -0600
SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Anthony is just trolling. He's been kicked out of wikipedia, as noted
multiple times. Ignore him.
That is untruthful.
Which bit?
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 15, 2010, at 9:13 PM, Anthony wrote:
I also haven't been kicked out of Wikipedia, though you have claimed
it multiple times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raul654/Anthony_evidence#Anthony_DiPierro
lately is from SteveC...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:43 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:36, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Oh hardly. All I have done is call out Anthony and link to the things he
denies about wikipedia.
What specifically has any
Well that's kind of hilarious given you cut out the first half of my email
where I exactly answered your question Duane.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 16, 2010, at 9:02 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I wish i had
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I wish i had a pony.
This is why things end up in a endless debate, people pose serious
questions and you either can't be bothered, or won't respond properly
so the debate can move forward.
I, and probably
On Oct 16, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
On Saturday 16 October 2010 17:40:36 SteveC wrote:
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*ed...@billiau.net
.spam/
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
^(to|cc|bcc
Believe it or not (and I look forward to the conspiracy theories on 80n's
mailing list) it's one very large coincidence.
I originally pushed Denver (where I live) with some folks here for SOTM-US and
Eric asked me to help with the FOSS4G bid for 2010. Both fell through. Then
Hurricane and
Hrm.
I think we should have some kind of idea of what we're trying to accomplish.
There are a bunch of companies interested in OSM, and it might be nice for them
to talk. I suspect it's about as simple as that? But we don't want to do that
and exclude anyone else, so it should be free for
Speaking personally about what large orgs and what they want, I think it's
pretty simple. Have a look at commercial data and OSM and do a diff, what are
the main things missing? Addressing for geocoding and turn restrictions for
routing.
On Nov 26, 2010, at 1:27 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
I think
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Grant Slater wrote:
John,
On 25 November 2010 20:15, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a comment from one of the 130 who has voted yes on the recommendation
of one of the people I thought was fairly sensible here and I now regret
taking his advice.
://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:36 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Speaking personally about what large orgs and what they want, I think it's
pretty simple. Have a look at commercial data and OSM and do a diff, what are
the main things
On Nov 26, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Grant Slater wrote:
On 26 November 2010 21:37, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Grant Slater wrote:
There have been many round of question, answers and many revisions.
The LWG spends at around 25% of their time just keeping minutes
://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:49 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Nov 26, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
...and some metric that tells you that the data
On Nov 26, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
Speaking personally about what large orgs and what they want, I think it's
pretty simple. Have a look at commercial data and OSM and do a diff, what are
the main things missing? Addressing for geocoding
Results from my crude little survey;
count percentage
Android of some kind70 30%
Nokia 65 28%
iPhone 39 17%
Other 45 19%
very funny
On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
On 04/01/11 15:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
I will currently be one of the people locked out because I have used
the Ordnance Survey open data which is apparently incompatible with
the new license.
OS OpenData
:
On 05/01/2011 22:45, SteveC wrote:
In response to the critique of the validity, feel free to go do a better job.
Why do people who are afraid of criticism (in fact, it was just a question to
start with) always post ridiculous non sequiturs such as the above?
*I* don't want to know who's
That's kind of interesting. Sold over what time period though?
On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:05 PM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
On 05.01.2011 23:45, SteveC wrote:
Results from my crude little survey;
For my point of view this is somehow the same as the distribution of phones
sold. Except: the very
now you just need to go add addr:* tags for all of them, and you're done :-)
On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:21 AM, Steve Chilton wrote:
Updated and colour differentiated:
http://www.stevechilton.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/osm/buildingsBing.png
Cheers
STEVE
-Original Message-
From:
On Jan 8, 2011, at 5:18 PM, David Murn wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 12:00 -0800, SteveC wrote:
That's kind of interesting. Sold over what time period though?
The article I posted gave figures (in both volume and $ sales) for
per-quarter periods, compared with other quarters in 2010
GPS might not work;
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/20/unavailabe_gps_warning/
Steve
stevecoast.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
That's an interesting idea, I wonder what else lurks on the web, like postcodes
for example?
Steve
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve,
Another thing that Bing can help us with is determining address ranges
of roads. For example, when you spider the web
Thanks for the feedback. Eyal and jm any chance of confidence?
Steve
On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:10 PM, François Van Der Biest
francois.vanderbi...@camptocamp.com wrote:
Thanks for this new service.
I felt quite frustrated when I saw the silverlight stuff warning, so I
decided to create a simple
Maybe put the magicshop version number in the creator?
