On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working on state highways and interstate relations myself lately,
too. I stopped using Potlatch for exactly this reason...
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Philip Shipley p...@barby.net wrote:
Any thoughts,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Dear Can-Americans,
This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906lon=-95.15362zoom=16layers=B000FTF
We're good neighbo(u)rs. We should fix our fence. Shouldn't each
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
Okay, taking you somewhat more seriously now, the ideology that Ted is
driving is that everything in OSM should be editable by everyone, and
nobody has any better edits to make than anyone else, and everybody
gets an equal
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Jukka Rahkonen
jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fiwrote:
Why not to store this kind of datasets as own layers in the database? DEC
data
could be on its own, non-editable layer, but if there's something that
people
would like to edit those features could be copied or
I've noticed that there's a GNIS import going on in the USA recently, and
one of the types of POIs being imported are islands, which are tagged
place=island. Of course, the GNIS database contains some very tiny islands,
but Mapnik renders place=island up to z10. For example:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
If it's This is what NYS DEC says it manages, then no, it doesn't make
ANY sense
to change it.
Then this data clearly doesn't belong in OSM.
If the data is These are NYS's State Forests, then
there's plenty of
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.comwrote:
First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database, unless
you have made certain by your own eye that the object in question is an
error and not existing in reality! Even than take care not to remove
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting issue. The techy in me thinks that tagging the island (tag
the way) rather than a point may help, since that allows data
consumers (e.g. renderers) to calculate the size of the island (and
even, perhaps in
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com wrote:
The thing about the several renderers we currently have is that they can't
be expected to take every possible mapped feature into account. The map
would just get too cluttered. I think for a general street map (the
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:31 AM, D Tucny d...@tucny.com wrote:
Not now it doesn't... jth did the last render and is obviously missing
fonts needed... however, it seems some people do have OK fonts...
Does t...@h require the correct fonts to be installed on the user's machine?
That seems
I went to look at an area I edited last week in the Mapnik rendering, and
noticed it looked wrong. I thought maybe my edits hadn't been picked up
somehow, so I looked at the data view on the slippy map. It matched the
rendering. So I thought maybe Potlatch had failed me and not saved my edits.
I
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
The easy fix is to edit the way with Potlatch, make some sort of
change (maybe drag a point away, then back again), then deselect to
force an upload.
Thanks, this appears to have worked.
Regards,
-Ted
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Andrew MacKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Don't forget University of Toronto -
http://openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=43.66328lon=-79.39365zoom=16
(shameless self promotion... that took several hours' work, walking
around campus and checking building names)
That
You can split ways in Potlatch by selecting the way, then clicking the node,
and then pressing 'x'. You can delete ways and their nodes by selecting the
way and then pressing Shift+Delete. This wiki page is quite helpful:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Potlatch/Keyboard_shortcuts
-Ted
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Ralf Zimmermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to share a good example of OSM coverage with you.
It is the city of Sofija in Bulgaria.
A friend of mine is travelling there and asked me if OSM has good maps
of that area as Google does not show much. I
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Beau Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The US national border with Canada is all tagged with admin_level=4,
border_type=state, border=administrative... It also has the left/right
countries (at least the bit I looked at in WA did).
How should state borders
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Beau Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please clarify one thing:
any border that is both a state and national border should be tagged at
the highest level (in this case national, admin_level=2)
To me this sounds like there is just one way for the
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Ari Torhamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
su, 2008-05-04 kello 15:40 +0200, Mike Collinson kirjoitti:
At 01:33 PM 4/05/2008, Ari Torhamo wrote:
la, 2008-05-03 kello 17:39 -0400, Ted Mielczarek kirjoitti:
Why else are we contributing
this data if not for people
On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Vincent MEURISSE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand why some users want their work in PD.
The goal of osm is to have a map of the world freely available for
anyone. But with PD someone (eg google) can take all the work of osm,
correct and complete
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, maning sambale wrote:
Well, they do censor their images,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_blurred_out_on_Google_Maps
Why not, in their streetmaps?
Dunno.. I just didn't expect them
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off topic I know, but I presume the upcoming Firefox 3, with its page
scaling, will make web browsing on an 800 pixel-wide screen a lot less
painful.
Unfortunately the official Firefox builds won't run on Gtk 2.8, so you
may be
21 matches
Mail list logo
