Hi,
there is, in my opinion, nothing ethically
wrong with putting a value on intellectual work and demanding
compensation (money, attribution, sex, ...) for it.
Entirely new licensing options come to mind!
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00.09'
But personally, I *do* have a principled objection to share-alike. I
think it is the choice of the petty-minded, of people who can't let
go, who praise themselves as giving something away when in fact
they're just laying out a bait; people who really want to control and
enforce and sue and
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:56:40PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
my back and leave if you were to win. I'd just quietly grumble and
point out my ethical superiority.
I think it is not helpfull to claim ethical superiority in this
debate. For the record : there is, in my opinion, nothing
On 20 Feb 2008, at 22:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I might therefore conclude (and stop me if my logic is faulty) that
the
only reason for someone to propose Option 1 over Option 2 on the
basis
of it won't work is because they actually have a principled
objection
to the
4 matches
Mail list logo
