Hi,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:52:24AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Let us drop all this nonsense and concentrate on drawing up the moral
guidelines - saying what we consider ok and what not - instead of
fantasizing about having legal powers to enforce anything.
I don't get it : you go on
Frederik Ramm wrote:
If the contract is between OSM and the user, then Foo cannot sue Bar
for breach of contract because they have no contract. (Can my
business sue your business because you use a pirated copy of
Microsoft Windows and thus have an unfair advantage? Unsure but don't
On 6 Feb 2008, at 11:59, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:52:24AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Let us drop all this nonsense and concentrate on drawing up the
moral
guidelines - saying what we consider ok and what not - instead of
fantasizing about having legal powers
Quoting Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well my position is the enlightened one: We can't enforce anything,
We don't know precisely what can and cannot be enforced.
This is why the current debate within OSM and with other organizations
is so important, to ensure that OSM has a reasonably
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I don't get it : you go on about how license such and such is
possibly unenforceable and then you propose moral guidelines
that are 100% guaranteed not enforceable. I fail to see progress.
Well my position is the enlightened
5 matches
Mail list logo