Steve
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:12 PM, John-Michael Wiley jmwi...@microsoft.com wrote:
I made the changes, checked in the code and published them to the staging
servers. If someone else wants to take a look at the output and let me know
Don't count your chickens until they are hatched.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Feb 11, 2011, at 1:44, Chris Browet c...@semperpax.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:40, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote:
What is the point of spreading unfounded FUD? OSM doesn't need Microsoft to
I want to go to that mapping party.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jan 21, 2011, at 17:59, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@thenilgiris.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:30 +, Steve Doerr wrote:
Nothing official, but it would be very unusual for anybody to call
something that wasn't surfaced a road.
it would make
more entertaining reading that your recent posts.
SteveC said he'd let me pilot his private jet if I say yes.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Steve
Google
while
mapping OSM data and he was very badly treated... ;) or ;((
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: SteveC [mailto:st...@asklater.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 19 april 2011 21:18
Aan: Frederik Ramm
CC: talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] License graph
It's true
are changed on the front page (some
still are old versions).
There is two quotes I want to cite from the log:
1.
(12:38:15 PM) SteveC: TomH: how is rails 3 coming BTW?
(12:39:02 PM) TomH: oh it mostly works, but there's an issue with our
multi-part primary keys that is giving me grief
(12
Mikel and SWG don't have to take all this, I did it so flame me Jochen.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Apr 30, 2011, at 9:04, Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com wrote:
So tired of the bad attitude in OSM. Perhaps you're just trying to be funny
Jochen, but really, this makes me want to quit trying
stevecoast.com
On Apr 30, 2011, at 9:17, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/30 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
You will also find discussion of this list in that meeting. If I had posted
the new logo idea here before doing anything there would have been a
gigantic discussion
Try image search?
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun 4, 2011, at 16:31, Steve Chilton s.l.chil...@mdx.ac.uk wrote:
For my SOTMEU presentation I need an image of the OSM webmap prior to mapnik,
the old landsat +white lines version.
I have looked on 'history' and 'featured images' on wiki but no
On Jun 11, 2011, at 1:02, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
Not at all - I know of no form of democracy that distinguishes between
grudging acceptance or evangelical zeal.
Dermot,
I would quite like to take my data and start my own PD / CC0 project.
What is stopping you?
So by
Thats a kind of odd set of statements given... the random polls you're showing
around...?
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun 13, 2011, at 13:53, TimSC mappingli...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
On 13/06/11 12:30, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
That vote took place three times. It was done first by the
So those guys put out a legal statement and an employee even gave you his
interpretation on this list, which you can cite in court if you want. I think
you're pretty solid and it feels like people are just looking for problems no
matter what is done or said. :-(
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun
Tim
Chris is trying to gently point out to you, as I was, that you're the one who's
sucked up the most LWG time lately and thus making your suggestions on how they
sound their time is a bit odd.
Ignoring the point isn't helping.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:25, TimSC
writes:
The Troll word is used so often around in this community that it's
hard to speak about courtesy.
That's because SteveC uses it on people who don't agree with him.
Can you point to an example where I call someone a troll who was not
characterized by the wikipedia definition?
http
Tim
An ad hominem attack would be something where you complained about what the LWG
spent it's time on and I replied with a comment about your mother. Instead, I
replied pointing out that you are in fact the one using most of their time
recently. That would be called a rebuttal or perhaps a
How will fosm (assuming it reaches the stage of being functional) continue to
sync with OSM when the licenses are incompatible?
Steve
On Jun 22, 2011, at 11:18 AM, 80n wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Jaakko Helleranta.com
jaa...@helleranta.com wrote:
As I suggest in the
I would encourage everyone to have a think about running for the board
and look to what you can contribute. Be aware when thinking about it
that we have a lot of work to do and meet frequently. That might impact
your work and social life, it's not a ceremonial role, just ask Henk :-)
The
On 8/20/2011 9:57 PM, Shu Higashi wrote:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/16768642/highlight/195864
Not all the members are OSMers though ;-)
Shu Higashi
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
that
things have changed since then, might be worth revisiting
On 8/31/2011 5:48 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Ed Avis wrote:
Why not do what Wikipedia did and work together with the licence authors
(in
this case Creative Commons and Open Data Commons) to provide an automatic
upgrade clause? Then
Very funny - it's my heatmap, right?
Steve
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
There are a bunch of people asking things on twitter about OSM that we
miss. Or people saying nice things that we should be retweeting.
I'm looking for a solution. Mozilla has this:
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/army-of-awesome
and I'm in touch with them to see if the src is available.
, Chris Fleming wrote:
On 08/09/2011 00:20, SteveC wrote:
There are a bunch of people asking things on twitter about OSM that
we miss. Or people saying nice things that we should be retweeting.
I'm looking for a solution. Mozilla has this:
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/army-of-awesome
and I'm
On 9/8/2011 11:30 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 09/08/2011 05:20 PM, SteveC wrote:
* Chicken and egg. No OSM answers supplied today - so why would there be
lots of questions?
