On 2020-01-05 23:25, Tomek wrote:
EN (automatic translation)
I plan to remove the "name" and "wikipedia" tags from places that are
not associated with a specific nation or language:
* continents
* north and south poles
* seas and bays, but exceptionally leaving the "name" tag for seas
with a
5 Jan 2020, 23:25 by to...@disroot.org:
> > I plan to remove the "name" and "wikipedia" tags fromplaces that
> are not associated with a specific nation orlanguage
>
This would be unacceptable damage,
for reasons already discussed.
> Wikipedia links will be available via
EO
Mi planas forigi la etikedojn “name” kaj “wikipedia” por la lokoj, kiuj
ne estas ligitaj al iu specifa popolo aŭ lingvo:
* kontinentoj
* norda kaj suda polusoj
* maroj kaj golfoj kun escepto: forlasi la etikedon “name” se ekzistas
maksimume du (aŭ tri) lingvoj de apudaj landoj, do ekzemple
I'd suggest using the 6 main United Nations languages for the "name=*"
tag of Oceans and Continents: Arabic, Chinese, English, French,
Russian and Spanish.
That would be very nice, actually. Although a bit redundant, as this
information is already present in the six “name:UN:” tags.
But
EO
Eble mi havas solvon pri la etikedo “name” por kontinentoj (escepte por
Antarkto), rigardu al la listo de landoj kaj ĝiaj oficialaj lingvoj,
aldonu Interlingvaon, kaj elektu 5 (aŭ pli) de ili:
PL
Chyba mam rozwiązanie etykiety „name” dla kontynentów (z wyjątkiem
Antarktydy), spojrzeć na listę
On 12/7/19 02:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 6. Dec 2019, at 15:16, pangoSE wrote:
I believe that we should deprecate all wikipedia links as they are
just potentially obsolete cruft that can be inferred from the
wikidata item. (I am also an editor of Wikidata)
If
sent from a phone
> On 6. Dec 2019, at 15:16, pangoSE wrote:
>
> I believe that we should deprecate all wikipedia links as they are just
> potentially obsolete cruft that can be inferred from the wikidata item. (I am
> also an editor of Wikidata)
>
> If you really want the Wikipedia link
sent from a phone
> On 6. Dec 2019, at 10:36, Oleksiy Muzalyev
> wrote:
>
> For many geographical names there are articles in the Latin version of
> Wikipedia. For example, for the Black Sea:
> https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontus_Euxinus
it is a very short article, compared to currently
W dniu 19-12-06 o 17:40, Steve Doerr pisze:
> This will take some research, but...
>
> Many of these names will be translations or transliterations of one
> particular name first attested in one particular language. So, 'Black
> Sea' is likely to be a translation of some name in a different
>
This will take some research, but...
Many of these names will be translations or transliterations of one
particular name first attested in one particular language. So, 'Black
Sea' is likely to be a translation of some name in a different language
and which has subsequently been translated
I agree with Oleksiy.
If you see Qxxx numbers in your editor ONLY it is the editor that should
be fixed to fetch the label/description in the local language (of the
browser, JOSM, or whatever tool you access our data through).
I believe that we should deprecate all wikipedia links as they
At least in the JOSM editor there is an additional text in English near
the wikidata code-title.
Since the wikidata title (or name) is usually translated on the wikidata
page itself in different languages and it is a part of the accessible
database, this text could be in different languages
6 Dec 2019, 09:55 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
> Am Fr., 6. Dez. 2019 um 08:08 Uhr schrieb Maarten Deen <> md...@xs4all.nl> >:
>
>> On 2019-12-05 22:12, Tomek wrote:
>> The adjacent Caspian sea is displayed as دریاچه خزر which is not the
>> complete name tag (Каспийское море / Хәзәр дәнизи /
Often people may think that they speak English, but in fact they do not
speak it good enough. English seems to be an easy language, but it is as
difficult as it gets. Its real complexity is in numerous idiomatic
expressions.
I would say a person speak English if she/he sat and passed the exam
Hi,
On 06.12.19 09:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> you should argue why it is a good idea to have _one_ standard language
> in the project. IMHO it excludes many billions of people from
> participating,
Let's be careful with the word "exclude". Does the pizzeria around the
corner "exclude"
On 2019-12-06 09:55, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am Fr., 6. Dez. 2019 um 08:08 Uhr schrieb Maarten Deen
:
On 2019-12-05 22:12, Tomek wrote:
Still, it is a Good Idea to have one standard (language) to
communicate
or define things, like everything meant for an international public
in
the wiki
For many geographical names there are articles in the Latin version of
Wikipedia. For example, for the Black Sea:
https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontus_Euxinus
for Poland: https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonia , for Canada:
https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada , etc.
So if one wishes to add
Am Fr., 6. Dez. 2019 um 08:08 Uhr schrieb Maarten Deen :
> On 2019-12-05 22:12, Tomek wrote:
> The adjacent Caspian sea is displayed as دریاچه خزر which is not the
> complete name tag (Каспийское море / Хәзәр дәнизи / دریاچه خزر) but
> looks to me the name:fa (Farsi).
> For me, that is very bad
On 2019-12-05 22:12, Tomek wrote:
EN:
In what language should the names of interstate objects be: seas /
bays, continents, oceans, poles? They are not currently displayed on
the default map(1), programs (e.g. OsmAnd, iD and JOSM editors) use
the name:LANGUAGE label, so the content of the "name"
sent from a phone
> On 6. Dec 2019, at 00:55, Tomek wrote:
>
> EO: Mi pensis, ke tio ĉi estas internacia forumo/dissendolisto.
> PL: Myślałem, że to jest międzynarodowe forum/lista
potremmo creare una lista OSM-babel dove tutti scrivono come li pare
Ciao Martin
EO: Mi pensis, ke tio ĉi estas internacia forumo/dissendolisto.
PL: Myślałem, że to jest międzynarodowe forum/lista.
W dniu 19-12-05 o 23:52, Mateusz Konieczny pisze:
>
> 5 Dec 2019, 22:12 by to...@disroot.org:
>
> EO:
> PL:
>
> Note that it is an English language forum.
>
> You may
> for smaller seas, I suggest adding names in all official / main languages
> of adjacent countries, so instead of "Black Sea" there will be:
Karadeniz Marea Neagră Чорне море | Черно море | Чёрное море | შავი ზღვა
That's fine.
> For larger seas (with more neighboring countries, so the name
5 Dec 2019, 22:12 by to...@disroot.org:
> EO:
> PL:
>
Note that it is an English language forum.
You may ask for help with translation
from Polish to English at
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
Or you can initially discuss this proposal there,
other mappers may have a
EO:
En kiu lingvo estu nomoj de interŝtataj objektoj: maroj/golfoj,
kontinentoj, oceanoj, polusoj? Tiuj objektoj ne estas montrataj(1) sur
la ĉefa mapo, kaj programoj (ekz. OsmAnd, redaktiloj iD kaj JOSM) uzas
etikedon name:LINGVO, do enhavo de la etikedo “name” havas nur
ideologian signifon, ne
24 matches
Mail list logo