+1 to Mikel: Let's answer questions by pointing people to our existing
support infrastructure; not by trying
blake street sports/dive bar for the NFL is where many are headed
On 9/8/2011 3:40 PM, Gregory Arenius wrote:
Are there any pre-SOTM gatherings going on this evening? Or failing
that can anybody recommend a brewery to get one going at?
Cheers,
Greg
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass.html
On 10/17/2011 10:40 AM, yvecai wrote:
As far as I know, submarine data cables are highly strategic. You can
see on the map linked they are only few of them but carrying 99% of
the information between continents.
I am certain it would be
once for a few
minutes and then vanished.
You have a better idea? :-)
Ultimately, I think if we get consensus the vast majority of people
will be happy to switch.
have fun,
SteveC | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.asklater.com/steve/
___
legal
?
have fun,
SteveC | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.asklater.com/steve/
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
On 21 Feb 2008, at 11:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 21 Feb 2008, at 08:47, Rob Myers wrote:
- I have violated the contract but I am completely anonymous and
untraceable. Nobody can find out who I am to do anything about this.
And
OSM would want
On 25 Apr 2008, at 10:28, Martijn Pannevis wrote:
Hi!
My first mail to the legal list, I'm mainly active on the dutch OSM
list.
We develop a mobile (and web) application, called Nulaz.:
http://www.nulaz.com.
It uses OSM data for the maps on mobile, as can be seen at
On 25 Apr 2008, at 16:50, Martijn Pannevis wrote:
Let me say this again: I didn't want to annoy anyone, we do want to
adhere to the OSM license, but I just want to know how to do that
best.
Look, I've told you what has been advised to everyone in a similar
situation to you. All of those
On 3 Oct 2008, at 14:39, Adrian wrote:
I could tell you about our plans for ice cream gloves but I think
this
does it better:
The difference being that you are planning on trading off of the
back of
the goodwill of many other people. I don't think it is unreasonable
for those people
All
I've received back general comments from Wilson Sonsini
(http://www.wsgr.com/WSGR/Index.aspx
) on the latest draft.
My next task is to review those comments and feed them back to this
list, review the use cases on the wiki and feed those to Wilson
Sonsini and probably take a call or
So I've looked through the changes back from wilson sonsini and as
they suggest they need clarification. Mostly they are minor or
reducing a few repetitive sentences here and there. Personally I don't
think waving around this list the document with tracked changes
switched on is going to
On 25 Oct 2008, at 11:56, Frederik Ramm wrote:
What I don't like about share-alike is the small-minded attempt to
codify this
giving away into something legally binding. To me, this is deeply
based
in a negativist, paranoid world view where everyone is out to cheat
you.
... which is
pacific time, agenda as posted here is to build reasons for comments,
engage jordan where possible and hopefully go through use cases.
Will post the results when I have them.
Best
Steve
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
phrased one way or the other
and that may be a particular flourish of Jordans or relate to specific
case law and Wilson Sonsini would like a deeper understanding of those
things.
Best
Steve
On 29 Oct 2008, at 21:45, SteveC wrote:
pacific time, agenda as posted here is to build reasons
All
Our lawyer has had a chat with Jordan (the original author of the
ODbL). I spoke with Jordan this morning and he has a list of suggested
changes with explanations from our lawyer which he is reviewing.
I expect and hope this stage to be a simple review process before
taking the next
Albertas - we will look urgently at this.
On 7 Feb 2009, at 12:57, Liz wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Albertas Agejevas wrote:
I am bringing this up in the public forum again as our correspondence
with the OSMF secretary Andy Robinson appears to have no results. On
7 October 2008 Andy informed
I disagree Grant I think the first agenda item should be how to pull
in more people, how to open up the process and have people contribute
and connect better now that the license is finally out.
Best
Steve
On 4 Mar 2009, at 15:09, Grant Slater wrote:
License working group meeting minutes
Oh my fault, sorry
On 4 Mar 2009, at 17:04, Grant Slater wrote:
SteveC wrote:
I disagree Grant I think the first agenda item should be how to pull
in more people, how to open up the process and have people contribute
and connect better now that the license is finally out.
Confusion
Dear all
Today the license working group had a 2 hour phone call with OSMFs
council to run through a large number of open issues, use cases and so
on which had been generated on the wiki and this list.. We found it
super useful and we're planning another soon.
Grant is collating the
On 6 May 2009, at 16:04, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Mike Collinson wrote:
The new text is available at
http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ and includes diff
versions so that you can see clearly what changes are made.
With 0.9, we identified the problem of produced works not being
Hi
We've put together a practical definition for the OSMFs point of view
on what a substantial extract is, or isn't
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Substantial_Defined
And we'd like help similarly with building a practical definition of
Produced Work. Here's how
Hi
We, the legal working group have been asked as a result of a chat in
the SOTM working group call (which mike and I were also on) to propose
talk(s) about the license at SOTM.
Today in our call we brainstormed a little around a few ideas and we
thought it would be good to flesh them out
at 01:24, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Hi
We, the legal working group have been asked as a result of a chat in
the SOTM working group call (which mike and I were also on) to
propose
talk(s) about the license at SOTM.
Today in our call we brainstormed a little around a few ideas and we
I could in theory make it, and I even considered it for about 10
seconds... but I couldn't think what I'd get out of it other than
frustration.
DRM for maps, sorry GeoDRM... what can you say but FAIL ?
Best
Steve
On 5 Jun 2009, at 08:10, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this is
Dear all
One of the things that's resulted from getting help with the license
process is that it's been noticed we don't have a lot of the legal
furniture, and thus protection and clarity, found frequently
elsewhere. We've been offered some fairly standard privacy and terms
of use
On 29 Jun 2009, at 17:11, SteveC wrote:
On 26 Jun 2009, at 14:57, Peter Miller wrote:
On 24 Jun 2009, at 06:56, SteveC wrote:
Dear all
One of the things that's resulted from getting help with the license
process is that it's been noticed we don't have a lot of the legal
furniture
On 13 Jul 2009, at 18:58, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 08/07/09 12:13, Stephen Gower wrote:
Actually, for what it's worth (probably very little) the very
original file
is provided as a PDF on the section of
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/location_of_every_post_box_that
marked from
On 17 Aug 2009, at 11:13, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/17 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
You may wish to set up a Belgium equivalent for this page to act as a
record of such reverts. As you can see we have been having some
problems of our own.
On 25 Aug 2009, at 03:35, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Gustav Foseid wrote:
This is basically a mashup based on Google Maps. I was unaware that
Google
have claimed any rights over POIs added in such mashups (Google My
Maps or
other sites). Could you provide some more details?
Getting any
bouncing to legal-tak
On 14 Sep 2009, at 21:49, Ori Mor wrote:
Steve,
Thank you for your help and quick response!
Please forward to whom you see fit.
Best regards and again many thanks
Ori
From: SteveC st...@asklater.com
To: Ori Mor mor_...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009
On 30 Sep 2009, at 04:50, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
I've mad a further FOI request to the OS today seeking clarification
with
respect to those OS maps that do not carry a Crown Copyright (c)
date. This
is the case with a lot of the First edition 1:25,000 sheets which
bouncing to legal-talk
Yours c.
Steve
On 7 Oct 2009, at 18:50, Brendan Bowen wrote:
Hi Steve,
I have a question about OSM.
I am currently producing some graphics to be used in a documentary,
that will most likely be aired on Australian television, on DVD, and
possibly the web in
Bouncing to legal...
Yours c.
Steve
On 6 Oct 2009, at 15:36, joelrsad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Steve,
I'm sure you are inundated with emails everyday so I hesitate to add
one more to your inbox. I've searched the wiki as best as I can but
could not find the answer to my question.
I
Rufus
Awesome this is happening, but the name is wrong. We don't need a OKFNODCAL,
and even the ODbL can be shortened, we need something that they all share and
then we also need a NC version. I suggest it's just something like OD for
OpenDatabase in place of CC, so that you get OD-BY-SA as
On Jan 12, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
then we also need a NC version.
NC licenses are not compatible with OKFN's own definition of Open
Knowledge, Paragraph 8:
(quote)
8. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
The license must not restrict
You're right we should just give up.
Yours c.
Steve
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:53 AM, jonathon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 13:35, SteveC wrote:
we also need a NC version.
Need?
Problem # 1: Define Non-Commercial Usage.
Problem # 2: Define Commercial Usage.
Problem # 3: What
The LWG has been working with council on similar infringement cases. I suggest
this gets added.
As an aside, this is exactly what happened to some of my work a few years ago.
On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Phil Monger wrote:
So I was looking through some cycle books, as you do, when I came
That's actually a pretty bad way to resolve the issue, since the publisher is
liable for damages and you can absolve them of that and make things far worse
by individually contacting or publishing these infringements pre-emptively.
Unless you have a law degree.
Individuals enforcing
On Jul 17, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 3:04 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jul 16, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
Science Commons seem to think copyright doesn't apply to databases
no they go much further, they say it shouldn't and that all
On Jul 19, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:13:02 +1000, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 19 July 2010 20:07, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
My source for the fact that creativity is not being relied on is the
fact
that the ODbL doesn't rely on it
On Jul 20, 2010, at 1:53 AM, Simon Ward wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:58:34PM +0100, Emilie Laffray wrote:
My point was to mention that the licence is using contract law as one of the
mechanism when no other are present, not to use other map providers as a
reference or an example to
401 - 500 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
